Fidelity D & D Bancorp Inc (FDBC) SEC Annual Report (10-K) for 2010

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010

COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 333-90273

FIDELITY D & D BANCORP, INC.

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA I.R.S. EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NO: 23-3017653

BLAKELY AND DRINKER STREETS

DUNMORE, PENNSYLVANIA  18512

TELEPHONE NUMBER (570) 342-8281

SECURITIES REGISTERED UNDER SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT:

None

SECURITIES REGISTERED UNDER SECTION 12(g) OF THE ACT:

Common Stock, without par value

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.  Yes  ¨   No  x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.  Yes  ¨   No  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes  x   No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ¨ No  ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by references in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company.  See definition of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check One)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).  Yes  ¨   No  x

The aggregate market value of the voting common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $24,818,987 as of June 30, 2010, based on the closing price of $14.00.  The number of shares of common stock outstanding as of February 28, 2011, was 2,182,829.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Excerpts from the Registrant's 2010 Annual Report to Shareholders are incorporated herein by reference in response to Part I.  Portions of the Registrant's definitive Proxy Statement to be used in connection with the 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders are incorporated herein by reference in partial response to Part II and Part III.

Fidelity D & D Bancorp, Inc.

2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K

Table of Contents

FIDELITY D & D BANCORP, INC.

PART I

Forward-Looking Statements

Certain of the matters discussed in this Annual Report on Form 10-K may constitute forward-looking statements for purposes of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and as such may involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.  The words "expect," "anticipate," "intend," "plan," "believe," "estimate," and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements.

The Company's actual results may differ materially from the results anticipated in these forward-looking statements due to a variety of factors, including, without limitation:

The Company cautions readers not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which reflect analyses only as of the date of this document.  The Company has no obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this document.

Readers should review the risk factors described in this document and other documents that we file or furnish, from time- to-time, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including quarterly reports filed on Form 10-Q and any current reports filed or furnished on Form 8-K.

ITEM 1:      BUSINESS

Fidelity D & D Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) was incorporated in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, on August 10, 1999, and is a bank holding company, whose wholly-owned state chartered commercial bank is The Fidelity Deposit and Discount Bank (the Bank) (collectively, the Company).  The Company is headquartered at Blakely and Drinker Streets in Dunmore, Pennsylvania.

The Bank has offered a full range of traditional banking services since it commenced operations in 1903.  The Bank has a personal and corporate trust department and also provides alternative financial and insurance products with asset management services.  A full list of services provided by the Bank is detailed in the section entitled "Products and Services" contained within the 2010 Annual Report to Shareholders, incorporated by reference.  The service area is comprised of the Borough of Dunmore and the surrounding communities within Lackawanna and Luzerne counties in Northeastern Pennsylvania.

The banking business is highly competitive, and the profitability of the Company depends principally upon the Company's ability to compete in its market area.  Competition includes, among other sources, the following:

The Company has been able to compete effectively with other financial institutions by emphasizing technology and customer service, including local decision making on loans.  These efforts enabled the Company to establish long-term customer relationships and build customer loyalty by providing products and services designed to address their specific needs.

There are no concentrations of loans that, if lost, would have a materially adverse effect on the continued business of the Company.  There are no material concentrations within a single industry or group of related industries that are vulnerable to the risk of a near-term severe impact.  However, the Company's success is dependent, to a significant degree, on economic conditions in Northeastern Pennsylvania, especially Lackawanna and Luzerne counties which the Company defines as its primary market area.  The banking industry is affected by general economic conditions including the effects of inflation, recession, unemployment, real estate values, trends in national and global economies and other factors beyond the Company's control.  An economic recession or a delayed economic recovery over a prolonged period of time in the Company's primary market area could cause an increase in the level of the Company's non-performing assets and loan losses, and thereby cause operating losses, impairment of liquidity and erosion of capital.  We cannot assure you that adverse changes in the local economy would not have a material effect on the Company's future consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.  Refer to Item 1A, "Risk Factors" for material risks and uncertainties that management believes affect the Company.

The Company had 159 full-time equivalent employees on December 31, 2010, which includes exempt officers, exempt, non-exempt and part-time employees.

Federal and state banking laws contain numerous provisions that affect various aspects of the business and operations of the Company and the Bank.  The Company is subject to, among others, the regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) and the Federal Reserve Board (the FRB) and the Bank is subject to, among others, the regulations of the Pennsylvania Department of Banking and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the FDIC).  Refer to Part II, Item 7 "Supervision and Regulation" for descriptions of and references to applicable statutes and regulations which are not intended to be complete descriptions of these provisions or their effects on the Company or the Bank.  They are summaries only and are qualified in their entirety by reference to such statutes and regulations.  Applicable regulations relate to, among other things:

Annually, the Bank is examined by the Pennsylvania Department of Banking and/or the FDIC.  The last examination was conducted by the Pennsylvania Department of Banking as of March 31, 2010.

The Company's website address is http://www.bankatfidelity.com.  The Company makes available through this website the annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports as soon as reasonably practical after filing with the SEC.  You may read and copy any materials filed with the SEC at the SEC's Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549.  You may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at (202) 551-8090.  The SEC also maintains an internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information about the Company at http://www.sec.gov.

The Company's accounting policies and procedures are designed to comply with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP).  Refer to "Critical Accounting Policies," which are incorporated by reference in Part II, Item 7.

ITEM 1A: RISK FACTORS

An investment in the Company's common stock is subject to risks inherent to the Company's business.  The material risks and uncertainties that management believes affect the Company are described below.  Before making an investment decision, you should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below together with all of the other information included or incorporated by reference in this report.  The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones facing the Company.  Additional risks and uncertainties that management is not aware of or focused on or that management currently deems immaterial may also impair the Company's business operations.  This report is qualified in its entirety by these risk factors.

If any of the following risks actually occur, the Company's financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.  If this were to happen, the value of the Company's common stock could decline significantly, and you could lose all or part of your investment.

Risks Related to the Company's Business

The Company's business is subject to interest rate risk and variations in interest rates may negatively affect its financial performance.

Changes in the interest rate environment may reduce profits. The Company's earnings and cash flows are largely dependent upon its net interest income. Net interest income is the difference between the interest earned on loans, securities and other interest-earning assets, and interest paid on deposits, borrowings and other interest-bearing liabilities. As prevailing interest rates change, net interest spreads are affected by the difference between the maturities and re-pricing characteristics of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. In addition, loan volume and yields are affected by market interest rates on loans, and rising interest rates generally are associated with a lower volume of loan originations. An increase in the general level of interest rates may also adversely affect the ability of certain borrowers to pay the interest on and principal of their obligations. Accordingly, changes in levels of market interest rates could materially adversely affect the Company's net interest spread, asset quality, loan origination volume and overall profitability.

 The Company is subject to lending risk.

There are inherent risks associated with the Company's lending activities. These risks include, among other things, the impact of changes in interest rates and changes in the economic conditions in the markets where the Company operates as well as those across the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the United States. Increases in interest rates and/or weakening economic conditions could adversely impact the ability of borrowers to repay outstanding loans or the value of the collateral securing these loans. The Company is also subject to various laws and regulations that affect its lending activities. Failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations could subject the Company to regulatory enforcement action that could result in the assessment of significant civil money penalties against the Company.

Commercial, commercial real estate and real estate construction loans are generally viewed as having more risk of default than residential real estate loans or consumer loans. These types of loans are also typically larger than residential real estate loans and consumer loans.   Because these loans generally have larger balances than residential real estate loans and consumer loans, the deterioration of one or a few of these loans could cause a significant increase in non-performing loans. An increase in non-performing loans could result in a net loss of earnings from these loans, an increase in the provision for possible loan losses and an increase in loan charge-offs, all of which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition and results of operations.

