Washington, DC  20549

For the quarterly period ended December 31, 2015

OR

Commission File Number 001-07172

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

516-466-3100

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes  ý   No  o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Date File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulations S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes  ý   No  o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See definition of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "small reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.  (Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes  o   No  ý

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of stock, as of the latest practicable date.

14,242,106 Shares of Beneficial Interest,

$3 par value, outstanding on February 5, 2016

Part I ‑ FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

BRT REALTY TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

BRT REALTY TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

BRT REALTY TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

(Unaudited)

(Dollars in thousands)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

BRT REALTY TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF EQUITY

Three Months Ended December 31, 2015

(Unaudited)

(Dollars in thousands, except share data)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

BRT REALTY TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

BRT REALTY TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2015

Note 1 – Organization and Background

BRT Realty Trust ("BRT" or the "Trust") is a business trust organized in Massachusetts. BRT owns, operates and develops (i) multi‑family properties and (ii) commercial and mixed-use real estate assets.

The multi‑family properties are generally acquired with venture partners in transactions in which the Trust contributes 80% of the equity. At December 31, 2015, the Trust owns 30 multi-family properties with 8,807 units located in 11 states.

BRT conducts its operations to qualify as a real estate investment trust, or REIT, for federal income tax purposes.

Note 2 – Basis of Preparation

The accompanying interim unaudited consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2015 , and for the three months ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 , reflect all normal recurring adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the results for such interim periods. The results of operations for the three months ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 , are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full year. The consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2015 , has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date but does not include all the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States ("GAAP") for complete financial statements.

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts and operations of BRT Realty Trust, its wholly owned subsidiaries, and its majority owned or controlled real estate entities and its interests in variable interest entities in which the Trust is determined to be the primary beneficiary. Material intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.

RBH‑TRB Newark Holdings LLC, referred to herein as the Newark Joint Venture, was determined to be a variable interest entity ("VIE") because the total equity investment at risk is not sufficient to permit it to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support by its equity holders. It was determined that the Trust is the primary beneficiary of this joint venture because it has a controlling interest in that it has the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the entity's economic performance and it has the obligation to absorb losses of the entity and the right to receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the VIE.

The Trust's consolidated joint ventures that own multi‑family properties, other than the joint venture which owns a multi-family property in Kennesaw, GA, were determined to be VIE's because the voting rights of some equity investors are not proportional to their obligations to absorb the expected losses of the entity and their right to receive the expected residual returns. In addition, substantially all of the entity's activities either involve or are conducted on behalf of an investor that has disproportionately fewer voting rights. It was determined that the Trust is the primary beneficiary of these joint ventures because it has a controlling interest in that it has the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the entity's economic performance and it has the obligation to absorb losses of the entity and the right to receive benefits that could potentially be significant to the VIE.

The joint venture that owns the Kennesaw, GA property was determined not to be a VIE but is consolidated because the Trust has a controlling financial interest in the entity due to its substantive participating rights.

The distributions to each joint venture partner are determined pursuant to the applicable operating agreement and may not be pro-rata to the equity interest each partner has in the applicable venture.     

The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Note 3 ‑ Equity

Common Share Dividend Distribution

During the quarter ended December 31, 2015 , the Trust did not declare a dividend on its shares.

Restricted Shares

The Trust's 2012 Incentive Plan, approved by its shareholders in March 2012, permits the Trust to grant stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares awards and any one or more of the foregoing, up to a maximum of 600,000 shares. In January 2016 , the Trust granted 141,050 shares of restricted stock pursuant to this plan. As of December 31, 2015 , 414,475 shares of unvested restricted stock are outstanding pursuant to this plan and 258,150 shares of unvested restricted stock are outstanding pursuant to the Trust's 2009 equity incentive plan (the "Prior Plan"). No additional awards may be granted under the Prior Plan. All restricted shares vest five years from the date of grant and under specified circumstances, including a change in control, may vest earlier. For accounting purposes, the restricted shares are not included in the outstanding shares shown on the consolidated balance sheets until they vest, but are included in the earnings per share computation. For the three months ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 , the Trust recorded $ 230,000 and $206,000 , respectively, of compensation expense related to the amortization of unearned compensation. At December 31, 2015 and September 30, 2014, $ 1,955,000 and $2,184,000 has been deferred as unearned compensation and will be charged to expense over the remaining vesting periods. The weighted average vesting period is 2.1 years.

Per Share Data

Basic earnings (loss) per share is determined by dividing net income (loss) applicable to common shareholders for the applicable period by the weighted average number of shares of beneficial interest outstanding during such period. Diluted earnings per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue shares of beneficial interest were exercised or converted into shares of beneficial interest or resulted in the issuance of shares of beneficial interest that share in the earnings of the Trust. Diluted earnings (loss) per share is determined by dividing net income (loss) applicable to common shareholders for the applicable period by the weighted average number of shares of beneficial interest outstanding during such period plus the dilutive effect of the Trust's unvested restricted stock using the treasury stock method.

