Concurrent Computer Corp (CCUR) SEC Quarterly Report (10-Q) for Q1 2017

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2017

or

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from __________ to __________

Commission File Number: 001-37706

_____________

CONCURRENT COMPUTER CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

4375 River Green Parkway, Suite 100, Duluth, GA 30096

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

Telephone: (678) 258-4000

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," "smaller reporting company" and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.     ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes ¨ No x

Number of shares of the Registrant's Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, outstanding as of May 11, 2017 was 9,853,561.

Concurrent Computer Corporation

Form 10-Q

For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2017

Table of Contents

Part I - Financial Information

Concurrent Computer Corporation

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

Concurrent Computer Corporation

Condensed Consolidated STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited )

(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

Concurrent Computer Corporation

Condensed Consolidated STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) (Unaudited)

(Amounts in thousands)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

CONCURRENT COMPUTER CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (Unaudited)

For the nine month period ended March 31, 2017

(Amounts in thousands, except share data)

 The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements

Concurrent Computer Corporation

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)

(Amounts in thousands)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements

Concurrent Computer Corporation

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

(Amounts in thousands, except for share and per share data)

References herein to "Concurrent," the "Company," "we," "our," or "us" refer to Concurrent Computer Corporation and its subsidiaries unless the context specifically indicates otherwise.

We provide software, hardware and professional services for the content delivery market, storage solutions market and the high-performance, real-time market. Effective July 1, 2016, we changed the way our chief operating decision maker ("CODM") views our operating results by providing more discrete segment financial information. As a result, our reportable operating segments now consist of Content Delivery and Real-Time.

Our content delivery solutions consist of software, hardware and services for intelligently streaming video content to a variety of consumer devices and storing and managing content in the network. Our streaming video and storage products and services are deployed by service providers to support consumer-facing video services including live broadcast video, video-on-demand and time-shifted video applications such as cloud-based digital video recording. In fiscal year 2016, we introduced Aquari™, our new unified scale-out storage solutions product to our content delivery customers.

Our real-time solutions consist of real-time Linux ® operating system versions, development and performance optimization tools, simulation software and other system software combined, in many cases, with computer platforms and services. These real-time products are sold to a wide variety of companies seeking high performance, real-time computer solutions in the defense, aerospace, financial and automotive markets around the world.

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared by the Company pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles of the United States of America ("U.S. GAAP") have been condensed or omitted pursuant to applicable rules and regulations. In the opinion of management, all adjustments of a normal recurring nature which were considered necessary for fair presentation have been included. The year-end condensed consolidated balance sheet data as of June 30, 2016 was derived from our audited consolidated financial statements but does not include all disclosures required by U.S. GAAP. The results of operations for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2017 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the entire year. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016 filed with the SEC on August 30, 2016.

There have been no changes to our Significant Accounting Policies as disclosed in Note 2 of the consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2016. The results reported in these condensed consolidated financial statements should not be regarded as necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for the entire year.

Smaller Reporting Company

We meet the SEC's definition of a "Smaller Reporting Company," and therefore qualify for the SEC's reduced disclosure requirements for smaller reporting companies.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Recently Adopted Accounting Guidance

In April 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued ASU No. 2015-05, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other – Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40) ("ASU 2015-05"). The pronouncement was issued to provide guidance concerning accounting for fees in a cloud computing arrangement. The pronouncement was effective for us on July 1, 2016, and we adopted the guidance prospectively. The adoption of ASU 2015-05 did not have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Recent Accounting Guidance Not Yet Adopted

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) ("ASU 2014-09"), as part of its ongoing efforts to assist in the convergence of U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards, the FASB issued a new standard related to revenue recognition. Under ASU 2014-09, recognition of revenue occurs when a customer obtains control of promised goods or services in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services. In addition, the standard requires disclosure of the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) : Deferral of the Effective Date and deferred the original effective date of ASU 2014-09 by one year. As a result, ASU 2014-09 will be effective for us beginning July 1, 2018. Early adoption is not permitted. Additionally, in March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net ) ("ASU  2016-08"); in April 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-10, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing ("ASU 2016-10"); and in May 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-12, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients ("ASU 2016-12"), all of which provide additional clarification on certain topics addressed in ASU 2014-09. ASU 2016-08, ASU 2016-10 and ASU 2016-12 follow the same implementation guidelines as ASU 2014-09 and ASU 2015-14. We anticipate that ASU 2014-09 and its related standards may have a material impact, and we are currently evaluating the impact these standards will have on our consolidated financial statements.

In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements – Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity's Ability to Continue as a Going Concern ("ASU 2014-15"), which provides guidance on determining when and how to disclose going concern uncertainties in the financial statements. ASU 2014-15 requires management to perform interim period and annual assessments of an entity's ability to continue as a going concern within one year of the date the financial statements are issued. An entity must provide certain disclosures if "conditions or events raise substantial doubt about the entity's ability to continue as a going concern." ASU 2014-15 applies to all entities and is effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016, and interim periods thereafter, with early adoption permitted. We do not expect ASU 2014-15 to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements or disclosures.

