The Quarterly
BAC Q2 2017 10-Q

Bank Of America Corp (BAC) SEC Quarterly Report (10-Q) for Q3 2017

BAC 2017 10-K
BAC Q2 2017 10-Q BAC 2017 10-K

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

[ ü ] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES

EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2017

or

[   ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES

EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from          to

Commission file number:

1-6523

Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter:

Bank of America Corporation

State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization:

Delaware

IRS Employer Identification No.:

56-0906609

Address of principal executive offices:

Bank of America Corporate Center

100 N. Tryon Street

Charlotte, North Carolina 28255

Registrant's telephone number, including area code:

(704) 386-5681

Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report:

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes ü No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes ü No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," "smaller reporting company," and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (check one).

Large accelerated filer ü

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

(do not check if a smaller

reporting company)

Smaller reporting company

Emerging growth company

Yes No ü

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.

Yes No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2).

Yes No ü

On October 27, 2017 , there were 10,430,613,675 shares of Bank of America Corporation Common Stock outstanding.



Bank of America Corporation and Subsidiaries

September 30, 2017

Form 10-Q

INDEX

Part I. Financial Information

Item 1. Financial Statements

Page

Consolidated Statement of Income

68

Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income

69

Consolidated Balance Sheet

70

Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders' Equity

72

Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows

73

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

74

Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Principles

74

Note 2 – Derivatives

75

Note 3 – Securities

83

Note 4 – Outstanding Loans and Leases

87

Note 5 – Allowance for Credit Losses

98

Note 6 – Securitizations and Other Variable Interest Entities

100

Note 7 – Representations and Warranties Obligations and Corporate Guarantees

104

Note 8 – Goodwill and Intangible Assets

106

Note 9 – Federal Funds Sold or Purchased, Securities Financing Agreements and Short-term Borrowings

107

Note 10 – Commitments and Contingencies

109

Note 11 – Shareholders' Equity

111

Note 12 – Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

112

Note 13 – Earnings Per Common Share

113

Note 14 – Fair Value Measurements

113

Note 15 – Fair Value Option

123

Note 16 – Fair Value of Financial Instruments

125

Note 17 – Business Segment Information

125

Glossary

128

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Executive Summary

3

Recent Events

3

Financial Highlights

4

Supplemental Financial Data

11

Business Segment Operations

14

Consumer Banking

14

Global Wealth & Investment Management

18

Global Banking

21

Global Markets

24

All Other

26

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations

27

Managing Risk

28

Capital Management

28

Liquidity Risk

35

Credit Risk Management

38

Consumer Portfolio Credit Risk Management

39

Commercial Portfolio Credit Risk Management

48

Non-U.S. Portfolio

56

Provision for Credit Losses

57

Allowance for Credit Losses

57

Market Risk Management

60

Trading Risk Management

60

Interest Rate Risk Management for the Banking Book

63

Mortgage Banking Risk Management

66

Complex Accounting Estimates

66

Non-GAAP Reconciliations

67

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

67

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

67


1 Bank of America




Part II. Other Information

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

131

Item 1A. Risk Factors

131

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

131

Item 6. Exhibits

132

Signature

132

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Bank of America Corporation (the "Corporation") and its management may make certain statements that constitute "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements can be identified by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. Forward-looking statements often use words such as "anticipates," "targets," "expects," "hopes," "estimates," "intends," "plans," "goals," "believes," "continue" and other similar expressions or future or conditional verbs such as "will," "may," "might," "should," "would" and "could." Forward-looking statements represent the Corporation's current expectations, plans or forecasts of its future results, revenues, expenses, efficiency ratio, capital measures, and future business and economic conditions more generally, and other future matters. These statements are not guarantees of future results or performance and involve certain known and unknown risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict and are often beyond the Corporation's control. Actual outcomes and results may differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, any of these forward-looking statements.

You should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statement and should consider the following uncertainties and risks, as well as the risks and uncertainties more fully discussed under Item 1A. Risk Factors of our 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K and in any of the Corporation's subsequent Securities and Exchange Commission filings: potential claims, damages, penalties, fines and reputational damage resulting from pending or future litigation, regulatory proceedings and enforcement actions, including inquiries into our retail sales practices, and the possibility that amounts may be in excess of the Corporation's recorded liability and estimated range of possible loss for litigation exposures; the possibility that the Corporation could face increased servicing, securities, fraud, indemnity, contribution or other claims from one or more counterparties, including trustees, purchasers of loans, underwriters, issuers, other parties involved in securitizations, monolines or private-label and other investors; the possibility that future representations and warranties losses may occur in excess of the Corporation ' s recorded liability and estimated range of possible loss for its representations and warranties exposures; the Corporation's ability to resolve representations and warranties repurchase and related claims, including claims brought by investors or trustees seeking to avoid the statute of limitations for repurchase claims; uncertainties about the financial stability and growth rates of non-U.S. jurisdictions, the risk that those jurisdictions may face difficulties servicing their sovereign debt, and related stresses on financial markets, currencies and trade, and the Corporation ' s exposures to such risks, including direct, indirect and operational; the impact of U.S. and global interest rates, currency exchange rates

and economic conditions; the impact on the Corporation's business, financial condition and results of operations of a potential higher interest rate environment; the possibility that future credit losses may be higher than currently expected due to changes in economic assumptions, customer behavior, adverse developments with respect to U.S. or global economic conditions, and other uncertainties; the impact on the Corporation ' s business, financial condition and results of operations from a protracted period of lower oil prices or ongoing volatility with respect to oil prices; the Corporation's ability to achieve its expense targets or net interest income expectations or other projections or expectations; adverse changes to the Corporation ' s credit ratings from the major credit rating agencies; estimates of the fair value of certain of the Corporation ' s assets and liabilities; uncertainty regarding the content, timing and impact of regulatory capital and liquidity requirements, including the approval of our internal models methodology for calculating counterparty credit risk for derivatives; the potential impact of total loss-absorbing capacity requirements; potential adverse changes to our global systemically important bank surcharge; the potential impact of Federal Reserve actions on the Corporation's capital plans; the possible impact of the Corporation's failure to remediate shortcomings identified by banking regulators in the Corporation's Resolution Plan or failure to take actions identified therein; the impact of implementation and compliance with U.S. and international laws, regulations and regulatory interpretations, including, but not limited to, recovery and resolution planning requirements, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation assessments, the Volcker Rule, fiduciary standards and derivatives regulations; a failure in or breach of the Corporation's operational or security systems or infrastructure, or those of third parties, including as a result of cyber attacks; the impact on the Corporation's business, financial condition and results of operations from the planned exit of the United Kingdom from the European Union; and other similar matters.

Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and the Corporation undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect the impact of circumstances or events that arise after the date the forward-looking statement was made.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements referred to in the Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A) are incorporated by reference into the MD&A. Certain prior-period amounts have been reclassified to conform to current-period presentation. Throughout the MD&A, the Corporation uses certain acronyms and abbreviations which are defined in the Glossary.




Bank of America 2


Executive Summary

Business Overview

The Corporation is a Delaware corporation, a bank holding company (BHC) and a financial holding company. When used in this report, "the Corporation" may refer to Bank of America Corporation individually, Bank of America Corporation and its subsidiaries, or certain of Bank of America Corporation's subsidiaries or affiliates. Our principal executive offices are located in Charlotte, North Carolina. Through our banking and various nonbank subsidiaries throughout the U.S. and in international markets, we provide a diversified range of banking and nonbank financial services and products through four business segments: Consumer Banking , Global Wealth & Investment Management (GWIM) , Global Banking and Global Markets , with the remaining operations recorded in All Other . We operate our banking activities primarily under the Bank of America, National Association (Bank of America, N.A. or BANA) charter. At September 30, 2017 , the Corporation had approximately $2.3 trillion in assets and a headcount of approximately 210,000 employees. Headcount remained relatively unchanged since December 31, 2016.

As of September 30, 2017 , we operated in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, the U.S. Virgin Islands, Puerto Rico and more than 35 countries. Our retail banking footprint covers approximately 83 percent of the U.S. population, and we serve approximately 47 million consumer and small business relationships with approximately 4,500 retail financial centers, approximately 16,000 ATMs, and leading digital banking platforms (www.bankofamerica.com) with approximately 34 million active users, including approximately 24 million mobile active users. We offer industry-leading support to approximately three million small business owners. Our wealth management businesses, with client balances of approximately $2.7 trillion , provide tailored solutions to meet client needs through a full set of investment management, brokerage, banking, trust and retirement products. We are a global leader in corporate and investment banking and trading across a broad range of asset classes serving corporations, governments, institutions and individuals around the world.

Third Quarter 2017

Economic and Business Environment

U.S. macroeconomic trends in the third quarter were characterized by a softening in economic growth and low inflation. GDP advanced at a slower pace than the previous quarter. At the same time, inflation remained subdued overall despite some energy-related pressure stemming from the hurricanes that impacted the southern U.S.

Despite sustained growth in the third quarter, the hurricanes added uncertainty to economic forecasts and distorted economic data releases. As a result of the hurricanes, there was an estimated 0.1 to 0.5 percent reduction from annualized GDP growth. Consumer spending slowed in August but recovered, especially vehicle sales, the following month. Business investment in equipment remained buoyant. While nonfarm payroll growth decelerated, the unemployment rate remained low. Despite tight labor market conditions, wage gains were modest.

The Federal Reserve, as expected, kept its target federal funds rate corridor at 1 to 1.25 percent, while announcing that balance

sheet normalization would begin in October. U.S. equities rose in the quarter, in part due to improvement in corporate earnings and despite the realization that domestic fiscal policy changes will likely take longer than previously expected. Despite a late rally, the U.S. dollar index fell primarily on the strength of the euro. Amid a weaker dollar, gold and oil prices both rose. The U.S. yield curve flattened modestly while interest rates increased.

Abroad, eurozone recovery remained robust in the third quarter, maintaining momentum following its best quarter in two years. The more robust economic momentum has failed to translate into stronger inflationary pressures, which remained depressed over the quarter. As a result, the European Central Bank remained cautious about the outlook for monetary policy and it has been carefully evaluating how to extend the ongoing quantitative easing program into next year.

Many survey indicators suggest that the subdued momentum from the first half of the year in the United Kingdom (U.K.) economy has extended into the third quarter. At the same time, inflation continued in an upward trend and reached the highest level since 2012, well above the Bank of England target, driven by the pass-through from the sterling depreciation that followed the Brexit referendum.

In Japan, business surveys suggest that moderate economic momentum remained intact in the third quarter. In China, the service sector remained a key driver of economic growth. The yuan had a volatile third quarter, reaching a one-year high in September with Chinese foreign exchange reserves rising steadily over the quarter.

Recent Events

Capital Management

During the third quarter of 2017 , we repurchased approximately $3.0 billion of common stock pursuant to the Board's 2017 repurchase authorization of $12.9 billion announced on June 28, 2017. For additional information, see Capital Management on page 28 . On July 26, 2017, the Board declared a quarterly common stock dividend of $0.12 per share, payable on September 29, 2017 to shareholders of record as of September 1, 2017.

Series T Preferred Stock

In connection with an investment in the Corporation's Series T 6% Non-cumulative preferred stock (Series T) in 2011, the Series T holders also received warrants to purchase 700 million shares of the Corporation's common stock at an exercise price of $7.142857 per share. On August 24, 2017, the Series T holders exercised the warrants and acquired the 700 million shares of our common stock using the Series T preferred stock as consideration for the exercise price, which increased the number of common shares outstanding, but had no effect on diluted earnings per share as this conversion had been included in the Corporation's diluted earnings per share calculation under the applicable accounting guidance. The carrying amount of the Series T was $2.9 billion and, upon conversion, was recorded as additional paid-in capital, increasing the Common equity tier 1 capital ratio by 20 basis points.


3 Bank of America




Selected Financial Data

Table 1 provides selected consolidated financial data for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 , and at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 .

Table 1

Selected Financial Data

Three Months Ended
September 30

Nine Months Ended
September 30

(Dollars in millions, except per share information)

2017

2016

2017

2016

Income statement



Revenue, net of interest expense

$

21,839


$

21,635


$

66,916


$

63,711


Net income

5,587


4,955


15,712


13,210


Diluted earnings per common share

0.48


0.41


1.35


1.10


Dividends paid per common share

0.12


0.075


0.27


0.175


Performance ratios



Return on average assets

0.98

%

0.90

%

0.93

%

0.81

%

Return on average common shareholders' equity

8.14


7.27


7.81


6.61


Return on average tangible common shareholders' equity  (1)

11.32


10.28


10.95


9.40


Efficiency ratio

60.16


62.31


62.34


65.59


September 30
2017

December 31
2016

Balance sheet





Total loans and leases

$

927,117


$

906,683


Total assets

2,283,896


2,187,702


Total deposits

1,284,417


1,260,934


Total common shareholders' equity

250,136


241,620


Total shareholders' equity

272,459


266,840


(1)

Return on average tangible common shareholders' equity is a non-GAAP financial measure. For additional information and a corresponding reconciliation to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) financial measures, see Non-GAAP Reconciliations on page  67 .

Financial Highlights

Net income was $5.6 billion and $15.7 billion , or $0.48 and $1.35 per diluted share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to $5.0 billion and $13.2 billion , or $0.41 and $1.10 per diluted share for the same periods in 2016 . The results for the three- and nine-month periods compared to the same periods in 2016 were primarily driven by higher revenue, lower provision for credit losses and noninterest expense.

Total assets increased $ 96.2 billion from December 31, 2016 to $2.3 trillion at September 30, 2017 due to higher trading account assets primarily driven by additional inventory in fixed-income, currencies and commodities (FICC) to meet expected client demand, and increased client financing activities in equities, growth in cash and cash equivalents primarily due to an increase in deposits, as well as higher loans and leases and securities

borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell. These increases were partially offset by the impact of the sale of the non-U.S. consumer credit card business to a third party in the second quarter of 2017. Total liabilities increased $90.6 billion from December 31, 2016 to $2.0 trillion at September 30, 2017 primarily driven by higher deposits due to strong organic growth, an increase in trading account liabilities, higher securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase due to increased matched-book activity, as well as increases in long-term debt and accrued expenses and other liabilities. Shareholders' equity increased $5.6 billion from December 31, 2016 primarily due to net income, partially offset by returns of capital to shareholders of $12.0 billion through common stock repurchases and common and preferred stock dividends.