Basic and diluted shares outstanding for the three months ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 , were 14,101,056 and 14,243,173 , respectively.

Note 4 ‑ Real Estate Properties

A summary of real estate properties owned including a multi-family property held for sale is as follows (dollars in thousands):

Note 5 ‑ Acquisitions

Set forth below is information for the quarter ended December 31, 2015 regarding the Trusts' purchase of multi-family properties. The Trust has a 65% interest in the Charleston, SC venture and it wholly owns the La Grange, GA property.

___________________________________________________

(a) This acquisition of 41.5 acres of land was purchased for development.

The Charleston, SC purchase was accounted for as an asset acquisition and the La Grange, GA purchase was accounted for as a business combination. The purchase price for the La Grange purchase was allocated to the acquired assets and assumed liabilities based on management's estimate of the fair value of these acquired assets and assumed liabilities at the dates of acquisition. The preliminary measurements of fair value reflected below are subject to change. The Trust expects to finalize the valuations and complete the purchase price allocations within one year from the date of the applicable acquisition.

The following table summarizes the preliminary allocations of the purchase prices of assets acquired and liabilities assumed during the three months ended December 31, 2015 (dollars in thousands):

Note 6 - Real Estate Property Held For Sale

At December 31, 2015, The Grove at Trinity Point property in Cordova, TN was held for sale. The property, which has a book value of $23,869,000 , is under contract for sale. The Trust estimates it will recognize a gain on the sale of the property of approximately $6,800,000 , of which approximately $2,700,000 will be allocated to the minority partner.

Note 7 - Restricted Cash

Restricted cash represents funds that are being held for specific purposes and are therefore not generally available for general corporate purposes. As reflected on the consolidated balance sheet: (i) "Restricted cash-Newark" represents funds that are held by third parties for the construction of residential/commercial buildings at the Newark Joint Venture's Teachers Village Project; and (ii) "Restricted cash-multi-family" represents funds that are held by or on behalf of the Trust specifically for capital improvements at multi-family properties.

Note 8 – Debt Obligations

Debt obligations consist of the following (dollars in thousands):

_____________________________________

(a) Excludes mortgages payable held for sale of $19,248

Mortgages Payable

During the three months ended December 31, 2015, the Trust purchased a multi-family property and incurred the following debt (dollars in thousands):

During the three months ended December 31, 2015 , the Trust obtained additional mortgage financing as set forth in the table below (dollars in thousands):

In the quarter ended December 31, 2015 , the Newark Joint Venture refinanced mortgage debt of $5,508,000 with a 6% interest rate and maturing in 2030 with new mortgage debt of $7,054,000 with a 5.75% interest rate and maturing in January 2022. The new debt was obtained in connection with a $2,746,000 New Markets Tax Credit transaction. See Note 9 "Deferred Income (New Markets Tax Credit Transaction)".

Junior Subordinated Notes

At December 31, 2015 and September 30, 2015 , the Trust's junior subordinated notes had an outstanding principal balance of $37,400,000 . The interest rates on the outstanding notes are set forth in the table below: 

The junior subordinated notes require interest only payments through maturity, at which time repayment of the outstanding principal and unpaid interest become due. Interest expense for each of the three months ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 was $458,000 . Amortization of the deferred costs, a component of interest expense, was $5,000 for each of the three months ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 .

Other borrowings

On December 11, 2015, the Trust borrowed $8,000,000 , on an unsecured basis, from Gould Investors L.P. , a related party. The note bears interest at 5.24% and matures on the earlier and to the extent of (i) May 10, 2016 and (ii) the receipt of proceeds from the sale of the Trust's equity interest in the Newark Joint Venture or the repayment of the Newark Joint Venture loan. At December 31, 2015, the principal amount of such loan, which is eliminated in consolidation, was $19,500,000 .

In the quarter ended December 31, 2015 , the Newark Joint Venture borrowed $6,001,000 pursuant to the EB-5 Immigrant Investor Program. These loans bear interest at a rate of 4.00% per annum and have stated terms of five years, subject to two one-year extension options.

