UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
| (Mark One) | ||
☑ | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | |
| For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 | ||
or | ||
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | |
| For the transition period from to | ||
Commission File number 0-23621
MKS INSTRUMENTS, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
| Massachusetts | 04-2277512 | |
| (State or other Jurisdiction
of Incorporation or Organization) | (IRS Employer Identification No.) | |
2 Tech Drive, Suite 201, Andover, Massachusetts | 01810 | |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) | (Zip Code) |
Registrant's
Telephone Number, including area code
(978) 645-5500
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Class | Name of Exchange on Which Registered | |
| Common Stock, no par value | NASDAQ Global Market |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No ☑
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No ☑
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☑ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
| Large accelerated filer ☑ | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company o |
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No ☑
Aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by nonaffiliates of the registrant as of June 30, 2009 based on the closing price of the registrant's Common Stock on such date as reported by the Nasdaq Global Market: $602,380,371
Number of shares outstanding of the issuer's Common Stock, no par value, as of February 17, 2010: 49,521,849
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the definitive Proxy Statement for MKS' Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 3, 2010 are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I | ||||||||
Item 1. | Business | 2 | ||||||
Item 1A. | Risk Factors | 8 | ||||||
Item 1B. | Unresolved Staff Comments | 15 | ||||||
Item 2. | Properties | 15 | ||||||
Item 3. | Legal Proceedings | 17 | ||||||
Item 4. | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders | 17 | ||||||
| PART II | ||||||||
Item 5. | Market for the Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities | 17 | ||||||
Item 6. | Selected Financial Data | 19 | ||||||
Item 7. | Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 20 | ||||||
Item 7A. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk | 33 | ||||||
Item 8. | Financial Statements and Supplementary Data | 35 | ||||||
Item 9. | Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure | 70 | ||||||
Item 9A. | Controls and Procedures | 70 | ||||||
Item 9B. | Other Information | 71 | ||||||
| PART III | ||||||||
Item 10. | Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance | 71 | ||||||
Item 11. | Executive Compensation | 71 | ||||||
Item 12. | Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters | 71 | ||||||
Item 13. | Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence | 72 | ||||||
Item 14. | Principal Accountant Fees and Services | 72 | ||||||
| PART IV | ||||||||
Item 15. | Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules | 72 | ||||||
SIGNATURES | 76 | |||||||
| EX-21.1 Subsidiaries of the Registrant | ||||||||
| EX-23.1 Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP | ||||||||
| EX-31.1 Section 302 Certification of CEO | ||||||||
| EX-31.2 Section 302 Certification of CFO | ||||||||
| EX-32.1 Section 906 Certification of CEO & CFO | ||||||||
1
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act. When used herein, the words "believe," "anticipate," "plan," "expect," "estimate," "intend," "may," "see," "will," "would" and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements although not all forward looking statements contain these identifying words. These forward-looking statements reflect management's current opinions and are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those stated or implied. MKS assumes no obligation to update this information. Risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, those discussed in the section entitled "Risk Factors" of this annual report on Form 10-K.
PART I
| Item 1. | Business |
MKS Instruments, Inc. (the "Company" or "MKS") was founded in 1961 as a Massachusetts corporation. We are a leading worldwide provider of instruments, subsystems and process control solutions that measure, control, power, monitor and analyze critical parameters to improve process performance and productivity of advanced manufacturing processes. We also provide services relating to the maintenance and repair of our products, software maintenance, installation services and training.
We are managed as one operating segment. We group our products into three product groups: Instruments and Control Systems, Power and Reactive Gas Products and Vacuum Products. Our products are derived from our core competencies in pressure measurement and control, materials delivery, gas composition analysis, electrostatic charge management, control and information technology, power and reactive gas generation and vacuum technology.
Our products are used in diverse markets, applications and processes. Our primary served markets are manufacturers of capital equipment for semiconductor devices and for other thin film applications including flat panel displays, light emitting diodes ("LEDs"), solar cells, data storage media and other advanced coatings. We also leverage our technology into other markets with advanced manufacturing applications including medical equipment, biopharm and environmental monitoring.
For over 45 years, we have focused on satisfying the needs of our customers by establishing long-term, collaborative relationships. We have a diverse base of customers that includes manufacturers of semiconductor capital equipment and semiconductor devices, thin film capital equipment used in the manufacture of flat panel displays, light emitting diodes, solar cells, data storage media and other coating applications; and other industrial, medical, biopharm, environmental monitoring and other advanced manufacturing companies, as well as university, government and industrial research laboratories.
We file reports, proxy statements and other documents with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). You may read and copy any document we file at the SEC Headquarters at Office of Investor Education and Assistance, 100 F Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20549. You should call 1-800-SEC-0330 for more information on the public reference room. Our SEC filings are also available to you on the SEC's internet site at http://www.sec.gov .
Our internet address is www.mksinstruments.com. We are not including the information contained in our website as part of, or incorporating it by reference into, this annual report on Form 10-K. We make available free of charge through our internet site our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to these reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such materials with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
2
Markets and Applications
We are focused on improving process performance and productivity by measuring, controlling, powering, monitoring and analyzing advanced manufacturing processes in semiconductor, thin film and other market sectors. We estimate that approximately 52%, 57% and 68% of our net sales for the years 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively, were to semiconductor capital equipment manufacturers and semiconductor device manufacturers. Approximately 48%, 43% and 32% of our net sales in the years 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively, were for other advanced manufacturing applications. These include, but are not limited to, thin-film processing equipment applications such as flat panel displays, LEDs, solar cells, data storage media and other thin film coatings as well as medical equipment; energy generation and environmental monitoring processes; biopharm and other industrial manufacturing; and university, government and industrial research laboratories.
We estimate that approximately 46%, 43% and 39% of our net sales for the years 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively, were to customers located in international markets. International sales include sales by our foreign subsidiaries, but exclude direct export sales.
Semiconductor Manufacturing Applications
The majority of our sales are derived from products sold to semiconductor capital equipment manufacturers and semiconductor device manufacturers. Our products are used in the major semiconductor processing steps such as depositing thin films of material onto silicon wafer substrates and etching and cleaning circuit patterns. In addition, we provide specialized instruments and software to monitor and analyze process performance.
We anticipate that the semiconductor manufacturing market will continue to account for a substantial portion of our sales. While the semiconductor device manufacturing market is global, major semiconductor capital equipment manufacturers are concentrated in Japan and the United States.
Other Advanced Manufacturing Applications
Our products are used in the manufacture of flat panel displays, data storage media, solar cells and other coatings including architectural glass that require the same or similar thin film deposition processes as semiconductor manufacturing.
Flat Panel Display Manufacturing
Flat panel displays are used in electronic hand-held devices, laptop computers, desktop computer monitors and television sets. We sell products to flat panel display equipment manufacturers and to end-users in the flat panel display market. Major manufacturers of flat panel displays are concentrated in Japan, Korea and Taiwan, and major manufacturers of flat panel display equipment are concentrated in Japan and the United States. The transition to larger panel sizes and higher display resolution is driving the need for improved process control to reduce defects.
Light Emitting Diodes (LEDs)
LEDs, or light emitting diodes are made using vacuum processes similar to semiconductor chip manufacturing. Because of their high brightness and long life, as well as environmentally friendly benefits such as lower power consumption, LEDs are experiencing rapid acceptance in solid state lighting and back side lighting of flat screen TV displays.
Solar Cells
Our products are used in crystalline silicon and emerging thin film processes to manufacture photovoltaic (PV) cells. Crystalline silicon technology requires wafer based deposition systems and is currently the dominant manufacturing technology. Thin film deposition on a non-silicon substrate, such as glass, is the emerging technology.
3
Data Storage Media
Our products are used to manufacture storage media that store and read data magnetically; optical storage media that store and read data using laser technology; hard disks; data storage devices; and digital video discs.
The transition to higher density storage capacity requires manufacturing processes incorporating tighter process controls. Major manufacturers of storage media are concentrated in Japan and the Asia Pacific region, and major manufacturers of storage media capital equipment are concentrated in Europe, Japan and the United States.
Other Advanced Coatings
Thin film coatings for diverse applications such as architectural glass and packaging are deposited using processes similar to those used in semiconductor manufacturing. Thin film processing manufacturers are concentrated in Europe, Japan and the United States.
Other Advanced Applications
Our products are used in other energy generation and environmental monitoring processes such as nuclear fuel processing, fuel cell research, greenhouse gas monitoring, and chemical agent detection; medical instrument sterilization; consumable medical supply manufacturing and biopharm applications. Our power delivery products are also incorporated into other end-market products such as medical imaging equipment. In addition, our products are sold to government, university and industrial laboratories for vacuum applications involving research and development in materials science, physical chemistry and electronics materials. Major equipment and process providers and research laboratories are concentrated in Europe, Japan and the United States.
Product Groups
We group our products into three product groups: Instruments and Control Systems, Power and Reactive Gas Products and Vacuum Products.
Instruments and Control Systems
This product group includes pressure measurement and control, materials delivery, gas composition analysis, electrostatic charge management and control and information technology products.
Pressure Measurement and Control Products. Each of our pressure measurement and control product lines consists of products that are designed for a variety of pressure ranges and accuracies.
Baratron ® Pressure Measurement Products. These products are typically used to measure the pressure of the gases being distributed upstream of the process chambers, to measure process chamber pressures and to measure pressures between process chambers, vacuum pumps and exhaust lines. We believe we offer the widest range of gas pressure measurement instruments in the semiconductor and advanced thin-film materials processing industries.
Automatic Pressure and Vacuum Control Products. These products enable precise control of process pressure by electronically actuating valves that control the flow of gases in and out of the process chamber to minimize the difference between desired and actual pressure in the chamber.
In most cases, Baratron pressure measurement instruments provide the pressure input to the automatic pressure control device. Together, these components create an integrated automatic pressure control subsystem. Our pressure control products can also accept inputs from other measurement instruments, enabling the automatic control of gas input or exhaust based on parameters other than pressure.
Materials Delivery Products. Each of our materials delivery product lines combines MKS flow, pressure measurement and control technologies to provide customers with integrated subsystems and precise control capabilities that are optimized for a given application.
Flow Measurement and Control Products. Flow measurement products include gas and vapor flow measurement products based upon thermal conductivity, pressure and direct liquid injection technologies. The flow control products combine the flow measurement device with valve control elements based upon solenoid, piezo-
4
electric and piston pump technologies. These products measure and automatically control the mass flow rate of gases and vapors into the process chamber.
Gas Composition Analysis Products. Gas composition analysis instruments are sold to a variety of industries including the semiconductor industry.
Mass Spectrometry-Based Gas Composition Analysis Instruments. These products are based on quadrupole mass spectrometer sensors that separate gases based on molecular weight. These sensors include built-in electronics and are provided with software that analyzes the composition of background and process gases in the process chamber. These instruments are provided both as portable laboratory systems and as process gas monitoring systems used in the diagnosis of semiconductor manufacturing process systems.
Fourier Transform Infra-Red (FTIR) Based Gas Composition Analysis Products. FTIR-based products provide information about the composition of gases by measuring the absorption of infra-red light as it passes through the sample being measured. Gas analysis applications include measuring the compositions of mixtures of reactant gases; measuring the purity of individual process gases; measuring the composition of process exhaust gas streams to determine process health; monitoring gases to ensure environmental health and safety and monitoring combustion exhausts. These instruments are provided as portable laboratory systems and as process gas monitoring systems used in the diagnosis of manufacturing processes.
Mass spectrometry-based and FTIR-based gas monitoring systems can indicate out-of-bounds conditions, such as the presence of undesirable contaminant gases and water vapor or out-of-tolerance amounts of specific gases in the process, which alert operators to diagnose and repair faulty equipment.
Leak Detection Products. Helium leak detection is used in a variety of industries including semiconductor, heating, ventilation and air-conditioning ("HVAC"), automotive and aerospace to ensure the leak integrity of both manufactured products and manufacturing equipment. We believe that our products are the smallest mass spectrometer-based helium leak detectors currently available.
Electrostatic Charge Management Products. Semiconductor, flat panel display and data storage industries are vulnerable to electrostatic charge-related contamination and yield problems. We design and manufacture products to control electrostatic attraction, electrostatic discharge and electromagnetic interference. In high throughput industrial applications such as plastics manufacture and printing, ionization is used to improve process control and productivity.
Control and Information Technology Products. We design and manufacture a suite of products that allow semiconductor and other manufacturing customers to better control their processes through computer-controlled automation. These products include digital control network products, process chamber and system controllers, connectivity products and data analysis/information products.
Control Products. Digital control network products are used to connect sensors, actuators and subsystems to the chamber and system control computers. They support a variety of industry-standard connection methods as well as conventional discrete digital and analog signals. Chamber and system control computers process these signals in real time and allow customers to precisely manage the process conditions.
Connecting sensors, chambers and tools to the factory network is essential for improving quality and productivity. Our connectivity products allow information to flow from the process sensors and subsystems and from the process tool control computer to the factory network. By enabling this information flow, we believe that we help customers optimize their processes through Advanced Process Control ("APC"), and diagnose equipment problems from a remote location ("e-diagnostics").
Information Technology Products. We design on-line and off-line software products to analyze data to improve the quality and yield of semiconductor, thin film, biopharmaceutical, injection molding and other manufacturing processes.
5
Power and Reactive Gas Products
This product group includes power delivery and reactive gas generation products used in semiconductor and other thin film applications, including solar and in medical imaging equipment applications.
Power Delivery Products. We design and manufacture microwave, DC and RF power delivery systems as well as RF matching networks and metrology products. In the semiconductor, thin film and other market sectors, our power supplies are used to provide energy to various etching, stripping and deposition processes. Our power amplifiers are also used in medical imaging equipment.