In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-11, Inventory (Topic 330): Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory ("ASU 2015-11"). This amendment requires that an entity measure its inventory at the "lower of cost and net realizable value." Net realizable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal and transportation. Current literature requires measurement of inventory at "lower of cost or market." Market could be replacement cost, net realizable value, or net realizable value less an approximate normal profit margin. ASU 2015-11 applies to all entities and is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods thereafter, with early adoption permitted. We do not expect ASU 2015-11 to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements or disclosures.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) ("ASU 2016-02"). ASU 2016-02 requires a lessee to recognize a lease liability for the obligation to make lease payments and a right-to-use asset for the right to use the underlying asset for the lease term. ASU 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the effect that ASU 2016-02 will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting ("ASU 2016-09"). ASU 2016-09 provides for simplification of certain aspects of employee share-based payment accounting including income taxes, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-09 is effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. We do not expect ASU 2016-09 to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements or disclosures.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Clarification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments ("ASU 2016-15"), which eliminates the diversity in practice related to the classification of certain cash receipts and payments in the statement of cash flows, by adding or clarifying guidance on eight specific cash flow issues. ASU 2016-15 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. The amendments in this update should be applied retrospectively to all periods presented, unless deemed impracticable, in which case, prospective application is permitted. We do not expect ASU 2016-15 to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements or disclosures.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01 - Business Combinations (Topic 805) ("ASU 2017-01"), which clarifies the definition of a business. For accounting and financial reporting purposes, businesses are generally comprised of three elements; inputs, processes, and outputs. Integrated sets of assets and activities capable of providing these three elements may not always be considered a business, and the lack of one of the three elements does not always disqualify the set from being a business. The issuance of ASU 2017-01 provides a clarifying screen to determine when a set of assets and activities is not a business. Primarily, the screen requires that when substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or group of similar identifiable assets, the set is not a business. The amendments contained in ASU 2017-01 are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and may be early adopted for certain transactions that have occurred before the effective date, but only when the underlying transaction has not been reported in the financial statements that have been issued or made available for issuance. We do not expect ASU 2017-01 to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements or disclosures.

In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-07, Compensation - Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost ("ASU 2017-07") which requires the service cost component of the net periodic benefit cost to be presented in the same income statement line items as other employee compensation costs arising from services rendered during the period. In addition, only the service cost component will be eligible for capitalization. Other components will be presented separately from the line items that include the service cost and outside of any subtotal of operating income, if one is presented. ASU 2017-07 is effective annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. The guidance on the presentation of the components of net periodic benefit cost requires retrospective application. The guidance limiting the capitalization of net periodic benefit cost requires prospective application. We do not expect ASU 2017-07 to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements or disclosures.

Basic net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each year. Diluted net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares including dilutive common share equivalents. Under the treasury stock method, incremental shares representing the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the dilutive potential common shares had been issued are included in the computation. Common share equivalents of 238,696 and 207,586 for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and 250,441 and 86,359 for the nine months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, were excluded from the calculation as their effect was anti-dilutive.

The following table presents a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of basic and diluted net income per share for the periods indicated:

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly fashion between market participants at the measurement date. When determining the fair value measurements for assets and liabilities required or permitted to be either recorded or disclosed at fair value, we consider the most advantageous market in which it would transact and assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability.

The Accounting Standards Codification requires certain disclosures around fair value and establishes a fair value hierarchy for valuation inputs. The hierarchy prioritizes the inputs into three levels based on the extent to which inputs used in measuring fair value are observable in the market. Each fair value measurement is reported in one of the three levels which are determined by the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. These levels are:

Our investment portfolio consists of money market funds, U.S. Treasury bills and commercial paper. Our investment portfolio has an average maturity of three months or less and no investments within the portfolio have an original maturity of one year or more. All highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less when purchased are considered to be cash equivalents. All cash equivalents are carried at cost less any unamortized premium or discount, which approximates fair value. All investments with original maturities of more than three months are classified as short-term investments. Our marketable securities are classified as available-for-sale and are reported at fair value with unrealized gains and losses, net of tax, reported in stockholders' equity as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income or loss. Interest on securities is recorded in interest income. Any realized gains or losses would be shown in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations in other income or expense. We provide fair value measurements disclosures of our available-for-sale securities in accordance with one of the three levels of fair value measurement.