Note 9 – Deferred Income (New Markets Tax Credit Transaction)

In connection with the Teachers Village project, on December 30, 2015, affiliates of US Bank contributed $2,746,000 on September 30, 2014, affiliates of JP Morgan Chase ("Chase") contributed $5,100,000 , and on September 12, 2012, and February 3, 2012, affiliates of Goldman Sachs (" Goldman") contributed $16,400,000 and $11,200,000 , respectively, to special purpose subsidiaries of the Newark Joint Venture and these subsidiaries

received the proceeds from the sale of New Markets Tax Credits ("NMTC") for which the project qualified. US Bank, Chase and Goldman are entitled to receive tax credits against their qualified investments in the project over seven years commencing as of the dates of their respective contributions. At the end of the seven years , the Newark Joint Venture subsidiaries have the option to acquire the special purpose entities for a nominal fee.

Included in deferred income on the Trust's consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2015 and September 30, 2015 are $33,736,000 and $30,990,000 , respectively, of the US Bank, Chase and Goldman contributions, which are net of fees of the NMTC transactions and Newark Joint Venture financing transactions. These amounts will be recognized into income when the obligations to comply with the requirements of the NMTC program as set forth in the applicable provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), are eliminated. The failure of the Newark Joint Venture to comply with the requirements of the NMTC program may result in the reversal of the tax credit benefits and the related obligation of the Newark Joint Venture to indemnify the beneficiaries of such credits. The tax credits are subject to recapture for a seven year period as provided in the Code.

Costs incurred in structuring these transactions are deferred and will be recognized as an expense based on the maturities of the various mortgage financings, including the debt financing obtained by the Newark Joint Venture contemporaneously with the NMTC transactions. At December 31, 2015 and September 30, 2015 , these costs totaled $9,800,000 and $9,700,000 , respectively, and are included in deferred costs on the consolidated balance sheets.

The Trust determined that the special purpose subsidiaries are VIE's. The VIE's ongoing activities, which include collecting and remitting interest and fees and NMTC compliance, were all considered in the design of the special purpose entities and are not anticipated to affect the economic performance during the life of the VIE's.

Management considered the obligation to deliver tax benefits, provide guarantees to Chase and Goldman and the Trust's obligation to absorb the losses of the VIE. Management also considered Chase's and Goldman's lack of a material interest in the underlying economics of the project. Management concluded that the Trust is the primary beneficiary and has therefore consolidated the VIE's.

Note 10 – Related Party Transactions

During the quarter ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, the Trust paid REIT Management, a related party, advisory fees pursuant to its Advisory Agreement of $693,000 and $584,000 respectively. The Advisory Agreement terminated effective December 31, 2015. In lieu thereof, the Trust will retain personnel, including related parties, to provide the services previously provided pursuant to such agreement. The aggregate fee in calendar 2016 for the provision of such services may not exceed $1,150,000 .

Majestic Property Management Corp., a related party, provides management services to the Trust for certain properties owned by the Trust and joint ventures in which the Trust participates. These fees amounted to $11,000 and $9,000 for the three months ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

The allocation of expenses for the shared facilities, personnel and other resources used by the Trust is computed in accordance with a shared services agreement by and among the Trust and related parties. Amounts paid pursuant to the agreement are included in general and administrative expenses on the consolidated statement of operations. During the quarter ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, the Trust paid Gould Investors L.P., $51,000 and $41,000 , respectively, for services provided under the agreement.

Management of many of the Trust's multi-family properties is performed by the Trust's joint venture partners or their affiliates. In addition, the Trust may pay an acquisition fee to a joint venture partner in connection with a property purchased by such joint venture. Management and acquisition fees to these related parties for the quarter ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 amounted to $422,000 and $594,000 , respectively.

On December 11, 2015, the Trust borrowed $8,000,000 from Gould Investors L.P. - see Note 8 "Debt Obligations - Other Borrowings". Interest for the quarter ended December 31, 2015, at a rate of 5.24% , was $24,000 .

In the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015, the Trust leased space from an affiliate of Gould Investors, L.P. The rent paid for the quarter ended December 31, 2014, was $38,000 . Commencing with the quarter ended March 31, 2015, the building was sold and the Trust ceased paying rent to Gould Investors for such space.

Note 11 - Segment Reporting

Management determined that the Trust operates in two reportable segments: a multi-family property segment which includes the ownership, operation and developing of its multi-family properties; and an other real estate segment which includes the ownership, operation and developing of the its other real estate assets and, in particular, the Newark Joint Venture.

Note 11- Segment Reporting - continued

Note 12 – Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Financial Instruments Not Measured at Fair Value

The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments that are not recorded at fair value on the consolidated balance sheets:

Cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable (included in other assets), accounts payable and accrued liabilities: The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheets for these instruments approximate their fair value due to the short term nature of these accounts.

Junior subordinated notes: At December 31, 2015 and September 30, 2015 the estimated fair value of the notes is lower than their carrying value by approximately $ 17,500,000 and $21,400,000 based on a market interest rate of 6.76% and 6.37% , respectively.