Reactive Gas Generation Products. Reactive gases are used to process and clean substrates and to clean process chambers to reduce particle contamination. A reactive gas is created when energy is added to a stable gas to break apart its molecules. When the resulting dissociated gas comes into contact with other matter it produces rapid chemical reactions which result in the processing of thin films (deposition of films, etching and cleaning of films and surface modifications) or equipment cleaning.
Processing Thin Films. Our reactive gas products include ozone generators and subsystems used for deposition of insulators onto semiconductor devices, ozonated water delivery systems for advanced semiconductor wafer and flat panel display cleaning, microwave plasma based products for photo resist removal and a new line of remote plasma generators which provide reactive gases for a wide range of semiconductor, flat panel and other thin film process applications.
Equipment Cleaning. As materials are deposited on wafers, films, or solar cells, the deposited material also accumulates on the walls of the vacuum process chamber. Our atomic fluorine generators are used to clean the process chambers between deposition steps to reduce particulates and contamination caused by accumulated build up on the chamber walls.
Vacuum Products
This product group consists of vacuum technology products, including vacuum containment components, vacuum gauges, vacuum valves, effluent management subsystems and custom stainless steel chambers, vessels, biopharmaceutical process equipment ("BPE") hardware and housings.
Vacuum Gauging Products. We offer a wide range of vacuum instruments consisting of vacuum measurement sensors and associated power supply and readout units as well as transducers where the sensor and electronics are integrated within a single package. These gauges complement our Baratron capacitance manometers for medium and high vacuum ranges. Our indirect gauges use thermal conductivity and ionization gauge technologies to measure pressure and vacuum levels, and our direct gauges use the pressure measurement technology of a MEMS-based piezo sensor.
Vacuum Valves, Stainless Steel Components, Process Solutions and Custom Stainless Steel Hardware. Our vacuum valves are used for vacuum isolation of vacuum lines, load locks, vacuum chambers and pumps for chamber isolation and vacuum containment. Our vacuum process solutions consist of vacuum fittings, traps and heated lines that are used downstream from the semiconductor process chamber to control process effluent gasses by preventing condensable materials from depositing particles near or back into the process chamber.
Custom Manufactured Components. Our design and manufacturing facilities build high purity chambers for material and thin film coating, atomic layer deposition ("ALD"), lithography and all semiconductor and solar processes. We design and build custom panels, weldments, ASME (American Society of Manufacturing Engineers) vessels and housings, as well as a line of BPE certified components for biopharmaceutical processes.
Customers
Our largest customers include leading semiconductor capital equipment manufacturers. Sales to our top ten customers accounted for approximately 36%, 38% and 46% of net sales for the years 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Sales to our largest customer, Applied Materials, accounted for approximately 12%, 19% and 20% of our net sales for the years 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
6
Sales, Marketing, Service and Support
Our worldwide sales, marketing, service and support organization is critical to our strategy of maintaining close relationships with semiconductor capital equipment manufacturers and semiconductor device manufacturers. We sell our products primarily through our direct sales force. As of December 31, 2009, we had 174 sales employees worldwide, located in China, France, Germany, Japan, Korea, the Netherlands, Singapore, Sweden, Taiwan, the United Kingdom and the United States. We also maintain sales representatives and agents in a number of countries, which supplement this direct sales force. We maintain a marketing staff that identifies customer requirements, assists in product planning and specifications, and focuses on future trends in semiconductor and other markets.
As semiconductor device manufacturers have become increasingly sensitive to the significant costs of system downtime, they have required that suppliers offer comprehensive local repair service and close customer support. Manufacturers require close support to enable them to repair, modify, upgrade and retrofit their equipment to improve yields and adapt new materials or processes. To meet these market requirements, we maintain a worldwide sales and support organization in 17 countries. Technical support is provided from offices in China, France, Germany, Japan, Korea, the Netherlands, Singapore, Taiwan, the United Kingdom and the United States. Repair and calibration services are provided at 25 service depots located worldwide. We typically provide warranties from one to three years, depending upon the type of product.
Research and Development
Our products incorporate sophisticated technologies to power, measure, control and monitor increasingly complex gas-related semiconductor manufacturing processes, thereby enhancing uptime, yield and throughput for our semiconductor device manufacturing customers. Our products have continuously advanced as we strive to meet our customers' evolving needs. We have developed, and continue to develop, new products to address industry trends, such as the shrinking of integrated circuit critical dimensions to 32 nanometers and below. In addition, we have developed, and continue to develop, products that support the migration to new classes of materials and ultra-thin layers, such as copper for low resistance conductors, high-k dielectric materials for capacitors and gates and low-k dielectric materials for low loss insulators that are used in small geometry manufacturing. We have undertaken an initiative to involve our marketing, engineering, manufacturing and sales personnel in the concurrent development of new products in order to reduce the time to market for new products. Our employees also work closely with our customers' development personnel helping us to identify and define future technical needs on which to focus research and development efforts. We support research at academic institutions targeted at advances in materials science and semiconductor process development. As of December 31, 2009, we had 337 research and development employees, primarily located in the United States. Our research and development expenses were $53.5 million, $78.5 million and $74.6 million for the years 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Our research and development efforts include numerous projects, none of which are individually material, and generally have a duration of 12 to 30 months depending upon whether the product is an enhancement of existing technology or a new product. Our current initiatives include projects to enhance the performance characteristics of older products, to develop new products and to integrate various technologies into subsystems.
Manufacturing
Our manufacturing facilities are located in China, Germany, Israel, Mexico, the United Kingdom and the United States. Manufacturing activities include the assembly and testing of components and subassemblies, which are integrated into our products. We outsource some of our subassembly work. We purchase a wide range of electronic, mechanical and electrical components, some of which are designed to our specifications. We consider our lean manufacturing techniques and responsiveness to customers' significantly fluctuating product demands to be a competitive advantage.
Competition
The market for our products is highly competitive. Principal competitive factors include:
| • | historical customer relationships; | |
| • | product quality, performance and price; |
7
| • | breadth of product line; | |
| • | manufacturing capabilities; and | |
| • | customer service and support. |
Although we believe that we compete favorably with respect to these factors, there can be no assurance that we will continue to do so.
We encounter substantial competition in most of our product lines, although no single competitor competes with us across all product lines. Certain of our competitors may have greater financial and other resources than us. In some cases, competitors are smaller than we are, but are well established in specific product niches. Advanced Energy and Horiba offer materials delivery products that compete with our product line of mass flow controllers. Nor-Cal Products and VAT offer products that compete with our vacuum components. Inficon offers products that compete with our vacuum measurement and gas analysis products. Brooks Automation and Inficon offer products that compete with our vacuum gauging products. Advanced Energy offers products that compete with our power delivery and reactive gas generator products.
Patents and Other Intellectual Property Rights
We rely on a combination of patent, copyright, trademark and trade secret laws and license agreements to establish and protect our proprietary rights. As of December 31, 2009, we owned 370 U.S. patents, 239 foreign patents and had 123 pending U.S. patent applications that expire at various dates through 2029. Foreign counterparts of certain of these applications have been filed or may be filed at the appropriate time.
We require each of our employees, including our executive officers, to enter into standard agreements pursuant to which the employee agrees to keep confidential all of our proprietary information and to assign to us all inventions while they are employed by us.
Employees
As of December 31, 2009, we employed 2,178 persons. We believe that our ongoing success depends upon our continued ability to attract and retain highly skilled employees for whom competition is intense. None of our employees are represented by a labor union or are party to a collective bargaining agreement. We believe that our employee relations are good.
Acquisitions
We completed one acquisition in 2007. On November 7, 2007, we acquired Yield Dynamics, Inc. ("YDI"), a provider of yield management technology located in Sunnyvale, California. YDI's data and yield management software, along with MKS' portfolio of sensors that control critical processes, data collection and integration hardware, and real-time fault detection and classification software, provides a comprehensive offering for generating, collecting and analyzing process sensor data and correlating the data to wafers, chambers and tools across the semiconductor fab as well as other thin film manufacturing processes.
| Item 1A. | Risk Factors |
The following factors could materially affect MKS' business, financial condition or results of operations and should be carefully considered in evaluating the Company and its business, in addition to other information presented elsewhere in this report.
Our business depends substantially on capital spending in the semiconductor industry which is characterized by periodic fluctuations that may cause a reduction in demand for our products.
We estimate that approximately 52%, 57% and 68% of our net sales for the years 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively, were to semiconductor capital equipment manufacturers and semiconductor device manufacturers, and we expect that sales to such customers will continue to account for a substantial portion of our sales. Our
8
business depends upon the capital expenditures of semiconductor device manufacturers, which in turn depend upon the demand for semiconductors.
Historically, the semiconductor market has been highly cyclical and has experienced periods of overcapacity, resulting in significantly reduced demand for capital equipment which may result in lower gross margins due to reduced absorption of manufacturing overhead. In addition, many semiconductor manufacturers have operations and customers in Asia, a region that in past years has experienced serious economic problems including currency devaluations, debt defaults, lack of liquidity and recessions. Reductions in demand for the products manufactured by semiconductor capital equipment manufacturers and semiconductor device manufacturers in 2008 and early 2009 adversely affected our business. The global economic uncertainty prolonged a steep downturn in semiconductor capital equipment spending and adversely affected our business, financial condition and results of operations. Our product revenues during 2009 for our semiconductor and capital equipment manufacturers and semiconductor device manufacturers decreased by 46%. We cannot be certain of the timing or magnitude of future semiconductor industry downturns. A decline in the level of orders as a result of any downturn or slowdown in the semiconductor capital equipment industry could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
MKS is exposed to risks associated with the weak global economy.
The severe tightening of the credit markets, turmoil in the financial markets, and weak global economy, contributed to slowdowns in the industries in which MKS operates in 2008 and 2009. The markets for semiconductors and flat panel displays in particular depend largely on consumer spending. Economic uncertainty exacerbates negative trends in consumer spending and may cause certain MKS customers to push out, cancel, or refrain from placing equipment or service orders, which may affect MKS' ability to convert backlog to sales and may reduce MKS' net sales. Difficulties in obtaining capital and deteriorating market conditions may also lead to the inability of some customers to obtain affordable financing, resulting in lower sales for MKS. Customers with liquidity issues may lead to additional bad debt expense for MKS. These conditions may also similarly affect key suppliers, which could affect their ability to deliver parts and result in delays for MKS' products. Further, these conditions and uncertainty about future economic conditions make it challenging for MKS to forecast its operating results, make business decisions, and identify the risks that may affect its business, financial condition and results of operations. If MKS is not able to timely and appropriately adapt to changes resulting from a difficult macroeconomic environment, MKS' business, financial condition or results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.
We anticipate that international sales will continue to account for a significant portion of our net sales. In addition, certain of our key domestic customers derive a significant portion of their revenues from sales in international markets. Therefore, our sales and results of operations could be adversely affected by economic slowdowns, such as the ongoing global economic crisis, and other risks associated with international sales. International sales include sales by our foreign subsidiaries, but exclude direct export sales. International sales accounted for approximately 46%, 43% and 39%, of net sales for the years 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively, a significant portion of which were sales to Japan.
Our quarterly operating results have fluctuated, and are likely to continue to vary significantly, which may result in volatility in the market price of our common stock.
A substantial portion of our shipments occurs shortly after an order is received and therefore we operate with a low level of backlog. As a result, a decrease in demand for our products from one or more customers could occur with limited advance notice and could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations in any particular period. A significant percentage of our expenses is relatively fixed and based in part on expectations of future net sales. The inability to adjust spending quickly enough to compensate for any shortfall would magnify the adverse impact of a shortfall in net sales on our results of operations. Factors that could cause fluctuations in our net sales include:
| • | the timing of the receipt of orders from major customers; | |
| • | shipment delays; |
9
| • | disruption in sources of supply; | |
| • | seasonal variations in capital spending by customers; | |
| • | production capacity constraints; and | |
| • | specific features requested by customers. |
In addition, our quarterly operating results may be adversely affected due to charges incurred in a particular quarter, for example, relating to inventory obsolescence, warranty or asset impairments.
As a result of the factors discussed above, it is likely that we may in the future experience quarterly or annual fluctuations and that, in one or more future quarters, our operating results may fall below the expectations of public market analysts or investors. In any such event, the price of our common stock could fluctuate or decline significantly.
The loss of net sales to any one of our major customers would likely have a material adverse effect on us.
Our top ten customers accounted for approximately 36%, 38% and 46% of our net sales for the years 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The loss of a major customer or any reduction in orders by these customers, including reductions due to market or competitive conditions, would likely have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. During the years 2009, 2008 and 2007, one customer, Applied Materials, accounted for approximately 12%, 19% and 20%, respectively, of our net sales. None of our significant customers, including Applied Materials, has entered into an agreement requiring it to purchase any minimum quantity of our products. The demand for our products from our semiconductor capital equipment customers depends in part on orders received by them from their semiconductor device manufacturer customers.
Attempts to lessen the adverse effect of any loss or reduction of net sales through the rapid addition of new customers could be difficult because prospective customers typically require lengthy qualification periods prior to placing volume orders with a new supplier. Our future success will continue to depend upon:
| • | our ability to maintain relationships with existing key customers; | |
| • | our ability to attract new customers; | |
| • | our ability to introduce new products in a timely manner for existing and new customers; and | |
| • | the successes of our customers in creating demand for their capital equipment products that incorporate our products. |
As part of our business strategy, we have entered into and may enter into or seek to enter into business combinations and acquisitions that may be difficult and costly to integrate, may be disruptive to our business, may dilute stockholder value or may divert management attention.