The Company's allowance for possible loan losses may be insufficient.

The Company maintains an allowance for possible loan losses, which is a reserve established through a provision for possible loan losses charged to expense, that represents management's best estimate of probable losses that have been incurred within the existing portfolio of loans. The allowance, in the judgment of management, is necessary to reserve for estimated loan losses and risks inherent in the loan portfolio. The level of the allowance reflects management's continuing evaluation of industry concentrations; specific credit risks; loan loss experience; current loan portfolio quality; present economic, political and regulatory conditions and unidentified losses inherent in the current loan portfolio. The determination of the appropriate level of the allowance for possible loan losses inherently involves a high degree of subjectivity and requires the Company to make significant estimates of current credit risks and future trends, all of which may undergo material changes. Changes in economic conditions affecting borrowers, new information regarding existing loans, identification of additional problem loans and other factors, both within and outside of the Company's control, may require an increase in the allowance for possible loan losses. In addition, bank regulatory agencies periodically review the Company's allowance for loan losses and may require an increase in the provision for possible loan losses or the recognition of further loan charge-offs, based on judgments different than those of management. In addition, if charge-offs in future periods exceed the allowance for possible loan losses, the Company will need additional provisions to increase the allowance for possible loan losses. Any increases in the allowance for loan losses will result in a decrease in net income and capital and may have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition and results of operations.

The Company may need or be compelled to raise additional capital in the future, but that capital may not be available when it is needed and on terms favorable to current shareholders.

Federal banking regulators require the Company and Bank to maintain adequate levels of capital to support their operations.  These capital levels are determined and dictated by law, regulation and banking regulatory agencies.  In addition, capital levels are also determined by the Company's management and board of directors based on capital levels that they believe are necessary to support the Company's business operations.  The Company is evaluating its present and future capital requirements and needs, is developing a comprehensive capital plan and is analyzing capital raising alternatives, methods and options.  Even if the Company succeeds in meeting the current regulatory capital requirements, the Company may need to raise additional capital in the near future to support possible loan losses during future periods or to meet future regulatory capital requirements.

Further, the Company's regulators may require it to increase its capital levels. If the Company raises capital through the issuance of additional shares of its common stock or other securities, it would likely dilute the ownership interests of current investors and would likely dilute the per-share book value and earnings per share of its common stock.  Furthermore, it may have an adverse impact on the Company's stock price.  New investors may also have rights, preferences and privileges senior to the Company's current shareholders, which may adversely impact its current shareholders.  The Company's ability to raise additional capital will depend on conditions in the capital markets at that time, which are outside its control, and on its financial performance.  Accordingly, the Company cannot assure you of its ability to raise additional capital on terms and time frames acceptable to it or to raise additional capital at all.  If the Company cannot raise additional capital in sufficient amounts when needed, its ability to comply with regulatory capital requirements could be materially impaired.  Additionally, the inability to raise capital in sufficient amounts may adversely affect the Company's operations, financial condition and results of operations.

If we conclude that the decline in value of any of our investment securities is other-than-temporary, we will be required to write down the credit-related portion of the impairment of that security through a charge to earnings.

We review our investment securities portfolio at each quarter-end reporting period to determine whether the fair value is below the current carrying value.  When the fair value of any of our investment securities has declined below its carrying value, we are required to assess whether the decline is other-than-temporary.  If we conclude that the decline is other-than-temporary, we will be required to write down the credit-related portion of the impairment of that security through a charge to earnings.  As of December 31, 2010, the book value of the Company's pooled trust preferred securities was $6,873,000 with an estimated fair value of $1,453,000.  Changes in the expected cash flows of these securities and/or prolonged price declines have resulted and may result in our concluding in future periods that there is additional impairment of these securities that is other-than-temporary, which would require a charge to earnings for the portion of the impairment that is deemed to be credit-related.  Due to the complexity of the calculations and assumptions used in determining whether an asset, such as pooled trust preferred securities, is impaired, the impairment disclosed may not accurately reflect the actual impairment in the future.

The Company is subject to environmental liability risk associated with lending activities.

A significant portion of the Company's loan portfolio is secured by real property. During the ordinary course of business, the Company may foreclose on and take title to properties securing certain loans. In doing so, there is a risk that hazardous or toxic substances could be found on these properties. If hazardous or toxic substances are found, the Company may be liable for remediation costs, as well as for personal injury and property damage. Environmental laws may require the Company to incur substantial expense and may materially reduce the affected property's value or limit the Company's ability to use or sell the affected property. In addition, future laws or more stringent interpretations or enforcement policies with respect to existing laws may increase the Company's exposure to environmental liability. Although the Company has policies and procedures to perform an environmental review before initiating any foreclosure action on real property, these reviews may not be sufficient to detect all potential environmental hazards. The remediation costs and any other financial liabilities associated with an environmental hazard could have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition and results of operations.

The Company's profitability depends significantly on economic conditions in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the local region in which it conducts business.

The Company's success depends primarily on the general economic conditions of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the specific local markets in which the Company operates. Unlike larger national or other regional banks that are more geographically diversified, the Company provides banking and financial services to customers primarily in Lackawanna and Luzerne Counties in Northeastern Pennsylvania. The local economic conditions in these areas have a significant impact on the demand for the Company's products and services as well as the ability of the Company's customers to repay loans, the value of the collateral securing loans and the stability of the Company's deposit funding sources. A significant decline in general economic conditions, caused by inflation, recession, acts of terrorism, an outbreak of hostilities or other international or domestic occurrences, unemployment, changes in securities markets or other factors could impact these local economic conditions and, in turn, have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition and results of operations.

There is no assurance that the Company will be able to successfully compete with others for business.

The Company competes for loans, deposits and investment dollars with numerous regional and national banks and other community banking institutions, as well as other kinds of financial institutions and enterprises, such as securities firms, insurance companies, savings associations, credit unions, mortgage brokers and private lenders. Many competitors have substantially greater resources than the Company does, and operate under less stringent regulatory environments. The differences in resources and regulations may make it more difficult for the Company to compete profitably, reduce the rates that it can earn on loans and on its investments, increase the rates it must offer on deposits and other funds, and adversely affect its overall financial condition and earnings.

The Company is subject to extensive government regulation and supervision.

The Company, primarily through the Bank, is subject to extensive federal and state regulation and supervision. Banking regulations are primarily intended to protect depositors' funds, federal deposit insurance funds and the banking system as a whole, not shareholders. These regulations affect the Company's lending practices, capital structure, investment practices, dividend policy and growth, among other things. Federal or commonwealth regulatory agencies continually review banking laws, regulations and policies for possible changes. Changes to statutes, regulations or regulatory policies, including changes in interpretation or implementation of statutes, regulations or policies, could affect the Company in substantial and unpredictable ways. Such changes could subject the Company to additional costs, limit the types of financial services and products the Company may offer and/or increase the ability of non-banks to offer competing financial services and products, among other things. Failure to comply with laws, regulations or policies could result in sanctions by regulatory agencies, civil money penalties and/or reputation damage, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. While the Company has policies and procedures designed to prevent any such violations, there can be no assurance that such violations will not occur.

The Company's controls and procedures may fail or be circumvented.

Management regularly reviews and updates the Company's internal controls, disclosure controls and procedures, and corporate governance policies and procedures. Any system of controls, however well designed and operated, is based in part on certain assumptions and can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurances that the objectives of the system are met. Any failure or circumvention of the Company's controls and procedures or failure to comply with regulations related to controls and procedures could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, results of operations and financial condition.