Mortgages payable: At December 31, 2015 , the estimated fair value of the Trust's mortgages payable is lower than their carrying value by approximately $2,826,000 assuming market interest rates between 2.06% and 14.25% and at September 30, 2015 , the estimated fair value of the Trust's mortgages paya ble was greater than their carrying value by approximately $890,000 assuming market interest rates between 1.99% and 15.00% . Market interest rates were determined using rates which the Trust believes reflects institutional lender yield requirements.

Other borrowed funds: At December 31, 2015, the estimated fair value of the Trust's other borrowed funds were equal to their carrying value assuming market interest rates of between 4% and 5.24% . Market interest rates were determined using rates which the Trust believes reflects institiutional yield requirements.

Considerable judgment is necessary to interpret market data and develop estimated fair value. The use of different market assumptions and/or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value assumptions.

Financial Instruments Measured at Fair Value

The Trust's fair value measurements are based on the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. As a basis for considering market participant assumptions in fair value measurements, there is a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between market participant assumptions based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity and the reporting entity's own assumptions about market participant assumptions. Level 1 assets/liabilities are valued based on quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets, Level 2 assets/liabilities are valued based on quoted prices in active markets for similar instruments, on quoted prices in less active or inactive markets, or on other "observable" market inputs, and Level 3 assets/liabilities are valued based significantly on "unobservable" market inputs. The Trust does not currently own any financial instruments that are classified as Level 3. Set forth below is information regarding the Trust's financial liabilities measured at fair value as of December 31, 2015 (dollars in thousands):

Derivative financial instrument: Fair values are approximated using widely accepted valuation techniques including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of the derivatives. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity, and uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves, foreign exchange rates, and implied volatilities. At December 31, 2015 , this derivative is included in other accounts payable and accrued liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet.

Although the Trust has determined that the majority of the inputs used to value its derivative fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments associated with it utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default by itself and its counterparty. As of December 31, 2015 ,

the Trust assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of its derivative position and determined that the credit valuation adjustments are not significant to the overall valuation of its derivative. As a result, the Trust determined that its derivative valuation is classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

Note 13 – Derivative Financial Instruments

Cash Flow Hedges of Interest Rate Risk

The Trust's objectives in using interest rate derivatives are to add stability to interest expense and to manage its exposure to interest rate movements. To accomplish this objective, the Trust primarily uses interest rate swaps as part of its interest rate risk management strategy. Interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges involve the receipt of variable amounts from a counterparty in exchange for the Trust making fixed-rate payments over the life of the agreements without exchange of the underlying notional amount.

The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives, designated and that qualify as cash flow hedges, is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss on our consolidated balance sheets and is subsequently reclassified into earnings in the period that the hedged forecasted transaction affects earnings.

Amounts reported in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) related to derivatives will be reclassified to interest expense as interest payments are made on the Trust's variable-rate debt.

As of December 31, 2015 , the Trust had the following outstanding interest rate derivative that was designated as a cash flow hedge of interest rate risk (dollars in thousands):

The table below presents the fair value of the Trust's derivative financial instrument as well as its classification on the consolidated balance sheets as of the dates indicated (amounts in thousands):

As of December 31, 2015 , the Trust did not have any derivative instruments that were considered to be ineffective and does not use derivative instruments for trading or speculative purposes.

The following table presents the effect of the Trust's interest rate swap on the consolidated statements of comprehensive loss for the dates indicated (dollars in thousands):

No gain or loss was recognized related to hedge ineffectiveness or to amounts excluded from effectiveness testing on the Trust's cash flow hedges during the three months ended December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 . During the twelve months ending September 30, 2016 , the Trust estimates an additional $23,000 will be reclassified from other comprehensive income (loss) as an increase to interest expense.

Credit-risk-related Contingent Features

The agreement between the Trust and its derivatives counterparty provides that if the Trust defaults on any of its indebtedness, including default where repayment of the indebtedness has not been accelerated by the lender, the Trust could be declared in default on its derivative obligation.

As of December 31, 2015 , the fair value of the derivative in a net liability position, which includes accrued interest, but excludes any adjustment for nonperformance risk related to this agreement, was $42,000 . As of December 31, 2015 , the Trust has not posted any collateral related to this agreement. If the Trust had been in breach of this agreement at December 31, 2015 , it could have been required to settle its obligations thereunder at its termination value of $42,000 .

Note 14 – New Accounting Pronouncements

In April 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2015-03 Interest - Imputation of Interest, which amends the balance sheet presentation for debt issuance costs. Under the amended guidance, a company will present unamortized debt issuance costs as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability. The guidance is to be applied on a retrospective basis, and is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015, with early adoption being permitted. The Trust is currently in the process of evaluating the impact the adoption of the guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements.