Our financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2017 are as follows:

Our financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2016 are as follows:

The following is a summary of available-for-sale securities as of March 31, 2017:

Components of Provision (Benefit) for Income Taxes

The domestic and foreign components of income (loss) before the provision (benefit) for income taxes are as follows:

We recorded income tax expense for our domestic and foreign subsidiaries of $142 and an income tax benefit of $442 during the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and an income tax expense of $373 and an income tax benefit of $604 during the nine months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The components of the provision (benefit) for income taxes are as follows:

For the three and nine months ended March 31, 2017, the domestic tax expense is higher than the prior year due to the full valuation allowance that is now being applied to any tax benefit generated from operating losses. The domestic expense is primarily attributable to interest and penalties on uncertain tax positions and minimum state taxes in a number of jurisdictions for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2017. The foreign tax expense is lower than the prior year primarily due to lower income in Japan and a reduction in the statutory tax rate in Japan for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2017, compared to the same periods from the prior year.

Net Operating Losses

As of June 30, 2016, we had U.S. federal net operating loss carryforwards ("NOLs") of approximately $89,957 for income tax purposes, of which none expire in fiscal year 2017, and the remainder expire at various dates through fiscal year 2035. We recently completed an evaluation of the potential effect of Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code (the "Code") on our ability to utilize these net operating losses. The study concluded that we have not had an ownership change for the period from July 22, 1993 to June 30, 2016. If we experience an ownership change as defined in Section 382 of the Code, our ability to use these NOLs will be substantially limited, which could therefore significantly impair the value of that asset. On March 1, 2016, we adopted a Tax Asset Preservation Plan ("TAPP") in order to protect the value of our NOLs. At our 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on October 26, 2016, our stockholders adopted a formal amendment to our certificate of incorporation for the same purpose. The TAPP terminated in accordance with its terms on November 3, 2016 concurrent with the effectiveness of the amendment to our certificate of incorporation.

As of June 30, 2016, we had state NOLs of $51,093 and foreign NOLs of $28,208. The state NOLs expire between fiscal year 2017 and fiscal year 2035. The foreign NOLs expire according to the rules of each country. Currently, none of the jurisdictions in which the Company has foreign NOLs are subject to expiration due to indefinite carryforward periods.

Valuation Allowance

Realization of our deferred tax assets is dependent primarily on the generation of future taxable income. In reviewing the need for a valuation allowance, we consider our historical and future projected operations along with other positive and negative evidence in assessing if sufficient future taxable income will be generated to use the existing deferred tax assets. The following summarizes our conclusions on the need for a valuation allowance in each jurisdiction as of March 31, 2017:

U.S. – As of June 30, 2016, we believed the weight of negative evidence was greater than the existing positive evidence and concluded that it was more-likely-than-not that we would be unable to realize our U.S. net deferred tax assets. As a result, a full valuation allowance was established on our U.S. net deferred tax assets which continue to remain in place as of March 31, 2017. For future periods in which we remain in a full valuation allowance position, we would expect our U.S. tax provision expense to be limited to the alternative minimum tax (if applicable) for federal tax purposes, which approximates 2% of earnings before income taxes, state taxes in various jurisdictions, and interest and penalties on our uncertain tax positions.

U.K. - During our fiscal year 2014, a change in U.K. tax law relative to treatment of research and development expenses allowed us to release $214 of valuation allowances against deferred tax assets that we believe are now realizable as a result of the current period tax law change. We believe that in light of this law change, we will now generate sufficient taxable income to fully utilize our net deferred tax assets in the U.K.

Japan - Our subsidiary in Japan has a long history of profitable operations, and we continue to project profitability in Japan for the foreseeable future. Therefore, we continue to believe that we will fully realize the net deferred tax assets in Japan, and no valuation allowance is needed.

Other Foreign Jurisdictions - We also evaluated the need for a continued full valuation allowance against our foreign deferred tax assets in other jurisdictions. We concluded that a full valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets for other foreign jurisdictions was warranted due to, among other reasons, (i) the realized cumulative accounting losses, (ii) our long history of taxable losses and (iii) our uncertainty with respect to generating future taxable income in the near term given our recently completed projections and other inherent uncertainties in our business.

We are beginning to show greater profitability in our German operations. While we continue to have cumulative losses over a 12-quarter period, it is possible that we could become cumulatively profitable over a 12-quarter period in the next 12 to 24 months should profitable operations continue. We will continue to monitor results in Germany to determine if a change in our valuation allowance conclusion is needed.

Each quarter, we assess the total weight of positive and negative evidence and evaluate whether release of all or any portion of the valuation allowance is appropriate. Should we come to the conclusion that a release of our valuation allowances is required, or that additional valuation allowance is required, there could be a significant increase or decrease in net income and earnings per share in the period of release, or the additional valuation allowance, due to the impact on the tax rate.

Unrecognized Tax Benefits

The Company has evaluated its unrecognized tax benefits and determined that there has not been a material change in the amount of such benefits for the three or nine months ended March 31, 2017.