We made several acquisitions in the years 2000 through 2002 and, more recently in 2006 and 2007. As a part of our business strategy, we may enter into additional business combinations and acquisitions. Acquisitions are typically accompanied by a number of risks, including the difficulty of integrating the operations, technology and personnel of the acquired companies, the potential disruption of our ongoing business and distraction of management, possible internal control weaknesses of the acquired companies, expenses related to the acquisition and potential unknown liabilities associated with acquired businesses. If we are not successful in completing acquisitions that we may pursue in the future, we may be required to reevaluate our growth strategy, and we may incur substantial expenses and devote significant management time and resources in seeking to complete proposed acquisitions that will not generate benefits for us.
In addition, with future acquisitions, we could use substantial portions of our available cash as all or a portion of the purchase price. We could also issue additional securities as consideration for these acquisitions, which could cause significant stockholder dilution without achieving the desired accretion to our business. Further, our prior acquisitions and any future acquisitions may not ultimately help us achieve our strategic goals and may pose other risks to us.
10
As a result of our previous acquisitions, we have added several different decentralized operating and accounting systems, resulting in a complex reporting environment. We will need to continue to modify our accounting policies, internal controls, procedures and compliance programs to provide consistency across all our operations. In order to increase efficiency and operating effectiveness and improve corporate visibility into our decentralized operations, we are currently implementing a worldwide Enterprise Resource Planning ("ERP") system. We expect to continue to implement the ERP system in phases over the next few years. Any future implementations may risk potential disruption of our operations during the conversion periods and the implementations could require significantly more management time and higher implementation costs than currently estimated.
An inability to convince semiconductor device manufacturers to specify the use of our products to our customers that are semiconductor capital equipment manufacturers would weaken our competitive position.
The markets for our products are highly competitive. Our competitive success often depends upon factors outside of our control. For example, in some cases, particularly with respect to mass flow controllers, semiconductor device manufacturers may direct semiconductor capital equipment manufacturers to use a specified supplier's product in their equipment. Accordingly, for such products, our success will depend in part on our ability to have semiconductor device manufacturers specify that our products be used at their semiconductor fabrication facilities. In addition, we may encounter difficulties in changing established relationships of competitors that already have a large installed base of products within such semiconductor fabrication facilities.
If our products are not designed into successive generations of our customers' products, we will lose significant net sales during the lifespan of those products.
New products designed by semiconductor capital equipment manufacturers typically have a lifespan of five to ten years. Our success depends on our products being designed into new generations of equipment for the semiconductor industry. We must develop products that are technologically advanced so that they are positioned to be chosen for use in each successive generation of semiconductor capital equipment. If customers do not choose our products, our net sales may be reduced during the lifespan of our customers' products. In addition, we must make a significant capital investment to develop products for our customers well before our products are introduced and before we can be sure that we will recover our capital investment through sales to the customers in significant volume. We are thus also at risk during the development phase that our products may fail to meet our customers' technical or cost requirements and may be replaced by a competitive product or alternative technology solution. If that happens, we may be unable to recover our development costs.
The semiconductor industry is subject to rapid demand shifts which are difficult to predict. As a result, our inability to expand our manufacturing capacity in response to these rapid shifts may cause a reduction in our market share.
Our ability to increase sales of certain products depends in part upon our ability to expand our manufacturing capacity for such products in a timely manner. If we are unable to expand our manufacturing capacity on a timely basis or to manage such expansion effectively, our customers could implement our competitors' products and, as a result, our market share could be reduced. Because the semiconductor industry is subject to rapid demand shifts which are difficult to foresee, we may not be able to increase capacity quickly enough to respond to a rapid increase in demand. Additionally, capacity expansion could increase our fixed operating expenses and if sales levels do not increase to offset the additional expense levels associated with any such expansion, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.
A material amount of our assets represents goodwill and intangible assets, and our net income will be reduced if our goodwill or intangible assets become impaired.
As of December 31, 2009, our goodwill and intangible assets, net, represented approximately $149.5 million, or 19% of our total assets. Goodwill is generated in our acquisitions when the cost of an acquisition exceeds the fair value of the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets we acquire. Goodwill is subject to an impairment analysis at least annually based on the fair value of the reporting unit. Intangible assets, which relate primarily to the
11
customer technologies, relationships and patents and trademarks acquired by us as part of our acquisitions of other companies, are subject to an impairment analysis whenever events or changes in circumstances exist that indicate that the carrying value of the intangible asset might not be recoverable. During 2009, we recorded non-cash impairment charges of $205.0 million related to goodwill and intangible assets. We will continue to monitor and evaluate the carrying value of goodwill and intangible assets. If market and economic conditions or business performance deteriorate, the likelihood of the Company recording an impairment charge will increase, which could materially and adversely affect our results of operations.
We operate in a highly competitive industry.
The market for our products is highly competitive. Principal competitive factors include:
| • | historical customer relationships; | |
| • | product quality, performance and price; | |
| • | breadth of product line; | |
| • | manufacturing capabilities; and | |
| • | customer service and support. |
Although we believe that we compete favorably with respect to these factors, we may not be able to continue to do so. We encounter substantial competition in most of our product lines. Certain of our competitors may have greater financial and other resources than we have. In some cases, competitors are smaller than we are, but well established in specific product niches. We may encounter difficulties in changing established relationships of competitors with a large installed base of products at such customers' fabrication facilities. In addition, our competitors can be expected to continue to improve the design and performance of their products. Competitors may develop products that offer price or performance features superior to those of our products. If our competitors develop superior products, we may lose existing customers and market share.
We have significant foreign operations, and outsource certain operations offshore, which pose significant risks.
We have significant international sales, service, engineering and manufacturing operations in Europe, Israel and Asia, and have outsourced a portion of our manufacturing to Mexico. We may expand the level of manufacturing and certain other operations that we do offshore in order to take advantage of cost efficiencies available to us in those countries. However, we may not achieve the significant cost savings or other benefits that we anticipate from this program. These foreign operations expose us to operational and political risks that may harm our business, including:
| • | political and economic instability; | |
| • | fluctuations in the value of currencies and high levels of inflation, particularly in Asia and Europe; | |
| • | changes in labor conditions and difficulties in staffing and managing foreign operations, including, but not limited to, labor unions; | |
| • | reduced or less certain protection for intellectual property rights; | |
| • | greater difficulty in collecting accounts receivable and longer payment cycles; | |
| • | burdens and costs of compliance with a variety of foreign laws; | |
| • | increases in duties and taxation; | |
| • | costs associated with compliance programs for import and export regulations; | |
| • | imposition of restrictions on currency conversion or the transfer of funds; | |
| • | changes in export duties and limitations on imports or exports; |
12
| • | expropriation of private enterprises; and | |
| • | unexpected changes in foreign regulations. |
If any of these risks materialize, our operating results may be adversely affected.
Unfavorable currency exchange rate fluctuations may lead to lower operating margins or may cause us to raise prices, which could result in reduced sales.
Currency exchange rate fluctuations could have an adverse effect on our net sales and results of operations and we could experience losses with respect to our hedging activities. Unfavorable currency fluctuations could require us to increase prices to foreign customers, which could result in lower net sales by us to such customers. Alternatively, if we do not adjust the prices for our products in response to unfavorable currency fluctuations, our results of operations could be adversely affected. In addition, most sales made by our foreign subsidiaries are denominated in the currency of the country in which these products are sold and the currency they receive in payment for such sales could be less valuable at the time of receipt as a result of exchange rate fluctuations. We enter into forward foreign exchange contracts and may enter into local currency purchased options to reduce currency exposure arising from intercompany sales of inventory. However, we cannot be certain that our efforts will be adequate to protect us against significant currency fluctuations or that such efforts will not expose us to additional exchange rate risks.
Changes in tax rates or tax liabilities could affect results of operations.
As a global company, MKS is subject to taxation in the United States and various other countries. Significant judgment is required to determine and estimate worldwide tax liabilities. MKS' future annual and quarterly effective tax rates could be affected by numerous factors, including changes in the: applicable tax laws; composition of pre-tax income in countries with differing tax rates; and/or valuation of MKS' deferred tax assets and liabilities. In addition, MKS is subject to regular examination by the Internal Revenue Service and other tax authorities. MKS regularly assesses the likelihood of favorable or unfavorable outcomes resulting from these examinations to determine the adequacy of its provision for income taxes. Although MKS believes its tax estimates are reasonable, there can be no assurance that any final determination will not be materially different from the treatment reflected in MKS' historical income tax provisions and accruals, which could materially and adversely affect MKS' financial condition and results of operations.
Key personnel may be difficult to attract and retain.
Our success depends to a large extent upon the efforts and abilities of a number of key employees and officers, particularly those with expertise in the semiconductor manufacturing and similar industrial manufacturing industries. The loss of key employees or officers could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. We believe that our future success will depend in part on our ability to attract and retain highly skilled technical, financial, managerial and marketing personnel. We cannot be certain that we will be successful in attracting and retaining such personnel.
Our proprietary technology is important to the continued success of our business. Our failure to protect this proprietary technology may significantly impair our competitive position.
As of December 31, 2009, we owned 370 U.S. patents, 239 foreign patents and had 123 pending U.S. patent applications that expire at various dates through 2029. Although we seek to protect our intellectual property rights through patents, copyrights, trade secrets and other measures, we cannot be certain that:
| • | we will be able to protect our technology adequately; | |
| • | competitors will not be able to develop similar technology independently; | |
| • | any of our pending patent applications will be issued; | |
| • | domestic and international intellectual property laws will protect our intellectual property rights; or | |
| • | third parties will not assert that our products infringe patent, copyright or trade secrets of such parties. |
13
Protection of our intellectual property rights may result in costly litigation.
Litigation may be necessary in order to enforce our patents, copyrights or other intellectual property rights, to protect our trade secrets, to determine the validity and scope of the proprietary rights of others or to defend against claims of infringement. We are, from time to time, involved in lawsuits enforcing or defending our intellectual property rights and may be involved in such litigation in the future. Such litigation could result in substantial costs and diversion of resources and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We may need to expend significant time and expense to protect our intellectual property regardless of the validity or successful outcome of such intellectual property claims. If we lose any litigation, we may be required to seek licenses from others or change, stop manufacturing or stop selling some of our products.
The market price of our common stock has fluctuated and may continue to fluctuate for reasons over which we have no control.
The stock market has from time to time experienced, and is likely to continue to experience, extreme price and volume fluctuations. Prices of securities of technology companies have been especially volatile and have often fluctuated for reasons that are unrelated to the operating performance of the companies. The market price of shares of our common stock has fluctuated greatly since our initial public offering and could continue to fluctuate due to a variety of factors. In the past, companies that have experienced volatility in the market price of their stock have been the objects of securities class action litigation. If we were the subject of securities class action litigation, it could result in substantial costs and a diversion of our management's attention and resources.
Our dependence on sole, limited source suppliers, and international suppliers, could affect our ability to manufacture products and systems.
We rely on sole, limited source suppliers and international suppliers for a few of our components and subassemblies that are critical to the manufacturing of our products. This reliance involves several risks, including the following:
| • | the potential inability to obtain an adequate supply of required components; | |
| • | reduced control over pricing and timing of delivery of components; and | |
| • | the potential inability of our suppliers to develop technologically advanced products to support our growth and development of new systems. |
We believe that in time we could obtain and qualify alternative sources for most sole, limited source and international supplier parts. Seeking alternative sources for these parts could require us to redesign our systems, resulting in increased costs and likely shipping delays. We may be unable to redesign our systems, which could result in further costs and shipping delays. These increased costs would decrease our profit margins if we could not pass the costs to our customers. Further, shipping delays could damage our relationships with current and potential customers and have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
We are subject to governmental regulations. If we fail to comply with these regulations, our business could be harmed.
We are subject to federal, state, local and foreign regulations, including environmental regulations and regulations relating to the design and operation of our products. We must ensure that the affected products meet a variety of standards, many of which vary across the countries in which our systems are used. For example, the European Union has published directives specifically relating to power supplies. In addition, the European Union has issued directives relating to regulation of recycling and hazardous substances, which may be applicable to our products, or to which some customers may voluntarily elect to adhere to. In addition, China has adopted, and certain other Asian countries have indicated an intention to adopt similar regulations. We must comply with any applicable regulation adopted in connection with these types of directives in order to ship affected products into countries that adopt these types of regulations. We believe we are in compliance with current applicable regulations, directives and standards and have obtained all necessary permits, approvals and authorizations to conduct our business. However,
14
compliance with future regulations, directives and standards, or customer demands beyond such requirements, could require us to modify or redesign certain systems, make capital expenditures or incur substantial costs. If we do not comply with current or future regulations, directives and standards:
| • | we could be subject to fines; | |
| • | our production could be suspended; or | |
| • | we could be prohibited from offering particular systems in specified markets. |
Some provisions of our restated articles of organization, as amended, our amended and restated by-laws and Massachusetts law could discourage potential acquisition proposals and could delay or prevent a change in control of us.
Anti-takeover provisions could diminish the opportunities for stockholders to participate in tender offers, including tender offers at a price above the then current market price of the common stock. Such provisions may also inhibit increases in the market price of the common stock that could result from takeover attempts. For example, while we have no present plans to issue any preferred stock, our board of directors, without further stockholder approval, may issue preferred stock that could have the effect of delaying, deterring or preventing a change in control of us. The issuance of preferred stock could adversely affect the voting power of the holders of our common stock, including the loss of voting control to others. In addition, our amended and restated by-laws provide for a classified board of directors consisting of three classes. The classified board could also have the effect of delaying, deterring or preventing a change in control of the Company.
Changes in financial accounting standards may adversely affect our reported results of operations.