Note 15 – Subsequent Events

Subsequent events have been evaluated and any significant events, relative to our consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2015 that warrant additional disclosure, have been included in the notes to the consolidated financial statements.

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Forward-Looking Statements

With the exception of historical information, this report on Form 10-Q contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. We intend such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provision for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and include this statement for purposes of complying with these safe harbor provisions. Forward-looking statements, which are based on certain assumptions and describe our future plans, strategies and expectations, are generally identifiable by use of the words "may", "will", "believe", "expect", "intend", "anticipate", "estimate", "project", or similar expressions or variations thereof. Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which are, in some cases, beyond our control and which could materially affect actual results, performance or achievements. Investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements and are urged to read "Item 1A. Risk Factors" in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2015 .

Overview

We are a real estate investment trust, also known as a REIT, engaged in two principal business activities - the ownership, operation and development of (i) multi‑family properties and (ii) commercial and mixed use and other real estate assets. Effective as of January 1, 2016, we are an internally managed REIT.

Our multi‑family property activities involve the ownership, operation and development, primarily through joint ventures in which we typically have an 80% equity interest, of such properties. At December 31, 2015 , we own 30 multi‑family properties located in 11 states with an aggregate of 8,807 units (including 631 units at two development properties, one of which is in the lease up stage). Occupancy at December 31, 2015, excluding the units at the development properties, is 93.9%.

We own, operate and develop various other real estate assets, the most significant of which are properties (including development properties) located in Newark, New Jersey. Since 2012, the joint venture that owns the Newark assets has obtained, through three financing phases, an aggregate of $99.1 million in debt financing and an aggregate of $31.4 million in New Markets Tax Credit proceeds to fund the construction of six buildings with an aggregate of 153,432 square feet of commercial space and 204 residential units. To date, four buildings have been completed, a fifth building is 50% complete (and the completed residential units are all occupied), and is expected to be completed in April 2016, and the sixth building is under construction and is expected to be completed by July 2016. At December 31, 2015, the net book value of the real property included in these other real estate assets was $157.9 million, including $147.4 million related to our Newark, New Jersey activities. See "-Other Developments" for information regarding the possible (i) sale by BRT of its equity interest in the Newark Joint Venture and (ii) repayment over time of $19.5 million in principal amount of secured mortgage debt owed to BRT which is eliminated in consolidation.

Net loss attributable to common shareholders decreased in the three months ended December 31, 2015 by $464,000 to a loss of $2.0 million from a loss of $2.5 million in the three months ended December 31, 2014 . The decrease in the loss is primarily due to gain on the sale of a coop apartment unit located in Manhattan, New York.

Other Developments

BRT continues to negotiate the sale of all or substantially all of its equity interest in the Newark Joint Venture, which we refer to as the Equity Sale, and anticipates that it will recognize a gain if this transaction is consummated. In addition, the Newark Joint Venture is discussing with an institutional lender the repayment over time, which we refer to as the Repayment Transaction, of the $19.5 million in principal amount of secured mortgage debt owed to BRT eliminated in consolidation. If the Equity Sale is consummated, BRT will no longer be engaged in funding the capital resource and liquidity requirements of the Newark Joint Venture. We can provide no assurance that the Equity Sale or Repayment Transaction will be consummated or if consummated, that such transactions will be consummated on terms favorable to BRT.

During the three months ended December 31, 2015, we acquired two multi-family properties with an aggregate of 507 units (including a development project that contemplates constructing 271 units) for $26.4 million, including mortgage debt on the operating property of $16.1 million. See Note 5 - "Acquisitions".

On December 11, 2015, we borrowed $8 million from Gould Investors, a related party. Such loan matures on the earlier, and to the extent, of (a) six months from the date of funding and (b) the receipt of proceeds from the Equity Sale and/or the Repayment Transaction. This loan bears interest at 5.24% per year.

During the quarter ended December 31, 2015, the Newark Joint Venture borrowed $6 million pursuant to the EB-5 Immigrant Investor Program, which we refer to as the EB-5 Program. These loans bear interest at a rate of 4.00% per annum and have stated terms of five years, subject to two one-year extensions options. The Newark Joint Venture estimates that it will be able to borrow up to an additional $3.5 million from this program, though no assurance can be given the it will be successful in this regard.

On January 22, 2016, we, through a joint venture in which we have a 75% interest, acquired a 268 unit multi-family property located in Katy, TX for $40.3 million, inclusive of $30.8 million of mortgage debt obtained in connection with the acquisition. The mortgage matures in 2026 and bears an interest rate of 4.44%.We estimate that this property will generate $ 2.7 million of revenues in fiscal 2016 and incur estimated operating expenses of $3.1 million (including estimated interest expense and depreciation of $1.0 million and $800,000, respectively) in such period.