Bank of America 4


Table 2

Summary Income Statement

Three Months Ended September 30

Nine Months Ended September 30

(Dollars in millions)

2017

2016

2017

2016

Net interest income

$

11,161


$

10,201


$

33,205


$

30,804


Noninterest income

10,678


11,434


33,711


32,907


Total revenue, net of interest expense

21,839


21,635


66,916


63,711


Provision for credit losses

834


850


2,395


2,823


Noninterest expense

13,139


13,481


41,713


41,790


Income before income taxes

7,866


7,304


22,808


19,098


Income tax expense

2,279


2,349


7,096


5,888


Net income

5,587


4,955


15,712


13,210


Preferred stock dividends

465


503


1,328


1,321


Net income applicable to common shareholders

$

5,122


$

4,452


$

14,384


$

11,889


Per common share information

Earnings

$

0.50


$

0.43


$

1.42


$

1.15


Diluted earnings

0.48


0.41


1.35


1.10


Net Interest Income

Net interest income increased $960 million to $11.2 billion , and $2.4 billion to $33.2 billion for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to the same periods in 2016 . The net interest yield increased 13 basis points (bps) to 2.31 percent, and 11 bps to 2.32 percent. These increases were primarily driven by the benefits from higher interest rates and loan and deposit growth, partially offset by the decline resulting from the sale of the non-U.S. consumer credit card business in the second quarter of 2017. For more information regarding interest rate risk management, see Interest Rate Risk Management for the Banking Book on page 63 .

Noninterest Income

Table 3

Noninterest Income

Three Months Ended September 30

Nine Months Ended September 30

(Dollars in millions)

2017

2016

2017

2016

Card income

$

1,429


$

1,455


$

4,347


$

4,349


Service charges

1,968


1,952


5,863


5,660


Investment and brokerage services

3,303


3,160


9,882


9,543


Investment banking income

1,477


1,458


4,593


4,019


Trading account profits

1,837


2,141


6,124


5,821


Mortgage banking income

(20

)

589


332


1,334


Gains on sales of debt securities

125


51


278


490


Other income

559


628


2,292


1,691


Total noninterest income

$

10,678


$

11,434


$

33,711


$

32,907


Noninterest income decreased $756 million to $10.7 billion , and increased $804 million to $33.7 billion for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to the same periods in 2016 . The following highlights the more significant changes.

Service charges remained relatively unchanged for the three-month period and increased $203 million for the nine-month period with the increase primarily driven by the impact of pricing strategies and higher treasury services-related revenue.

Investment and brokerage services income increased $143 million and $339 million primarily driven by the impact of assets under management (AUM) flows and higher market valuations, partially offset by the impact of changing market dynamics on transactional revenue and AUM pricing.

Investment banking income remained relatively unchanged for the three-month period and increased $574 million for the nine-month period primarily due to higher debt and equity issuance fees and higher advisory fees.

Trading account profits decreased $304 million for the three-month period primarily due to weaker performance in fixed-income products, and increased $303 million for the nine-month period primarily due to increased client financing activity in equities.

Mortgage banking income decreased $609 million and $1.0 billion primarily driven by lower net servicing income due to lower mortgage servicing rights (MSR) results, net of the related hedge performance, and lower production income primarily due to lower volume.


5 Bank of America




Gains on sales of debt securities increased $74 million for the three-month period and decreased $212 million for the nine-month period primarily driven by sales volume.

Other income decreased $69 million for the three-month period due to lower fair value adjustments from economic hedging activities in the fair value option portfolio, partially offset by higher gains on asset sales, and increased $601 million for the nine-month period primarily due to the $793 million pre-tax gain recognized in connection with the sale of the non-U.S. consumer credit card business in the second quarter of 2017.

Provision for Credit Losses

The provision for credit losses decreased $16 million to $834 million , and $428 million to $2.4 billion for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to the same periods in 2016 primarily due to credit quality improvements in the consumer real estate portfolio and reductions in energy exposures in the commercial portfolio, partially offset by portfolio seasoning and loan growth in the U.S. credit card portfolio. For more information on the provision for credit losses, see Provision for Credit Losses on page 57 .

Noninterest Expense

Table 4

Noninterest Expense

Three Months Ended September 30

Nine Months Ended September 30

(Dollars in millions)

2017

2016

2017

2016

Personnel

$

7,483


$

7,704


$

24,353


$

24,278


Occupancy

999


1,005


3,000


3,069


Equipment

416


443


1,281


1,357


Marketing

461


410


1,235


1,243


Professional fees

476


536


1,417


1,433


Amortization of intangibles

151


181


473


554


Data processing

777


685


2,344


2,240


Telecommunications

170


189


538


551


Other general operating

2,206


2,328


7,072


7,065


Total noninterest expense

$

13,139


$

13,481


$

41,713


$

41,790


Noninterest expense declined $342 million to $13.1 billion for the three months ended September 30, 2017 compared to the same period in 2016. The decrease was primarily due to lower personnel and other general operating expense, including the reduction related to the sale of the non-U.S. credit card business.

Noninterest expense for the nine-month period remained relatively unchanged as a $295 million impairment charge related to certain data centers in the process of being sold and higher Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) expense were largely offset by lower litigation expense.

Income Tax Expense

Table 5

Income Tax Expense

Three Months Ended September 30

Nine Months Ended September 30

(Dollars in millions)

2017

2016

2017

2016

Income before income taxes

$

7,866


$

7,304


$

22,808


$

19,098


Income tax expense

2,279


2,349


7,096


5,888


Effective tax rate

29.0

%

32.2

%

31.1

%

30.8

%

The effective tax rates for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 were driven by the impact of our recurring tax preference benefits. The nine-month 2017 effective tax rate also included tax expense of $690 million recognized in connection with the sale of the non-U.S. consumer credit card business in the second quarter of 2017.

The effective tax rates for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 were driven by our recurring tax preference benefits, and the third quarter of 2016 included a $350 million charge for the impact of the U.K. tax law changes enacted in September 2016.


Bank of America 6


Table 6

Selected Quarterly Financial Data

2017 Quarters

2016 Quarters

(Dollars in millions, except per share information)

Third

Second

First

Fourth

Third

Income statement






Net interest income

$

11,161


$

10,986


$

11,058


$

10,292


$

10,201


Noninterest income

10,678


11,843


11,190


9,698


11,434


Total revenue, net of interest expense

21,839


22,829


22,248


19,990


21,635


Provision for credit losses

834


726


835


774


850


Noninterest expense

13,139


13,726


14,848


13,161


13,481


Income before income taxes

7,866


8,377


6,565


6,055


7,304


Income tax expense

2,279


3,108


1,709


1,359


2,349


Net income

5,587


5,269


4,856


4,696


4,955


Net income applicable to common shareholders

5,122


4,908


4,354


4,335


4,452


Average common shares issued and outstanding

10,198


10,014


10,100


10,170


10,250


Average diluted common shares issued and outstanding

10,725


10,822


10,915


10,959


11,000


Performance ratios






Return on average assets

0.98

%

0.93

%

0.88

%

0.85

%

0.90

%

Four quarter trailing return on average assets  (1)

0.91


0.89


0.88


0.82


0.76


Return on average common shareholders' equity

8.14


8.00


7.27


7.04


7.27


Return on average tangible common shareholders' equity  (2)

11.32


11.23


10.28


9.92


10.28


Return on average shareholders' equity

8.10


7.79


7.35


6.91


7.33


Return on average tangible shareholders' equity  (2)

10.89


10.54


10.00


9.38


9.98


Total ending equity to total ending assets

11.93


12.02


11.93


12.20


12.30


Total average equity to total average assets

12.05


11.95


12.01


12.24


12.28


Dividend payout

24.78


15.25


17.37


17.68


17.32


Per common share data






Earnings

$

0.50


$

0.49


$

0.43


$

0.43


$

0.43


Diluted earnings

0.48


0.46


0.41


0.40


0.41


Dividends paid

0.12


0.075


0.075


0.075


0.075


Book value

23.92


24.88


24.36


24.04


24.19


Tangible book value  (2)

17.23


17.78


17.23


16.95


17.14


Market price per share of common stock






Closing

$

25.34


$

24.26


$

23.59


$

22.10


$

15.65


High closing

25.45


24.32


25.50


23.16


16.19


Low closing

22.89


22.23


22.05


15.63


12.74


Market capitalization

$

264,992


$

239,643


$

235,291


$

222,163


$

158,438


(1)

Calculated as total net income for four consecutive quarters divided by annualized average assets for four consecutive quarters.

(2)

Tangible equity ratios and tangible book value per share of common stock are non-GAAP financial measures. For more information on these ratios and for corresponding reconciliations to GAAP financial measures, see Non-GAAP Reconciliations on page  67 .

(3)

For more information on the impact of the purchased credit-impaired (PCI) loan portfolio on asset quality, see Consumer Portfolio Credit Risk Management on page  39 .

(4)

Includes the allowance for loan and lease losses and the reserve for unfunded lending commitments.

(5)

Balances and ratios do not include loans accounted for under the fair value option. For additional exclusions from nonperforming loans, leases and foreclosed properties, see Consumer Portfolio Credit Risk Management – Nonperforming Consumer Loans, Leases and Foreclosed Properties Activity on page  48 and corresponding Table 33 , and Commercial Portfolio Credit Risk Management – Nonperforming Commercial Loans, Leases and Foreclosed Properties Activity on page  52 and corresponding Table 40 .

(6)

Asset quality metrics include $242 million and $243 million of non-U.S. credit card allowance for loan and lease losses and $9.5 billion and $9.2 billion of non-U.S. credit card loans in the first quarter of 2017 and in the fourth quarter of 2016, which were previously included in assets of business held for sale. During the second quarter of 2017, the Corporation sold its non-U.S. consumer credit card business.

(7)

Primarily includes amounts allocated to the U.S. credit card and unsecured consumer lending portfolios in Consumer Banking , PCI loans and the non-U.S. credit card portfolio in All Other .

(8)

Net charge-offs exclude $73 million , $55 million , $33 million , $70 million , and $83 million of write-offs in the PCI loan portfolio in the third, second and first quarters of 2017, and in the fourth and third quarters of 2016 , respectively. For more information on PCI write-offs, see Consumer Portfolio Credit Risk Management – Purchased Credit-impaired Loan Portfolio on page 45 .

(9)

Includes net charge-offs of $31 million, $44 million and $41 million on non-U.S. credit card loans in the second and first quarters of 2017, and in the fourth quarter of 2016, which were previously included in assets of business held for sale on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016.

(10)

Risk-based capital ratios are reported under Basel 3 Advanced - Transition. For additional information, see Capital Management on page 28 .


7 Bank of America




Table 6

Selected Quarterly Financial Data (continued)

2017 Quarters

2016 Quarters

(Dollars in millions)

Third

Second

First

Fourth

Third

Average balance sheet






Total loans and leases

$

918,129


$

914,717


$

914,144


$

908,396


$

900,594


Total assets

2,270,872


2,269,153


2,231,420


2,208,039


2,189,490


Total deposits

1,271,711


1,256,838


1,256,632


1,250,948


1,227,186


Long-term debt

227,309


224,019


221,468


220,587


227,269


Common shareholders' equity

249,624


246,003


242,883


245,139


243,679


Total shareholders' equity

273,648


271,223


268,103


270,360


268,899


Asset quality  (3)






Allowance for credit losses  (4)

$

11,455


$

11,632


$

11,869


$

11,999


$

12,459


Nonperforming loans, leases and foreclosed properties  (5)

6,869


7,127


7,637


8,084


8,737


Allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of total loans and leases outstanding  (5, 6)

1.16

%

1.20

%

1.25

%

1.26

%

1.30

%

Allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of total nonperforming loans and leases  (5, 6)

163


160


156


149


140


Allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of total nonperforming loans and leases, excluding the PCI loan portfolio (5, 6)

158


154


150


144


135


Amounts included in allowance for loan and lease losses for loans and leases that are excluded from nonperforming loans and leases (7)

$

3,880


$

3,782


$

4,047


$

3,951


$

4,068


Allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of total nonperforming loans and leases, excluding the allowance for loan and lease losses for loans and leases that are excluded from nonperforming loans and leases (5, 7)

104

%

104

%

100

%

98

%

91

%

Net charge-offs (8, 9)

$

900


$

908


$

934


$

880


$

888


Annualized net charge-offs as a percentage of average loans and leases outstanding  (5, 8)

0.39

%

0.40

%

0.42

%

0.39

%

0.40

%

Annualized net charge-offs as a percentage of average loans and leases outstanding, excluding the PCI loan portfolio (5)

0.40


0.41


0.42


0.39


0.40


Annualized net charge-offs and PCI write-offs as a percentage of average loans and leases outstanding  (5)

0.42


0.43


0.43


0.42


0.43


Nonperforming loans and leases as a percentage of total loans and leases outstanding  (5, 6)

0.71


0.75


0.80


0.85


0.93


Nonperforming loans, leases and foreclosed properties as a percentage of total loans, leases and foreclosed properties  (5, 6)

0.75


0.78


0.84


0.89


0.97


Ratio of the allowance for loan and lease losses at period end to annualized net charge-offs (6, 8)

3.00


2.99


3.00


3.28


3.31


Ratio of the allowance for loan and lease losses at period end to annualized net charge-offs, excluding the PCI loan portfolio (6)

2.91


2.88


2.88


3.16


3.18


Ratio of the allowance for loan and lease losses at period end to annualized net charge-offs and PCI write-offs (6)

2.77


2.82


2.90


3.04


3.03


Capital ratios at period end (10)






Risk-based capital:






Common equity tier 1 capital

11.9

%

11.6

%

11.0

%

11.0

%

11.0

%

Tier 1 capital

13.3


13.2


12.5


12.4


12.4


Total capital

15.1


15.1


14.4


14.3


14.2


Tier 1 leverage

9.0


8.9


8.8


8.9


9.1


Tangible equity  (2)

9.1


9.2


9.1


9.2


9.4


Tangible common equity  (2)

8.1


8.0


7.9


8.1


8.2


For footnotes see page 7 .