A change in accounting standards or practices could have a significant effect on our reported results and may even affect our reporting of transactions completed before the change was effective. New accounting pronouncements and varying interpretations of existing accounting pronouncements have occurred and may occur in the future. Such changes may adversely affect our reported financial results or may impact our related business practice.
| Item 1B. | Unresolved Staff Comments |
None.
| Item 2. | Properties |
The following table provides information concerning MKS' principal and certain other owned and leased facilities as of December 31, 2009:
| Products | Lease | |||||||||
Location | Sq. Ft. | Activity | Manufactured | Expires | ||||||
Alameda, California | 50,000 | Manufacturing and Research & Development | Electrostatic Management Programs and Systems | March 31, 2011 | ||||||
Akishima, Japan | 26,300 | Customer Support and Service | Materials and Power Delivery Products | September 11, 2018 | ||||||
Andover, Massachusetts | 118,000 | Manufacturing, Research & Development and Corporate Headquarters | Pressure Measurement and Control Products | (1) | ||||||
Austin, Texas | 20,880 | Manufacturing, Sales, Customer Support, Service and Research & Development | Control & Information Management Products | May 31, 2012 | ||||||
Berlin, Germany | 20,750 | Manufacturing, Customer Support, Service and Research & Development | Reactive Gas Generation Products | December 13, 2010 | ||||||
Boulder, Colorado | 124,000 | Manufacturing, Customer Support, Service and Research & Development | Vacuum Products | (2) | ||||||
Carmiel, Israel | 11,800 | Manufacturing and Research & Development | Control & Information Management Products | December 31, 2009 | ||||||
15
| Products | Lease | |||||||||
Location | Sq. Ft. | Activity | Manufactured | Expires | ||||||
Cheshire, United Kingdom | 16,000 | Manufacturing, Sales, Customer Support and Service | Materials Delivery Products | November 6, 2018 | ||||||
Colorado Springs, Colorado | 24,000 | Research & Development | Not applicable | (3) | ||||||
Filderstadt, Germany | 9,300 | Sales and Service | Not applicable | July 31, 2014 | ||||||
Fukuoka, Japan | 9,300 | Customer Support and Service | Not applicable | October 19, 2010 | ||||||
Lawrence, Massachusetts | 40,000 | Manufacturing | Pressure Measurement and Control Products | (3) | ||||||
Lod, Israel | 10,500 | Customer Support and Research & Development | Not applicable | May 31, 2010 | ||||||
Methuen, Massachusetts | 85,000 | Manufacturing, Customer Support, Service and Research & Development | Pressure Measurement and Control Products and Materials Delivery Products | (3) | ||||||
Munich, Germany | 14,000 | Manufacturing, Sales, Customer Support, Service and Research & Development | Pressure Measurement and Control Products and Materials Delivery Products | (3) | ||||||
Nogales, Mexico | 67,700 | Manufacturing | Pressure Measurement and Control Products and Reactive Gas Generation Products | March 31, 2014 | ||||||
Richardson, Texas | 8,800 | Sales, Customer Support and Service | Not applicable | November 30, 2012 | ||||||
Rochester, New York | 156,000 | Manufacturing, Sales, Customer Support, Service and Research & Development | Power Delivery Products | (3) | ||||||
San Jose, California | 32,000 | Sales, Customer Support and Service | Not applicable | April 30, 2011 | ||||||
Seoul, Korea | 18,000 | Sales, Customer Support and Service | Not applicable | May 29, 2010 | ||||||
Shenzhen, China | 242,000 | Manufacturing | Power Delivery Products | May 31, 2017 | ||||||
Shropshire, United Kingdom | 25,000 | Manufacturing | Control & Information Management Products | October 18, 2010 | ||||||
Singapore | 6,100 | Sales, Customer Support and Service | Not applicable | July 7, 2010 | ||||||
Sunnyvale, California | 10,000 | Vacant | Not applicable | July 7, 2010 | ||||||
Taiwan | 21,400 | Sales, Customer Support and Service | Not applicable | August 25, 2010 | ||||||
Tianjin, China | 12,917 | Research & Development | Not applicable | August 1, 2011 | ||||||
Tokyo, Japan | 12,600 | Sales and Customer Support | Not applicable | (4) | ||||||
Umea, Sweden | 7,000 | Sales, Customer Support and Research & Development | Not applicable | August 31, 2010 | ||||||
Wilmington, Massachusetts | 118,000 | Manufacturing, Sales, Customer Support, Service and Research & Development | Reactive Gas Generation Products and Power Delivery Products | (3) | ||||||
| (1) | MKS owns one facility with 82,000 square feet of space used for manufacturing and research and development and leases 36,000 square feet of space used for its corporate headquarters with a lease term which expires January 1, 2018. | |
| (2) | MKS leases two facilities, one has 39,000 square feet of space and the other has 38,000 square feet of space. Both leases expire on May 31, 2015. MKS also owns a third and fourth facility with 27,000 and 20,000 square feet of space, respectively. | |
| (3) | This facility is owned by MKS. | |
| (4) | MKS leases one facility which has 6,000 square feet of space with a lease term that expires January 31, 2011. MKS owns a second facility of 6,600 square feet. |
16
In addition to manufacturing and other operations conducted at the foregoing leased or owned facilities, MKS provides worldwide sales, customer support and services from various other leased facilities throughout the world not listed in the table above. See "Business - Sales, Marketing and Support."
| Item 3. | Legal Proceedings |
We are subject to various legal proceedings and claims, which have arisen in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, the ultimate disposition of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.
| Item 4. | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of 2009 through the solicitation of proxies or otherwise.
PART II
| Item 5. | Market for the Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities |
Price Range of Common Stock
Our common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol MKSI. On February 17, 2010, the closing price of our common stock, as reported on the NASDAQ Global Market, was $19.00 per share. The following table sets forth for the periods indicated the high and low sales prices per share of our common stock as reported by the NASDAQ Global Market.
| 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||
Price Range of Common Stock | High | Low | High | Low | ||||||||||||
First Quarter | $ | 16.29 | $ | 11.38 | $ | 22.24 | $ | 15.90 | ||||||||
Second Quarter | 17.50 | 12.75 | 25.88 | 20.91 | ||||||||||||
Third Quarter | 20.60 | 13.28 | 25.00 | 19.00 | ||||||||||||
Fourth Quarter | 20.24 | 14.80 | 19.79 | 11.76 | ||||||||||||
On February 17, 2010, we had approximately 184 stockholders of record.
Dividend Policy
We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock. We currently intend to retain earnings, if any, to support our growth strategy and do not anticipate paying cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Payment of future dividends, if any, will be at the discretion of our board of directors after taking into account various factors, including our financial condition, operating results and current and anticipated cash needs.
17
Comparative Stock Performance
The following graph compares the cumulative total shareholder return (assuming reinvestment of dividends) from investing $100.00 on December 31, 2004, and plotted at the last trading day of each of the fiscal years ended December 31, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009, in each of MKS' Common Stock; an industry group index of semiconductor equipment/material manufacturers (the "Hemscott Group Index"), compiled by Hemscott Data ("Hemscott"), a business owned by Morningstar, Inc.; and the NASDAQ Market Index of companies. The stock price performance on the graph below is not necessarily indicative of future price performance. The Company's Common Stock is listed on the NASDAQ Global Market under the ticker symbol "MKSI."
Performance
Graph
COMPARISON OF 5-YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN
AMONG MKS INSTRUMENTS, INC., NASDAQ MARKET INDEX AND
SEMICONDUCTOR EQUIPMENT & MATERIALS MANUFACTURERS
Assumes $100.00 invested on December 31, 2004
Assumes dividend reinvested
| 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
MKS Instruments, Inc. | $ | 100.00 | $ | 96.44 | $ | 121.73 | $ | 103.18 | $ | 79.73 | $ | 93.80 | ||||||||||||||||||
Hemscott Group Index | $ | 100.00 | $ | 105.15 | $ | 118.39 | $ | 112.59 | $ | 59.90 | $ | 86.97 | ||||||||||||||||||
NASDAQ Market Index | $ | 100.00 | $ | 102.20 | $ | 112.68 | $ | 124.57 | $ | 74.71 | $ | 108.56 | ||||||||||||||||||
The information included under the heading "Comparative Stock Performance" in Item 5 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K is "furnished" and not "filed" and shall not be deemed to be "soliciting material" or subject to Regulation 14A, shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act.
18
| Item 6. | Selected Financial Data |
Selected Consolidated Financial Data
| Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||||||||
| (In thousands, except per share data) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Statement of Operations Data | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net sales | $ | 411,406 | $ | 646,994 | $ | 780,487 | $ | 782,801 | $ | 509,294 | ||||||||||
Gross profit | 138,090 | 259,943 | 331,487 | 338,122 | 200,434 | |||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from operations(1) | (240,499 | ) | 35,533 | 106,985 | 122,541 | 40,548 | ||||||||||||||
Net income (loss)(2) | $ | (212,659 | ) | $ | 30,117 | $ | 86,360 | $ | 94,235 | $ | 34,565 | |||||||||
Net income (loss) per share: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Basic | $ | (4.31 | ) | $ | 0.61 | $ | 1.53 | $ | 1.70 | $ | 0.64 | |||||||||
Diluted | $ | (4.31 | ) | $ | 0.59 | $ | 1.51 | $ | 1.68 | $ | 0.63 | |||||||||
Balance Sheet Data | ||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 111,009 | $ | 119,261 | $ | 223,968 | $ | 215,208 | $ | 220,573 | ||||||||||
Short-term investments | 160,786 | 159,608 | 99,797 | 74,749 | 72,046 | |||||||||||||||
Working capital | 461,581 | 452,793 | 514,235 | 461,541 | 410,060 | |||||||||||||||
Long-term marketable securities | 4,853 | - | - | 2,816 | 857 | |||||||||||||||
Total assets | 774,069 | 984,939 | 1,076,260 | 1,043,720 | 863,740 | |||||||||||||||
Short-term obligations | 12,885 | 18,678 | 20,203 | 23,021 | 18,886 | |||||||||||||||
Long-term obligations, less current portion | - | 396 | 5,871 | 6,113 | 6,152 | |||||||||||||||
Stockholders' equity | $ | 684,933 | $ | 886,698 | $ | 954,009 | $ | 901,219 | $ | 762,843 | ||||||||||
| (1) | Income (loss) from operations for the years 2009, 2008, 2007 and 2006 includes stock-based compensation of $8.8 million, $15.3 million, $12.9 million and $13.1 million, respectively. Loss from operations for 2009 includes an impairment charge of $208.5 million related to the write-down of goodwill, intangible and long-lived assets and $5.8 million of restructuring charges. Income from operations for 2008 includes an impairment charge of $6.1 million related to the write-down of intangible assets. | |
| (2) | Net income (loss) for the years 2009, 2008, 2007 and 2006 includes stock-based compensation of $5.7 million, $9.9 million, $8.4 million and $8.7 million, net of tax, respectively. Loss from operations for 2009 includes charges, net of tax, of $202.7 million related to the write-down of goodwill, intangible and long-lived assets and $3.6 million of restructuring charges. Income from operations for 2008 includes an impairment charge of $3.8 million, net of tax, related to the write-down of intangible assets. |
19
| Item 7. | Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
Overview
We are a leading worldwide provider of instruments, subsystems and process control solutions that measure, control, power, monitor and analyze critical parameters to improve process performance and productivity of advanced manufacturing processes.
We are managed as one operating segment. We group our products into three product groups: Instruments and Control Systems, Power and Reactive Gas Products and Vacuum Products. Our products are derived from our core competencies in pressure measurement and control, materials delivery, gas composition analysis, electrostatic charge management, control and information technology, power and reactive gas generation and vacuum technology. Our products are used in diverse markets, applications and processes. Our primary served markets are manufacturers of capital equipment for semiconductor devices, and for thin film applications including flat panel displays, LEDs, solar cells, data storage media and other advanced coatings. We also leverage our technology in other markets with advanced manufacturing applications including medical equipment, biopharm manufacturing, energy generation and environmental monitoring.
We have a diverse base of customers that includes manufacturers of semiconductor capital equipment and semiconductor devices, thin film capital equipment used in the manufacture of flat panel displays, LEDs, solar cells, data storage media and other coating applications; and other industrial, medical, energy generation, environmental monitoring and manufacturing companies, and university, government and industrial research laboratories. During the years 2009, 2008 and 2007, we estimate that approximately 52%, 57% and 68% of our net sales, respectively, were to semiconductor capital equipment manufacturers and semiconductor device manufacturers. We expect that sales to semiconductor capital equipment manufacturers and semiconductor device manufacturers will continue to account for a substantial portion of our sales.
Reductions in demand for the products manufactured by semiconductor capital equipment manufacturers and semiconductor device manufacturers adversely affected our business in 2008 and in early 2009. The global economic uncertainty prolonged a steep downturn in semiconductor capital equipment spending and adversely affected our business, financial condition and results of operations. Our product revenues decreased 46% for 2009 compared to the prior year for these customers. However, in the second half of 2009 we saw an increase in orders and shipments compared to the first half of 2009, primarily as a result of increased demand by semiconductor capital equipment manufacturers and semiconductor device manufacturers. The semiconductor capital equipment industry is subject to rapid demand shifts, which are difficult to predict, and we are uncertain as to the timing or extent of further increased demand or any future weakness in the semiconductor capital equipment industry.
Our product revenues sold to other markets, which exclude semiconductor capital equipment and semiconductor device product applications, decreased 30% for 2009 compared to the prior year. Although the decrease in 2009 reflects the overall weakness in the global economy and the impact from tightened credit markets on our customers' ability to invest in capital spending, our product revenues in these other markets showed an increase in orders and shipments in the second half of 2009 compared to the first six months of 2009.