New lines of business or new products and services may subject the Company to additional risks.

From time-to-time, the Company may implement new lines of business or offer new products and services within existing lines of business. There are substantial risks and uncertainties associated with these efforts, particularly in instances where the markets are not fully developed. In developing and marketing new lines of business and/or new products and services the Company may invest significant time and resources. Initial timetables for the introduction and development of new lines of business and/or new products or services may not be achieved and price and profitability targets may not prove feasible. External factors, such as compliance with regulations, competitive alternatives, and shifting market preferences, may also impact the successful implementation of a new line of business or a new product or service. Furthermore, any new line of business and/or new product or service could have a significant impact on the effectiveness of the Company's system of internal controls. Failure to successfully manage these risks in the development and implementation of new lines of business or new products or services could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, results of operations and financial condition.

The Company's future acquisitions could dilute your ownership and may cause it to become more susceptible to adverse economic events.

The Company may use its common stock to acquire other companies or make investments in banks and other complementary businesses in the future. The Company may issue additional shares of common stock to pay for future acquisitions, which would dilute your ownership interest in the Company. Future business acquisitions could be material to the Company, and the degree of success achieved in acquiring and integrating these businesses into the Company could have a material effect on the value of the Company's common stock. In addition, any acquisition could require it to use substantial cash or other liquid assets or to incur debt. In those events, it could become more susceptible to economic downturns and competitive pressures.

The Company may not be able to attract and retain skilled people.

The Company's success depends, in large part, on its ability to attract and retain key people. Competition for the best people in most activities engaged in by the Company can be intense and the Company may not be able to hire people or to retain them. The unexpected loss of services of one or more of the Company's key personnel could have a material adverse impact on the Company's business because of their skills, knowledge of the Company's market, years of industry experience and the difficulty of promptly finding qualified replacement personnel.

The Company's information systems may experience an interruption or breach in security.

The Company relies heavily on communications and information systems to conduct its business. Any failure, interruption or breach in security of these systems could result in failures or disruptions in the Company's customer relationship management, general ledger, deposit, loan and other systems. While the Company has policies and procedures designed to prevent or limit the effect of the failure, interruption or security breach of its information systems, there can be no assurance that any such failures, interruptions or security breaches will not occur or, if they do occur, that they will be adequately addressed. The occurrence of any failures, interruptions or security breaches of the Company's information systems could damage the Company's reputation, result in a loss of customer business, subject the Company to additional regulatory scrutiny, or expose the Company to civil litigation and possible financial liability, any of which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition and results of operations.

The Company continually encounters technological change.

The financial services industry is continually undergoing rapid technological change with frequent introductions of new technology-driven products and services. The effective use of technology increases efficiency and enables financial institutions to better serve customers and to reduce costs. The Company's future success depends, in part, upon its ability to address the needs of its customers by using technology to provide products and services that will satisfy customer demands, as well as to create additional efficiencies in the Company's operations. Many of the Company's competitors have substantially greater resources to invest in technological improvements. The Company may not be able to effectively implement new technology-driven products and services or be successful in marketing these products and services to its customers. Failure to successfully keep pace with technological change affecting the financial services industry could have a material adverse impact on the Company's business and, in turn, the Company's financial condition and results of operations.

The Company is subject to claims and litigation pertaining to fiduciary responsibility.

From time-to-time, customers make claims and take legal action pertaining to the Company's performance of its fiduciary responsibilities. Whether customer claims and legal action related to the Company's performance of its fiduciary responsibilities are founded or unfounded, if such claims and legal actions are not resolved in a manner favorable to the Company, they may result in significant financial liability and/or adversely affect the market perception of the Company and its products and services as well as impact customer demand for those products and services. Any financial liability or reputation damage could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, which, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition and results of operations.

Severe weather, natural disasters, acts of war or terrorism and other external events could significantly impact the Company's business.

Severe weather, natural disasters, acts of war or terrorism and other adverse external events could have a significant impact on the Company's ability to conduct business. Such events could affect the stability of the Company's deposit base, impair the ability of borrowers to repay outstanding loans, impair the value of collateral securing loans, cause significant property damage, result in loss of revenue and/or cause the Company to incur additional expenses. Severe weather or natural disasters, acts of war or terrorism or other adverse external events may occur in the future. Although management has established disaster recovery policies and procedures, the occurrence of any such event could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, which, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition and results of operations.

Readers should review the risk factors described in other documents that we file or furnish, from time-to-time, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including Annual Reports to Shareholders, Annual Reports filed on Form 10-K and other current reports filed or furnished on Form 8-K.

Risks Associated with the Company's Common Stock

The Company's stock price can be volatile.

Stock price volatility may make it more difficult for you to resell your common stock when you want and at prices you find attractive. The Company's stock price can fluctuate significantly in response to a variety of factors including, among other things:

General market fluctuations, industry factors and general economic and political conditions and events, such as economic slowdowns or recessions, interest rate changes or credit loss trends, could also cause the Company's stock price to decrease regardless of operating results.

The trading volume in the Company's common stock is less than that of other larger financial services companies.

The Company's common stock is listed for trading on the over-the-counter bulletin board and the trading volume in its common stock is less than that of other larger financial services companies. A public trading market having the desired characteristics of depth, liquidity and orderliness depends on the presence in the marketplace of willing buyers and sellers of the Company's common stock at any given time. This presence depends on the individual decisions of investors and general economic and market conditions over which the Company has no control. Given the lower trading volume of the Company's common stock, significant sales of the Company's common stock, or the expectation of these sales, could cause the Company's stock price to fall.

Risks Associated with the Company's Industry

Future governmental regulation and legislation could limit the Company's future growth.

The Company is a registered bank holding company, and its subsidiary bank is a depository institution whose deposits are insured by the FDIC. As a result, the Company is subject to various regulations and examinations by various regulatory authorities. In general, statutes establish the corporate governance and eligible business activities for the Company, certain acquisition and merger restrictions, limitations on inter-company transactions such as loans and dividends, capital adequacy requirements, requirements for anti-money laundering programs and other compliance matters, among other regulations. The Company is extensively regulated under federal and state banking laws and regulations that are intended primarily for the protection of depositors, federal deposit insurance funds and the banking system as a whole. Compliance with these statutes and regulations is important to the Company's ability to engage in new activities and consummate additional acquisitions.

In addition, the Company is subject to changes in federal and state tax laws as well as changes in banking and credit regulations, accounting principles and governmental economic and monetary policies. The Company cannot predict whether any of these changes may adversely and materially affect it. Federal and state banking regulators also possess broad powers to take supervisory actions as they deem appropriate. These supervisory actions may result in higher capital requirements, higher insurance premiums and limitations on the Company's activities that could have a material adverse effect on its business and profitability. While these statutes are generally designed to minimize potential loss to depositors and the FDIC insurance funds, they do not eliminate risk, and compliance with such statutes increases the Company's expense, requires management's attention and can be a disadvantage from a competitive standpoint with respect to non-regulated competitors.

The earnings of financial services companies are significantly affected by general business and economic conditions.

The Company's operations and profitability are impacted by general business and economic conditions in the United States and abroad. These conditions include short-term and long-term interest rates, inflation, money supply, political issues, legislative and regulatory changes, fluctuations in both debt and equity capital markets, broad trends in industry and finance, and the strength of the U.S. economy and the local economies in which the Company operates, all of which are beyond the Company's control. Deterioration in economic conditions could result in an increase in loan delinquencies and non-performing assets, decreases in loan collateral values and a decrease in demand for the Company's products and services, among other things, any of which could have a material adverse impact on the Company's financial condition and results of operations.