Bank of America 8


Table 7

Selected Year-to-Date Financial Data

Nine Months Ended September 30

(In millions, except per share information)

2017

2016

Income statement

Net interest income

$

33,205


$

30,804


Noninterest income

33,711


32,907


Total revenue, net of interest expense

66,916


63,711


Provision for credit losses

2,395


2,823


Noninterest expense

41,713


41,790


Income before income taxes

22,808


19,098


Income tax expense

7,096


5,888


Net income

15,712


13,210


Net income applicable to common shareholders

14,384


11,889


Average common shares issued and outstanding

10,103


10,313


Average diluted common shares issued and outstanding

10,820


11,047


Performance ratios



Return on average assets

0.93

%

0.81

%

Return on average common shareholders' equity

7.81


6.61


Return on average tangible common shareholders' equity  (1)

10.95


9.40


Return on average shareholder's equity

7.75


6.66


Return on average tangible shareholders' equity  (1)

10.48


9.13


Total ending equity to total ending assets

11.93


12.30


Total average equity to total average assets

12.01


12.13


Dividend payout

19.28


15.19


Per common share data



Earnings

$

1.42


$

1.15


Diluted earnings

1.35


1.10


Dividends paid

0.27


0.175


Book value

23.92


24.19


Tangible book value  (1)

17.23


17.14


Market price per share of common stock



Closing

$

25.34


$

15.65


High closing

25.50


16.43


Low closing

22.05


11.16


Market capitalization

$

264,992


$

158,438


(1)

Tangible equity ratios and tangible book value per share of common stock are non-GAAP financial measures. For more information on these ratios and for corresponding reconciliations to GAAP financial measures, see Non-GAAP Reconciliations on page 67 .

(2)

For more information on the impact of the PCI loan portfolio on asset quality, see Consumer Portfolio Credit Risk Management on page 39 .

(3)

Includes the allowance for loan and lease losses and the reserve for unfunded lending commitments.

(4)

Balances and ratios do not include loans accounted for under the fair value option. For additional exclusions from nonperforming loans, leases and foreclosed properties, see Consumer Portfolio Credit Risk Management – Nonperforming Consumer Loans, Leases and Foreclosed Properties Activity on page  48 and corresponding Table 33 , and Commercial Portfolio Credit Risk Management – Nonperforming Commercial Loans, Leases and Foreclosed Properties Activity on page 52 and corresponding Table 40 .

(5)

Primarily includes amounts allocated to the U.S. credit card and unsecured consumer lending portfolios in Consumer Banking , PCI loans and the non-U.S. credit card portfolio in All Other . During the second quarter of 2017, the Corporation sold its non-U.S. consumer credit card business.

(6)

Net charge-offs exclude $161 million and $270 million of write-offs in the PCI loan portfolio for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 . For more information on PCI write-offs, see Consumer Portfolio Credit Risk Management – Purchased Credit-impaired Loan Portfolio on page 45 .


9 Bank of America




Table 7

Selected Year-to-Date Financial Data (continued)

Nine Months Ended September 30

(Dollars in millions)

2017

2016

Average balance sheet



Total loans and leases

$

915,678


$

897,760


Total assets

2,257,293


2,183,905


Total deposits

1,261,782


1,213,029


Long-term debt

224,287


231,313


Common shareholders' equity

246,195


240,440


Total shareholders' equity

271,012


264,907


Asset quality  (2)



Allowance for credit losses  (3)

$

11,455


$

12,459


Nonperforming loans, leases and foreclosed properties  (4)

6,869


8,737


Allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of total loans and leases outstanding  (4)

1.16

%

1.30

%

Allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of total nonperforming loans and leases  (4)

163


140


Allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of total nonperforming loans and leases, excluding the PCI loan portfolio  (4)

158


135


Amounts included in allowance for loan and lease losses for loans and leases that are excluded from nonperforming loans and leases (5)

$

3,880


$

4,068


Allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of total nonperforming loans and leases, excluding the allowance for loan and lease losses for loans and leases that are excluded from nonperforming loans and leases (4, 5)

104

%

91

%

Net charge-offs (6)

$

2,742


$

2,941


Annualized net charge-offs as a percentage of average loans and leases outstanding (4, 6)

0.40

%

0.44

%

Annualized net charge-offs as a percentage of average loans and leases outstanding, excluding the PCI loan portfolio (4)

0.41


0.45


Annualized net charge-offs and PCI write-offs as a percentage of average loans and leases outstanding (4)

0.43


0.48


Nonperforming loans and leases as a percentage of total loans and leases outstanding  (4)

0.71


0.93


Nonperforming loans, leases and foreclosed properties as a percentage of total loans, leases and foreclosed properties  (4)

0.75


0.97


Ratio of the allowance for loan and lease losses at period end to annualized net charge-offs (6)

2.92


2.98


Ratio of the allowance for loan and lease losses at period end to annualized net charge-offs, excluding the PCI loan portfolio

2.83


2.86


Ratio of the allowance for loan and lease losses at period end to annualized net charge-offs and PCI write-offs

2.76


2.73


For footnotes see page 9 .

Bank of America 10


Supplemental Financial Data

In this Form 10-Q, we present certain non-GAAP financial measures. Non-GAAP financial measures exclude certain items or otherwise include components that differ from the most directly comparable measures calculated in accordance with GAAP. Non-GAAP financial measures are provided as additional useful information to assess our financial condition, results of operations (including period-to-period operating performance) or compliance with prospective regulatory requirements. These non-GAAP financial measures are not intended as a substitute for GAAP financial measures and may not be defined or calculated the same way as non-GAAP financial measures used by other companies.

We view net interest income and related ratios and analyses on a fully taxable-equivalent (FTE) basis, which when presented on a consolidated basis, are non-GAAP financial measures. To derive the FTE basis, net interest income is adjusted to reflect tax-exempt income on an equivalent before-tax basis with a corresponding increase in income tax expense. For purposes of this calculation, we use the federal statutory tax rate of 35 percent and a representative state tax rate. In addition, certain performance measures including the efficiency ratio and net interest yield utilize net interest income (and thus total revenue) on an FTE basis. The efficiency ratio measures the costs expended to generate a dollar of revenue, and net interest yield measures the bps we earn over the cost of funds. We believe that presentation of these items on an FTE basis allows for comparison of amounts from both taxable and tax-exempt sources and is consistent with industry practices.

We may present certain key performance indicators and ratios excluding certain items (e.g., debit valuation adjustment (DVA)) which result in non-GAAP financial measures. We believe that the presentation of measures that exclude these items are useful because they provide additional information to assess the underlying operational performance and trends of our businesses and to allow better comparison of period-to-period operating performance.

We also evaluate our business based on certain ratios that utilize tangible equity, a non-GAAP financial measure. Tangible equity represents an adjusted shareholders' equity or common shareholders' equity amount which has been reduced by goodwill and certain acquired intangible assets (excluding MSRs), net of related deferred tax liabilities. These measures are used to evaluate our use of equity. In addition, profitability, relationship and investment models use both return on average tangible common shareholders' equity and return on average tangible shareholders' equity as key measures to support our overall growth goals. These ratios are as follows:

Return on average tangible common shareholders' equity measures our earnings contribution as a percentage of adjusted common shareholders' equity. The tangible common equity ratio represents adjusted ending common shareholders' equity divided by total assets less goodwill and certain acquired intangible assets (excluding MSRs), net of related deferred tax liabilities.

Return on average tangible shareholders' equity measures our earnings contribution as a percentage of adjusted average total shareholders' equity. The tangible equity ratio represents adjusted ending shareholders' equity divided by total assets less goodwill and certain acquired intangible assets (excluding MSRs), net of related deferred tax liabilities.

Tangible book value per common share represents adjusted ending common shareholders' equity divided by ending common shares outstanding.

We believe that the use of ratios that utilize tangible equity provides additional useful information because they present measures of those assets that can generate income. Tangible book value per share provides additional useful information about the level of tangible assets in relation to outstanding shares of common stock.

The aforementioned supplemental data and performance measures are presented in Tables 6 and 7 . Table 8 presents certain non-GAAP financial measures and performance measurements on an FTE basis.

Table 8

Supplemental Financial Data

Three Months Ended September 30

Nine Months Ended September 30

(Dollars in millions)

2017

2016

2017

2016

Fully taxable-equivalent basis data



Net interest income

$

11,401


$

10,429


$

33,879


$

31,470


Total revenue, net of interest expense

22,079


21,863


67,590


64,377


Net interest yield

2.36

%

2.23

%

2.36

%

2.26

%

Efficiency ratio

59.51


61.66


61.71


64.91



11 Bank of America




Table 9

Quarterly Average Balances and Interest Rates – FTE Basis

Third Quarter 2017

Third Quarter 2016

(Dollars in millions)

Average

Balance

Interest
Income/

Expense

Yield/

Rate

Average
Balance

Interest
Income/
Expense

Yield/
Rate

Earning assets







Interest-bearing deposits with the Federal Reserve, non-U.S. central banks and other banks

$

127,835


$

323


1.00

%

$

133,866


$

148


0.44

%

Time deposits placed and other short-term investments

12,503


68


2.17


9,336


34


1.45


Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell

223,585


659


1.17


214,254


267


0.50


Trading account assets

124,068


1,125


3.60


128,879


1,111


3.43


Debt securities (1)

436,886


2,670


2.44


423,182


2,169


2.07


Loans and leases  (2) :

Residential mortgage

199,240


1,724


3.46


188,234


1,612


3.42


Home equity

61,225


664


4.31


70,603


681


3.84


U.S. credit card

91,602


2,253


9.76


88,210


2,061


9.30


Non-U.S. credit card (1)

-


-


-


9,256


231


9.94


Direct/Indirect consumer  (3)

93,510


678


2.88


92,870


585


2.51


Other consumer  (4)

2,762


28


4.07


2,358


18


2.94


Total consumer

448,339


5,347


4.74


451,531


5,188


4.58


U.S. commercial

293,203


2,542


3.44


276,833


2,040


2.93


Commercial real estate  (5)

59,044


552


3.71


57,606


452


3.12


Commercial lease financing

21,818


160


2.92


21,194


153


2.88


Non-U.S. commercial

95,725


676


2.80


93,430


599


2.55


Total commercial

469,790


3,930


3.32


449,063


3,244


2.87


Total loans and leases

918,129


9,277


4.02


900,594


8,432


3.73


Other earning assets

76,496


775


4.02


59,951


677


4.50


Total earning assets  (6)

1,919,502


14,897


3.09


1,870,062


12,838


2.74


Cash and due from banks (1)

28,990


27,361


Other assets, less allowance for loan and lease losses (1)

322,380


292,067


Total assets

$

2,270,872


$

2,189,490


Interest-bearing liabilities







U.S. interest-bearing deposits:







Savings

$

54,328


$

1


0.01

%

$

49,885


$

2


0.01

%

NOW and money market deposit accounts

631,270


333


0.21


592,907


73


0.05


Consumer CDs and IRAs

44,239


31


0.27


48,695


33


0.27


Negotiable CDs, public funds and other deposits

38,119


101


1.05


32,023


43


0.54


Total U.S. interest-bearing deposits

767,956


466


0.24


723,510


151


0.08


Non-U.S. interest-bearing deposits:

Banks located in non-U.S. countries

2,259


5


0.97


4,294


9


0.87


Governments and official institutions

1,012


3


1.04


1,391


3


0.61


Time, savings and other

63,716


150


0.93


59,340


103


0.70


Total non-U.S. interest-bearing deposits

66,987


158


0.93


65,025


115


0.71


Total interest-bearing deposits

834,943


624


0.30


788,535


266


0.13


Federal funds purchased, securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase, short-term borrowings and other interest-bearing liabilities

230,230


944


1.63


207,634


569


1.09


Trading account liabilities

48,390


319


2.62


37,229


244


2.61


Long-term debt

227,309


1,609


2.82


227,269


1,330


2.33


Total interest-bearing liabilities  (6)

1,340,872


3,496


1.04


1,260,667


2,409


0.76


Noninterest-bearing sources:

Noninterest-bearing deposits

436,768


438,651


Other liabilities

219,584


221,273


Shareholders' equity

273,648


268,899


Total liabilities and shareholders' equity

$

2,270,872


$

2,189,490


Net interest spread

2.05

%

1.98

%

Impact of noninterest-bearing sources

0.31


0.25


Net interest income/yield on earning assets

$

11,401


2.36

%

$

10,429


2.23

%

(1)

Includes assets of the Corporation's non-U.S. consumer credit card business, which was sold during the second quarter of 2017.

(2)

Nonperforming loans are included in the respective average loan balances. Income on these nonperforming loans is generally recognized on a cost recovery basis. PCI loans were recorded at fair value upon acquisition and accrete interest income over the estimated life of the loan.

(3)

Includes non-U.S. consumer loans of $2.9 billion and $3.2 billion in the third quarter of 2017 and 2016 .

(4)

Includes consumer finance loans of $406 million and $501 million ; consumer leases of $2.2 billion and $1.7 billion , and consumer overdrafts of $193 million and $187 million in the third quarter of 2017 and 2016 , respectively.

(5)

Includes U.S. commercial real estate loans of $55.2 billion and $54.3 billion , and non-U.S. commercial real estate loans of $3.8 billion and $3.3 billion in the third quarter of 2017 and 2016 , respectively.

(6)

Interest income includes the impact of interest rate risk management contracts, which decreased interest income on the underlying assets by $7 million and $64 million in the third quarter of 2017 and 2016 . Interest expense includes the impact of interest rate risk management contracts, which decreased interest expense on the underlying liabilities by $346 million and $560 million in the third quarter of 2017 and 2016 . For additional information, see Interest Rate Risk Management for the Banking Book on page  63 .