Research and Development Tax Credits

During the three months ended March 31, 2017, the Company applied for both a U.S. federal and state of Georgia research and development tax credit for its fiscal year ending June 30, 2016 in the amounts of $719 and $675, respectively. For U.S. federal tax purposes, the credit cannot be utilized immediately but will carryforward for a period of 20 years. As we do not expect to be able to realize the benefit of the U.S. federal tax credit carryforward before its expiration, we maintain a full valuation allowance on this item. For the state of Georgia tax credit, we have recorded the credit within other current assets with an offset in accrued expenses in our consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2017. As future payroll tax withholdings of our Georgia-based employees become due, we are able to offset the withholding amount dollar-for-dollar against the credit. As a result, as the credit is claimed, we will (1) reduce other current assets and offset the payroll tax liability and (2) reduce accrued expenses and recognize a reduction of operating expenses.

As of March 31, 2017, we had share-based compensation plans which are described in Note 10 of the consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2016. We recognize stock compensation expense over the requisite service period of the individual grantees, which generally equals the vesting period. As of March 31, 2017, we had 55,138 stock options outstanding and 589,395 restricted shares outstanding. During the nine months ended March 31, 2017, no stock options were granted or exercised; however, 29,281 stock options were cancelled. We recorded share-based compensation related to the issuance of restricted stock to employees and board members as follows:

A summary of the activity of our time-based, service condition restricted shares during the nine months ended March 31, 2017, is presented below:

In conjunction with the resignation of one of our directors (See Note 17 – Commitments and Contingencies – Board Representation and Standstill Agreement), we accelerated the vesting of 5,400 shares of restricted stock. This acceleration of vesting resulted in stock compensation expense of $27 during the nine months ended March 31, 2017.

During the nine months ended March 31, 2017, we issued 50,000 performance-based restricted shares ("PSAs") to senior and executive management. The PSAs issued in fiscal year 2016 will be released only if certain company financial performance criteria are achieved over a cumulative three-year performance period. The weighted-average grant date fair value per share for these PSAs was established on the date the cumulative three-year performance criteria was approved by our Board of Directors ("Board").

During the nine months ended March 31, 2017, 5,387 previously granted performance-based restricted shares were forfeited due to a failure to meet performance goals associated with our fiscal year 2016 financial results. A summary of the activity of our performance-based restricted shares during the three months ended March 31, 2017, is presented below:

Defined Contribution Plans

We maintain a retirement savings plan available to U.S. employees that qualifies as a defined contribution plan under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. We match 50% of the first 5% of the participants' compensation invested by the employee in the 401(k) plan. We made matching contributions of $117 and $120 during the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and $338 and $332 during the nine months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

We also maintain a defined contribution plan (the "Stakeholder Plan") for our U.K. based employees. The Stakeholder Plan provides for discretionary matching contributions of between 4% and 7% of the employee's salary. We contributed $7 and $9 to the Stakeholder Plan for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and $28 and $35 to the Stakeholder Plan for the nine months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Defined Benefit Plans

The following table provides the components of net periodic pension cost of our German defined benefit pension plans recognized in earnings for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016:

We contributed $3 and $4 to our German defined benefit pension plans for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and $10 and $12 to for the nine months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. We expect to make additional, similar, quarterly contributions during the remaining quarters of our fiscal year 2017.

Inventories consist of the following:

Property and equipment consists of the following:

Depreciation expense for property and equipment was $418 and $405 for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and $1,332 and $1,228 for the nine months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Intangible assets, net of $137 and $143 at March 31, 2017 and June 30, 2016, respectively, consist of patents and an internet domain name (www.concurrent.com). The domain name is considered an indefinite lived intangible asset and is not amortizable. Intangible assets are included in other long-term assets, net in our consolidated balance sheets.

Amortization expense related to finite-lived intangible assets was $3 for each of the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 and $9 and $42 for the nine months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Accounts payable and accrued expenses consist of the following:

On September 9, 2015, we sold the customer contracts and intellectual property related to our multi-screen video analytics product line for $3,500 pursuant to an Asset Purchase Agreement ("APA") dated August 31, 2015 with Verimatrix, Inc. ("Verimatrix"), a privately-held video revenue security company based in San Diego, California. The APA included customary terms and conditions, including provisions that require the Company to indemnify Verimatrix for certain losses that it incurs as a result of a breach by the Company of its representations and warranties in the APA and certain other matters. Proceeds from the sale were payable to the Company as follows: (1) a $2,750 payment to the Company in cash (received on September 10, 2015), (2) a $375 deferred payment (received in full on June 30, 2016) and (3) $375 placed in escrow (released and received in full on June 30, 2016). No amounts were held back pusuant to indemnification provisions in the APA.

The customer contracts and intellectual property sold had a net book value of $188 (which was included in intangible assets, net in our consolidated balance sheet). As a result of the sale, we also included $1,016 (net liability, consisting primarily of unearned deferred revenue) of related assets and liabilities not sold or transferred in the transaction in the calculation of the recorded gain. Additionally, through September 30, 2015, we incurred $212 in legal, accounting and other expenses that would not have been incurred otherwise. As a result, we recorded a net gain of $4,116 in our consolidated statement of operations for the nine months ended March 31, 2016.