Financial services companies depend on the accuracy and completeness of information about customers and counterparties.

In deciding whether to extend credit or enter into other transactions, the Company may rely on information furnished by or on behalf of customers and counterparties, including financial statements, credit reports and other financial information. The Company may also rely on representations of those customers, counterparties or other third parties, such as independent auditors, as to the accuracy and completeness of that information. Reliance on inaccurate or misleading financial statements, credit reports or other financial information could have a material adverse impact on the Company's business and, in turn, the Company's financial condition and results of operations.

Consumers may decide not to use banks to complete their financial transactions.

Technology and other changes are allowing parties to complete financial transactions that historically have involved banks through alternative methods. For example, consumers can now maintain funds that would have historically been held as bank deposits in brokerage accounts or mutual funds. Consumers can also complete transactions such as paying bills and/or transferring funds directly without the assistance of banks. The process of eliminating banks as intermediaries, known as "disintermediation," could result in the loss of fee income, as well as the loss of customer deposits and the related income generated from those deposits. The loss of these revenue streams and the lower cost deposits as a source of funds could have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition and results of operations.

ITEM 1B: UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None

ITEM 2: PROPERTIES

As of December 31, 2010, the Company operated 11 full-service banking offices, of which four were owned and seven were leased.  None of the lessors of the properties leased by the Company are affiliated with the Company and all of the properties are located in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.  The Company is headquartered at its owner-occupied main branch located on the corner of Blakely and Drinker Streets in Dunmore, PA.

The following table provides information with respect to the principal properties from which the Bank conducts business:

(1) Executive and administrative, commercial lending, trust and asset management services are located at the Main Branch.

(3) In addition, there is a banking facility located in the Clarks Summit State Hospital.  The office is leased from the hospital under a lease-for-service-provided agreement with service limited to employees and patients of the hospital.

(4) Executive, mortgage and consumer lending, finance and operational offices are located in this building.  A portion of the building is leased to a non-related entity.

The Bank maintains several free-standing 24-hour ATMs located at the following locations in Pennsylvania:

Other real estate owned includes all foreclosed properties listed for sale.  Upon possession, foreclosed properties are recorded on the Company's balance sheet at the lower of cost or fair value.

ITEM 3:    LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

The nature of the Company's business generates some litigation involving matters arising in the ordinary course of business.  However, in the opinion of the Company after consulting with legal counsel, no legal proceedings are pending, which, if determined adversely to the Company or the Bank, would have a material effect on the Company's undivided profits or financial condition.  No legal proceedings are pending other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to the business of the Company and the Bank.  In addition, to management's knowledge, no governmental authorities have initiated or contemplated any material legal actions against the Company or the Bank.

ITEM 4:   REMOVED AND RESERVED

PART II

The common stock of the Company is traded on the over-the-counter bulletin board under the symbol "FDBC."  Shareholders requesting information about the Company's common stock may contact:

Salvatore R. DeFrancesco, Jr., Treasurer

Fidelity D & D Bancorp, Inc.

Blakely and Drinker Sts.

Dunmore, PA 18512

(570) 342-8281

The following table lists the quarterly cash dividends paid per share and the range of high and low bid prices for the Company's common stock based on information obtained from on-line published sources.  Such over-the-counter prices do not include retail mark-ups, markdowns or commissions:

Dividends are determined and declared by the Board of Directors of the Company.  The Company expects to continue to pay cash dividends in the future; however, future dividends are dependent upon earnings, financial condition, capital strength and other factors of the Company.  For a further discussion of regulatory capital requirements see Note 14, "Regulatory Matters," contained within the notes to the consolidated financial statements, incorporated by reference in Part II, Item 8.

The Company has established a dividend reinvestment plan (DRP) for its shareholders.  The plan provides shareholders with a convenient and economical method of investing cash dividends payable on their common stock and the opportunity to make voluntary optional cash payments to purchase additional shares of the Company's common stock.  Participants pay no brokerage commissions or service charges when they acquire additional shares of common stock through the plan.  The administrator may purchase shares directly from the Company, in the open market, in negotiated transactions, or using a combination of these methods.

The Company had approximately 1,293 shareholders at December 31, 2010 and 1,290 shareholders as of February 28, 2011.  The number of shareholders is the actual number of individual shareholders of record.  Each security depository is considered a single shareholder for purposes of determining the approximate number of shareholders.

Securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans

The information required under this section is incorporated by reference herein, to the information presented in the Company's definitive Proxy Statement for its 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be filed with the SEC.

Performance graph

The following graph and table compare the cumulative total shareholder return on the Company's common stock against the cumulative total return of the NASDAQ Composite and the SNL index of greater than $500 million in-asset banks traded on the OTC-BB and Pink Sheet (the SNL index) for the period of five fiscal years commencing January 1, 2006, and ending December 31, 2010.  As of December 31, 2010, the SNL index consisted of 81 banks.  The graph illustrates the cumulative investment return to shareholders, based on the assumption that a $100 investment was made on December 31, 2005, in each of: the Company's common stock, the NASDAQ Composite and the SNL index.  All cumulative total returns are computed assuming the reinvestment of dividends into the applicable securities.  The shareholder return shown on the graph and table below is not necessarily indicative of future performance:

ITEM 6: SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

Set forth below are our selected consolidated financial and other data.  This financial data is derived in part from, and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in Part II, Item 8 of this report:

Critical accounting policies

The presentation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect many of the reported amounts and disclosures.  Actual results could differ from these estimates.

A material estimate that is particularly susceptible to significant change relates to the determination of the allowance for loan losses.  Management believes that the allowance for loan losses at December 31, 2010 is adequate and reasonable.  Given the subjective nature of identifying and valuing loan losses, it is likely that well-informed individuals could make different assumptions, and could, therefore calculate a materially different allowance value.  While management uses available information to recognize losses on loans, changes in economic conditions may necessitate revisions in the future.  In addition, various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the Company's allowance for loan losses.  Such agencies may require the Company to recognize adjustments to the allowance based on their judgment of information available to them at the time of their examination.

Another material estimate is the calculation of fair values of the Company's investment securities.  Except for the Company's investment in corporate bonds, consisting of pooled trust preferred securities, fair values on the other investment securities are determined by prices provided by a third-party vendor, who is a provider of financial market data, analytics and related services to financial institutions.  For the pooled trust preferred securities, management is unable to obtain readily attainable and realistic pricing from market traders due to a lack of active market participants and therefore management has determined the market for these securities to be inactive.  In order to determine the fair value of the pooled trust preferred securities, management relied on the use of an income valuation approach (present value technique) that maximizes the use of relevant observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs, the results of which are more representative of fair value than the market approach valuation technique used for the other investment securities.

Based on experience, management is aware that estimated fair values of investment securities tend to vary among valuation services.  Accordingly, when selling investment securities, price quotes may be obtained from more than one source.  As described in Notes 1 and 3 of the consolidated financial statements, incorporated by reference in Part II, Item 8, the majority of the Company's investment securities are classified as available-for-sale (AFS).  AFS securities are carried at fair value on the consolidated balance sheets, with unrealized gains and losses, net of income tax, reported separately within shareholders' equity as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (OCI).

The fair value of residential mortgage loans, classified as held-for-sale (HFS), is obtained from the Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA) or the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB).  Generally, the market to which the Company sells mortgages it originates for sale is restricted and price quotes from other sources are not typically obtained.  On occasion, the Company may transfer loans from the loan portfolio to loans HFS.  Under these rare circumstances, pricing may be obtained from other entities and the loans are transferred at the lower of cost or market value and simultaneously sold.  For a further discussion on the accounting treatment of HFS loans, see the section entitled "Loans held-for-sale," contained within management's discussion and analysis.  As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, loans classified as HFS consisted of residential mortgages.