On February 1, 2016, we, through a joint venture in which we have an 80% interest, acquired a 240 unit multi-family property located in Macon, GA, for $14.5 million, inclusive of $11.2 million of mortgage debt obtained in connection with the acquisition. The mortgage debt matures in 2026 and bears an interest rate of 4.39%. We estimate that this property will generate $1.3 million of revenues in  fiscal 2016 and incur estimated operating expenses of $1.2 million (including estimated  interest expense and depreciation of $328,000 and $291,000, respectively) in such period.

We anticipate that a temporary certificate of occupancy will be issued by mid February 2016 for the remaining 123 units under development at the Southridge development property.We commenced leasing the completed units in April 2015 and approximately 50% of the total number of units contemplated at this property are currently leased.

Results of Operations – Three months ended December 31, 2015 compared to the three months ended December 31, 2014 .

Revenues

The following table compares our revenues for the periods indicated:

Rental and other revenues from real estate properties.

The increase is due primarily to:

ended December 31, 2015 and 2014) , due primarily to a net increase in rental rates at many of our multi-family properties,

Included in the three months ended December 31, 2014 is $2.3 million of rental revenue from three properties sold in fiscal 2015.

Expenses

The following table compares our expenses for the periods indicated:

Real estate operating expenses.

The increase is due primarily to:

Included in the three months ended December 31, 2014 are expenses of $1.3 million relating to three properties sold in fiscal 2015.

Interest expense .

The increase is due primarily to:

Included in the three months ended December 31, 2014 is $545,000 of interest from three properties sold in fiscal 2015. Capitalized interest at the Newark Joint Venture was $713,000 and $563,000 for the three months ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

Advisor's fees, related party . The fee is calculated based on invested assets which increased primarily due to the purchase, since July 2015, of five multi-family properties, and improvements made at same store properties. The advisory agreement terminated effective December 31, 2015. The services previously provided pursuant to the advisory agreement will be provided by personnel, including related parties, at a cost per quarter of $287,500. These costs will be included in general and administrative expense beginning the quarter ending March 31, 2016. We estimate that we will realize savings of approximately $1 million in fiscal 2016 from the termination of the advisory agreement.

Property acquisition costs . These costs decreased due to reduced acquisition activity.

Depreciation. The increase is due to:

Included in the 2014 period is $511,000 of depreciation from properties sold in fiscal 2015.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We require funds to acquire properties, repay borrowings and pay operating expenses. In 2015, our primary sources of capital and liquidity were the operations of, and distributions from, our multi-family properties, our available cash (including restricted cash), mortgage debt financing and our share of proceeds from the sale of three of multi-family properties. Our available cash (including restricted cash) at December 31, 2015 and February 2, 2016, is approximately $42.4 million and $30.6 million, respectively.

BRT's primary sources of liquidity and capital resources for 2016 are available cash and funds from multi-family property operations. Other potential liquidity and capital resources for 2016 include the Equity Sale, the Repayment Transaction and the sale of multi-family properties. The Newark Joint Venture anticipates that its general operating requirements will be funded from operations and to the extent of any shortfall, capital contributions from the members of the venture, and that its capital expenditure requirements (including retail build out, cost overruns and construction of the sixth building) will be funded as described under "-Newark Joint Venture-Capital Expenditures" and by up to $3.5 million of additional borrowings from the EB-5 Program.

We believe that available cash and distributions from multi-family properties will provide us with sufficient funds to meet our operating expenses in 2016 and 2017 and to fund any capital contributions required by the general operations of Newark Joint Venture. Our ability to acquire additional multi-family properties is limited by our available cash, the availability of mortgage debt and, if completed, funds from the Equity Sale and Repayment Transaction. We can provide no assurance that the Equity Sale and Repayment Transaction will be completed, and if completed, $8 million of the proceeds from such transactions are to be used to repay the loan from Gould Investors. We believe, though there is uncertainty, that the Newark Joint Venture has sufficient access to capital resources, as described under "-Newark Joint Venture", to complete the sixth building, scheduled to be completed in July 2016, which we refer to as Phase III, and address the cost overruns and retail build out associated with Phase II ( i.e . three buildings, one completed in August 2014, the second completed in December 2015 and the third scheduled to be completed in April 2016, all which require retail build out).

Multi-Family Properties

We anticipate that the operating expenses will be funded from cash generated from the operations of these properties and that the debt service payable through 2017 will be funded from the cash generated from operations of these properties and, if needed, supplemental financings. The mortgage debt with respect to these properties generally is non-recourse to us and our subsidiary holding our interest in the applicable joint venture. At December 31, 2015, approximately $5.9 million of restricted cash is available to fund improvements to these properties.