Bank of America 12


Table 10

Year-to-Date Average Balances and Interest Rates – FTE Basis

Nine Months Ended September 30

2017

2016

(Dollars in millions)

Average
Balance

Interest
Income/
Expense

Yield/
Rate

Average
Balance

Interest
Income/
Expense

Yield/
Rate

Earning assets







Interest-bearing deposits with the Federal Reserve, non-U.S. central banks and other banks

$

127,000


$

786


0.83

%

$

135,910


$

460


0.45

%

Time deposits placed and other short-term investments

11,820


173


1.96


8,784


101


1.54


Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell

222,255


1,658


1.00


215,476


803


0.50


Trading account assets

128,547


3,435


3.57


130,785


3,432


3.50


Debt securities  (1)

432,775


7,875


2.42


414,115


6,990


2.27


Loans and leases (2) :







Residential mortgage

196,288


5,082


3.45


187,325


4,867


3.46


Home equity

63,339


1,967


4.15


73,015


2,095


3.83


U.S. credit card

90,238


6,492


9.62


87,362


6,065


9.27


Non-U.S. credit card (1)

5,253


358


9.12


9,687


734


10.12


Direct/Indirect consumer  (3)

93,316


1,929


2.76


91,291


1,698


2.48


Other consumer  (4)

2,648


81


4.07


2,240


50


2.99


Total consumer

451,082


15,909


4.71


450,920


15,509


4.59


U.S. commercial

290,632


7,167


3.30


274,669


5,982


2.91


Commercial real estate  (5)

58,340


1,545


3.54


57,550


1,320


3.06


Commercial lease financing

21,862


547


3.33


21,049


482


3.05


Non-U.S. commercial

93,762


1,886


2.69


93,572


1,748


2.50


Total commercial

464,596


11,145


3.21


446,840


9,532


2.85


Total loans and leases

915,678


27,054


3.95


897,760


25,041


3.72


Other earning assets

74,554


2,206


3.95


58,189


2,031


4.66


Total earning assets (6)

1,912,629


43,187


3.02


1,861,019


38,858


2.79


Cash and due from banks (1)

27,955



28,041



Other assets, less allowance for loan and lease losses (1)

316,709




294,845




Total assets

$

2,257,293




$

2,183,905




Interest-bearing liabilities







U.S. interest-bearing deposits:







Savings

$

53,679


$

4


0.01

%

$

49,281


$

4


0.01

%

NOW and money market deposit accounts

622,920


512


0.11


584,896


216


0.05


Consumer CDs and IRAs

45,535


92


0.27


48,920


101


0.28


Negotiable CDs, public funds and other deposits

35,968


221


0.82


32,212


107


0.45


Total U.S. interest-bearing deposits

758,102


829


0.15


715,309


428


0.08


Non-U.S. interest-bearing deposits:







Banks located in non-U.S. countries

2,643


16


0.82


4,218


28


0.90


Governments and official institutions

1,002


7


0.92


1,468


7


0.60


Time, savings and other

60,747


400


0.88


58,866


273


0.62


Total non-U.S. interest-bearing deposits

64,392


423


0.88


64,552


308


0.64


Total interest-bearing deposits

822,494


1,252


0.20


779,861


736


0.13


Federal funds purchased, securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase, short-term borrowings and other interest-bearing liabilities

237,857


2,508


1.41


215,131


1,808


1.12


Trading account liabilities

44,128


890


2.70


37,760


778


2.76


Long-term debt

224,287


4,658


2.77


231,313


4,066


2.35


Total interest-bearing liabilities  (6)

1,328,766


9,308


0.94


1,264,065


7,388


0.78


Noninterest-bearing sources:







Noninterest-bearing deposits

439,288




433,168




Other liabilities

218,227




221,765




Shareholders' equity

271,012




264,907




Total liabilities and shareholders' equity

$

2,257,293




$

2,183,905




Net interest spread



2.08

%



2.01

%

Impact of noninterest-bearing sources



0.28




0.25


Net interest income/yield on earning assets


$

33,879


2.36

%


$

31,470


2.26

%

(1)

Includes assets of the Corporation's non-U.S. consumer credit card business, which was sold during the second quarter of 2017.

(2)

Nonperforming loans are included in the respective average loan balances. Income on these nonperforming loans is generally recognized on a cost recovery basis. PCI loans were recorded at fair value upon acquisition and accrete interest income over the estimated life of the loan.

(3)

Includes non-U.S. consumer loans of $2.9 billion and $3.5 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 .

(4)

Includes consumer finance loans of $430 million and $526 million ; consumer leases of $2.0 billion and $1.5 billion , and consumer overdrafts of $177 million and $171 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 , respectively.

(5)

Includes U.S. commercial real estate loans of $55.0 billion and $54.1 billion , and non-U.S. commercial real estate loans of $3.4 billion and $3.4 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 , respectively.

(6)

Interest income includes the impact of interest rate risk management contracts, which decreased interest income on the underlying assets by $48 million and $155 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 . Interest expense includes the impact of interest rate risk management contracts, which decreased interest expense on the underlying liabilities by $1.1 billion and $1.7 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 . For additional information, see Interest Rate Risk Management for the Banking Book on page  63 .



13 Bank of America




Business Segment Operations

Segment Description and Basis of Presentation

We report our results of operations through the following four business segments: Consumer Banking , GWIM , Global Banking and Global Markets , with the remaining operations recorded in All Other . We periodically review capital allocated to our businesses and allocate capital annually during the strategic and capital planning processes. We utilize a methodology that considers the effect of regulatory capital requirements in addition to internal risk-

based capital models. Our internal risk-based capital models use a risk-adjusted methodology incorporating each segment's credit, market, interest rate, business and operational risk components. For more information on the nature of these risks, see Managing Risk on page 28 . For more information on the basis of presentation for business segments and reconciliations to consolidated total revenue, net income and period-end total assets, see Note 17 – Business Segment Information to the Consolidated Financial Statements .


Consumer Banking

Three Months Ended September 30

Deposits

Consumer

Lending

Total Consumer Banking

(Dollars in millions)

2017

2016

2017

2016

2017

2016

% Change


Net interest income (FTE basis)

$

3,439


$

2,629


$

2,772


$

2,660


$

6,211


$

5,289


17

 %

Noninterest income:

Card income

3


2


1,241


1,216


1,244


1,218


2


Service charges

1,082


1,072


1


-


1,083


1,072


1


Mortgage banking income (1)

-


-


142


297


142


297


(52

)

All other income (loss)

96


98


(2

)

(6

)

94


92


2


Total noninterest income

1,181


1,172


1,382


1,507


2,563


2,679


(4

)

Total revenue, net of interest expense (FTE basis)

4,620


3,801


4,154


4,167


8,774


7,968


10




Provision for credit losses

47


43


920


655


967


698


39


Noninterest expense

2,615


2,397


1,844


1,974


4,459


4,371


2


Income before income taxes (FTE basis)

1,958


1,361


1,390


1,538


3,348


2,899


15


Income tax expense (FTE basis)

738


510


523


576


1,261


1,086


16


Net income

$

1,220


$

851


$

867


$

962


$

2,087


$

1,813


15


Net interest yield (FTE basis)

2.08

%

1.73

%

4.16

%

4.31

%

3.56

%

3.30

%

Return on average allocated capital

40


28


14


17


22


21


Efficiency ratio (FTE basis)

56.61


63.03


44.40


47.40


50.83


54.86


Balance Sheet

Three Months Ended September 30

Average

2017

2016

2017

2016

2017

2016

% Change


Total loans and leases

$

5,079


$

4,837


$

263,731


$

243,846


$

268,810


$

248,683


8

 %

Total earning assets  (2)

657,036


604,223


264,665


245,540


692,122


636,832


9


Total assets (2)

684,642


630,394


276,014


257,167


731,077


674,630


8


Total deposits

652,286


598,117


6,688


7,588


658,974


605,705


9


Allocated capital

12,000


12,000


25,000


22,000


37,000


34,000


9


(1)

Total consolidated mortgage banking income (loss) of $(20) million and $332 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 were recorded primarily in Consumer Lending and All Other, compared to $589 million and $1.3 billion for the same periods in 2016 .

(2)

In segments and businesses where the total of liabilities and equity exceeds assets, we allocate assets from All Other to match the segments' and businesses' liabilities and allocated shareholders' equity. As a result, total earning assets and total assets of the businesses may not equal total Consumer Banking .


Bank of America 14


Nine Months Ended September 30

Deposits

Consumer

Lending

Total Consumer Banking

(Dollars in millions)

2017

2016

2017

2016

2017

2016

% Change


Net interest income (FTE basis)

$

9,804


$

7,940


$

8,149


$

7,885


$

17,953


$

15,825


13

 %

Noninterest income:

Card income

6


7


3,710


3,638


3,716


3,645


2


Service charges

3,193


3,079


1


1


3,194


3,080


4


Mortgage banking income (1)

-


-


401


754


401


754


(47

)

All other income

294


312


9


4


303


316


(4

)

Total noninterest income

3,493


3,398


4,121


4,397


7,614


7,795


(2

)

Total revenue, net of interest expense (FTE basis)

13,297


11,338


12,270


12,282


25,567


23,620


8




Provision for credit losses

148


132


2,491


1,823


2,639


1,955


35


Noninterest expense

7,702


7,227


5,578


6,097


13,280


13,324


<(1)


Income before income taxes (FTE basis)

5,447


3,979


4,201


4,362


9,648


8,341


16


Income tax expense (FTE basis)

2,054


1,473


1,584


1,615


3,638


3,088


18


Net income

$

3,393


$

2,506


$

2,617


$

2,747


$

6,010


$

5,253


14


Net interest yield (FTE basis)

2.02

%

1.79

%

4.21

%

4.39

%

3.52

%

3.39

%

Return on average allocated capital

38


28


14


17


22


21


Efficiency ratio (FTE basis)

57.93


63.74


45.46


49.64


51.94


56.41


Balance Sheet

Nine Months Ended September 30

Average

2017

2016

2017

2016

2017

2016

% Change


Total loans and leases

$

5,025


$

4,787


$

257,779


$

238,404


$

262,804


$

243,191


8

 %

Total earning assets  (2)

647,887


591,913


258,659


239,870


682,436


623,834


9


Total assets (2)

675,159


618,466


270,196


251,609


721,245


662,126


9


Total deposits

642,783


586,334


6,421


7,167


649,204


593,501


9


Allocated capital

12,000


12,000


25,000


22,000


37,000


34,000


9


Period end

September 30
2017

December 31
2016

September 30
2017

December 31
2016

September 30
2017

December 31
2016

% Change


Total loans and leases

$

5,060


$

4,938


$

267,300


$

254,053


$

272,360


$

258,991


5

 %

Total earning assets (2)

667,733


631,172


268,354


255,511


703,277


662,698


6


Total assets  (2)

695,403


658,316


279,920


268,002


742,513


702,333


6


Total deposits

662,781


625,727


6,866


7,059


669,647


632,786


6


See page 14 for footnotes.

Consumer Banking, which is comprised of Deposits and Consumer Lending, offers a diversified range of credit, banking and investment products and services to consumers and small businesses. Our customers and clients have access to a coast to coast network including financial centers in 33 states and the District of Columbia. Our network includes approximately 4,500 financial centers, 16,000 ATMs, nationwide call centers, and leading digital banking platforms with approximately 34 million active users, including approximately 24 million mobile active users.

Consumer Banking Results

Three Months Ended September 30, 2017 Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2016

Net income for Consumer Banking increased $274 million to $2.1 billion primarily driven by higher net interest income, partially offset by higher provision for credit losses and noninterest expense. Net interest income increased $922 million to $6.2 billion primarily due to the beneficial impact of an increase in investable assets as a result of higher deposits, and loan growth. Noninterest income decreased $116 million to $2.6 billion primarily driven by lower mortgage banking income, partially offset by higher card income and service charges.

The provision for credit losses increased $269 million to $967

million due to portfolio seasoning and loan growth in the U.S. credit

card portfolio. The three months ended September 30, 2017 included a net reserve increase of $167 million compared to a release of $12 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016 . Noninterest expense increased $88 million to $4.5 billion primarily driven by investments in digital capabilities and business growth, including increased primary sales professionals combined with investments in new financial centers and renovations, as well as higher litigation expense.

The return on average allocated capital was 22 percent, up from 21 percent, as higher net income was partially offset by an increased capital allocation. For more information on capital allocations, see Business Segment Operations on page 14 .

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016

Net income for Consumer Banking increased $757 million to $6.0 billion primarily driven by higher net interest income, partially offset by higher provision for credit losses. Net interest income increased $2.1 billion to $18.0 billion primarily due to the beneficial impact of an increase in investable assets as a result of higher deposits, as well as pricing discipline and loan growth. Noninterest income decreased $181 million to $7.6 billion driven by lower mortgage banking income, partially offset by higher service charges and card income.


15 Bank of America




The provision for credit losses increased $684 million to $2.6 billion due to portfolio seasoning and loan growth in the U.S. credit card portfolio. Noninterest expense decreased $44 million to $13.3 billion driven by improved operating efficiencies, largely offset by higher FDIC, personnel and litigation expenses.

The return on average allocated capital was 22 percent, up from 21 percent, as higher net income was partially offset by an increased capital allocation. For more information on capital allocations, see Business Segment Operations on page 14 .

Deposits

Deposits includes the results of consumer deposit activities which consist of a comprehensive range of products provided to consumers and small businesses. Our deposit products include traditional savings accounts, money market savings accounts, CDs and IRAs, noninterest- and interest-bearing checking accounts, as well as investment accounts and products . Net interest income is allocated to the deposit products using our funds transfer pricing process that matches assets and liabilities with similar interest rate sensitivity and maturity characteristics. Deposits generates fees such as account service fees, non-sufficient funds fees, overdraft charges and ATM fees, as well as investment and brokerage fees from Merrill Edge accounts. Merrill Edge is an integrated investing and banking service targeted at customers with less than $250,000 in investable assets. Merrill Edge provides investment advice and guidance, client brokerage asset services, a self-directed online investing platform and key banking capabilities including access to the Corporation's network of financial centers and ATMs.

Deposits includes the net impact of migrating customers and their related deposit and brokerage asset balances between Deposits and GWIM as well as other client-managed businesses. For more information on the migration of customer balances to or from GWIM , see GWIM – Net Migration Summary on page 20 .

Three Months Ended September 30, 2017 Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2016

Net income for Deposits increased $369 million to $1.2 billion driven by higher revenue, partially offset by higher noninterest expense. Net interest income increased $810 million to $3.4 billion primarily due to the beneficial impact of an increase in investable assets as a result of higher deposits, and pricing discipline.

Noninterest expense increased $218 million to $2.6 billion primarily driven by investments in digital capabilities and business growth, including increased primary sales professionals, combined with investments in new financial centers and renovations, and higher litigation and FDIC expenses.

Average deposits increased $54.2 billion to $652.3 billion driven by strong organic growth. Growth in checking, money market savings and traditional savings of $57.4 billion was partially offset by a decline in time deposits of $3.4 billion.

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016

Net income for Deposits increased $887 million to $3.4 billion . Net interest income increased $1.9 billion to $9.8 billion and noninterest income increased $95 million to $3.5 billion , both of which were primarily driven by the same factors as described in the three-month discussion. The prior-year period included gains on certain divestitures.

The provision for credit losses increased $16 million to $148 million . Noninterest expense increased $475 million to $7.7 billion primarily driven by the same factors as described in the three-month discussion.

Average deposits increased $56.4 billion to $642.8 billion primarily driven by the same factor as described in the three-month discussion.