A significant portion of our net sales is to operations in international markets. International net sales include sales by our foreign subsidiaries, but exclude direct export sales. International net sales accounted for approximately 46%, 43% and 39% of net sales for the years 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively, a significant portion of which were sales in Japan. We expect that international net sales will continue to represent a significant percentage of our total net sales.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations discusses our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates and judgments, including those related to revenue
20
recognition and allowance for doubtful accounts, inventory, warranty costs, stock-based compensation expense, intangible assets, goodwill and other long-lived assets, in-process research and development and income taxes. We base our estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
We believe the following critical accounting policies affect the most significant judgments, assumptions and estimates we use in preparing our consolidated financial statements:
Revenue Recognition and Accounts Receivable Allowances. Revenue from product sales is recorded upon transfer of title and risk of loss to the customer provided that there is evidence of an arrangement, the sales price is fixed or determinable, and collection of the related receivable is reasonably assured. In most transactions, we have no obligations to our customers after the date products are shipped other than pursuant to warranty obligations. In some instances, we provide installation, training, support and services to customers after the product has been shipped. We defer the fair value of any undelivered elements until the undelivered element is delivered. Fair value is the price charged when the element is sold separately. Shipping and handling fees billed to customers, if any, are recognized as revenue. The related shipping and handling costs are recognized in cost of sales.
We monitor and track the amount of product returns, provide for accounts receivable allowances and reduce revenue at the time of shipment for the estimated amount of such future returns, based on historical experience. While product returns have historically been within our expectations and the provisions established, there is no assurance that we will continue to experience the same return rates that we have in the past. Any significant increase in product return rates could have a material adverse impact on our operating results for the period or periods in which such returns materialize.
While we maintain a credit approval process, significant judgments are made by management in connection with assessing our customers' ability to pay at the time of shipment. Despite this assessment, from time to time, our customers are unable to meet their payment obligations. We continuously monitor our customers' credit worthiness, and use our judgment in establishing a provision for estimated credit losses based upon our historical experience and any specific customer collection issues that we have identified. While such credit losses have historically been within our expectations and the provisions established, there is no assurance that we will continue to experience the same credit loss rates that we have in the past. A significant change in the liquidity or financial position of our customers could have a material adverse impact on the collectability of accounts receivable and our future operating results.
Inventory. We value our inventory at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out method) or market. We regularly review inventory quantities on hand and record a provision to write-down excess and obsolete inventory to its estimated net realizable value, if less than cost, based primarily on our estimated forecast of product demand. Demand for our products can fluctuate significantly. A significant increase in the demand for our products could result in a short-term increase in the cost of inventory purchases as a result of supply shortages or a decrease in the cost of inventory purchases as a result of volume discounts, while a significant decrease in demand could result in an increase in the charges for excess inventory quantities on hand. In addition, our industry is subject to technological change, new product development and product technological obsolescence that could result in an increase in the amount of obsolete inventory quantities on hand. Therefore, any significant unanticipated changes in demand or technological developments could have a significant impact on the value of our inventory and our reported operating results. Due to a sharp decrease in demand during the fourth quarter of 2008, we took a charge for excess and obsolete inventory of $6.5 million. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2008, our total charges for excess and obsolete inventory totaled $11.4 million. Due to the continued weakness in the markets we serve, we recorded a charge for excess and obsolete inventory of $14.4 million during the first quarter of 2009. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2009, our total charges for excess and obsolete inventory totaled $20.3 million.
Warranty costs. We provide for the estimated costs to fulfill customer warranty obligations upon the recognition of the related revenue. We provide warranty coverage for our products ranging from 12 to 36 months, with the majority of our products ranging from 12 to 24 months. We estimate the anticipated costs of repairing our products under such warranties based on the historical costs of the repairs and any known specific product issues.
21
The assumptions we use to estimate warranty accruals are reevaluated periodically in light of actual experience and, when appropriate, the accruals are adjusted. Our determination of the appropriate level of warranty accrual is based upon estimates. Should product failure rates differ from our estimates, actual costs could vary significantly from our expectations.
Stock-Based Compensation Expense. For the past three years, we have been issuing restricted stock awards as stock-based compensation. Prior to that, we issued shared-based options. Accounting for share-based compensation requires the measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all share-based payment awards made to employees and directors based on estimated fair values. For restricted stock awards, the fair value is the stock price on the date of grant. For share-based options, we have estimated the fair value on the date of grant using the Black Scholes pricing model, which is affected by our stock price as well as assumptions regarding a number of complex and subjective variables. These variables include our expected stock price volatility over the term of the awards, actual and projected employee option exercise behaviors, risk free interest rate and expected dividends. We are also required to estimate forfeitures at the time of grant and revise those estimates in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. Management determined that blended volatility, a combination of historical and implied volatility, is more reflective of market conditions and a better indicator of expected volatility than historical or implied volatility.
Certain restricted stock awards involve stock to be issued upon the achievement of performance conditions (performance shares) under our stock incentive plans. Such performance shares become available subject to time-based vesting conditions if, and to the extent that, financial performance criteria for the applicable period are achieved. Accordingly, the number of performance shares earned will vary based on the level of achievement of financial performance objectives for the applicable period. Until such time that our performance can ultimately be determined, each quarter we estimate the number of performance shares more likely than not to be earned based on an evaluation of the probability of achieving the performance objectives. Such estimates are revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods when the underlying factors change our evaluation of the probability of achieving the performance objectives. Accordingly, share-based compensation expense associated with performance shares may differ significantly from the amount recorded in the current period.
The assumptions used in calculating the fair value of share-based payment awards represents management's best estimates, but these estimates involve inherent uncertainties and the application of managements judgment. As a result, if factors change and we use different assumptions, our stock-based compensation expense could be materially different in the future.
Intangible assets, goodwill and other long-lived assets. As a result of our acquisitions, we have identified intangible assets and generated significant goodwill. Intangible assets are valued based on estimates of future cash flows and amortized over their estimated useful life. Goodwill is subject to annual impairment testing as well as testing upon the occurrence of any event that indicates a potential impairment. Intangible assets and other long-lived assets are subject to an impairment test if there is an indicator of impairment. The carrying value and ultimate realization of these assets is dependent upon estimates of future earnings and benefits that we expect to generate from their use. If our expectations of future results and cash flows are significantly diminished, intangible assets and goodwill may be impaired and the resulting charge to operations may be material. When we determine that the carrying value of intangibles or other long-lived assets may not be recoverable based upon the existence of one or more indicators of impairment, we use the projected undiscounted cash flow method to determine whether an impairment exists, and then measure the impairment using discounted cash flows. To measure impairment for goodwill, we compare the fair value of our reporting units by measuring discounted cash flows to the book value of the reporting units. Goodwill would be impaired if the resulting implied fair value of goodwill was less than the recorded book value of the goodwill.
The estimation of useful lives and expected cash flows require us to make significant judgments regarding future periods that are subject to some factors outside of our control. Changes in these estimates can result in significant revisions to the carrying value of these assets and may result in material charges to the results of operations.
We have elected to perform our annual goodwill impairment testing on October 31 of each fiscal year, or more often if events or circumstances indicate that there may be impairment. Reporting units are defined as operating
22
segments or one level below an operating segment, referred to as a component. We have determined that our reporting units are components of our one operating segment. We allocate goodwill to reporting units at the time of acquisition and base that allocation on which reporting units will benefit from the acquired assets and liabilities. The estimated fair values of our reporting units were based on discounted cash flow models derived from internal earnings and external market forecasts. Assumptions in estimating future cash flows are subject to a high degree of judgment and complexity. We make every effort to forecast these future cash flows as accurately as possible with the information available at the time the forecast is developed. Goodwill impairment is determined using a two-step process. The first step involves a comparison of the estimated fair value of a reporting unit to its carrying amount, including goodwill. In performing the first step, we determine the fair value of a reporting unit using a discounted cash flow ("DCF") analysis. Determining fair value requires the exercise of significant judgment, including judgments about appropriate discount rates, perpetual growth rates, and the amount and timing of expected future cash flows. Discount rates are based on a weighted average cost of capital ("WACC"), which represents the average rate a business must pay its providers of debt and equity. The WACC used to test goodwill is derived from a group of comparable companies. The cash flows employed in the DCF analysis are derived from internal earnings and forecasts and external market forecasts. If the estimated fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting unit is not impaired and the second step of the impairment test is not necessary. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value, then the second step of the goodwill impairment test must be performed. The second step of the goodwill impairment test compares the implied fair value of the reporting unit's goodwill with its carrying amount of goodwill to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined in the same manner as the amount of goodwill recognized in a business combination, whereby the estimated fair value of the reporting unit is allocated to all of the assets and liabilities of that unit (including any unrecognized intangible assets) as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination and the fair value of the reporting unit was the purchase price paid. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit's goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of that goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess.
Due to various factors, including market and economic conditions that contributed to a decline in our forecasted business levels, and the excess of our consolidated net assets over market capitalization for a sustained period of time, we concluded an interim assessment for impairment should be conducted for our goodwill and intangible assets as of April 30, 2009, the date of the triggering event. In the interim assessment, we determined that for certain reporting units, the carrying amount of their net assets exceeded their respective fair values, indicating that a potential impairment existed. After completing the second step of the goodwill impairment test, we recorded a goodwill impairment charge in the second quarter of 2009 of $193.3 million. We tested the long-lived assets in question for recoverability by comparing the sum of the undiscounted cash flows attributable to each respective asset group to their carrying amounts, and determined that the carrying amounts were not recoverable. We then evaluated the fair values of each long-lived asset of the potentially impaired long-lived asset group to determine the amount of the impairment, if any. The fair value of each intangible asset was based primarily on an income approach, which is a present value technique used to measure the fair value of future cash flows produced by the asset. We estimated future cash flows over the remaining useful life of each intangible asset. As a result of this analysis, we determined that certain of our intangible assets related to completed technology, customer relationships, and patents and trademarks, had carrying values that exceeded their estimated fair values. As a result, an impairment charge of $11.7 million was recorded in the second quarter of 2009.
As of October 31, 2009, we performed our annual impairment assessment of goodwill and determined that no additional impairment charges were required. We will continue to monitor and evaluate the carrying value of goodwill. If market and economic conditions or business performance deteriorate, this could increase the likelihood of us recording an impairment charge.
As a result of a facility consolidation in Asia, we recorded an asset impairment charge of $3.5 million in the second quarter of 2009 resulting from the write-down of the value of a building to its estimated fair value.
During the fourth quarter of 2008, we incurred an intangible asset impairment charge of $6.1 million related to the acquired YDI customer technologies, relationships, and patents and trademarks. The impairment charge was primarily related to lower than previously estimated revenues from our YDI management software due to the macroeconomic environment and industry downturn.
23
Income taxes. We evaluate the realizability of our net deferred tax assets and assess the need for a valuation allowance on a quarterly basis. The future benefit to be derived from our deferred tax assets is dependent upon our ability to generate sufficient future taxable income to realize the assets. We record a valuation allowance to reduce our net deferred tax assets to the amount that may be more likely than not to be realized. To the extent we established a valuation allowance, an expense is recorded within the provision for income taxes line in the consolidated statements of operations. In future periods, if we were to determine that it was more likely than not that we would not be able to realize the recorded amount of our remaining net deferred tax assets, an adjustment to the valuation allowance would be recorded as an increase to income tax expense in the period such determination was made.
Accounting for income taxes requires a two-step approach to recognize and measure uncertain tax positions. The first step is to evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining if, based on the technical merits, it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon audit, including resolutions of related appeals or litigation processes, if any. The second step is to measure the tax benefit as the largest amount that is more than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. We reevaluate these uncertain tax positions on a quarterly basis. This evaluation is based on factors including, but not limited to, changes in facts or circumstances, changes in tax law, effectively settled issues under audit and new audit activity. Any change in these factors could result in the recognition of a tax benefit or an additional charge to the tax provision.
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the percentage of total net sales of certain line items included in our consolidated statements of operations data:
| Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
Net sales | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||
Cost of sales | 66.4 | 59.8 | 57.5 | |||||||||
Gross profit | 33.6 | 40.2 | 42.5 | |||||||||
Research and development | 13.0 | 12.2 | 9.6 | |||||||||
Selling, general and administrative | 25.9 | 20.2 | 17.0 | |||||||||
Amortization of acquired intangible assets | 1.1 | 1.4 | 2.1 | |||||||||
Goodwill and asset impairment | 50.7 | 0.9 | - | |||||||||
Restructuring | 1.4 | - | - | |||||||||
Purchase of in-process technology | - | - | 0.1 | |||||||||
Income (loss) from operations | (58.5 | ) | 5.5 | 13.7 | ||||||||
Interest income, net | 0.4 | 1.0 | 1.9 | |||||||||
Impairment of investments | - | (0.1 | ) | (0.2 | ) | |||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes | (58.1 | ) | 6.4 | 15.4 | ||||||||
Provision (benefit) for income taxes | (6.4 | ) | 1.7 | 4.3 | ||||||||
Net income (loss) | (51.7 | )% | 4.7 | % | 11.1 | % | ||||||
Year Ended 2009 Compared to 2008 and 2007
Net Revenue
| Years Ended December 31, | % Change | % Change | ||||||||||||||||||
| 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | in 2009 | in 2008 | ||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Product | $ | 342.1 | $ | 560.9 | $ | 708.5 | (39.0 | ) | (20.8 | ) | ||||||||||
Service | 69.3 | 86.1 | 72.0 | (19.6 | ) | 19.5 | ||||||||||||||
Total net revenues | $ | 411.4 | $ | 647.0 | $ | 780.5 | (36.4 | ) | (17.1 | ) | ||||||||||
24
Product revenues decreased $218.7 million or 39.0% during 2009 compared to 2008 mainly due to a decrease in worldwide demand from our semiconductor capital equipment manufacturer and semiconductor device manufacturer customers. Product revenues related to these customers decreased $144.9 million or 45.8% compared to the same period for the prior year. Revenues related to other markets decreased $73.8 million or 30.2% compared to the same period for the prior year. Our domestic product revenues decreased by $135.4 million or 40.7% mainly due to a high concentration of sales to the semiconductor capital equipment and device manufacturer customers. Our international product revenues decreased $83.4 million or 36.6% during 2009. This decrease consists of a $40.8 million decrease in product revenues from our semiconductor customers and a decrease in product revenues of $42.6 million related to other markets.