All significant accounting policies are contained in Note 1, "Nature of Operations and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies", within the notes to consolidated financial statements and incorporated by reference in Part II, Item 8.

The following discussion and analysis presents the significant changes in the financial condition and in the results of operations of the Company as of December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 and for each of the years then ended.  This discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in Part II, Item 8 of this report.

Comparison of Financial Condition as of December 31, 2010

and 2009 and Results of Operations for each of the Years then Ended

Financial Condition

Overview

The national economy shows signs of improvement as evidenced by, among other things, a decrease in the unemployment rate from December 2009 and moderate job growth.  However, softness in the housing and real estate markets persist and unemployment levels remain elevated with a national unemployment rate of 9.4% for December 2010.  Although we remain cautiously optimistic with respect to the outlook for credit quality and expect credit costs to decline in 2011, resulting in improved core financial performance, the uncertainty in the financial markets related to the Company's investments in pooled trust preferred securities, could continue to negatively impact the overall operating results.  We anticipate maintaining a relatively stable net interest margin which, when coupled with lower credit costs and other cost containment measures should mitigate the earnings impact of any further write-downs of pooled trust preferred securities.  Thus, capital improvement from sound financial performance and improved asset quality will be the tone for the upcoming year.  In an effort to stimulate economic growth, the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) has not adjusted the short-term federal funds rate which has remained near zero percent over the past two years.  Lower interest rates are expected to be the catalyst that will stimulate jobs creation.  Though low interest rates help lower funding costs, at the same time their effect can be unfavorable to resetting floating-rate asset yields and re-financed fixed-rate assets thereby pressuring margins.  The shape of the interest rate yield curve continued to be positively sloped throughout 2010 but the overall interest rate environment remained historically low.  The management team of the Company is prepared to address these issues and will implement strategies to continue the journey through these uncertain times that will maximize financial performance and continue to strengthen the financial condition of the Company.

Consolidated assets increased $5,656,000, or 1%, during the year ended December 31, 2010 to $561,673,000.  The increase was the result of increased deposits of $23,453,000, or 5%, and increased shareholders' equity of $1,099,000, or 2%.  The cash inflow from deposits enabled the Company to reduce total borrowings by $18,985,000, or 39%.  The increase in shareholders' equity was predominantly from $1.0 million of common stock issued via the Company's dividend reinvestment and employee stock purchase plans.

The following table is a comparison of condensed balance sheet accounts and percentage to total assets at December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 (dollars in thousands):

A comparison of net changes in selected balance sheet categories as of December 31, are as follows (dollars in thousands):

* Earning assets exclude: loans and securities placed on non-accrual status.

Deposits

The Bank is a community based commercial financial institution, member FDIC, which offers a variety of deposit products with varying ranges of interest rates and terms.  Deposit products include savings, clubs, interest-bearing checking (NOW), money market, non-interest bearing checking (DDA) and certificates of deposit.  Certificates of deposit, or CDs, are deposits with stated maturities which can range from seven days to ten years.  The flow of deposits is influenced by economic conditions, changes in the interest rate environment, pricing and competition.  To determine interest rates on its deposit products, the Company considers local competition, spreads to earning-asset yields, liquidity position and rates charged for alternative sources of funding such as borrowings and FHLB advances.  Though the Company competes for deposits, the interest rate setting strategy also considers the Company's balance sheet structure and cost effective strategies that are mindful of the current economic backdrop.

The following table represents the components of total deposits as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 (dollars in thousands):

In 2009, the Company began to use the Certificate of Deposit Account Registry Service (CDARS) reciprocal program to obtain FDIC insurance protection for customers who have large deposits that at times exceed the FDIC maximum amount of $250,000.  In the CDARS program, deposits with varying terms and interest rates, originated in the Company's own markets, are exchanged for deposits of other financial institutions that are members in the CDARS network.  By placing these deposits in other participating institutions, the deposits of our customers are fully insured by the FDIC.  In return for deposits placed with network institutions, the Company receives from network institutions deposits that are approximately equal in amount and contain similar terms as those placed for our customers.  Deposits the Company receives, or reciprocal deposits, from other institutions are considered brokered deposits by regulatory definitions.  As of December 31, 2010, CDARS represented $11,876,000, or 2%, of total deposits, compared to $8,748,000, or 2%, of total deposits at December 31, 2009.

Total deposits increased $23,453,000, or 5%, during 2010 to $482,448,000.  The increase stems from growth in savings and clubs of $19,500,000, NOW accounts of $5,541,000 and non-interest bearing DDAs of $14,890,000, partially offset by a $4,599,000 decline in CDs and money market accounts of $11,878,000.  Deposits are obtained mostly from consumers and businesses within the communities that surround the Company's 11 branch offices and all deposits are insured by the FDIC up to the full extent permitted by law.  The Company's forte has been to develop some highly innovative deposit-gathering techniques.  The savings product campaigns have bolstered deposit levels and possibly have provided a foundation on which to grow, retain and maintain core deposits to a new, higher plateau.  Most notable was the introduction of the tiered interest rate savings account which has increased savings deposit balances back to all-time highs.  This increase in conjunction with higher non-interest bearing DDAs and the Company's dedication to exemplary customer service will strengthen the low-cost funding base of the Company.  The prolonged low interest rate environment has resulted in a wide-spread preference for customers not to renew maturing CDs.  When market rates begin to rise, the Company will vigilantly develop and promote a CD gathering strategy that will capture new time deposits without significantly eroding its low-costing core deposit foundation.

The maturity distribution of certificates of deposit at December 31, 2010 is as follows (dollars in thousands):

Including CDARS, approximately 54% of the CDs are scheduled to mature within one year.  Renewing CDs may re-price to lower or higher market rates depending on the direction of interest rate movements, the shape of the yield curve, competition, the rate profile of the maturing accounts and depositor preference for alternative products.

Short-term borrowings

In addition to deposits, other funding sources available to the Company are short-term borrowings consisting of overnight funds purchased from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh (FHLB), fed funds purchased from correspondent banks, short-term advances from the FHLB and repurchase agreements with businesses and public entities.  The Company uses overnight and short-term funding for asset growth, deposit run-off and short-term liquidity needs.  Because of the success in deposit growth, during 2010 the Company's usage of overnight borrowings was minimal and allowed the reduction of overnight funding entirely, or by $8.6 million from 2009.  During 2010 the Company borrowed and repaid a $9.5 million advance with the FHLB.  The advance was a low-cost, short-term means to accommodate a match funded commercial loan with a municipal customer.

Repurchase agreements are non-insured interest-bearing liabilities that have a perfected security interest in qualified investments of the Company.  The FDIC Depositor Protection Act of 2009 requires banks to provide a perfected security interest to the purchasers of uninsured repurchase agreements.  Repurchase agreements are offered through a sweep product.  A sweep account is designed to ensure that on a daily basis, an attached DDA is adequately funded and excess funds are transferred, or "swept", into an interest-bearing overnight repurchase agreement account.  Due to the constant flow of funds into and out of the sweep product, their balances tend to be somewhat volatile, mimicking the likes of a DDA.  Customer liquidity is the typical cause for variances in repurchase agreements, which during 2010 declined $199,000 from $7,747,000 at December 31, 2009 to $7,548,000 as of December 31, 2010.

Overnight borrowings and repurchase agreements are included with short-term borrowings on the consolidated balance sheets.  For a further discussion on short-term borrowings, see Note 7, "Short-Term Borrowings", contained in the notes to consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8.