On July 1, 2015, we had adopted ASU No. 2014-08, Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant, and Equipment (Topic 360): Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity ("ASU 2014-08"). As a result, we evaluated the sale of our multi-screen video analytics product line in light of this new standard. We concluded that the sale of our multi-screen video analytics product line in September 2015 was not a "material shift" (as defined in ASU 2014-08) for us and therefore, was not considered a discontinued operation. The operating profit related to the multi-screen video analytics product line for the nine months ended March 31, 2016 (through the date of sale) was $179.

Reportable Operating Segments

The "management approach" has been used to present the following segment information. This approach is based upon the way the management organizes segments within the Company for making operating decisions and assessing performance. Financial information is reported on the basis that it is used internally by the CODM for evaluating segment performance and deciding how to allocate resources to segments. The Company's chief executive officer has been identified as the CODM.

Effective July 1, 2016, we changed the way our CODM views our operating results by providing more discrete segment financial information. As a result, our reportable operating segments now consist of Content Delivery and Real-Time.

These operating segments were determined based on the nature of the products and services offered and the nature and industry of customers serviced. The measures that are used to assess the reportable segment's operating performance are sales and operating income. Operating income for reportable segments is defined as gross margin less selling and marketing, research and development expenses, and certain general and administrative expenses. Any transactions between operating segments are eliminated in consolidation.

Additionally, corporate and unallocated costs include certain corporate sales and marketing and corporate general and administrative expenses (executive, finance, legal, risk management and human resources). These expenses are not included in the measure of segment operating income but are included in the reconciliation to income (loss) before income taxes.

Segment assets may be either directly attributable or allocated to the operating segment depending on their nature. However, segment assets are not regularly reviewed by the CODM for evaluating performance or allocating resources and therefore, are not presented.

The table below represents information about the Company's reportable operating segments for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016:

Geographic Information

We attribute revenues to individual countries and geographic areas based upon location of our customers. A summary of our revenue by geographic area is as follows:

The following table summarizes revenues by significant customer where such revenue accounted for 10% or more of total revenues for any one of the indicated periods:

We assess credit risk through ongoing credit evaluations of customers' financial condition, and collateral is generally not required. The following summarizes accounts receivable by significant customers for whom accounts receivable were 10% or more of total accounts receivables for any one of the indicated periods:

The following summarizes purchases from significant vendors where such purchases accounted for 10% or more of total purchases for any one of the indicated periods:

During the nine months ended March 31, 2017, our Board approved quarterly cash dividends as follows:

As of March 31, 2017, we recorded $367 of dividends payable to holders of restricted common stock who held restricted shares at the time of the dividend record dates and still hold those restricted shares as of March 31, 2017. Such dividends will be paid when the restrictions on a holder's restricted common shares lapse. This dividend payable is divided between current payable and non-current payable in the amounts of $102 and $265, respectively, based upon the expected vesting date of the underlying shares. These holders of restricted common stock will receive the dividend payments as long as they remain eligible at the vesting date of the shares. For the nine months ended March 31, 2017, $66 of dividends payable were forfeited and returned to capital for restricted shares that were forfeited prior to meeting vesting requirements. Because the participants are not entitled to these dividends unless they complete the requisite service period for the shares to vest, they are not "participating dividends" as defined under ASC Topic 260-10, Earnings per Share .

The following table summarizes the changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) by component, net of taxes, for the nine months ended March 31, 2017:

From time to time, we are involved in litigation incidental to the conduct of our business. We believe that such pending litigation will not have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition.

We enter into agreements in the ordinary course of business with customers that often require us to defend and/or indemnify the customer against intellectual property infringement claims brought by a third-party with respect to our products. For example, we were notified that certain of our customers have settled with or been sued by the following companies, in the noted jurisdictions, regarding the listed patents:

We continue to review our potential obligations under our indemnification agreements with these customers and the indemnity obligations to these customers from other vendors that also provided systems and services to these customers. From time to time, we also indemnify customers and business partners for damages, losses and liabilities they may suffer or incur relating to personal injury, personal property damage, product liability, and environmental claims relating to the use of our products and services or resulting from our acts or omissions, our employees, authorized agents or subcontractors. We have not accrued any material liabilities related to such indemnifications in our financial statements and do not expect any other material costs as a result of such obligations. The maximum potential amount of future payments that we could be required to make is unlimited, and we are unable to estimate any possible loss or range of possible loss.