Product revenues decreased $147.6 million or 20.8% during 2008 compared to 2007 mainly due to a decrease in worldwide demand from our semiconductor capital equipment manufacturer and semiconductor device manufacturer customers. Product revenues related to these customers decreased $166.3 million or 34.5% compared to the same period for the prior year. This decrease was partially offset by an $18.7 million or 8.3% increase in revenues related to other markets, mainly solar. Our domestic product revenues decreased by $114.8 million or 25.6% mainly due to a high concentration of sales to the semiconductor capital equipment and device manufacturer customers. Our international product revenues decreased $32.8 million or 12.6% during 2008. This decrease consists of a $59.0 million decrease in product revenues from our semiconductor customers offset by an increase of $26.2 million related to other markets, mainly solar.
Service revenues consisted mainly of fees for services related to the maintenance and repair of our products, software maintenance, installation services and training. Service revenues decreased $16.8 million or 19.6% during 2009 compared to 2008 due to lower spending by our customers on these services as a result of the global economic conditions. Service revenues increased $14.1 million or 19.5% during 2008 compared to 2007 mainly due to a higher installed base of products and increased software maintenance fees.
Total international net revenues, including product and service, were $188.5 million for 2009 or 45.8% of net sales compared to $281.3 million for 2008 or 43.5% of net sales and $302.7 million or 38.8% of net sales for 2007.
Gross Profit
| % Points | % Points | |||||||||||||||||||
| Years Ended December 31, | Change in | Change in | ||||||||||||||||||
| 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||||||||
Product | 32.9 | % | 40.7 | % | 43.4 | % | (7.8 | ) | (2.7 | ) | ||||||||||
Service | 37.0 | % | 36.5 | % | 33.5 | % | 0.5 | 3.0 | ||||||||||||
Total gross profit percentage | 33.6 | % | 40.2 | % | 42.5 | % | (6.6 | ) | (2.3 | ) | ||||||||||
Gross profit on product revenues decreased by 7.8 percentage points during 2009 compared to the prior year. The decrease is mainly due to a reduction in product revenue volumes partially offset by lower overhead spending, which total 6.4 percentage points of the overall decrease. A decrease of 2.6 percentage points is a result of excess and obsolete inventory related charges. These decreases were offset by 1.0 percentage point due to a favorable product mix. The excess and obsolete inventory related charges were primarily a result of a lower inventory consumption plan in the first quarter of 2009 that we implemented in response to the weakness in the markets we serve during that period. The decrease in overhead costs was primarily related to lower compensation expense resulting from workforce reductions associated with our restructuring plan.
Gross profit on product revenues decreased by 2.7 percentage points for 2008 compared to the prior year. The decrease consists of approximately 3.2 lower percentage points from decreased revenue volumes, 0.4 percentage points from unfavorable foreign currency fluctuations and 0.8 percentage points from additional excess and obsolete inventory charges. These decreases were offset by 1.7 percentage points from lower overhead spending due to lower sales volumes and favorable product mix.
Cost of service revenues consists primarily of costs of providing services for repair and training which includes salaries and related expenses and other fixed costs. Service gross profit for 2009 increased modestly compared to the same period for the prior year. Service gross profit increased by 3.0 percentage points for 2008 compared to 2007.
25
The increase was a result of increased revenue volumes partly related to our YDI acquisition in the fourth quarter of 2007.
Research and Development
| Years Ended December 31, | % Change | % Change | ||||||||||||||||||
| 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | in 2009 | in 2008 | ||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Research and development expenses | $ | 53.5 | $ | 78.5 | $ | 74.6 | (31.8 | ) | 5.2 | |||||||||||
Research and development expenses decreased $25.0 million or 31.8% during 2009 compared to the prior year. The decrease includes a $14.1 million decrease in compensation expense, a $4.7 million reduction in spending on project materials, a $1.7 million decrease in consulting costs and a $4.5 million decrease in other discretionary spending. The decrease in compensation expense is mainly due to workforce reductions that took place from the third quarter of 2008 through the first quarter of 2009, as well as other temporary cost reductions.
Research and development expenses increased $3.9 million or 5.2% during 2008 compared to the prior year, mainly due to $3.7 million in expenses related to the YDI acquisition and $1.0 million in other research and development costs, primarily patent legal fees. These increases were offset by $0.8 million in lower compensation expenses as a result of decreased staffing levels.
Our research and development is primarily focused on developing and improving our instruments, components, subsystems and process control solutions to improve process performance and productivity.
We have hundreds of products and our research and development efforts primarily consist of a large number of projects related to these products, none of which is individually material to us. Current projects typically have a duration of 12 to 30 months depending upon whether the product is an enhancement of existing technology or a new product. Our current initiatives include projects to enhance the performance characteristics of older products, to develop new products and to integrate various technologies into subsystems. These projects support in large part the transition in the semiconductor industry to larger wafer sizes and smaller integrated circuit geometries, which require more advanced process control technology. Research and development expenses consist primarily of salaries and related expenses for personnel engaged in research and development, fees paid to consultants, material costs for prototypes and other expenses related to the design, development, testing and enhancement of our products as well as legal costs associated with maintaining and defending our intellectual property.
We believe that the continued investment in research and development and ongoing development of new products are essential to the expansion of our markets, and expect to continue to make significant investment in research and development activities. We are subject to risks if products are not developed in a timely manner, due to rapidly changing customer requirements and competitive threats from other companies and technologies. Our success primarily depends on our products being designed into new generations of equipment for the semiconductor industry. We develop products that are technologically advanced so that they are positioned to be chosen for use in each successive generation of semiconductor capital equipment. If our products are not chosen to be designed into our customers' products, our net sales may be reduced during the lifespan of those products.
Selling, General and Administrative
| Years Ended December 31, | % Change | % Change | ||||||||||||||||||
| 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | in 2009 | in 2008 | ||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses | $ | 106.3 | $ | 130.8 | $ | 132.8 | (18.7 | ) | (1.5 | ) | ||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased $24.5 million or 18.7% during 2009 compared to 2008. The decrease includes a $17.1 million decrease in compensation expense, a $3.1 million decrease in depreciation and facility related costs and a decrease of $3.2 million in consulting, professional and other fees. The decrease in compensation expense is mainly due to workforce reductions that took place from the third quarter of 2008 through the first quarter of 2009, as well as other temporary cost reductions.
26
Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased $2.0 million or 1.5% during 2008 compared to 2007. The decrease includes a $5.6 million decrease in consulting and professional fees and a $2.3 million decrease in foreign exchange costs. These decreases were partially offset by a $5.3 million increase related to the YDI acquisition and a $1.0 million increase in facilities costs related to the relocated corporate headquarters. The decrease in consulting and professional fees was due primarily to lower IT infrastructure spending. The foreign exchange gains during 2008 were primarily attributable to the settlement of cash and intercompany loans at different foreign exchange rates in connection with a legal entity consolidation in the first quarter of 2008 between some of our foreign subsidiaries.
Amortization of Acquired Intangible Assets
| Years Ended December 31, | % Change | % Change | ||||||||||||||||||
| 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | in 2009 | in 2008 | ||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of acquired intangible assets | $ | 4.4 | $ | 9.0 | $ | 16.2 | (51.0 | ) | (44.4 | ) | ||||||||||
Amortization expense for 2009 decreased $4.6 million or 51.0% as certain acquired intangible assets became fully amortized during 2008, and as a result of the write-downs of certain intangibles of $6.1 million recorded in the fourth quarter of 2008 and $11.7 million in the second quarter of 2009.
Amortization expense for 2008 decreased $7.2 million or 44.4% primarily related to intangible assets from earlier acquisitions that became fully amortized during 2007.
Goodwill and Asset Impairment Charges
| Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||
Goodwill and asset impairment charges | $ | 208.5 | $ | 6.1 | $ | - | ||||||
During the second quarter of 2009, we reviewed our goodwill, intangible assets, and other long-lived assets for potential impairment as a result of market and economic conditions that contributed to a decline in our forecasted business levels, and the excess of our consolidated net assets over our market capitalization for a sustained period of time. As a result of this impairment assessment, we recorded non-cash goodwill and intangible asset impairment charges of $193.3 million and $11.7 million, respectively. In addition, as a result of a facility consolidation in Asia in the second quarter of 2009, we recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $3.5 million resulting from the write-down of the value of a building to its estimated fair value.
During the fourth quarter of 2008, we incurred an intangible asset impairment charge of $6.1 million related to customer technologies, relationships, and patents and trademarks. The impairment charge was primarily as a result of lower than previously estimated revenues from our YDI management software due to the macroeconomic environment and industry downturn. The lower estimated future cash flows were based on the amount by which the carrying value of the intangible assets exceeded the estimated fair value. Fair value was determined based on a discounted estimate of future cash flows expected to be derived from the intangible assets.
Restructuring
| Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||
Restructuring | $ | 5.8 | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||
In light of the global financial crisis and its impact on our semiconductor equipment OEM customers and the other markets we serve, we initiated a restructuring plan in the first quarter of 2009. The plan included a reduction in our worldwide headcount of approximately 630 people, which represented approximately 24% of our global workforce. This resulted in restructuring charges of $5.8 million primarily for severance and other charges associated with the reductions in workforce. As of December 31, 2009, approximately $0.2 million of accrued
27
employee related benefit costs are remaining and will be paid by June 31, 2010. The costs related to workforce reductions that took place during 2008 were immaterial.
Interest Income, Net
| Years Ended December 31, | % Change | % Change | ||||||||||||||||||
| 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | in 2009 | in 2008 | ||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income, net | $ | 1.6 | $ | 6.4 | $ | 14.5 | (74.5 | ) | (55.7 | ) | ||||||||||
Net interest income decreased $4.8 million during 2009 compared to the prior year mainly related to lower average rates on our investment portfolio.
Net interest income decreased $8.1 million during 2008 compared to the prior year mainly related to lower average outstanding cash and investment balances in 2008 and lower average rates. The lower cash and investment balances were mainly a result of our stock repurchase program.
Impairment of Investments
| Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||
Impairment of investments | $ | - | $ | (0.9 | ) | $ | (1.5 | ) | ||||
We review our investment portfolio on a monthly basis to identify and evaluate individual investments that have indications of potential impairment. The factors considered in determining whether a loss is other-than-temporary include: the length of time and extent to which fair market value has been below the cost basis, the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, credit quality, and our ability to hold the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value. At December 31, 2007, we determined that declines in the fair value of two of our investments in certain commercial paper were other-than-temporary, and as a result, we recorded a $1.5 million impairment charge to earnings.
For 2008, we recorded additional net impairment charges of $0.9 million related to these two investments. We liquidated our position in these two impaired investments during the third quarter of 2008, one by sale and the other by a structured payment. We received a combined total of $3.4 million from the settlement of these investments during 2008.
Provision (Benefit) for Income Taxes
| Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
| (Dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||
Provision (benefit) for income taxes | $ | (26.2 | ) | $ | 10.9 | $ | 33.7 | |||||
The provision (benefit) for income taxes in 2009, 2008 and 2007 are comprised of U.S. federal, state and foreign income taxes.
Our effective tax rate for the years 2009, 2008 and 2007 was (11.0)%, 26.6% and 28.0%, respectively. The effective tax rate in 2009 is less than the statutory rate primarily due to the benefit from the U.S. federal research and development credits, the profits of our international subsidiaries being taxed at rates lower than the U.S. statutory tax rate, discrete reserve releases and a non-deductible goodwill impairment charge of $190.7 during the second quarter.
The effective tax rate in 2008 was less than the statutory tax rate primarily due to the benefit from the U.S. federal research and development credits, the profits of our international subsidiaries being taxed at rates lower than the U.S. statutory tax rate and discrete reserve releases.
28
The effective tax rate in 2007 was less than the statutory tax rate primarily due to the benefit from the U.S. federal research and development credits and the profits of our international subsidiaries being taxed at rates lower than the U.S. statutory tax rate.
At December 31, 2009, the total amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits, which excludes interest and penalties, was approximately $9.1 million. The decrease from December 31, 2008 was primarily attributable to the close of the 2005 and 2006 U.S. federal tax audits. At December 31, 2009, if these benefits were recognized in a future period, the timing of which is not estimable, the net unrecognized tax benefit of $6.5 million, excluding interest and penalties, would impact our effective tax rate.
At December 31, 2008, the total amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits, which excludes interest and penalties, was approximately $14.7 million. If these benefits were recognized in a future period, the timing of which is not estimable, the net unrecognized tax benefit of $10.9 million, excluding interest and penalties, would impact our effective tax rate.
We accrue interest and penalties, if applicable, for any uncertain tax positions. This interest and penalty expense is a component of income tax expense. At December 31, 2009 and 2008, we had $0.7 million and $1.7 million, respectively, accrued for interest on net unrecognized tax benefits.
Over the next 12 months it is reasonably possible that we may recognize $1.9 million to $2.4 million of previously unrecognized tax benefits related to various U.S. federal, state and foreign tax positions as a result of the conclusion of various audits and the expiration of statutes of limitations. The following tax years, in the major tax jurisdictions noted, are open for assessment or refund: U.S. Federal: 2006 to 2008, Germany: 2001 to 2008, Korea: 2004 to 2008, Japan: 2004 to 2008, and the United Kingdom: 2007 and 2008. As of December 31, 2009 and currently, there are ongoing audits in various tax jurisdictions for various tax years.