Long-term debt

Long-term debt consists of borrowings from the FHLB.  The weighted-average rate in effect on funds borrowed at December 31, 2010 was 4.87% compared to 5.11% as of December 31, 2009.  The 2010 weighted-average rate was 25 basis points below the tax-equivalent yield of 5.12% earned from the Company's portfolio of average interest-earning assets for the year ended December 31, 2010.  Interest rates on the $21,000,000 balances of two long-term advances are currently fixed until 2013 and 2016, but are structured to adjust quarterly should market interest rates increase beyond the issues' original or strike rates.  Significant prepayment penalties are attached to the borrowings thereby creating a disincentive from paying off the higher cost advances.  However, in the event underlying market rates drift above the rates currently paid on these borrowings, the fixed-rate would convert to a floating rate advance and at that time, the Company would have the option to repay or to renegotiate the converted advance rate.  As of December 31, 2010, the Company had the ability to borrow an additional $163,585,000 from the FHLB.

Investments

The Company's investment policy is designed to complement its lending activities, provide monthly cash flow, manage interest rate sensitivity, generate a favorable return above cash holdings, without incurring undue interest rate and credit risk and manage liquidity at acceptable levels.  In establishing investment strategies, the Company considers its business, growth or restructuring plans, the economic environment, the interest rate sensitivity position, the types of securities held, permissible purchases, credit quality, maturity and re-pricing terms, call or average-life intervals and investment concentrations.  The policy prescribes permissible investment categories that meet the policy standards and management is responsible for structuring and executing the specific investment purchases within these policy parameters.  Management buys and sells investment securities from time-to-time depending on market conditions, business trends, liquidity needs, capital levels and structuring strategies.  Investment security purchases provide a way to quickly invest excess liquidity in order to generate additional earnings.  The Company generally earns a positive interest spread by assuming interest rate risk and using deposits and/or borrowings to purchase securities with longer maturities.

At the time of purchase, management classifies investment securities into one of three categories: trading, available-for-sale (AFS) or held-to-maturity (HTM).  To date, management has not purchased any securities for trading purposes.  Most of the securities purchased are classified as AFS even though there is no immediate intent to sell them.  The AFS designation affords management the flexibility to sell securities and position the balance sheet in response to capital levels, liquidity needs or changes in market conditions.  Securities AFS are carried at their net fair values in the consolidated balance sheets with an adjustment to shareholders' equity, net of tax, presented under the caption "Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)."  As of December 31, 2010, AFS debt securities were recorded with an unrealized net loss of $5,937,000 while equity securities were recorded with an unrealized gain of $154,000.  Investment securities designated as HTM represent debt securities that the Company has the ability and intent to hold until maturity and are carried at amortized cost.    As of December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the aggregate fair value of securities HTM exceeded their respective aggregate amortized cost by $48,000 and $56,000, respectively.

As of December 31, 2010, the carrying value of investment securities totaled $83,431,000, or 15% of total assets, compared to $76,530,000, or 14% of total assets at December 31, 2009.  At December 31, 2010, approximately 49% of the carrying value of the investment portfolio was comprised of U.S. Government Sponsored Enterprise residential mortgage-backed securities (MBS – GSE residential) that amortize and provide monthly cash flow.  Municipal general obligations, Agency Government Sponsored Enterprise (Agency – GSE) securities and pooled trust preferred securities comprised 29%, 20% and 2%, respectively, of the investment portfolio at December 31, 2010.

A comparison of total investment securities as of December 31 follows:

The tax-equivalent yield on debt securities by stated maturity date at December 31, 2010 is as follows:

In the above table, the book yields on state & municipal subdivisions were adjusted to a tax-equivalent basis using the corporate federal tax rate of 34%.  In addition, average yields on securities AFS are based on amortized cost and do not reflect unrealized gains or losses.

Though stabilizing, uncertainty continues to reign in the financial markets which has increased the volatility in fair value estimates for the securities in the Company's investment portfolio.  Though market values still remain below amortized cost, net of credit-related OTTI in the Company's portfolio of pooled trust preferred securities, fair values of the Company's investment securities have improved since year-end 2009.  Management believes fair value changes are due mainly to the interest rate environment, and the unrealized losses are the result of what is perceived as instability in the capital markets, limited trading activity and illiquid conditions, not deterioration in the creditworthiness of the issuers.  Nearly all of the securities in the portfolio have fixed rates or have predetermined scheduled rate changes, and many have call features that allow the issuer to call the security at par before its stated maturity without penalty.  As of December 31, 2010, the debt securities with unrealized losses have 14.7% depreciation; an improvement compared to 25.9% at December 31, 2009.   The most significant component of the $5.9 million net unrealized loss position in the AFS debt securities portfolio was $5.4 million from the Company's investments in pooled trust preferred securities.

Quarterly, management performs a review of the investment portfolio to determine the cause of declines in the fair value of each security.  The Company uses inputs provided by independent third parties to determine the fair value of its investment securities portfolio.  Inputs provided by the third party are reviewed and corroborated by management.  Evaluations of the causes of the unrealized losses are performed to determine whether impairment is temporary or other-than-temporary.  Considerations such as the Company's intent and ability to hold the securities to maturity, recoverability of the invested amounts over the intended holding period, the length of time and the severity in pricing decline below cost, the interest rate environment, the receipt of amounts contractually due and whether or not there is an active market for the security, for example, are applied, along with the financial condition of the issuer for management to make a realistic judgment of the probability that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts (principal and interest) due in determining whether a security is other-than-temporarily impaired.  If a decline in value is deemed to be other-than-temporary, the amortized cost of the security is reduced by the credit impairment amount and a corresponding charge to earnings is recognized.  If at the time of sale, call or maturity the proceeds exceed the security's amortized cost, the impairment charge may be fully or partially recovered.

Based on the technique described, the Company determined that as of December 31, 2010, the amortized cost of 12 PreTSLs: IV, V, VII, IX, XI, XV, XVI, XVII, XVIII, XIX, XXIV and  XXV had declined $11,947,000 in total during 2010 and since the present value of the security's expected cash flows were insufficient to recover the entire amortized cost, the securities are deemed to have experienced credit-related OTTI in the amount of $11,836,000 which was charged to current earnings as a component of other income in the consolidated statement of income for the year ended December 31, 2010.  Future analyses could yield results that may indicate further impairment has occurred and would therefore require additional write-downs and corresponding OTTI charges to current earnings.

Prior to December 31, 2010, the valuation process used by the Company was different than the process currently used.  The inputs used in the past also consisted of a mix of both observable and unobservable, however they were more global applications and not as security-specific as those currently used.  For example, prior to December 31, 2010, to project a default rate, universal adjustments were applied to the historical average default rates.  The historical average default rates were obtained from the FDIC for U.S. Banks and Thrifts for the period spanning 1988 to 1991.  This rate was tripled, and then adjusted downward for actual deferrals/defaults in all PreTSLs for the years 2008 and 2009.  The results were then stratified beginning with a higher rate of default and then regressing to normal, with projected global recoveries and prepayment speeds.  The resulting rate was then applied to all of the PreTSLs in the Company's portfolio to determine period-end valuations and the existence of OTTI.  Management of the Company has determined that a security-specific analysis is more representative of the performance and credit-worthiness of the collateral within each of the securities.  Accordingly, the Company's intent is to use the new analysis in future OTTI determinations.