Key Statistics  Deposits

Three Months Ended September 30

Nine Months Ended September 30

2017

2016

2017

2016

Total deposit spreads (excludes noninterest costs) (1)

1.88

%

1.64

%

1.82

%

1.65

%

Period end

Client brokerage assets (in millions)

$

167,274


$

137,985


Digital banking active users (units in thousands) (2)

34,472


32,814


Mobile banking active users (units in thousands)

23,572


21,305


Financial centers

4,511


4,629


ATMs

15,973


15,959


(1)

Includes deposits held in Consumer Lending.

(2)

Digital users represents mobile and/or online users across consumer businesses; historical information has been reclassified primarily due to the sale of the Corporation's non-U.S. consumer credit card business during the second quarter of 2017.

Client brokerage assets increased $29.3 billion driven by strong client flows and market performance. Mobile banking active users increased 2.3 million reflecting continuing changes in our customers' banking preferences. The number of financial centers

declined 118 driven by changes in customer preferences to self-service options as we continue to optimize our consumer banking network and improve our cost-to-serve.

Consumer Lending

Consumer Lending offers products to consumers and small businesses across the U.S. The products offered include credit and debit cards, residential mortgages and home equity loans, and direct and indirect loans such as automotive, recreational

vehicle and consumer personal loans. In addition to earning net interest spread revenue on its lending activities, Consumer Lending generates interchange revenue from credit and debit card transactions, late fees, cash advance fees, annual credit card fees, mortgage banking fee income and other miscellaneous fees. Consumer Lending products are available to our customers through our retail network, direct telephone, and online and mobile channels. Consumer Lending results also include the impact of servicing residential mortgages and home equity loans in the core portfolio, including loans held on the balance sheet of Consumer Lending and loans serviced for others.


Bank of America 16


We classify consumer real estate loans as core or non-core based on loan and customer characteristics such as origination date, product type, loan-to-value (LTV), Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO) score and delinquency status. For more information on the core and non-core portfolios, see Consumer Portfolio Credit Risk Management on page 39 . At September 30, 2017 , total owned loans in the core portfolio held in Consumer Lending were $111.6 billion, an increase of $13.8 billion from September 30, 2016 , primarily driven by higher residential mortgage balances, partially offset by a decline in home equity balances.

Consumer Lending includes the net impact of migrating customers and their related loan balances between Consumer Lending and GWIM . For more information on the migration of customer balances to or from GWIM , see GWIM – Net Migration Summary on page 20 .

Three Months Ended September 30, 2017 Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2016

Net income for Consumer Lending decreased $95 million to $867 million driven by higher provision for credit losses and lower noninterest income, partially offset by lower noninterest expense and higher net interest income. Net interest income increased $112 million to $2.8 billion primarily driven by the impact of an increase in loan balances. Noninterest income decreased $125 million to $1.4 billion driven by lower mortgage banking income, partially offset by higher card income.

The provision for credit losses increased $265 million to $920 million due to portfolio seasoning and loan growth in the U.S. credit card portfolio. Noninterest expense decreased $130 million to $1.8 billion primarily driven by improved operating efficiencies.

Average loans increased $19.9 billion to $263.7 billion primarily driven by increases in residential mortgages, as well as U.S. credit card and consumer vehicle loans, partially offset by lower home equity loan balances.

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016

Net income for Consumer Lending decreased $130 million to $2.6 billion driven by the same factors as described in the three-month discussion. Net interest income increased $264 million to $8.1 billion . Noninterest income decreased $276 million to $4.1 billion . Fluctuations were driven by the same factors as described in the three-month discussion.

The provision for credit losses increased $668 million to $2.5 billion due to portfolio seasoning and loan growth in the U.S. credit card portfolio. Noninterest expense decreased $519 million to $5.6 billion primarily driven by the same factor as described in the three-month discussion.

Average loans increased $19.4 billion to $257.8 billion driven by increases in residential mortgages as well as consumer vehicle and U.S credit card loans, partially offset by lower home equity loan balances.

Key Statistics  Consumer Lending

Three Months Ended September 30

Nine Months Ended September 30

(Dollars in millions)

2017

2016

2017

2016

Total U.S. credit card (1)

Gross interest yield

9.76

%

9.30

%

9.62

%

9.27

%

Risk-adjusted margin

8.63


9.11


8.64


8.99


New accounts (in thousands)

1,315


1,324


3,801


3,845


Purchase volumes

$

62,244


$

57,591


$

179,230


$

165,412


Debit card purchase volumes

$

74,769


$

71,049


$

220,729


$

212,316


(1)

In addition to the U.S. credit card portfolio in Consumer Banking , the remaining U.S. credit card portfolio is in GWIM .

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 , the total U.S. credit card risk-adjusted margin decreased 48 bps and 35 bps compared to the same periods in 2016 , primarily driven by increased net charge-offs and higher credit card rewards costs.

Total U.S. credit card purchase volumes increased $4.7 billion to $62.2 billion , and $13.8 billion to $179.2 billion , and debit card purchase volumes increased $3.7 billion to $74.8 billion , and $8.4 billion to $220.7 billion , reflecting higher levels of consumer spending.

Mortgage Banking Income

Mortgage banking income in Consumer Banking includes production income and net servicing income. Production income is comprised primarily of revenue from the fair value gains and losses recognized on our interest rate lock commitments (IRLCs) and loans held-for-sale (LHFS), the related secondary market execution, and costs related to representations and warranties made in the sales transactions along with other obligations incurred in the sales of mortgage loans. Production income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 decreased $148 million to $64 million , and $347 million to $185 million compared to the same periods in 2016 due to a decision to retain

a higher percentage of residential mortgage production in Consumer Banking , as well as the impact of a higher interest rate environment driving lower refinances.

Net servicing income within Consumer Banking includes income earned in connection with servicing activities and MSR valuation adjustments for the core portfolio, net of results from risk management activities used to hedge certain market risks of the MSRs. Net servicing income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 decreased $7 million to $78 million , and $6 million to $216 million compared to the same periods in 2016 .

Mortgage Servicing Rights

At September 30, 2017 , the core MSR portfolio, held within Consumer Lending, was $1.7 billion compared to $1.8 billion at September 30, 2016 . The decrease was primarily driven by the amortization of expected cash flows, which exceeded additions to the MSR portfolio, partially offset by changes in fair value from rising interest rates. For more information on MSRs, see Note 14 – Fair Value Measurements to the Consolidated Financial Statements .


17 Bank of America




Key Statistics

Three Months Ended September 30

Nine Months Ended September 30

(Dollars in millions)

2017

2016

2017

2016

Loan production (1) :





Total (2) :

First mortgage

$

13,183


$

16,865


$

37,876


$

45,802


Home equity

4,133


3,541


12,871


11,649


Consumer Banking:

First mortgage

$

9,044


$

11,588


$

25,679


$

32,207


Home equity

3,722


3,139


11,604


10,535


(1)

The loan production amounts represent the unpaid principal balance of loans and in the case of home equity, the principal amount of the total line of credit.

(2)

In addition to loan production in Consumer Banking , there is also first mortgage and home equity loan production in GWIM.

First mortgage loan originations in Consumer Banking and for the total Corporation decreased $2.5 billion and $3.7 billion in the three months ended September 30, 2017 compared to the same period in 2016 primarily driven by a higher interest rate environment driving lower first-lien mortgage refinances. First mortgage loan originations in Consumer Banking and for the total Corporation decreased $6.5 billion and $7.9 billion in the nine months ended September 30, 2017 primarily driven by the same factor as described in the three-month discussion.

Home equity production in Consumer Banking and for the total Corporation increased $583 million and $592 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 compared to the same period in 2016 due to a higher demand based on improving housing trends, and improved engagement with customers. Home equity production in Consumer Banking and for the total Corporation increased $1.1 billion and $1.2 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 primarily driven by the same factors as described in the three-month discussion.

Global Wealth & Investment Management

Three Months Ended September 30

Nine Months Ended September 30

(Dollars in millions)

2017

2016

% Change

2017

2016

% Change


Net interest income (FTE basis)

$

1,496


$

1,394


7

%

$

4,653


$

4,310


8

%

Noninterest income:

Investment and brokerage services

2,728


2,585


6


8,073


7,718


5


All other income

396


400


(1

)

1,181


1,245


(5

)

Total noninterest income

3,124


2,985


5


9,254


8,963


3


Total revenue, net of interest expense (FTE basis)

4,620


4,379


6


13,907


13,273


5


Provision for credit losses

16


7


129


50


46


9


Noninterest expense

3,370


3,255


4


10,091


9,816


3


Income before income taxes (FTE basis)

1,234


1,117


10


3,766


3,411


10


Income tax expense (FTE basis)

465


419


11


1,420


1,270


12


Net income

$

769


$

698


10


$

2,346


$

2,141


10


Net interest yield (FTE basis)

2.29

%

2.03

%

2.32

%

2.09

%

Return on average allocated capital

22


21


22


22


Efficiency ratio (FTE basis)

72.95


74.32


72.56


73.96


Balance Sheet

Three Months Ended September 30

Nine Months Ended September 30

Average

2017

2016

% Change

2017

2016

% Change


Total loans and leases

$

154,333


$

143,207


8

%

$

151,205


$

141,169


7

 %

Total earning assets

259,564


273,567


(5

)

267,732


275,674


(3

)

Total assets

275,570


288,820


(5

)

283,324


291,382


(3

)

Total deposits

239,647


253,812


(6

)

247,389


256,356


(3

)

Allocated capital

14,000


13,000


8


14,000


13,000


8


Period end

September 30
2017

December 31
2016

% Change


Total loans and leases

$

155,871


$

148,179


5

 %

Total earning assets

259,548


283,151


(8

)

Total assets

276,187


298,931


(8

)

Total deposits

237,771


262,530


(9

)


Bank of America 18


GWIM consists of two primary businesses: Merrill Lynch Global Wealth Management (MLGWM) and U.S. Trust, Bank of America Private Wealth Management (U.S. Trust).

MLGWM's advisory business provides a high-touch client experience through a network of financial advisors focused on clients with over $250,000 in total investable assets. MLGWM provides tailored solutions to meet our clients' needs through a full set of investment management, brokerage, banking and retirement products.

U.S. Trust, together with MLGWM's Private Banking & Investments Group, provides comprehensive wealth management solutions targeted to high net worth and ultra high net worth clients, as well as customized solutions to meet clients' wealth structuring, investment management, trust and banking needs, including specialty asset management services.

Three Months Ended September 30, 2017 Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2016

Net income for GWIM increased $71 million to $769 million due to higher revenue, partially offset by an increase in revenue-related expense. The operating margin was 27 percent compared to 26 percent a year ago.

Net interest income increased $102 million to $1.5 billion driven by higher short-term interest rates. Noninterest income, which primarily includes investment and brokerage services income, increased $139 million to $3.1 billion . This increase was driven by the impact of AUM flows and higher market valuations, partially offset by the impact of changing market dynamics on transactional revenue and AUM pricing. Noninterest expense increased $115 million to $3.4 billion primarily driven by higher revenue-related expense.

The return on average allocated capital was 22 percent, up from 21 percent, as higher net income was partially offset by an increased capital allocation.

MLGWM revenue of $3.8 billion increased five percent due to higher net interest income and asset management fees driven by higher market valuations and AUM flows, partially offset by lower transactional revenue. U.S. Trust revenue of $822 million increased eight percent reflecting higher net interest income and asset management fees driven by higher market valuations and AUM flows.

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016

Net income for GWIM increased $205 million to $2.3 billion due to higher revenue, partially offset by an increase in noninterest expense. The operating margin was 27 percent compared to 26 percent a year ago.

Net interest income increased $343 million to $4.7 billion . Noninterest income, which primarily includes investment and brokerage services income, increased $291 million to $9.3 billion . Noninterest expense increased $275 million to $10.1 billion . These increases were driven by the same factors as described in the three-month discussion.

The return on average allocated capital was 22 percent for both periods.

Revenue from MLGWM of $11.5 billion increased five percent, and U.S. Trust revenue of $2.5 billion increased seven percent. These increases were due to the same factors as described in the three-month discussion.


19 Bank of America




Key Indicators and Metrics

Three Months Ended September 30

Nine Months Ended September 30

(Dollars in millions, except as noted)

2017

2016

2017

2016

Revenue by Business

Merrill Lynch Global Wealth Management

$

3,796


$

3,617


$

11,452


$

10,886


U.S. Trust

822


761


2,450


2,300


Other (1)

2


1


5


87


Total revenue, net of interest expense (FTE basis)

$

4,620


$

4,379


$

13,907


$

13,273


Client Balances by Business, at period end

Merrill Lynch Global Wealth Management

$

2,245,499


$

2,089,683


U.S. Trust

430,684


400,538


Total client balances

$

2,676,183


$

2,490,221


Client Balances by Type, at period end

Assets under management

$

1,036,048


$

871,026


Brokerage assets

1,112,178


1,095,635


Assets in custody

131,680


122,804


Deposits

237,771


252,962


Loans and leases (2)

158,506


147,794


Total client balances

$

2,676,183


$

2,490,221


Assets Under Management Rollforward

Assets under management, beginning of period

$

990,709


$

832,394


$

886,148


$

900,863


Net client flows (3)

20,749


10,182


77,479


11,648


Market valuation/other  (1)

24,590


28,450


72,421


(41,485

)

Total assets under management, end of period

$

1,036,048


$

871,026


$

1,036,048


$

871,026


Associates, at period end (4, 5)

Number of financial advisors

17,221


16,834


Total wealth advisors, including financial advisors

19,108


18,714


Total primary sales professionals, including financial advisors and wealth advisors

20,115


19,594


Merrill Lynch Global Wealth Management Metric (5)

Financial advisor productivity (6)  (in thousands)

$

994


$

979


$

1,009


$

978


U.S. Trust Metric, at period end (5)

Primary sales professionals

1,696


1,684


(1)

Includes the results of BofA Global Capital Management, the cash management division of Bank of America, and certain administrative items. Also reflects the sale to a third party of approximately $80 billion of BofA Global Capital Management's AUM in the second quarter of 2016.

(2)

Includes margin receivables which are classified in customer and other receivables on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

(3)

For the nine months ended September 30, 2016, net client flows included $8.0 billion of net outflows related to BofA Global Capital Management's AUM that were sold during the second quarter of 2016.

(4)

Includes financial advisors in the Consumer Banking segment of 2,267 and 2,171 at September 30, 2017 and 2016 .

(5)

Associate computation is based on headcount.

(6)

Financial advisor productivity is defined as annualized MLGWM total revenue, excluding the allocation of certain asset and liability management (ALM) activities, divided by the total average number of financial advisors (excluding financial advisors in the Consumer Banking segment).