On a quarterly basis, we evaluate both positive and negative evidence that bears on the realizability of net deferred tax assets and assess the need for a valuation allowance. The future benefit to be derived from our deferred tax assets is dependent upon our ability to generate sufficient future taxable income to realize the assets. During 2009, we increased our valuation allowance by $0.5 million for state tax credit carryforwards as we determined it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets related to these attributes will not be realized. In addition, in 2009, we recorded a net benefit to income tax expense of $5.7 million, excluding interest and penalties, due to discrete reserve releases primarily related to the close of the 2005 and 2006 U.S. federal tax audits.
During 2007, we amended prior U.S. federal tax returns to reflect revised estimates for qualifying U.S. federal research and development costs that allowed us to claim additional research tax credits. As a result of this claim, we recorded a benefit to income tax expense of $1.8 million.
During 2006, we received a notification letter from the Israeli Ministry of Industry Trade and Labor ("MITL") indicating that our Israeli operations were in compliance with requirements relating to the tax holiday granted to our manufacturing operations in Israel in 2001. This tax holiday is anticipated to expire in 2011 and is subject to meeting continued investment, employment and other requirements under the guidelines of the MITL. This tax holiday resulted in income tax savings of $0.3 million, $0.2 million and $3.4 million for 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term marketable securities totaled $271.8 million at December 31, 2009 compared to $278.9 million at December 31, 2008. This decrease was mainly due to $4.2 million of cash used to purchase plant and equipment, a decrease of $4.5 million of cash for net repayments of short-term borrowings and a $5.9 million decrease in net purchases of available for sale investments. These decreases were offset by an increase of $7.4 million of cash provided by operations. The primary driver in our current and anticipated future cash flows is and will continue to be cash generated from operations, consisting mainly of our net income and changes in operating assets and liabilities. In periods when our sales are growing, higher sales to customers will result in increased trade receivables, and inventories will generally increase as we build products for future sales. This may result in lower cash generated from operations. Conversely, in periods when our sales are declining, our trade accounts receivable and inventory balances will generally decrease, resulting in increased cash from operations.
29
Net cash provided by operating activities was $7.4 million for 2009 and resulted mainly from a net loss of $212.7 million, a $28.0 million increase in operating assets and a $4.7 million decrease in operating liabilities, offset by a $20.3 million provision for excess or obsolete inventory, non-cash charges of $208.5 million for impairment of goodwill, intangibles and other long-lived assets, $18.8 million for depreciation and amortization and $11.3 million for stock-based compensation and related taxes. The increase in operating assets consisted of a $9.9 million increase in accounts receivable as a result of higher sales in the last two months of 2009 compared to 2008 and a $15.9 million increase in income taxes receivable as we expect to receive an income tax refund due to current operating losses. The decrease in operating liabilities is mainly caused by a decrease of $5.0 million in non-current income taxes payable, a decrease of $2.3 million in accrued compensation and a decrease of $1.7 million in the product warranty reserve. The decrease in accrued compensation is primarily as a result of the workforce reduction and mandatory time-off. The decrease in the product warranty reserve is primarily as a result of lower product revenues.
Net cash provided by operating activities was $89.8 million for 2008 and resulted mainly from net income of $30.1 million, a $23.9 million decrease in operating assets, non-cash charges of $30.5 million for depreciation, amortization and impairments, a $12.0 million charge for stock-based compensation and related taxes, a decrease in net operating liabilities of $13.6 million, an $11.4 million provision for excess or obsolete inventory and a deferred tax benefit of $5.0 million. The decrease in operating assets consisted of a $23.6 million decrease in accounts receivable as a result of lower sales in the last two months of 2008 compared to 2007 and a $7.1 million decrease in inventories due to lower ordering levels partially offset by a $3.0 million increase in income taxes receivable. The decrease in operating liabilities was mainly caused by a decrease of $9.2 million in accounts payable primarily as a result of lower inventory procurement activities and a decrease of $4.4 million in accrued expenses and other current liabilities primarily as a result of lower accrued compensation.
Net cash used in investing activities was $9.6 million for 2009 and resulted primarily from the net purchases of $5.9 million of available-for-sale investments and purchases of plant and equipment of $4.2 million. The $4.2 million increase in plant and equipment was primarily for the purchase of calibration and test equipment. Net cash used in investing activities was $74.1 million for 2008 and resulted primarily from the net purchases of $60.7 million of available-for-sale investments and purchases of plant and equipment of $13.5 million. The purchases of plant and equipment related to leasehold improvements in Japan to facilitate a consolidation of facilities, IT hardware to reduce system operating costs in the future and test equipment.
Net cash used in financing activities was $8.0 million for 2009 and consisted primarily of $4.5 million in net repayment of short-term borrowings and $2.5 million related to excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation. Net cash used in financing activities of $114.8 million for 2008, resulted from $115.7 million used to repurchase common stock, $4.8 million in net repayment of short-term borrowings and $6.3 million in principal payments on capital lease obligations and long-term debt, primarily to retire a $5.0 million industrial development revenue bond, offset by $8.9 million in proceeds from the exercise of stock options and purchases under our employee stock purchase plan.
On March 18, 2009, we entered into an amendment to the Optional Advance Demand Grid Note dated August 3, 2004 (the "Grid Note"). The unsecured short-term LIBOR-based loan agreement with HSBC Bank USA is utilized primarily by our Japanese subsidiary for short-term liquidity purposes. The credit line, as amended: (a) decreased the maximum amount of the note from $35.0 million to $5.0 million, (b) decreased the limit for standby letters of credit under the note from $0.8 million to $0.7 million, and (c) established an annual facility fee of 0.0375% of the maximum amount of the note. We believe the reduced amount of the note more accurately reflects our anticipated utilization of this line, and minimizes the cost of the new facility fee. At December 31, 2008, total outstanding borrowings under this credit line were $1.1 million at an interest rate of 1.65%. There were no outstanding borrowings under this line of credit at December 31, 2009.
On January 31, 2010, we entered into an amendment to the Grid Note, as amended, to extend its maturity date to July 31, 2010.
Additionally, our Japanese subsidiary has lines of credit and short-term borrowing arrangements with two financial institutions which provide for aggregate borrowings as of December 31, 2009 of up to an equivalent of $26.9 million U.S. dollars, which generally expire and are renewed at three month intervals. At December 31, 2009
30
and 2008, total borrowings outstanding under these arrangements were $12.9 million and $16.7 million, respectively, at interest rates ranging from 0.76% to 1.48% at December 31, 2009 and at interest rates ranging from 1.20% to 1.68% at December 31, 2008.
We have provided financial guarantees for certain unsecured borrowings and have standby letters of credit, some of which do not have fixed expiration dates. At December 31, 2009, our maximum exposure as a result of these standby letters of credit and performance bonds was approximately $1.0 million.
Future payments due under debt, lease and purchase commitment obligations as of December 31, 2009 are as follows:
| Payment Due By Period | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Less than | After | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Contractual Obligations (In thousands) | Total | 1 Year | 1-3 years | 3-5 years | 5 years | Other | ||||||||||||||||||
Operating lease obligations | $ | 30,120 | $ | 7,794 | $ | 11,160 | $ | 5,928 | $ | 5,238 | $ | - | ||||||||||||
Purchase obligations(1) | 137,840 | 111,834 | 11,731 | 10,457 | 3,818 | - | ||||||||||||||||||
Other long-term liabilities reflected on the Balance Sheet under GAAP(2) | 17,836 | 98 | 18 | - | 10,947 | 6,773 | ||||||||||||||||||
Contingent purchase consideration in connection with acquisitions(3) | 5,000 | 5,000 | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 190,796 | $ | 124,726 | $ | 22,909 | $ | 16,385 | $ | 20,003 | $ | 6,773 | ||||||||||||
| (1) | The majority of the outstanding inventory purchase commitments of approximately $98.4 million at December 31, 2009 are to be purchased within the next 12 months. Additionally, approximately $32.7 million represents a commitment, as of December 31, 2009, to multiple parties engaged to provide certain computer equipment, IT network services and IT support. These contracts are for periods ranging from two to six years and the actual timing of payments and amounts may vary based on equipment deployment dates. However, the amount noted represents our expected obligation based on anticipated deployment. | |
| (2) | The majority of this balance relates to income taxes payable and accrued compensation for certain executives related to supplemental retirement benefits. | |
| (3) | In connection with the YDI acquisition, additional purchase consideration may be payable upon the achievement of specific annual and cumulative revenue targets for 2010. |
We believe that our working capital, together with the cash anticipated to be generated from operations, will be sufficient to satisfy our estimated working capital and planned capital expenditure requirements through at least the next 12 months.
On February 12, 2007, our Board of Directors approved a share repurchase program (the "Program") for the repurchase of up to $300.0 million of our outstanding stock over the next two years. The repurchases were made from time to time on the open market or through privately negotiated transactions. The timing and amount of any shares repurchased under the Program were dependent upon a variety of factors, including price, corporate and regulatory requirements, capital availability, and other market conditions. During 2007, we repurchased 4,779,000 shares of common stock for $101.2 million for an average price of $21.17 per share. During 2008, we repurchased 5,667,000 shares of common stock for $115.7 million for an average price of $20.42 per share. The Program expired on February 11, 2009 with no additional share repurchases in 2009. In total, we repurchased 10,446,000 shares of common stock for $216.9 million for an average price of $20.76 per share.
Derivatives
We enter into derivative instruments for risk management purposes only, including derivatives designated as hedging instruments and those utilized as economic hedges. We operate internationally, and in the normal course of business, are exposed to fluctuations in interest rates and foreign exchange rates. These fluctuations can increase the costs of financing, investing and operating the business. We have used derivative instruments, such as forward contracts, to manage certain foreign currency exposure.
31
By nature, all financial instruments involve market and credit risks. We enter into derivative instruments with major investment grade financial institutions and no collateral is required. We have policies to monitor the credit risk of these counterparties. While there can be no assurance, we do not anticipate any material non-performance by any of these counterparties.
We hedge a portion of our forecasted foreign currency denominated intercompany sales of inventory, over a maximum period of eighteen months, using forward foreign exchange contracts accounted for as cash-flow hedges related to Japanese, South Korean, British and European currencies. To the extent these derivatives are effective in offsetting the variability of the hedged cash flows, and otherwise meet the hedge accounting criteria, changes in the derivatives' fair value are not included in current earnings but are included in accumulated other comprehensive income in stockholders' equity. These changes in fair value will subsequently be reclassified into earnings as a component of product cost, as applicable, when the forecasted transaction occurs. To the extent that a previously designated hedging transaction is no longer an effective hedge, any ineffectiveness measured in the hedging relationship is recorded immediately in earnings in the period it occurs. The cash flows resulting from forward exchange contracts are classified in the consolidated statements of cash flows as part of cash flows from operating activities. We do not enter into derivative instruments for trading or speculative purposes.
To the extent that hedge accounting criteria is not met, the foreign currency forward contracts are considered economic hedges and changes in the fair value of these contracts are recorded immediately in earnings in the period in which they occur. These include hedges that are used to reduce exchange rate risks arising from the change in fair value of certain foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities (i.e., payables, receivables) and other economic hedges where the hedge accounting criteria were not met.
We had forward exchange contracts with notional amounts totaling $48.7 million outstanding at December 31, 2009 of which $29.0 million were outstanding to exchange Japanese yen for U.S. dollars. We had forward exchange contracts with notional amounts totaling $30.6 million outstanding at December 31, 2008 of which $17.3 million were outstanding to exchange Japanese yen for U.S. dollars.
As of December 31, 2009, the unrealized gain that will be reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income to cost of products over the next twelve months is $0.8 million. The ineffective portions of the derivatives are recorded in selling, general and administrative costs and were immaterial in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
We also hedge certain intercompany and other payables with forward exchange contracts. Typically, as these derivatives hedge existing amounts that are denominated in foreign currencies, the derivatives do not qualify for hedge accounting. The foreign exchange gain or loss on these derivatives was immaterial in 2009, a gain of $2.7 million in 2008 and immaterial in 2007.
Realized and unrealized gains and losses on forward exchange contracts that do not qualify for hedge accounting are recognized immediately in earnings. The cash flows resulting from forward exchange contracts are classified in our consolidated statements of cash flows as part of cash flows from operating activities. We do not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading purposes.
Gains and losses on forward exchange contracts that qualify for hedge accounting are classified in cost of products, which totaled a gain of $1.1 million, losses of $1.2 million and gains of $1.3 million for the years 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any financial partnerships with unconsolidated entities, such as entities often referred to as structured finance, special purpose entities or variable interest entities which are often established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes. Accordingly, we are not exposed to any financing, liquidity, market or credit risk that could arise if we had such relationships.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In October 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued guidance that establishes the accounting and reporting provisions for arrangements including multiple revenue-generating activities. This
32
guidance provides amendments to the criteria for separating deliverables, measuring and allocating arrangement consideration to one or more units of accounting. The amendments in this guidance also establish a selling price hierarchy for determining the selling price of a deliverable. Significantly enhanced disclosures are also required to provide information about a vendor's multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements, including information about the nature and terms, significant deliverables, and its performance within arrangements. The amendments also require providing information about the significant judgments made and changes to those judgments and about how the application of the relative selling-price method effects the timing or amount of revenue recognition. The amendments in this guidance are effective prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in the fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. Early application is permitted. We are currently evaluating the potential impact of this new guidance on our consolidated financial statements.