Severance Arrangements

Pursuant to the terms of the employment agreements with our executive officers and certain other employees, employment may be terminated by either the respective executive officer or us at any time. In the event the employee voluntarily resigns (except as described below) or is terminated for cause, compensation under the employment agreement will end. In the event an agreement is terminated by us without cause or in certain circumstances constructively by us, the terminated employee will receive severance compensation for a period from 6 to 12 months, depending on the officer, in an annualized amount equal to the respective employee's base salary then in effect. In the event our CEO resigns within three months of a change in control or the CEO's agreement is terminated by us within one year of a change of control other than for due cause, disability or non-renewal by our CEO, our CEO will be entitled to severance compensation multiplied by two, as well as incremental medical costs. Additionally, if terminated, our CEO and CFO may be entitled to bonuses during the severance period. At March 31, 2017, the maximum contingent liability under these agreements is $2,090. Our employment agreements with certain of our employees contain certain offset provisions, as defined in their respective agreements.

Board Representation and Standstill Agreement

As previously disclosed in our Form 8-K filed on August 29, 2016, the Company entered into a Board Representation and Standstill Agreement (the "Standstill Agreement") with an investor and its affiliated party. Pursuant to the terms of the Standstill Agreement, in consideration for certain restrictions applicable to the investor, our Board, among other things (1) agreed to appoint a nominee of the investor to serve on the Company's Board until the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company (the nominee was subsequently elected as a director of the Company at the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on October 26, 2016) and (2) agreed to pay up to $235 for fees and expenses incurred by the investor and its affiliated party in connection with the Standstill Agreement.

Additionally, pursuant to the Standstill Agreement, effective as of August 29, 2016, one of our directors tendered his resignation from the Board and all Board committees thereof. In connection with this resignation, the Company agreed to accelerate the vesting of 5,400 shares of restricted stock held by this director and to make a one-time payment to him of $48 (including $2 of accrued dividends released upon the acceleration of the vesting of the restricted stock).

Sale of Real-Time business

On May 15, 2017, the Company completed the sale and transfer of certain assets and certain liabilities primarily related to our Real-Time business segment pursuant to an Asset Purchase Agreement (the "RT APA") dated as of May 15, 2017 with Real Time, Inc. (the "Purchaser"), an investment company owned by Battery Ventures, a private-equity firm, for $35 million less agreed upon adjustments for working capital. Pursuant to the terms of the RT APA, the Company will sell and transfer certain respective equity interests in one of its subsidiaries, which constitutes the European operations of the Real-Time business, upon receipt of French regulatory approval. The RT APA includes customary terms and conditions, including provisions that require the Company to indemnify the Purchaser for certain losses that it incurs as a result of a breach by the Company of its representations and warranties in the RT APA and certain other matters.

Gross proceeds from the sale are payable to the Company as follows: (1) a $30.2 million payment to the Company in cash received on May 15, 2017 (subject to an adjustment for estimated working capital as defined in the RT APA), (2) a $2.8 million payment in cash to the Company concurrently with the transfer of the European operations of the Real-Time business to the Purchaser and (3) $2.0 million placed in escrow as security for certain purchase price adjustments and for the Company's indemnification obligations to the Purchaser under the RT APA which amount will be released to the Company on or before May 15, 2018 (less any portion of the escrow used to make indemnification or purchase price adjustment payments to the Purchaser).

The RT APA contains customary representations and warranties of each of the parties. The RT APA contains indemnification rights in favor of the Company following closing for (i) breaches of any of the representations or warranties by the Purchaser including, but not limited to, breaches related to organization, authorization, and governmental authorization, (ii) breaches of the covenants or agreements of the Purchaser in the RT APA, and (iii) liabilities which the Purchaser agrees to assume in the RT APA.

In conjunction with the RT APA, the Company and the Purchaser entered into a Transition Services Agreement (the "TSA"). Under the TSA, the Company has agreed to provide various services to the Purchaser on a fee-for-service basis for a term of six months as of the date of the TSA, subject to a renewal term of up to eighteen months. Additionally, the Company and the Purchaser entered into a License and Support Agreement (the "LSA"). Under the LSA, the Purchaser has agreed to provide a royalty-free, non-exclusive license to certain software products that are purchased assets under the RT APA to the Company for a term of three years as of the date of the LSA.

In accordance with ASC 360-10, Property, Plant and Equipment, the sale of the Real-Time business did not meet the "held-for-sale" criteria in the standard at March 31, 2017 and therefore, is not reported as "held-for-sale" in our condensed consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2017. Additionally, because the sale also did not meet the guidelines under ASU 2014-08 for reporting as a discontinued operation, the Real-Time business is not reflected as a discontinued operation in our condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three months and nine months ended March 31, 2017 but will be reflected as a discontinued operation beginning with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2017.

Other than the sale of our Real-Time business described above, we have evaluated subsequent events through the date these financial statements were issued and determined that there were no other material subsequent events that require recognition or additional disclosure in our consolidated financial statements.