We anticipate that the construction and other costs associated with the Greenville and N. Charleston, SC development projects will be funded by capital previously contributed by our joint venture partner and us and in-place construction financing of up to $38.6 million for the Greenville project and $30.3 million for the N. Charleston project. As of December 31, 2015, $32.9 million has been drawn on the Greenville facility and nothing has been drawn against the N. Charleston project.

Newark Joint Venture

The Newark Joint Venture's capital resource and liquidity requirements through December 31, 2017 are primarily operating expenses in excess of rental income, debt service associated with the Teachers Village project and construction and other costs related to this project.

Operating Expenses

The Newark Joint Venture anticipates that the debt service (including principal and sinking fund payments) and operating expenses of approximately $20 million payable through December 2017 for the Teachers Village project will be funded by an aggregate of approximately (i) $10.6 million from an interest reserve, tax credit proceeds and the US Treasury interest subsidy on the qualified school construction bonds (collectively the "Reserve"), and (ii) $7.5 million from revenues of the currently completed buildings. The Newark Joint Venture believes that this approximate $2 million shortfall can be funded through leasing of substantially all of the residential units and at least 70% of the vacant (and/or to be built) commercial space units at the Phase II and III buildings-however, there is uncertainty as to whether this leasing activity can be completed on a timely basis, due , among other things, to the need, as described below, to obtain additional capital resources to fund change orders and the build out of retail space at the Phase II buildings, the timing of the receipt of such additional capital resources, the ability to complete the build out of the retail space and obtain tenants for the Phase II buildings on a timely basis, the ability of retail tenants to obtain third party financing to complete on a timely basis tenant work at the Phase II buildings and the ability to complete and lease the Phase III building on a timely basis. Additional financing from third parties and/or capital contributions from the members of the Newark Joint Venture (of which we are a 50.1% member), may be required if the Reserve, and funds generated from operations are insufficient to satisfy debt service and operating expenses. No assurance can be given that sufficient funds will be generated, provided or contributed to fund the debt service and operating expenses of the project.

Capital Expenditures

The Newark Joint Venture estimates that it will require approximately $25 million to $28 million to complete the Teachers Village project ( i.e., the cost overruns and retail build out required with respect to Phase II and the costs associated with Phase III). It is anticipated that these capital expenditures will be funded in part by the (i) $11.7 million (of $15.2 million) restricted cash- Newark reflected on our consolidated balance sheet, (ii) an aggregate of approximately $6.8 million from tax credit proceeds and committed but unfunded loans (which are not reflected on our consolidated balance sheet), and (iii) additional proceeds from the EB-5 program. The venture expects that the foregoing sums will be released or funded, as the case may be, from time to time upon satisfaction of specified conditions (including budgeting, construction and permitting related conditions). The estimated additional $6.5 million to $9.5 million required over approximately the next nine months to complete this project will require additional equity investments and/or debt financing from third parties or the members of the Newark Joint Venture. Although discussions have taken place with lenders and members of the venture with respect to the additional funds required, there have been no commitments

by any such party to provide the funding. Failure to obtain such funds and complete the project will have a material adverse effect on the Newark Joint Venture and BRT.

Statements of Cash Flows

The decrease in cash flow provided by operating activities in 2015 is due primarily to the inclusion in 2014 of a receivable from the September 2014 Newark Joint Venture financing and an increase in deposits and escrow balances in the current period versus a decrease in these balances in the prior period. The increase in the current period is due to increased balances due to additional property purchases. The decline in the prior period is due to the payment of real estate taxes.

The increase in cash flow used in investing activities in 2015 is due primarily to the changes in our restricted cash balances at our Newark Joint Venture and a change in non-controlling interest due to the purchase of our partners' interests in fiscal 2015.

The increase in cash flow from financing activities in 2015 is due primarily to increased mortgage borrowing activity due to the purchase of two properties and increased other borrowings from the EB-5 program and a related party. See Note 8 - "Debt Obligations".

Cash Distribution Policy

We have not paid cash dividends since 2010. At December 31, 2014, we had a net operating loss carry-forward of approximately $65 million. Since we can offset our future taxable income, if any, against our tax loss carry-forward until the earlier of 2029 or the tax loss carry-forward has been fully used, it is unlikely that we will be required under the Internal Revenue Code to pay a dividend for the next several years to maintain our REIT status.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

None.

Funds from Operations; Adjusted Funds from Operations

In view of our equity investments in joint ventures which have acquired multi‑ family properties, we disclose below funds from operations ("FFO") and adjusted funds from operations ("AFFO") because we believe that such metrics are a widely recognized and appropriate measure of the performance of an equity REIT.