In October 2009, the FASB issued guidance that changes the accounting model for revenue arrangements that include both tangible products and software elements that are "essential to the functionality," and scopes these products out of current software revenue guidance. The new guidance will include factors to help companies determine what software elements are considered "essential to the functionality." The amendments will now subject software-enabled products to other revenue guidance and disclosure requirements, such as guidance surrounding revenue arrangements with multiple-deliverables. The amendments in this guidance are effective prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in the fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. Early application is permitted. We are currently evaluating the potential impact of this new guidance on our consolidated financial statements.
| Item 7A. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk |
Market Risk and Sensitivity Analysis
Our primary exposures to market risks include fluctuations in interest rates on our investment portfolio, short and long-term debt as well as fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates.
Foreign Exchange Rate Risk
We mainly enter into forward exchange contracts to reduce currency exposure arising from intercompany sales of inventory. We sometimes also enter into forward exchange contracts to reduce foreign exchange risks arising from the change in fair value of certain foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities.
There were forward exchange contracts with notional amounts totaling $48.7 million and $30.6 million outstanding at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Of such forward exchange contracts, $29.0 million and $17.3 million, respectively, were outstanding to exchange Japanese yen for U.S. dollars with the remaining amounts relating to contracts to exchange the British pound, South Korean won and Euro for U.S. dollars. The potential fair value loss for a hypothetical 10% adverse change in the currency exchange rate on our forward exchange contracts at December 31, 2009 and 2008 would be $4.9 million and $3.1 million, respectively. The potential losses in 2009 and 2008 were estimated by calculating the fair value of the forward exchange contracts at December 31, 2009 and 2008 and comparing that with those calculated using the hypothetical forward currency exchange rates.
At December 31, 2009 and 2008 we had $1.3 million and $0.6 million, respectively, in loans outstanding between subsidiaries that were subject to foreign exchange exposure. At December 31, 2009 and 2008 a hypothetical 10% adverse change in foreign exchange rates would result in a net transaction loss of $0.1 million and $0.1 million, respectively, which would be recorded in current earnings.
At December 31, 2009 and 2008, we had $12.9 million and $17.8 million, respectively, related to short-term borrowings denominated in Japanese yen. The carrying value of these short-term borrowings approximates fair value due to their short period to maturity. Assuming a hypothetical 10% adverse change in the Japanese yen to U.S. dollar year-end exchange rate, the fair value of these short-term borrowings would increase by $1.4 million and $2.0 million, respectively. The potential increase in fair value was estimated by calculating the fair value of the short-term borrowings at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and comparing that with the fair value using the hypothetical year-end exchange rate.
33
Interest Rate Risk
Due to its short-term duration, the fair value of our cash and investment portfolio at December 31, 2009 and 2008 approximated its carrying value. Interest rate risk was estimated as the potential decrease in fair value resulting from a hypothetical 10% increase in interest rates for securities contained in the investment portfolio. The resulting hypothetical fair value was not materially different from the year-end carrying values.
From time to time, we have outstanding short-term borrowings with variable interest rates, primarily denominated in Japanese yen. At December 31, 2009 and 2008, we had $12.9 million and $17.8 million, respectively, outstanding related to these short-term borrowings at interest rates ranging from 0.76% to 1.48% and 1.2% to 1.68%, respectively. Due to the short-term nature and amount of this short-term debt, a hypothetical change of 10% in interest rates would not have a material effect on our near-term financial condition or results of operations.
34
| Item 8. | Financial Statements and Supplementary Data |
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To Board of Directors and Shareholders of
MKS Instruments, Inc.:
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated financial statements listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a)(1) present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of MKS Instruments, Inc. and its subsidiaries at December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement schedule listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a)(2) presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company's management is responsible for these financial statements and financial statement schedule, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements, on the financial statement schedule, and on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our integrated audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
February 26, 2010
35
MKS
INSTRUMENTS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
| December 31, | ||||||||
| 2009 | 2008 | |||||||
| (In thousands, except share data) | ||||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||
Current assets: | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 111,009 | $ | 119,261 | ||||
Short-term investments | 160,786 | 159,608 | ||||||
Trade accounts receivable, net of allowances of $2,415 and $2,148 at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively | 94,215 | 85,350 | ||||||
Inventories | 118,004 | 131,519 | ||||||
Income taxes receivable | 14,476 | 4,057 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes | 21,505 | 19,058 | ||||||
Other current assets | 12,886 | 9,875 | ||||||
Total current assets | 532,881 | 528,728 | ||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net | 67,196 | 82,017 | ||||||
Goodwill | 144,511 | 337,765 | ||||||
Acquired intangible assets, net | 4,963 | 21,069 | ||||||
Other assets | 24,518 | 15,360 | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 774,069 | $ | 984,939 | ||||
| LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY | ||||||||
Current liabilities: | ||||||||
Short-term borrowings | $ | 12,885 | $ | 17,808 | ||||
Current portion of capital lease obligations | - | 870 | ||||||
Accounts payable | 26,292 | 19,320 | ||||||
Accrued compensation | 10,658 | 13,768 | ||||||
Other current liabilities | 21,465 | 24,169 | ||||||
Total current liabilities | 71,300 | 75,935 | ||||||
Long-term portion of capital lease obligations | - | 396 | ||||||
Other liabilities | 17,836 | 21,910 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 20) | ||||||||
Stockholders' equity: | ||||||||
Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value, 2,000,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding | - | - | ||||||
Common Stock, no par value, 200,000,000 shares authorized; 49,514,941 and 49,275,975 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively | 113 | 113 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital | 645,411 | 637,938 | ||||||
Retained earnings | 28,769 | 241,428 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income | 10,640 | 7,219 | ||||||
Total stockholders' equity | 684,933 | 886,698 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity | $ | 774,069 | $ | 984,939 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
36
MKS
INSTRUMENTS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
| Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
| (In thousands, except per share data) | ||||||||||||
Net Revenues: | ||||||||||||
Products | $ | 342,145 | $ | 560,888 | $ | 708,456 | ||||||
Services | 69,261 | 86,106 | 72,031 | |||||||||
Total net revenues | 411,406 | 646,994 | 780,487 | |||||||||
Cost of revenues: | ||||||||||||
Cost of products | 229,686 | 332,366 | 401,119 | |||||||||
Cost of services | 43,630 | 54,685 | 47,881 | |||||||||
Total cost of revenues | 273,316 | 387,051 | 449,000 | |||||||||
Gross profit | 138,090 | 259,943 | 331,487 | |||||||||
Research and development | 53,543 | 78,540 | 74,628 | |||||||||
Selling, general and administrative | 106,330 | 130,800 | 132,791 | |||||||||
Amortization of acquired intangible assets | 4,407 | 9,001 | 16,183 | |||||||||
Purchase of in-process technology | - | - | 900 | |||||||||
Goodwill and asset impairment charges | 208,497 | 6,069 | - | |||||||||
Restructuring | 5,812 | - | - | |||||||||
Income (loss) from operations | (240,499 | ) | 35,533 | 106,985 | ||||||||
Interest income, net | 1,641 | 6,425 | 14,488 | |||||||||
Impairment of investments | - | (906 | ) | (1,457 | ) | |||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes | (238,858 | ) | 41,052 | 120,016 | ||||||||
Provision (benefit) for income taxes | (26,199 | ) | 10,935 | 33,656 | ||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | (212,659 | ) | $ | 30,117 | $ | 86,360 | |||||
Net income (loss) per share: | ||||||||||||
Basic | $ | (4.31 | ) | $ | 0.61 | $ | 1.53 | |||||
Diluted | $ | (4.31 | ) | $ | 0.59 | $ | 1.51 | |||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding: | ||||||||||||
Basic | 49,318 | 49,717 | 56,349 | |||||||||
Diluted | 49,318 | 50,754 | 57,173 | |||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
37
MKS
INSTRUMENTS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
| For The Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Additional | Other | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Common Stock | Paid-In | Retained | Comprehensive | Comprehensive | Stockholders' | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Shares | Amount | Capital | Earnings | Income (loss) | Income (loss) | Equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| (In thousands, except share data) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2006 | 56,671,625 | $ | 113 | $ | 680,164 | $ | 210,877 | $ | 10,065 | $ | 901,219 | |||||||||||||||||
Net issuance under stock-based plans | 2,368,954 | 45,266 | 45,266 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation | 12,918 | 12,918 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tax benefit from stock-based plans | 5,712 | 5,712 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock repurchases | (4,778,632 | ) | (59,165 | ) | (41,993 | ) | (101,158 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other | 570 | 570 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income (net of tax): | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income | 86,360 | 86,360 | 86,360 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changes in value of financial instruments designated as cash flow hedges and unrealized loss on investments | (622 | ) | (622 | ) | (622 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment | 3,744 | 3,744 | 3,744 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income | $ | 89,482 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2007 | 54,261,947 | $ | 113 | $ | 685,465 | $ | 255,244 | $ | 13,187 | $ | 954,009 | |||||||||||||||||
Net issuance under stock-based plans | 681,493 | 8,861 | 8,861 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation | 15,176 | 15,176 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tax benefit from stock-based plans | 226 | 226 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock repurchases | (5,667,465 | ) | (71,790 | ) | (43,933 | ) | (115,723 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income (net of tax): | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income | 30,117 | 30,117 | 30,117 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changes in value of financial instruments designated as cash flow hedges and unrealized gain on investments | 203 | 203 | 203 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment | (6,171 | ) | (6,171 | ) | (6,171 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income | $ | 24,149 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2008 | 49,275,975 | $ | 113 | $ | 637,938 | $ | 241,428 | $ | 7,219 | $ | 886,698 | |||||||||||||||||
Net issuance under stock-based plans | 238,966 | (114 | ) | (114 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation | 8,845 | 8,845 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tax expense from stock-based plans | (1,258 | ) | (1,258 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income (loss) (net of tax): | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss | (212,659 | ) | (212,659 | ) | (212,659 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss): | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changes in value of financial instruments designated as cash flow hedges and unrealized gain on investments | 359 | 359 | 359 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment | 3,062 | 3,062 | 3,062 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive loss | $ | (209,238 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2009 | 49,514,941 | $ | 113 | $ | 645,411 | $ | 28,769 | $ | 10,640 | $ | 684,933 | |||||||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
38
MKS
INSTRUMENTS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
| Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
| (In thousands) | ||||||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | (212,659 | ) | $ | 30,117 | $ | 86,360 | |||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities: | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 18,759 | 23,524 | 30,644 | |||||||||
Stock-based compensation | 8,845 | 15,274 | 12,918 | |||||||||
Excess tax benefit (expense) from stock-based compensation | 2,460 | (3,250 | ) | (2,688 | ) | |||||||
Deferred income taxes | (7,202 | ) | (4,975 | ) | (10,283 | ) | ||||||
Provision for excess and obsolete inventory | 20,335 | 11,401 | 6,401 | |||||||||
Impairment of goodwill | 193,255 | - | - | |||||||||
Impairment of intangibles and other long-lived assets | 15,242 | 6,069 | - | |||||||||
Impairment of investments | - | 906 | 1,457 | |||||||||
Other | 1,003 | 394 | 888 | |||||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects of businesses acquired: | ||||||||||||
Trade accounts receivable | (9,935 | ) | 23,565 | 18,263 | ||||||||
Inventories | (4,677 | ) | 7,088 | (5,195 | ) | |||||||
Income taxes receivable | (15,880 | ) | (3,047 | ) | 5,116 | |||||||
Other current assets | 2,511 | (3,730 | ) | 708 | ||||||||
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities | (10,792 | ) | (4,384 | ) | (6,615 | ) | ||||||
Accounts payable | 6,103 | (9,175 | ) | (18,855 | ) | |||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 7,368 | 89,777 | 119,119 | |||||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: | ||||||||||||
Acquisitions of businesses, net of cash acquired | - | - | (24,021 | ) | ||||||||
Purchases of short-term and long-term available-for-sale investments | (254,057 | ) | (324,375 | ) | (183,927 | ) | ||||||
Maturities and sales of short-term and long-term available-for-sale investments | 248,147 | 263,715 | 160,269 | |||||||||
Purchases of property, plant and equipment | (4,179 | ) | (13,457 | ) | (15,090 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from sale of assets | 128 | 336 | 370 | |||||||||
Other | 333 | (273 | ) | 1,451 | ||||||||
Net cash used in investing activities | (9,628 | ) | (74,054 | ) | (60,948 | ) | ||||||
Cash flows from financing activities: | ||||||||||||
Proceeds from short-term borrowings | 162,361 | 155,922 | 137,656 | |||||||||
Payments on short-term borrowings | (166,847 | ) | (160,771 | ) | (141,749 | ) | ||||||
Repurchases of common stock | - | (115,723 | ) | (101,158 | ) | |||||||
Payments on long-term debt | - | (5,000 | ) | - | ||||||||
Principal payments on capital lease obligations | (961 | ) | (1,330 | ) | (1,426 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds (payments) from exercise of stock options and employee stock purchase plan | (114 | ) | 8,861 | 45,266 | ||||||||
Excess tax benefit (expense) from stock-based compensation | (2,460 | ) | 3,250 | 2,688 | ||||||||
Net cash used in financing activities | (8,021 | ) | (114,791 | ) | (58,723 | ) | ||||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | 2,029 | (5,639 | ) | 9,312 | ||||||||
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | (8,252 | ) | (104,707 | ) | 8,760 | |||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year | 119,261 | 223,968 | 215,208 | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year | $ | 111,009 | $ | 119,261 | $ | 223,968 | ||||||
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: | ||||||||||||
Cash paid during the year: | ||||||||||||
Interest | $ | 187 | $ | 649 | $ | 830 | ||||||
Income taxes | $ | 10,038 | $ | 11,625 | $ | 27,116 | ||||||
Non-cash financing activities: | ||||||||||||
Equipment capital leases | $ | 194 | $ | 489 | $ | 1,244 | ||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
39
MKS
INSTRUMENTS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tables in thousands, except share and per share data)