Federal Home Loan Bank Stock

Investment in FHLB stock is required for membership in the organization and is carried at cost since there is no market value available.  The amount the Company is required to invest is dependent upon the relative size of outstanding borrowings the Company has with the FHLB.  The Company was not required to purchase FHLB stock during 2010 and 2009.  Excess stock is typically repurchased from the Company at par if the level of borrowings decline to a predetermined level.  In addition, the Company normally earns a return or dividend on the amount invested.  In December 2008, in order to preserve capital, the FHLB declared a suspension on the redemption of its stock and ceased payment of quarterly dividends until such time it becomes prudent to reinstate either or both.  During the fourth quarter of 2010, the FHLB announced a partial lifting and limited repurchase of the stock redemption provision of the suspension.  As a result, the Company was able to redeem $239,000 of its FHLB stock.  The FHLB also announced that the dividend suspension remains in effect.  Future redemptions and dividend payments will be predicated on the financial performance and health of the FHLB.   Management believes that the FHLB will continue to be a primary source of wholesale liquidity for both short- and long-term funding and has concluded that its investment in FHLB stock is not other than temporarily impaired.  Management reviews for impairment based on the ultimate recoverability of the cost basis in the FHLB stock.  There can be no assurance that future negative changes to the financial condition of the FHLB may not require the Company to recognize an impairment charge with respect to such holdings.  The Company will continue to monitor the financial condition of the FHLB and assess its future ability to resume normal dividend payments and stock redemption activities.  Based on the financial results of the FHLB for the years December 31, 2010 and 2009, management had concluded that the suspension of both the dividend payments and excess capital stock redemptions is temporary in nature.

Loans

The Company originates commercial and industrial (commercial), commercial real estate (CRE), residential mortgages, consumer, home equity and construction loans.  The relative volume of originations is dependent upon customer demand, current interest rates and the perception and duration of future interest levels.  As part of the overall strategy to serve the business community in which it operates, the Company is focused on developing and implementing products and services to the broad spectrum of businesses that operate in its marketplace.  The Company's goals center on building relationships by providing credit and cash management products and services, continuing to diversify its loan portfolio and utilizing loan participations to reduce risk in larger credit transactions.  A loan participation is a tool that allows a community bank to meet the needs of its local customer base.  Certain customers, from time-to-time, may require funding that is out of the ability of a local community bank.  In such circumstances, it allows a bank to originate the loan, and subsequently sell a portion, or portions, of that loan to other financial institutions, thereby mitigating the risk the Company will take on with one loan.  These sold portions of the loan are referred to as loan participations.  During 2010, the Company originated and participated over $13,000,000 in commercial and commercial real estate loans.  As of December 31, 2010, the Company has approximately $41,000,000 in sold loan participations outstanding.  The policies, procedures and credit risk of the Company are reflective of the current economy.  The risks associated with interest rates are being managed by utilizing floating versus long-term fixed rates and exploring programs where we can match our cost of funds.  As a result of the continued low interest rate environment throughout 2010, long-term fixed-rate residential mortgage demand remained high.  To manage interest rate risk, the Company originated $55,928,000 for sale into the secondary market rather than for portfolio retention.

As a part of the risk management practices of the Company, gross loans were strategically reduced $14,897,000, or 3%, from $430,698,000 at December 31, 2009 to $415,801,000 as of December 31, 2010.  Gross loans represented 74% of total assets at December 31, 2010, compared to 77% of total assets as of December 31, 2009.

Net of loan participations, in 2010 the Company originated $26,041,000 of commercial and industrial loans and $12,022,000 of commercial real estate loans compared to $22,959,000 and $9,726,000, respectively in 2009.  Also, during 2010, the Company originated $13,725,000 of residential real estate loans for portfolio retention and $15,986,000 of consumer loans, compared to $13,809,000 and $20,602,000, respectively, in 2009.  Included in mortgage loans are $4,727,000 of residential real estate construction lines in 2010 and $8,307,000 in 2009.  In addition for 2010, the Company had net originations of lines of credit in the amounts of $20,154,000 for commercial borrowers and $16,758,000 in home equity and other consumer lines of credit.

As previously stated, in keeping with the risk management strategy of the Company, net origination activity declined 1% in 2010 compared to 2009.  The decline in the commercial and CRE originations was due to weak economic conditions and the related strict underwriting practices that the Company employs to help ensure against possible future losses, as well as selling participations in commercial and industrial and commercial real estate loans.

Commercial and industrial

Commercial and industrial lending increased $8,059,000, or 10%, to $85,129,000 during 2010.  While the majority of this portfolio remained unchanged, with originations replacing scheduled run-off, the Company saw an increase in municipal tax anticipation loans.  Tax anticipation loan activity provides the Company an opportunity to establish deposit and trust relationships in addition to provide for the funding needs of the local municipal and school district communities.

Commercial real estate

Commercial real estate lending saw a decrease of $20,294,000, or 11%, from $189,488,000 at December 31, 2009 to $169,194,000 as of December 31, 2010.  There were several factors contributing to this overall decrease, including the selling of participations, the Company's decision to maintain its pricing standards and the resolution of several large commercial credits that were not renewed due to the strict underwriting standards of the Company, which are reflective of the current economic conditions.

Residential real estate

Residential real estate saw a decline of $4,190,000, or 5%, to $74,304,000 during 2010.  The majority of this decrease was due to refinance activity associated with the low interest rate environment.  Loans within the Company's residential real estate portfolio were refinanced, to long-term, fixed-rate loans, and subsequently sold into the secondary market, consistent with the risk management practices of the Company.

Consumer loans

Consumer loans saw a modest increase of $1,529,000, or 2%, from $85,645,000 at December 31, 2009 to $87,174,000 at December 31, 2010.  While the consumer portfolio remained relatively stable during 2010, there was a flux in a few of the classes within this segment.  Home equity installment loans saw a decrease of $8,088,000, which was almost entirely offset by a $7,334,000 increase in home equity lines of credit.  The Company credits this fluctuation within the portfolio to home equity installment loan pay-offs from mortgage loan refinancing partially offset by promotions run during 2010 featuring home equity lines of credit with a floating rate that was tied to the national prime rate.

A comparison of domestic loans and related percentage of gross loans, at December 31, for the five previous periods as is as follows:

The following table sets forth the maturity distribution of select components of the loan portfolio at December 31, 2010.  Excluded from the table are residential real estate loans and consumer loans (dollars in thousands):

Both residential and commercial real estate construction loans are included in the one-year or less category since, by their nature, these loans are converted into residential and CRE loans within one year from the date the real estate construction loan was consummated.  Upon conversion, the residential and CRE loans would normally mature after five years.

The following table sets forth the greater than one-year sensitivity changes in interest rates for performing commercial and CRE loans at December 31, 2010 (dollars in thousands):

Non-refundable fees and costs associated with all loan originations are deferred.  Using the principal reduction method, the deferral is released as charges or credits to loan interest income over the life of the loan.

There are no concentrations of loans to a number of borrowers engaged in similar activities exceeding 10% of total loans that are not otherwise disclosed as a category in the tables above.  There are no concentrations of loans that, if resulted in a loss, would have a material adverse effect on the business of the Company.  The Company's loan portfolio does not have a material concentration within a single industry or group of related industries that is vulnerable to the risk of a near-term severe negative business impact.

Loans held-for-sale

Upon origination, certain residential mortgages are classified as held-for-sale (HFS).  In the event market rates increase, fixed-rate loans and adjustable-rate loans not immediately scheduled to re-price would no longer produce yields consistent with the current market.  In a declining interest rate environment, the Company would be exposed to prepayment risk and, as rates on adjustable-rate loans decrease, interest income would be negatively affected.  Consideration is given to the Company's current liquidity position and projected future liquidity needs.  To better manage interest rate and prepayment risk, loans meeting these conditions may be classified as HFS.  The carrying value of loans HFS is at the lower of cost or estimated fair value.  If the fair values of loans HFS fall below their original cost, the difference is written down and charged to current earnings.  Any subsequent appreciation in the portfolio is credited to current earnings but only to the extent of previous write-downs.