Client Balances

Client balances managed under advisory and/or discretion of GWIM are AUM and are typically held in diversified portfolios. Fees earned on AUM are calculated as a percentage of clients' AUM balances. The asset management fees charged to clients per year depend on various factors, but are commonly driven by the breadth of the client's relationship and generally range from 50 to 150 bps on their total AUM. The net client AUM flows represent the net change in clients' AUM balances over a specified period of time, excluding market appreciation/depreciation and other adjustments.

Client balances increased $186.0 billion , or seven percent , to nearly $2.7 trillion at September 30, 2017 compared to September 30, 2016 . The increase in client balances was primarily due to AUM which increased $165.0 billion , or 19 percent, due to positive net flows and higher market valuations.

Net Migration Summary

GWIM results are impacted by the net migration of clients and their corresponding deposit, loan and brokerage balances primarily to or from Consumer Banking, as presented in the table below. Migrations result from the movement of clients between business segments to better align with client needs.

Net Migration Summary (1)

Three Months Ended September 30

Nine Months Ended September 30

(Dollars in millions)

2017

2016

2017

2016

Total deposits, net – to (from) GWIM

$

34


$

17


$

(250

)

$

(1,040

)

Total loans, net – (from) GWIM

(15

)

(15

)

(145

)

-


Total brokerage, net – (from) GWIM

(199

)

(264

)

(175

)

(830

)

(1)

Migration occurs primarily between GWIM and Consumer Banking .



Bank of America 20


Global Banking

Three Months Ended September 30

Nine Months Ended September 30

(Dollars in millions)

2017

2016

% Change

2017

2016

% Change

Net interest income (FTE basis)

$

2,743


$

2,470


11

 %

$

8,229


$

7,440


11

 %

Noninterest income:

Service charges

777


780


<(1)


2,351


2,284


3


Investment banking fees

807


796


1


2,661


2,230


19


All other income

659


700


(6

)

1,739


1,942


(10

)

Total noninterest income

2,243


2,276


(1

)

6,751


6,456


5


Total revenue, net of interest expense (FTE basis)

4,986


4,746


5


14,980


13,896


8


Provision for credit losses

48


118


(59

)

80


870


(91

)

Noninterest expense

2,118


2,152


(2

)

6,435


6,450


<(1)


Income before income taxes (FTE basis)

2,820


2,476


14


8,465


6,576


29


Income tax expense (FTE basis)

1,062


925


15


3,192


2,435


31


Net income

$

1,758


$

1,551


13


$

5,273


$

4,141


27


Net interest yield (FTE basis)

2.99

%

2.83

%

3.02

%

2.88

%

Return on average allocated capital

17


17


18


15


Efficiency ratio (FTE basis)

42.52


45.34


42.97


46.42


Balance Sheet

Three Months Ended September 30

Nine Months Ended September 30

Average

2017

2016

% Change

2017

2016

% Change

Total loans and leases

$

346,093


$

334,363


4

 %

$

344,683


$

332,474


4

 %

Total earning assets

363,560


347,462


5


364,385


345,406


5


Total assets

414,755


395,479


5


414,867


394,425


5


Total deposits

315,692


307,288


3


307,163


301,175


2


Allocated capital

40,000


37,000


8


40,000


37,000


8


Period end

September 30
2017

December 31
2016

% Change

Total loans and leases

$

349,838


$

339,271


3

 %

Total earning assets

371,159


356,241


4


Total assets

423,185


408,330


4


Total deposits

319,545


307,630


4


Global Banking , which includes Global Corporate Banking, Global Commercial Banking, Business Banking and Global Investment Banking, provides a wide range of lending-related products and services, integrated working capital management and treasury solutions, and underwriting and advisory services through our network of offices and client relationship teams . Our lending products and services include commercial loans, leases, commitment facilities, trade finance, commercial real estate lending and asset-based lending . Our treasury solutions business includes treasury management, foreign exchange and short-term investing options . We also provide investment banking products to our clients such as debt and equity underwriting and distribution, and merger-related and other advisory services . Underwriting debt and equity issuances, fixed-income and equity research, and certain market-based activities are executed through our global broker-dealer affiliates, which are our primary dealers in several countries. Within Global Banking, Global Commercial Banking clients generally include middle-market companies, commercial real estate firms and not-for-profit companies . Global Corporate Banking clients generally include large global corporations, financial institutions and leasing clients . Business Banking clients include mid-sized U.S.-based businesses requiring customized and integrated financial advice and solutions .

Three Months Ended September 30, 2017 Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2016

Net income for Global Banking increased $207 million to $1.8 billion driven by higher revenue and lower provision for credit losses.

Revenue increased $240 million to $5.0 billion driven by higher net interest income. Net interest income increased $273 million to $2.7 billion primarily driven by the impact of higher short-term rates, as well as loan and deposit growth, partially offset by modest loan spread compression. Noninterest income decreased $33 million to $2.2 billion largely due to the impact of loans and loan-related hedging activity in the fair value option portfolio, partially offset by higher leasing-related revenue.

The provision for credit losses decreased $70 million to $48 million driven by reductions in energy exposures. Noninterest expense decreased $34 million to $2.1 billion driven by lower revenue-related incentives, partially offset by investments in technology and relationship bankers.

The return on average allocated capital remained relatively unchanged at 17 percent as higher net income offset the impact of $3.0 billion in additional allocated capital. For more information on capital allocated to the business segments, see Business Segment Operations on page 14 .


21 Bank of America




Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016

Net income for Global Banking increased $1.1 billion to $5.3 billion driven by higher revenue and lower provision for credit losses.

Revenue increased $1.1 billion to $15.0 billion driven by higher net interest income and noninterest income. Net interest income increased $789 million to $8.2 billion driven by loan-related growth, an increased deposit base driven by higher short-term rates and the impact of the allocation of ALM activities, partially offset by margin compression. Noninterest income increased $295 million to $6.8 billion largely due to higher investment banking fees.

The provision for credit losses decreased $790 million to $80 million primarily driven by reductions in energy exposures. Noninterest expense decreased $15 million to $6.4 billion primarily driven by lower personnel and operating expense, partially offset by higher FDIC expense and investments in technology.

The return on average allocated capital was 18 percent , up from 15 percent , as higher net income was partially offset by an

increased capital allocation. For more information on capital allocated to the business segments, see Business Segment Operations on page 14 .

Global Corporate, Global Commercial and Business Banking

Global Corporate, Global Commercial and Business Banking each include Business Lending and Global Transaction Services activities. Business Lending includes various lending-related products and services, and related hedging activities, including commercial loans, leases, commitment facilities, trade finance, real estate lending and asset-based lending. Global Transaction Services includes deposits, treasury management, credit card, foreign exchange and short-term investment products.

The table below and following discussion present a summary of the results, which exclude certain investment banking activities in Global Banking .

Global Corporate, Global Commercial and Business Banking

Three Months Ended September 30

Global Corporate Banking

Global Commercial Banking

Business Banking

Total

(Dollars in millions)

2017

2016

2017


2016

2017

2016

2017

2016

Revenue

Business Lending

$

1,127


$

1,113


$

1,090


$

1,069


$

101


$

91


$

2,318


$

2,273


Global Transaction Services

840


738


758


671


217


182


1,815


1,591


Total revenue, net of interest expense

$

1,967


$

1,851


$

1,848


$

1,740


$

318


$

273


$

4,133


$

3,864


Balance Sheet

Average

Total loans and leases

$

159,417


$

153,249


$

168,945


$

163,446


$

17,659


$

17,658


$

346,021


$

334,353


Total deposits

149,564


144,694


129,440


127,161


36,687


35,433


315,691


307,288


Nine Months Ended September 30

Global Corporate Banking

Global Commercial Banking

Business Banking

Total

2017

2016

2017

2016

2017

2016

2017

2016

Revenue

Business Lending

$

3,322


$

3,269


$

3,186


$

3,129


$

301


$

280


$

6,809


$

6,678


Global Transaction Services

2,470


2,171


2,217


2,036


625


549


5,312


4,756


Total revenue, net of interest expense

$

5,792


$

5,440


$

5,403


$

5,165


$

926


$

829


$

12,121


$

11,434


Balance Sheet

Average

Total loans and leases

$

157,144


$

152,772


$

169,751


$

162,207


$

17,762


$

17,467


$

344,657


$

332,446


Total deposits

146,627


140,817


124,446


125,676


36,092


34,685


307,165


301,178


Period end

Total loans and leases

$

161,441


$

151,825


$

170,825


$

164,518


$

17,579


$

17,760


$

349,845


$

334,103


Total deposits

147,893


141,754


135,249


124,995


36,402


35,656


319,544


302,405



Bank of America 22


Business Lending revenue increased $45 million and $131 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to the same periods in 2016 . The increase in the three-month period was driven by the impact of loan growth and lease-related activities and the allocation of ALM activities, partially offset by credit spread compression. The increase in the nine-month period was driven by the impact of the allocation of ALM activities and loans and loan-related hedging activity, partially offset by lower revenues from commercial real estate activity.

Global Transaction Services revenue increased $224 million and $556 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to the same periods in 2016 driven by the impact of an increase in deposit balances and higher short-term rates, the allocation of ALM activities as well as higher treasury-related revenue.

Average loans and leases increased three percent and four percent for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017

compared to the same periods in 2016 driven by growth in the commercial and industrial, and leasing portfolios. Average deposits increased three percent and two percent for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to the same periods in 2016 due to growth with new and existing clients.

Global Investment Banking

Client teams and product specialists underwrite and distribute debt, equity and loan products, and provide advisory services and tailored risk management solutions. The economics of certain investment banking and underwriting activities are shared primarily between Global Banking and Global Markets under an internal revenue-sharing arrangement. To provide a complete discussion of our consolidated investment banking fees, the following table presents total Corporation investment banking fees and the portion attributable to Global Banking.

Investment Banking Fees

Three Months Ended September 30

Nine Months Ended September 30

Global Banking

Total Corporation

Global Banking

Total Corporation

(Dollars in millions)

2017


2016

2017

2016

2017

2016

2017

2016

Products

Advisory

$

322


$

295


$

374


$

328


$

1,177


$

913


$

1,262


$

1,007


Debt issuance

397


405


962


908


1,170


1,060


2,789


2,466


Equity issuance

88


96


193


261


314


257


736


681


Gross investment banking fees

807


796


1,529


1,497


2,661


2,230


4,787


4,154


Self-led deals

(18

)

(10

)

(52

)

(39

)

(89

)

(36

)

(194

)

(135

)

Total investment banking fees

$

789


$

786


$

1,477


$

1,458


$

2,572


$

2,194


$

4,593


$

4,019


Total Corporation investment banking fees, excluding self-led deals, of $1.5 billion and $4.6 billion , which are primarily included within Global Banking and Global Markets, increased one percent and 14 percent for the three and nine months ended September

30, 2017 compared to the same periods in 2016 . The increase for both periods was driven by higher advisory fees and higher debt issuance fees due to an increase in overall client activity and market fee pools.



23 Bank of America




Global Markets

Three Months Ended September 30

Nine Months Ended September 30

(Dollars in millions)

2017

2016

% Change

2017

2016

% Change

Net interest income (FTE basis)

$

899


$

1,119


(20

)%

$

2,812


$

3,391


(17

)%

Noninterest income:

Investment and brokerage services

496


490


1


1,548


1,583


(2

)

Investment banking fees

623


645


(3

)

1,879


1,742


8


Trading account profits

1,714


1,934


(11

)

5,634


5,401


4


All other income

168


170


(1

)

682


501


36


Total noninterest income

3,001


3,239


(7

)

9,743


9,227


6


Total revenue, net of interest expense (FTE basis)

3,900


4,358


(11

)

12,555


12,618


<(1)


Provision for credit losses

(6

)

19


(132

)

2


23


(91

)

Noninterest expense

2,710


2,656


2


8,117


7,690


6


Income before income taxes (FTE basis)

1,196


1,683


(29

)

4,436


4,905


(10

)

Income tax expense (FTE basis)

440


609


(28

)

1,553


1,746


(11

)

Net income

$

756


$

1,074


(30

)

$

2,883


$

3,159


(9

)

Return on average allocated capital

9

%

12

%

11

%

11

%

Efficiency ratio (FTE basis)

69.48


60.94


64.64


60.94


Balance Sheet

Three Months Ended September 30

Nine Months Ended September 30

Average

2017

2016

% Change

2017

2016

% Change

Trading-related assets:

Trading account securities

$

216,988


$

185,785


17

 %

$

214,190


$

183,928


16

 %

Reverse repurchases

101,556


89,435


14


99,998


89,218


12


Securities borrowed

81,950


87,872


(7

)

83,770


86,159


(3

)

Derivative assets

41,789


52,325


(20

)

41,184


52,164


(21

)

Total trading-related assets (1)

442,283


415,417


6


439,142


411,469


7


Total loans and leases

72,347


69,043


5


70,692


69,315


2


Total earning assets (1)

446,754


422,636


6


444,478


421,221


6


Total assets

642,430


584,069


10


631,686


582,006


9


Total deposits

32,125


32,840


(2

)

32,397


34,409


(6

)

Allocated capital

35,000


37,000


(5

)

35,000


37,000


(5

)

Period end

September 30
2017

December 31
2016

% Change

Total trading-related assets (1)

$

426,371


$

380,562


12

 %

Total loans and leases

76,225


72,743


5


Total earning assets (1)

441,656


397,023


11


Total assets

629,270


566,060


11


Total deposits

33,382


34,927


(4

)

(1)

Trading-related assets include derivative assets, which are considered non-earning assets.

Global Markets offers sales and trading services, including research, to institutional clients across fixed-income, credit, currency, commodity and equity businesses . Global Markets product coverage includes securities and derivative products in both the primary and secondary markets . Global Markets provides market-making, financing, securities clearing, settlement and custody services globally to our institutional investor clients in support of their investing and trading activities. We also work with our commercial and corporate clients to provide risk management products using interest rate, equity, credit, currency and commodity derivatives, foreign exchange, fixed-income and mortgage-related products . As a result of our market-making activities in these products, we may be required to manage risk in a broad range of financial products including government securities, equity and equity-linked securities, high-grade and high-yield corporate debt securities , syndicated loans, mortgage-backed securities (MBS), commodities and asset-backed securities. The economics of certain investment banking and underwriting activities are shared primarily between Global Markets and Global Banking under an

internal revenue-sharing arrangement . Global Banking originates certain deal-related transactions with our corporate and commercial clients that are executed and distributed by Global Markets . For more information on investment banking fees on a consolidated basis, see page 23 .