The following Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations should be read in conjunction with the condensed consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto which appear elsewhere herein. Except for the historical financial information, many of the matters discussed in this Item 2 may be considered "forward-looking" statements that reflect our plans, estimates and beliefs. Actual results could differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed in the section below entitled "Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements," elsewhere herein and in other filings made with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), including our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2016.

References herein to "Concurrent," the "Company," "we," "our" or "us" refer to Concurrent Computer Corporation and its subsidiaries unless the context specifically indicates otherwise.

Discussions concerning revenues in the context of geographic areas are based upon the location of our customers.

References to our Form 10-K made throughout this document refer to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016 as filed with the SEC on August 30, 2016.

Overview

We provide software, hardware and professional services for the content delivery market, storage solutions market and the high-performance, real-time market. Effective July 1, 2016, we changed the way our chief operating decision maker views our operating results by providing more discrete segment financial information. As a result, our reportable operating segments now consist of Content Delivery and Real-Time. Our Content Delivery segment includes both our content delivery solutions and Aquari storage solutions product lines.

Our content delivery solutions consist of software, hardware and services for intelligently streaming video content to a variety of consumer devices and storing and managing content in the network. Our streaming video and storage products and services are deployed by service providers to support consumer-facing video services including live broadcast video, video-on-demand and time-shifted video applications such as cloud-based digital video recording. In fiscal year 2016, we introduced Aquari, our unified scale-out storage solutions product to our content delivery and other third-party customers. In September 2015, we sold our multi-screen video analytics product line for collecting and analyzing data related to content delivery applications (see Note 12 – Sale of Product Line to the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements) .

Our real-time solutions consist of real-time Linux operating system versions, development and performance optimization tools, simulation software and other system software combined, in many cases, with computer platforms and services. These real-time products are sold to a wide variety of companies seeking high-performance, real-time computer solutions in the defense, aerospace, financial and automotive markets around the world.

On May 15, 2017, we announced the sale of our Real-Time business segment (see Note 18 – Subsequent Events to the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements). Because this transaction did not qualify as a discontinued operation as of March 31, 2017, the following discussions continue to include the results of this business segment as a continuing operation.

Results of Operations for the Three months ended March 31, 2017 Compared to the Three months ended March 31, 2016

Revenue

The following table sets forth our revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 for each of our operating segments as well as comparative data showing increases and decreases between periods (dollars in thousands):

An analysis of revenue by operating segment is described below.

Content Delivery

Content delivery product revenue decreased by $1.3 million, or 22.9%, for the three months ended March 31, 2017 compared to the prior year period. Additionally, the three months ended March 31, 2017 includes $1.0 million of revenue from our Aquari storage product solution compared to $1.3 million in the same period last year. The period-over-period decrease in content delivery product revenue resulted from the following:

Fluctuation in content delivery product revenue is often due to the fact that we have a small number of customers making periodic large purchases that account for a significant percentage of revenue. Our content delivery product revenue is also subject to customers' capital spending cycles, including product upgrade and expansion patterns, and may be impacted in the future by consolidation of the industry in which our customers operate.

Content delivery services revenue increased by $0.7 million, or 29.2%, for the three months ended March 31, 2017 compared to the prior year. The increase period-over-period is primarily due to an increase in the volume of out-of-warranty revenue.

Real-Time

Real-time product revenue was flat for the three months ended March 31, 2017 compared to the prior year period. However, changes in real-time product revenue across regions are as follows:

Revenue from defense contractors and the government tend to vary by quarter and year, and are dependent upon government initiatives and funding availability.

Real-time service revenue increased by $0.2 million, or 8.6%, for the three months ended March 31, 2017 compared to the prior year period. The increase is due to an increase in annual maintenance revenue in all regions.

Gross Margin

The following tables set forth our gross margins and gross margin percentage of revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 for each of our operating segments as well as comparative data showing increases and decreases between periods (dollars in thousands):

Consolidated gross margin was $8.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017, an increase of $0.5 million, or 6.8%, from $8.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2016. Consolidated gross margin percentage improved to 56.8% for the three months ended March 31, 2017 from 51.5% for the three months ended March 31, 2016. An analysis by operating segment is described below.

Content Delivery

Segment gross margin dollars were $4.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017, an increase of $0.2 million, or 6.7%, from $3.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2016. The increase in gross margin dollars is due to an increase in content delivery services revenue partially offset by a decrease in content delivery product revenue. The improvement in gross margin percentage is primarily due to (1) higher gross margin on certain content delivery product sales to our largest customer in Japan, (2) improved gross margins on the sales of our Aquari storage product solution and (3) a favorable service mix due to an increase in the volume of out-of-warranty revenue.

Real-Time

Segment gross margin dollars were $4.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017, an increase of $0.3 million, or 7.0%, from $4.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2016. The increase in gross margin dollars is a primarily due to the increase in both real-time product and service revenue. The increase in gross margin percentage is primarily due a favorable mix of product sales, including higher software-only sales period-over-period.