Loans HFS as of December 31, 2010 were $213,000 with a corresponding fair value of $217,000 compared to $1,221,000 and $1,233,000, respectively, at December 31, 2009.  During 2010, the Company originated $55,928,000 of residential mortgages HFS, compared to $87,896,000 in 2009.  The higher volume in 2009 was a function of the low interest rate environment which produced a spike in the refinance of existing home debt.  During 2010, residential mortgage loans with principal balances of $61,320,000 were sold into the secondary market and the Company recognized net gains of approximately $798,000, compared to $98,213,000 and $1,060,000, respectively during 2009.  The Company expects residential mortgage loan origination activity to continue to recede during 2011.

The Company retains mortgage servicing rights (MSRs) on loans sold into the secondary market.  MSRs are retained so that the Company can foster personal relationships with its loyal customer base.  At December 31, 2010 and 2009, the servicing portfolio balance of sold residential mortgage loans was $188,627,000 and $157,516,000, respectively.

Allowance for loan losses

Management continually evaluates the credit quality of the Company's loan portfolio and performs a formal review of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses (the allowance) on a quarterly basis.  The allowance reflects management's best estimate of the amount of credit losses in the loan portfolio.  Management's judgment is based on the evaluation of individual loans, past experience, the assessment of current economic conditions and other relevant factors including the amounts and timing of cash flows expected to be received on impaired loans.  Those estimates may be susceptible to significant change.  The provision for loan losses represents the amount necessary to maintain an appropriate allowance.  Loan losses are charged directly against the allowance when loans are deemed to be uncollectible.  Recoveries from previously charged-off loans are added to the allowance when received.

Management applies two primary components during the loan review process to determine proper allowance levels.  The two components are a specific loan loss allocation for loans that are deemed impaired and a general loan loss allocation for those loans not specifically allocated.  The methodology to analyze the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses is as follows:

Allocation of the allowance for different categories of loans is based on the methodology as explained above.  A key element of the methodology to determine the allowance is the Company's credit risk evaluation process, which includes credit risk grading of individual commercial loans.  Commercial loans are assigned credit risk grades based on the Company's assessment of conditions that affect the borrower's ability to meet its contractual obligations under the loan agreement.  That process includes reviewing borrowers' current financial information, historical payment experience, credit documentation, public information and other information specific to each individual borrower.  Upon review, the commercial loan credit risk grade is revised or reaffirmed as the case may be.  The credit risk grades may be changed at any time management feels an upgrade or downgrade may be warranted.  The credit risk grades for the commercial loan portfolio are taken into account in the reserve methodology and loss factors are applied based upon the credit risk grades.  The loss factors applied are based upon the Company's historical experience as well as what we believe to be best practices and common industry standards.    Historical experience reveals there is a direct correlation between the credit risk grades and loan charge-offs.  The changes in allocations in the commercial loan portfolio from period-to-period are based upon the credit risk grading system and from periodic reviews of the loan portfolio.

Each quarter, management performs an assessment of the allowance and the provision for loan losses.  The Company's Special Assets Committee meets quarterly and the applicable lenders discuss each relationship under review and reach a consensus on the appropriate estimated loss amount based on current accounting guidelines.  The Special Assets Committee's focus is on ensuring the pertinent facts are considered and the reserve amounts pursuant to the accounting principles are reasonable.  The assessment process includes the review of all loans on a non-accruing basis as well as a review of certain loans to which the lenders or the Company's Credit Administration function have assigned a criticized or classified risk rating.

Total charge-offs, net of recoveries, for the twelve months ending December 31, 2010, were $1,761,000, compared to $2,221,000 in the twelve months of 2009.  The $460,000 decrease resulted primarily from fewer charge-offs of impaired loans in the current year.  Commercial real estate loan net charge-offs of $889,000 were recorded during the twelve months ending December 31, 2010 versus $842,000 at December 31, 2009.  Commercial and industrial loan net charge-offs were $448,000 for the twelve months ending December 31, 2010 compared to net charge-offs of $948,000 in the same period of 2009.  There were no residential real estate loan net charge-offs for the twelve months ended December 31, 2010 compared to $9,000 in the like period of 2009.  Consumer loan net charge-offs of $424,000 were recorded during the twelve months ending December 31, 2010 versus $422,000 at December 31, 2009.  For a discussion on the provision for loan losses, see the "Provision for loan losses," located in the results of operations section of management's discussion and analysis contained herein.

The allowance for loan losses was $7,898,000 at December 31, 2010, an increase of $324,000 from December 31, 2009.  The increase in the allowance was primarily driven by increased historical loss percentages applied to the loan pools in the allowance calculation.

Management believes that the current balance in the allowance for loan losses of $7,898,000 is sufficient to withstand the identified potential credit quality issues that may arise and others unidentified but inherent to the portfolio.  Potential problem loans are those where there is known information that leads management to believe repayment of principal and/or interest is in jeopardy and the loans are currently neither on non-accrual status nor past due 90 days or more.  Given continuing pressure on property values and the generally uncertain economic backdrop, there could be additional instances, which become identified in future periods that may require additional charge-offs and/or increases to the allowance.  At December 31, 2010 the ratio of the allowance for loans losses was increased to 1.90% of total loans compared to 1.75% at December 31, 2009.  While the allowance to non-performing loans is below a 1:1 coverage in 2009 and 2010, the level of the allowance is deemed adequate as a substantial amount of the non-accrual loans are collateralized by real estate at sufficient values.  The 30-89 day past due loans at December 31, 2010 were $2,611,000 compared to $5,173,000 at December 31, 2009.  The decrease in the 30-89 day past due loans can be attributed to a general improvement in economic conditions, along with increasing employment and stabilizing real estate values, each having an impact on borrowers' ability to make their payments in a timely fashion.

The following table sets forth the activity in the allowance for loan losses and certain key ratios for the periods indicated (dollars in thousands):

The allowance for loan losses can generally absorb losses throughout the loan portfolio.  However, in some instances an allocation is made for specific loans or groups of loans.  Allocation of the allowance for loan losses for different categories of loans is based on the methodology used by the Company, as previously explained.  The changes in the allocations from year-to-year are based upon year-end reviews of the loan portfolio.

Allocation of the allowance among major categories of loans for the past five years is summarized in the following table.  This table should not be interpreted as an indication that charge-offs in future periods will occur in these amounts or proportions, or that the allocation indicates future charge-off trends.  The portion of the allowance designated as unallocated is within the Company's policy guidelines.

The allocation of the allowance for the commercial loan portfolio which is comprised of commercial real estate loans and commercial and industrial loans, accounted for approximately 71%, or $5,606,000 of the total allowance for loan losses at December 31, 2010.  Collateral values were prudently calculated to provide a conservative and realistic value supporting these loans.  The Company uses information from its ongoing review process as well as appraisals from independent third parties and other current market information to support the valuations.  The allocations to the other categories of loans are adequate compared to the actual two-year historical net charge-offs. Approximately $1,008,000, or 13%, of the allowance is allocated to specifically identified impaired loans.

Non-performing assets

The Company defines non-performing assets as accruing loans past due 90 days or more, non-accrual loans, troubled debt restructured loans (TDRs), other real estate owned (ORE), repossessed assets and non-accrual investment securities.  As of December 31, 2010, non-performing assets represented 2.38% of total assets compared to 2.58% at December 31, 2009.

The following table sets forth non-performing assets at December 31 (dollars in thousands):

The composition of non-performing loans as of December 31, 2010 is as follows (dollars in thousands):