Three Months Ended September 30, 2017 Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2016

Net income for Global Markets decreased $318 million to $756 million driven by lower sales and trading revenue, as well as a decline in investment banking fees and increased noninterest expense. Net DVA losses were $21 million compared to losses of $127 million . Sales and trading revenue, excluding net DVA, decreased $577 million primarily due to less favorable FICC market conditions across credit products and lower volatility in rates products compared to the prior-year period. Noninterest expense increased $54 million to $2.7 billion as continued investments in technology were partially offset by lower operating costs.


Bank of America 24


Average trading-related assets increased $26.9 billion to $442.3 billion primarily driven by targeted growth in client financing activities in the global equities business.

The return on average allocated capital was nine percent , down from 12 percent as lower net income was partially offset by a decreased capital allocation.

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016

Net income for Global Markets decreased $276 million to $2.9 billion . Net DVA losses were $310 million compared to losses of $137 million . Excluding net DVA, net income decreased $169 million to $3.1 billion primarily driven by higher noninterest expense and lower sales and trading revenue, partially offset by higher investment banking fees. Sales and trading revenue, excluding net DVA, decreased $168 million primarily due to weaker performance in rates products and emerging markets. Noninterest expense increased $427 million to $8.1 billion primarily due to litigation expense in the nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to a litigation recovery in the same period in 2016 and continued investments in technology.

Average trading-related assets increased $27.7 billion to $439.1 billion primarily driven by targeted growth in client financing activities in the global equities business. Period-end trading-related assets increased $45.8 billion to $426.4 billion driven by additional inventory in FICC to meet expected client demand as

well as targeted growth in client financing activities in the global equities business.

The return on average allocated capital remained at 11 percent , reflecting lower net income offset by a decrease in average allocated capital.

Sales and Trading Revenue

Sales and trading revenue includes unrealized and realized gains and losses on trading and other assets, net interest income, and fees primarily from commissions on equity securities. Sales and trading revenue is segregated into fixed-income (government debt obligations, investment and non-investment grade corporate debt obligations, commercial MBS, residential mortgage-backed securities, collateralized loan obligations (CLOs), interest rate and credit derivative contracts), currencies (interest rate and foreign exchange contracts), commodities (primarily futures, forwards, swaps and options) and equities (equity-linked derivatives and cash equity activity). The following table and related discussion present sales and trading revenue, substantially all of which is in Global Markets, with the remainder in Global Banking . In addition, the following table and related discussion present sales and trading revenue excluding the impact of net DVA, which is a non-GAAP financial measure. We believe the use of this non-GAAP financial measure provides additional useful information to assess the underlying performance of these businesses and to allow better comparison of period-over-period operating performance.

Sales and Trading Revenue (1, 2)

Three Months Ended September 30

Nine Months Ended September 30

(Dollars in millions)

2017

2016

2017

2016

Sales and trading revenue

Fixed-income, currencies and commodities

$

2,152


$

2,646


$

7,068


$

7,507


Equities

977


954


3,170


3,072


Total sales and trading revenue

$

3,129


$

3,600


$

10,238


$

10,579


Sales and trading revenue, excluding net DVA (3)

Fixed-income, currencies and commodities

$

2,166


$

2,767


$

7,350


$

7,647


Equities

984


960


3,198


3,069


Total sales and trading revenue, excluding net DVA

$

3,150


$

3,727


$

10,548


$

10,716


(1)

Includes FTE adjustments of $63 million and $162 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to $49 million and $136 million for the same periods in 2016 . For more information on sales and trading revenue, see Note 2 – Derivatives to the Consolidated Financial Statements .

(2)

Includes Global Banking sales and trading revenue of $61 million and $175 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to $57 million and $336 million for the same periods in 2016 .

(3)

FICC and Equities sales and trading revenue, excluding net DVA, is a non-GAAP financial measure. FICC net DVA losses were $14 million and $282 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to net DVA losses of $121 million and $140 million for the same periods in 2016 . Equities net DVA losses were $7 million and $28 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to net DVA losses of $6 million and gains of $3 million for the same periods in 2016 .

The explanations for period-over-period changes in sales and trading, FICC and Equities revenue, as set forth below, would be the same if net DVA was included.

Three Months Ended September 30, 2017 Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2016

FICC revenue, excluding net DVA, decreased $601 million due to less favorable market conditions across credit-related products and lower volatility in rates products in the current-year quarter. Equities revenue, excluding net DVA, increased $24 million

primarily due to growth in client financing activities, partially offset by slower secondary markets.

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016

FICC revenue, excluding net DVA, decreased $297 million as weaker performance in rates products and emerging markets were partially offset by strength in credit and G10 currencies. Equities revenue, excluding net DVA, increased $129 million primarily due to growth in client financing activities.



25 Bank of America




All Other

Three Months Ended September 30

Nine Months Ended September 30

(Dollars in millions)

2017

2016

% Change

2017

2016

% Change

Net interest income (FTE basis)

$

52


$

157


(67

)%

$

232


$

504


(54

)%

Noninterest income:

Card income

-


46


(100

)

71


145


(51

)

Mortgage banking income (loss)

(163

)

292


n/m


(72

)

577


(112

)

Gains on sales of debt securities

125


51


145


278


490


(43

)

All other income (loss)

(215

)

(134

)

60


72


(746

)

(110

)

Total noninterest income (loss)

(253

)

255


n/m


349


466


(25

)

Total revenue, net of interest expense (FTE basis)

(201

)

412


(149

)

581


970


(40

)

Provision for credit losses

(191

)

8


n/m


(376

)

(71

)

n/m


Noninterest expense

482


1,047


(54

)

3,790


4,510


(16

)

Loss before income taxes (FTE basis)

(492

)

(643

)

(23

)

(2,833

)

(3,469

)

(18

)

Income tax expense (benefit) (FTE basis)

(709

)

(462

)

53


(2,033

)

(1,985

)

2


Net income (loss)

$

217


$

(181

)

n/m


$

(800

)

$

(1,484

)

(46

)

Balance Sheet (1)

Three Months Ended September 30

Nine Months Ended September 30

Average

2017

2016

% Change

2017

2016

% Change

Total loans and leases

$

76,546


$

105,298


(27

)%

$

86,294


$

111,611


(23

)%

Total deposits

25,273


27,541


(8

)

25,629


27,588


(7

)

Period end

September 30
2017

December 31
2016

% Change

Total loans and leases  (2)

$

72,823


$

96,713


(25

)%

Total deposits

24,072


23,061


4


(1)

In segments where the total of liabilities and equity exceeds assets, which are generally deposit-taking segments, we allocate assets from All Other to those segments to match liabilities (i.e., deposits) and allocated shareholders' equity. Such allocated assets were $510.1 billion and $517.9 billion for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to $500.4 billion and $497.8 billion for the same periods in 2016 , and $515.0 billion and $518.7 billion at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 .

(2)

Included $9.2 billion of non-U.S. credit card loans, which were included in assets of business held for sale on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2016 . During the second quarter of 2017, the Corporation sold its non-U.S. consumer credit card business.

n/m = not meaningful

All Other consists of ALM activities , equity investments, non-core mortgage loans and servicing activities, the net impact of periodic revisions to the MSR valuation model for both core and non-core MSRs and the related economic hedge results and ineffectiveness, other liquidating businesses, residual expense allocations and other. ALM activities encompass certain residential mortgages, debt securities, interest rate and foreign currency risk management activities, the impact of certain allocation methodologies and accounting hedge ineffectiveness . The results of certain ALM activities are allocated to our business segments. For more information on our ALM activities, see Note 17 – Business Segment Information to the Consolidated Financial Statements . Equity investments include our merchant services joint venture as well as Global Principal Investments (GPI) which is comprised of a portfolio of equity, real estate and other alternative investments. For more information on our merchant services joint venture, see Note 10 – Commitments and Contingencies to the Consolidated Financial Statements .

During the second quarter of 2017, the Corporation sold its non-U.S. consumer credit card business. For more information on the sale, see Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Principles to the Consolidated Financial Statements .

The Corporation classifies consumer real estate loans as core or non-core based on loan and customer characteristics such as origination date, product type, LTV, FICO score and delinquency status. For more information on the core and non-core portfolios, see Consumer Portfolio Credit Risk Management on page 39 . Residential mortgage loans that are held for ALM purposes, including interest rate or liquidity risk management, are classified as core and are presented on the balance sheet of All Other . For more information on our interest rate and liquidity risk management activities, see Liquidity Risk on page 35 and Interest Rate Risk Management for the Banking Book on page 63 . During

the nine months ended September 30, 2017 , residential mortgage loans held for ALM activities decreased $4.9 billion to $29.8 billion at September 30, 2017 primarily as a result of payoffs and paydowns outpacing new originations. Non-core residential mortgage and home equity loans, which are principally run-off portfolios, including certain loans accounted for under the fair value option and MSRs pertaining to non-core loans serviced for others, are also held in All Other . During the nine months ended September 30, 2017 , total non-core loans decreased $9.3 billion to $43.8 billion at September 30, 2017 due primarily to payoffs and paydowns, as well as loan sales.

Three Months Ended September 30, 2017 Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2016

Results for All Other improved $398 million to net income of $217 million from a net loss of $181 million in the prior-year period, reflecting lower noninterest expense and a benefit in the provision for credit losses, partially offset by a decline in revenue. Revenue declined $613 million to a loss of $201 million reflecting lower mortgage banking income and the impact of the sale of the non-U.S. consumer credit card business. Mortgage banking income was negatively impacted by less favorable valuations on mortgage servicing rights, net of related hedges, and an increase in the provision for representations and warranties.

The provision for credit losses improved $199 million to a benefit of $191 million primarily driven by loan sale recoveries, continued runoff of the non-core portfolio and the sale of the non-U.S. consumer credit card business. Noninterest expense decreased $565 million to $482 million driven by lower personnel and operational costs due to the sale of the non-U.S. consumer credit card business and lower litigation expense in the non-core mortgage business.



Bank of America 26


The income tax benefit increased to $709 million from a benefit of $462 million as the prior-year quarter included a $350 million charge for the impact of the U.K. tax law changes enacted in September 2016. Both periods included income tax benefit adjustments to eliminate the FTE treatment in noninterest income of certain tax credits recorded in Global Banking .

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016

The net loss for All Other decreased $684 million to a net loss of $800 million , reflecting lower noninterest expense, the net gain on sale of the non-U.S. consumer credit card business in the second quarter and a larger benefit in the provision for credit losses, offset by a decline in revenue. Revenue declined $389 million primarily due to lower mortgage banking income. Mortgage banking income decreased $649 million driven by the same factors as described in the three-month discussion. Gains on sales of loans included in all other income, including nonperforming and other delinquent loans, were $108 million compared to gains of $214 million in the same period in 2016 .

The benefit in the provision for credit losses increased $305 million to a benefit of $376 million driven by the same factors as described in the three-month discussion. Noninterest expense decreased $720 million to $3.8 billion driven by lower litigation expense, lower personnel expense and a decline in non-core mortgage servicing costs, partially offset by a $295 million impairment charge related to certain data centers in the process of being sold.

The income tax benefit increased $48 million to a benefit of $2.0 billion , reflecting tax expense of $690 million recognized in connection with the sale of the non-U.S. consumer credit card business and tax benefits related to a new accounting standard on share-based compensation. The prior-year period included a $350 million charge for the impact of the U.K. tax law changes. Both periods included income tax benefit adjustments to eliminate the FTE treatment in noninterest income of certain tax credits recorded in Global Banking.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations

We have contractual obligations to make future payments on debt and lease agreements. Additionally, in the normal course of business, we enter into contractual arrangements whereby we commit to future purchases of products or services from unaffiliated parties. For more information on obligations and commitments, see Note 10 – Commitments and Contingencies to the Consolidated Financial Statements , Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations in the MD&A of the Corporation's 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K , as well as Note 11 – Long-term Debt and Note 12 – Commitments and Contingencies to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Corporation's 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K .

Representations and Warranties

For more information on representations and warranties, the reserve for representations and warranties exposures and the corresponding estimated range of possible loss, see Note 7 – Representations and Warranties Obligations and Corporate

Guarantees to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Corporation's 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K and, for more information related to the sensitivity of the assumptions used to estimate our reserve for representations and warranties, see Complex Accounting Estimates – Representations and Warranties Liability in the MD&A of the Corporation's 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K .

At September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , we had $17.6 billion and $18.3 billion of unresolved repurchase claims, predominately related to subprime and pay option first-lien loans and home equity loans. Outstanding repurchase claims remain unresolved primarily due to (1) the level of detail, support and analysis accompanying such claims, which impact overall claim quality and, therefore, claim resolution and (2) the lack of an established process to resolve disputes related to these claims.

In addition to unresolved repurchase claims, we have received notifications from a sponsor of third-party securitizations with whom we engaged in whole-loan transactions indicating that we may have indemnity obligations with respect to specific loans for which we have not received a repurchase request. These notifications were received prior to 2015, and totaled $1.3 billion at both September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 . During the three months ended September 30, 2017 , we reached an agreement with the party requesting indemnity, subject to acceptance of a settlement agreement by a securitization trustee; the impact of this agreement is included in the reserve for representations and warranties.

The reserve for representations and warranties and corporate guarantees is included in accrued expenses and other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet and the related provision is included in mortgage banking income. At September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , the reserve for representations and warranties was $2.2 billion and $2.3 billion . For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 , the representations and warranties provision was $198 million and $193 million compared to $99 million and $158 million for the same periods in 2016 . The increase in the provision was the result of advanced negotiations with certain counterparties where we believe we will reach settlements on several outstanding legacy matters.

In addition, we currently estimate that the range of possible loss for representations and warranties exposures could be up to $2 billion over existing accruals at September 30, 2017 . The estimated range of possible loss represents a reasonably possible loss, but does not represent a probable loss, and is based on currently available information, significant judgment and a number of assumptions that are subject to change.

Future provisions and/or ranges of possible loss associated with obligations under representations and warranties may be significantly impacted if future experiences are different from historical experience or our understandings, interpretations or assumptions. Adverse developments, with respect to one or more of the assumptions underlying the reserve for representations and warranties and the corresponding estimated range of possible loss, such as counterparties successfully challenging or avoiding the application of the relevant statute of limitations, could result in significant increases to future provisions and/or the estimated range of possible loss.