Segment Operating Expenses

Segment operating expenses include selling and marketing, research and development expenses, and certain general and administrative expenses. The following tables set forth our segment operating expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 for each of our operating segments as well as comparative data showing increases and decreases between periods (dollars in thousands):

Sales and Marketing - An analysis of sales and marketing expenses by operating segment is described below.

Content Delivery

Segment sales and marketing expenses were $2.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017, a decrease of $0.1 million, or 3.9%, from $2.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2016. This period-over-period decrease primarily resulted from (1) a $0.4 million decrease in sales personnel and related costs including commissions and share-based compensation, partially offset by (2) a $0.3 million increase in severance costs due to changes in segment sales leadership.

Real-Time

Segment sales and marketing expenses were $1.4 million for each of the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016.

Research and Development - An analysis of research and development expenses by operating segment is described below.

Content Delivery

Segment research and development expenses were $2.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017, a decrease of $0.5 million, or 20.6%, from $2.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2016. The period-over-period decrease primarily resulted from a $0.5 million decrease due to a reduction of headcount in the U.S. within our development teams.

Real-Time

Segment research and development expenses were $1.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017, an increase of $0.1 million, or 12.1%, from $0.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2016. The period-over-period increase primarily resulted from an increase in personnel and related costs due to an increase in headcount.

Segment Operating Income (Loss)

Segment operating income (loss) is defined as gross margin less selling and marketing, research and development expenses, and certain general and administrative expenses. The following tables set forth our segment operating income (loss) for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 for each of our operating segments as well as comparative data showing increases and decreases between periods (dollars in thousands):

An analysis of operating income (loss) by operating segment is described below.

Content Delivery

The period-over-period increase primarily resulted from higher services revenues and related gross margin dollars and the reduction in research and development costs, as described above.

Real-Time

The period-over-period increase primarily resulted from higher product and services revenues and related gross margin dollars, as described above.

Corporate and Unallocated Costs

Corporate and unallocated costs include certain corporate sales and marketing and corporate general and administrative expenses (executive, finance, legal, risk management and human resources). These expenses are not included in the measure of segment operating income but are included in the reconciliation to income (loss) before income taxes. The following tables set forth our corporate and unallocated costs for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 as well as comparative data showing increases and decreases between periods (dollars in thousands):

Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing expenses decreased approximately $0.2 million, or 37.3%, to $0.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017 from $0.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2016. This decrease was primarily due to (1) a $0.1 million decrease in personnel and related costs and (2) a $0.1 million decrease in recruiting costs.

General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses increased approximately $0.8 million, or 41.2%, to $2.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017 from $2.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2016. This increase was primarily due to (1) a $1.1 million increase in legal, accounting and other professional fees primarily associated with our disposition of our Real-Time business segment consummated in May 2017, partially offset by (2) a $0.1 decrease in personnel and related costs, (3) a $0.1 million decrease in recruiting costs and (4) $0.1 million in professional fees associated with our Tax Asset Preservation Plan incurred in the prior year period.

Other

Other Income, net . During the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, we recognized less than $0.1 million and $0.4 million in net realized currency translation gains, respectively. These gains and losses result from the impact of the changes in value of the British pound, euro and Japanese yen, relative to the U.S. dollar, on foreign currency transactions related to short-term intercompany accounts which are settled in the normal course of business by our European and Japanese subsidiaries for which the British pound, euro and Japanese yen are the functional currencies.

Provision (Benefit) for Income Taxes. We recorded consolidated income tax expense of $0.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017 compared to $0.4 million consolidated income tax benefit for the three months ended March 31, 2016. For the three months ended March 31, 2017, the domestic tax expense is higher than the prior year due to the full valuation allowance that is now being applied to any tax benefit generated from operating losses in the U.S. The domestic expense is primarily attributable to interest and penalties on uncertain tax positions and minimum state taxes in a number of jurisdictions for the three months ended March 31, 2017. The foreign tax expense is lower than the prior year primarily due to lower income in Japan and a reduction in the statutory tax rate in Japan for the three months ended March 31, 2017, compared to the same period from the prior year.

In jurisdictions other than the U.K. and Japan, we either generate net operating losses or occasionally utilize some of the net operating loss carryforward amounts. However, because of the cumulative accounting losses in those jurisdictions, we maintain a full valuation allowance on those losses. This results in no net income tax provision impact in those jurisdictions as of March 31, 2017.

Net Loss. Our consolidated net loss for the three months ended March 31, 2017 was $1.7 million, or a $0.18 loss per basic and diluted share, compared to a consolidated net loss for the three months ended March 31, 2016 of $1.2 million, or $0.13 loss per basic and diluted share.

Results of Operations for the Nine months ended March 31, 2017 Compared to the Nine months ended March 31, 2016

Revenue

The following table sets forth our revenue for the nine months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 for each of our operating segments as well as comparative data showing increases and decreases between periods (dollars in thousands):