We compute FFO in accordance with the "White Paper on Funds From Operations" issued by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts ("NAREIT") and NAREIT's related guidance. FFO is defined in the White Paper as net income (computed in accordance with generally accepting accounting principles), excluding gains (or losses) from sales of property, plus depreciation and amortization, plus impairment write‑downs of depreciable real estate and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. Adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures will be calculated to reflect funds from operations on the same basis. In computing FFO, we do not add back to net income the amortization of costs in connection with our financing activities or depreciation of non‑real estate assets. Since the NAREIT White Paper only provides guidelines for computing FFO, the computation of FFO may vary from one REIT to another. We compute AFFO by deducting from FFO our straight line rent accruals and deferrals, amortization of restricted stock compensation and amortization of deferred financing costs.

We believe that FFO and AFFO are useful and standard supplemental measures of the operating performance for equity REITs and are used frequently by securities analysts, investors and other interested parties in evaluating equity REITs, many of which present FFO and AFFO when reporting their operating results. FFO and AFFO are intended to exclude GAAP historical cost depreciation and amortization of real estate assets, which assumes that the value of real estate assets diminish predictability over time. In fact, real estate values have historically risen and fallen with market conditions. As a result, we believe that FFO and AFFO provide a performance measure that when compared year over year, should reflect the impact to operations from trends in occupancy rates, rental rates, operating costs, interest costs and other matters without the inclusion of depreciation and amortization, providing a perspective that may not be necessarily apparent from net income. We also consider FFO and AFFO to be useful to us in evaluating potential property acquisitions.

FFO and AFFO do not represent net income or cash flows from operations as defined by GAAP. FFO and AFFO should not be considered to be an alternative to net income as a reliable measure of our operating performance; nor should FFO and AFFO be considered an alternative to cash flows from operating, investing or financing activities (as defined by GAAP) as measures of liquidity.

FFO and AFFO do not measure whether cash flow is sufficient to fund all of our cash needs, including principal amortization and capital improvements. FFO and AFFO do not represent cash flows from operating, investing or financing activities as defined by GAAP.

Management recognizes that there are limitations in the use of FFO and AFFO. In evaluating our performance, management is careful to examine GAAP measures such as net income and cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities. Management also reviews the reconciliation of net (loss) income to FFO and AFFO.

Funds from Operations; Adjusted Funds from Operations - cont'd

Funds from Operations; Adjusted Funds from Operations - cont'd

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risks

All of our mortgage debt is fixed rate, other than three mortgages, one of which is subject to an interest rate swap agreement . With respect to the remaining two variable rate mortgages, an increase of 100 basis points in interest rates would have a negative annual effect of $553,000 on net income (loss) and a decrease of 100 basis points would have a positive annual effect of $298,000 on net income (loss).

As of December 31, 2015 , we had one interest rate swap agreement outstanding. The fair value of our interest rate swap is dependent upon existing market interest rates and swap spreads, which change over time. At December 31, 2015 , if there had been (i) an increase of 100 basis points in forward interest rates, the fair market value of the interest rate swap and net unrealized loss on the derivative instrument would have decreased by approximately $73,000 and (ii) if there had been a decrease of 100 basis points in forward interest rates, the fair market value of the interest rate swap and net unrealized loss on derivative instrument would have increased by approximately $76,000. These changes would not have any impact on our net income or cash.

Our junior subordinated notes bear interest at a fixed rate of 4.9% per year through April 2016 and thereafter, bear interest at the rate of three month LIBOR plus 200 basis points.Assuming that interest rates on such debt at the time it becomes floating is 2.33% per annum (the rate that would be in effect if such interest was determined as of December 31, 2015), a 100 basis point increase would have a negative effect of $374,000 and a 100 basis point decrease in such floating rate would have a positive effect of $124,000. In either event, the interest expense on these notes would be less than the current expense.

As of December 31, 2015 , based on the number of residential units in each state, 18% of our properties are located in Georgia,16% in Texas, 14% in Tennessee, 13% in Florida, 10% in South Carolina and the remaining 29% in six other states and we are therefore subject to risks associated with the economics in these areas.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

As required under Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, we carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer, Senior Vice President-Finance and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2015 . Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer, Senior Vice President-Finance and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2015 are effective.

There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 2015 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of their evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Part II - Other Information

Item 2.    Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

Our Board of Trustees has authorized us to repurchase up to $4 million of our common shares through September 30, 2017. At December 31, 2015, $1.6 million of such authorization remains available.

Item 5.    Other Information.

See Part I, Item 2. "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Other Developments" for information regarding the Equity Sale, Repayment Transaction, and the acquisition of two multi-family properties subsequent to December 31, 2015.

Item 6. Exhibits

____________________

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

BRT REALTY TRUST

(Registrant)