27 Bank of America




Other Mortgage-related Matters

We continue to be subject to additional mortgage-related litigation and disputes, as well as governmental and regulatory scrutiny and investigations, related to our past and current origination, servicing, transfer of servicing and servicing rights, servicing compliance obligations, foreclosure activities, indemnification obligations, and mortgage insurance and captive reinsurance practices with mortgage insurers. The ongoing environment of additional regulation, increased regulatory compliance obligations, and enhanced regulatory enforcement, combined with ongoing uncertainty related to the continuing evolution of the regulatory environment, has resulted in increased operational and compliance costs and may limit our ability to continue providing certain products and services. For more information on management's estimate of the aggregate range of possible loss for certain litigation matters and on regulatory investigations, see Note 10 – Commitments and Contingencies to the Consolidated Financial Statements .

Managing Risk

Risk is inherent in all our business activities. The seven key types of risk faced by the Corporation are strategic, credit, market, liquidity, compliance, operational and reputational risks. Sound risk management enables us to serve our customers and deliver for our shareholders. If not managed well, risks can result in financial loss, regulatory sanctions and penalties, and damage to our reputation, each of which may adversely impact our ability to execute our business strategies. The Corporation takes a comprehensive approach to risk management with a defined Risk Framework and an articulated Risk Appetite Statement which are approved annually by the Enterprise Risk Committee (ERC) and the Board.

Our Risk Framework is the foundation for comprehensive management of the risks facing the Corporation. The Risk Framework sets forth clear roles, responsibilities and accountability for the management of risk and provides a blueprint for how the Board, through delegation of authority to committees and executive officers, establishes risk appetite and associated limits for our activities.

Our Risk Appetite Statement is intended to ensure that the Corporation maintains an acceptable risk profile by providing a common framework and a comparable set of measures for senior management and the Board to clearly indicate the level of risk the Corporation is willing to accept. Risk appetite is set at least annually and is aligned with the Corporation's strategic, capital and financial operating plans. Our line of business strategies and risk appetite are also similarly aligned.

For more information on our risk management activities, including our Risk Framework, and the key types of risk faced by the Corporation, see the Managing Risk through Reputational Risk sections in the MD&A of the Corporation's 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K .


Capital Management

The Corporation manages its capital position so its capital is more than adequate to support its business activities and to maintain capital, risk and risk appetite commensurate with one another. Additionally, we seek to maintain safety and soundness at all times, even under adverse scenarios, take advantage of organic growth opportunities, meet obligations to creditors and counterparties, maintain ready access to financial markets, continue to serve as a credit intermediary, remain a source of strength for our subsidiaries, and satisfy current and future regulatory capital requirements. Capital management is integrated into our risk and governance processes, as capital is a key consideration in the development of our strategic plan, risk appetite and risk limits.

We periodically review capital allocated to our businesses and allocate capital annually during the strategic and capital planning processes. For additional information, see Business Segment Operations on page 14 .

Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review and Capital Planning

The Federal Reserve requires BHCs to submit a capital plan and requests for capital actions on an annual basis, consistent with the rules governing the Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR) capital plan.

On June 28, 2017, following the Federal Reserve's non-objection to our 2017 CCAR capital plan, the Board authorized the repurchase of $12.9 billion in common stock from July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018, including approximately $900 million to offset the effect of equity-based compensation plans during the same period. The common stock repurchase authorization includes both common stock and warrants.

During the three months ended September 30, 2017 , pursuant to the Board's authorization, we repurchased $3.0 billion of common stock, which includes common stock to offset equity-based compensation awards. The timing and amount of common stock repurchases will be subject to various factors, including the Corporation's capital position, liquidity, financial performance and alternative uses of capital, stock trading price, and general market conditions, and may be suspended at any time. The common stock repurchases may be effected through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions, including repurchase plans that satisfy the conditions of Rule 10b5-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. As a "well-capitalized" BHC, we may notify the Federal Reserve of our intention to make additional capital distributions not to exceed 0.25 percent of Tier 1 capital, and which were not contemplated in our capital plan, subject to the Federal Reserve's non-objection.


Bank of America 28


Regulatory Capital

As a financial services holding company, we are subject to regulatory capital rules issued by U.S. banking regulators including Basel 3, which includes certain transition provisions through January 1, 2019. The Corporation and its primary affiliated banking entity, BANA, are Basel 3 Advanced approaches institutions.

Basel 3 Overview

Basel 3 updated the composition of capital and established a Common equity tier 1 capital ratio. Common equity tier 1 capital primarily includes common stock, retained earnings and accumulated other comprehensive income (OCI), net of deductions and adjustments primarily related to goodwill, deferred tax assets, intangibles and defined benefit pension assets. Under the Basel 3 regulatory capital transition provisions, certain deductions and adjustments to Common equity tier 1 capital are phased in through January 1, 2018. As of January 1, 2017, under the transition provisions, 80 percent of these deductions and adjustments was recognized. Basel 3 also revised minimum capital ratios and buffer requirements, added a supplementary leverage ratio (SLR), and addressed the adequately capitalized minimum requirements under the Prompt Corrective Action (PCA) framework. Finally, Basel 3 established two methods of calculating risk-weighted assets, the Standardized approach and the Advanced approaches. The Standardized approach relies primarily on supervisory risk weights based on exposure type, and the Advanced approaches determine risk weights based on internal models.

As an Advanced approaches institution, we are required to report regulatory risk-based capital ratios and risk-weighted assets under both the Standardized and Advanced approaches. The approach that yields the lower ratio is used to assess capital adequacy including under the PCA framework.

Minimum Capital Requirements

Minimum capital requirements and related buffers are being phased in from January 1, 2014 through January 1, 2019. The PCA framework establishes categories of capitalization including "well capitalized," based on the Basel 3 regulatory ratio requirements. U.S. banking regulators are required to take certain mandatory actions depending on the category of capitalization, with no mandatory actions required for "well-capitalized" banking organizations, which included BANA at September 30, 2017 .

We are subject to a capital conservation buffer, a countercyclical capital buffer and a global systemically important

bank (G-SIB) surcharge that are being phased in over a three-year period ending January 1, 2019. Once fully phased in, the Corporation's risk-based capital ratio requirements will include a capital conservation buffer greater than 2.5 percent, plus any applicable countercyclical capital buffer and a G-SIB surcharge in order to avoid restrictions on capital distributions and discretionary bonus payments. The buffers and surcharge must be comprised solely of Common equity tier 1 capital. Under the phase-in provisions, we were required to maintain a capital conservation buffer greater than 1.25 percent plus a G-SIB surcharge of 1.5 percent at September 30, 2017 . The countercyclical capital buffer is currently set at zero. We estimate that our fully phased-in G-SIB surcharge will be 2.5 percent. The G-SIB surcharge may differ from this estimate over time. For more information on the Corporation's transition and fully phased-in capital ratios and regulatory requirements, see Table 11 .

Supplementary Leverage Ratio

Basel 3 requires Advanced approaches institutions to disclose an SLR. The numerator of the SLR is quarter-end Basel 3 Tier 1 capital. The denominator is total leverage exposure based on the daily average of the sum of on-balance sheet exposures less permitted Tier 1 deductions, as well as the simple average of certain off-balance sheet exposures, as of the end of each month in a quarter. Effective January 1, 2018, the Corporation will be required to maintain a minimum SLR of 3.0 percent, plus a leverage buffer of 2.0 percent in order to avoid certain restrictions on capital distributions and discretionary bonus payments. Insured depository institution subsidiaries of BHCs will be required to maintain a minimum 6.0 percent SLR to be considered "well capitalized" under the PCA framework.

Capital Composition and Ratios

Table 11 presents Bank of America Corporation's transition and fully phased-in capital ratios and related information in accordance with Basel 3 Standardized and Advanced approaches as measured at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 . Fully phased-in estimates are non-GAAP financial measures that the Corporation considers to be useful measures in evaluating compliance with new regulatory capital requirements that are not yet effective. For reconciliations to GAAP financial measures, see Table 14 . As of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , the Corporation met the definition of "well capitalized" under current regulatory requirements.


29 Bank of America




Table 11

Bank of America Corporation Regulatory Capital under Basel 3 (1)

September 30, 2017

Transition

Fully Phased-in

(Dollars in millions)

Standardized

Approach

Advanced

Approaches

Regulatory Minimum  (2)

Standardized

Approach

Advanced

Approaches (3)

Regulatory Minimum (4)

Risk-based capital metrics:

Common equity tier 1 capital

$

176,094


$

176,094


$

173,568


$

173,568


Tier 1 capital

196,438


196,438


195,291


195,291


Total capital (5)

232,849


223,814


229,779


220,745


Risk-weighted assets (in billions)

1,407


1,482


1,420


1,460


Common equity tier 1 capital ratio

12.5

%

11.9

%

7.25

%

12.2

%

11.9

%

9.5

%

Tier 1 capital ratio

14.0


13.3


8.75


13.8


13.4


11.0


Total capital ratio

16.5


15.1


10.75


16.2


15.1


13.0


Leverage-based metrics:

Adjusted quarterly average assets (in billions) (6)

$

2,194


$

2,194


$

2,193


$

2,193


Tier 1 leverage ratio

9.0

%

9.0

%

4.0


8.9

%

8.9

%

4.0


SLR leverage exposure (in billions)

$

2,742


SLR

7.1

%

5.0


December 31, 2016

Risk-based capital metrics:

Common equity tier 1 capital

$

168,866


$

168,866


$

162,729


$

162,729


Tier 1 capital

190,315


190,315


187,559


187,559


Total capital (5)

228,187


218,981


223,130


213,924


Risk-weighted assets (in billions)

1,399


1,530


1,417


1,512


Common equity tier 1 capital ratio

12.1

%

11.0

%

5.875

%

11.5

%

10.8

%

9.5

%

Tier 1 capital ratio

13.6


12.4


7.375


13.2


12.4


11.0


Total capital ratio

16.3


14.3


9.375


15.8


14.2


13.0


Leverage-based metrics:

Adjusted quarterly average assets (in billions) (6)

$

2,131


$

2,131


$

2,131


$

2,131


Tier 1 leverage ratio

8.9

%

8.9

%

4.0


8.8

%

8.8

%

4.0


SLR leverage exposure (in billions)

$

2,702


SLR

6.9

%

5.0


(1)

As an Advanced approaches institution, we are required to report regulatory capital risk-weighted assets and ratios under both the Standardized and Advanced approaches. The approach that yields the lower ratio is to be used to assess capital adequacy and was the Advanced approaches method at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 .

(2)

The September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 amounts include a transition capital conservation buffer of 1.25 percent and 0.625 percent, and a transition G-SIB surcharge of 1.5 percent and 0.75 percent. The countercyclical capital buffer for both periods is zero.

(3)

Basel 3 fully phased-in Advanced approaches estimates assume approval by U.S. banking regulators of our internal models methodology (IMM) for calculating counterparty credit risk regulatory capital for derivatives. As of September 30, 2017, we did not have regulatory approval of the IMM model. Basel 3 fully phased-in Common equity tier 1 capital ratio would be reduced by approximately 25 bps if IMM is not used.

(4)

Fully phased-in regulatory minimums assume a capital conservation buffer of 2.5 percent and estimated G-SIB surcharge of 2.5 percent . The estimated fully phased-in countercyclical capital buffer is currently set at zero . We will be subject to fully phased-in regulatory minimums on January 1, 2019. The fully phased-in SLR minimum assumes a leverage buffer of 2.0 percent and is applicable on January 1, 2018.

(5)

Total capital under the Advanced approaches differs from the Standardized approach due to differences in the amount permitted in Tier 2 capital related to the qualifying allowance for credit losses.

(6)

Reflects adjusted average total assets for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 .

Common equity tier 1 capital under Basel 3 Advanced – Transition was $176.1 billion at September 30, 2017 , an increase of $7.2 billion compared to December 31, 2016 driven by earnings and the exercise of warrants associated with the Series T preferred stock, partially offset by common stock repurchases, dividends and the phase-in under Basel 3 transition provisions of deductions, primarily related to deferred tax assets. During the nine months ended September 30, 2017 , total capital increased $4.8 billion

primarily driven by earnings, partially offset by common stock repurchases, dividends and the phase-in under Basel 3 transition provisions.

Risk-weighted assets decreased $48 billion during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 to $1,482 billion primarily due to model improvements, the sale of the non-U.S. consumer credit card business, improved credit quality and lower market risk.



Bank of America 30


Table 12 shows the capital composition as measured under Basel 3 – Transition at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 .

Table 12

Capital Composition under Basel 3 – Transition (1, 2)

(Dollars in millions)

September 30
2017

December 31
2016

Total common shareholders' equity

$

250,136


$

241,620


Goodwill

(68,413

)

(69,191

)

Deferred tax assets arising from net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards

(5,428

)

(4,976

)

Adjustments for amounts recorded in accumulated OCI attributed to AFS Securities and defined benefit postretirement plans

747


1,899


Adjustments for amounts recorded in accumulated OCI attributed to certain cash flow hedges

739


895


Intangibles, other than mortgage servicing rights and goodwill

(1,263

)

(1,198

)

Defined benefit pension fund assets

(749

)

(512

)

DVA related to liabilities and derivatives

632


413


Other

(307

)

(84

)

Common equity tier 1 capital

176,094


168,866


Qualifying preferred stock, net of issuance cost

22,323


25,220


Deferred tax assets arising from net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards

(1,357

)

(3,318

)

Defined benefit pension fund assets

(187

)

(341

)

DVA related to liabilities and derivatives under transition

158


276


Other

(593

)

(388

)

Total Tier 1 capital

196,438


190,315


Long-term debt qualifying as Tier 2 capital

23,129


23,365


Eligible credit reserves included in Tier 2 capital

2,420


3,035


Nonqualifying capital instruments subject to phase out from Tier 2 capital

1,893


2,271


Other

(66

)

(5

)

Total Basel 3 Capital

$

223,814


$

218,981


(1)

See Table 11 , footnote 1.

(2)

Deductions from and adjustments to regulatory capital subject to transition provisions under Basel 3 are generally recognized in 20 percent annual increments, and will be fully recognized as of January 1, 2018. Any assets that are a direct deduction from the computation of capital are excluded from risk-weighted assets and adjusted average total assets.

Table 13 presents the components of our risk-weighted assets as measured under Basel 3 – Transition at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 .

Table 13

Risk-weighted Assets under Basel 3 – Transition

September 30, 2017

December 31, 2016

(Dollars in billions)

Standardized Approach

Advanced Approaches

Standardized Approach

Advanced Approaches

Credit risk

$

1,348


$

868


$

1,334


$

903


Market risk

59


58


65


63


Operational risk

n/a


500


n/a


500


Risks related to CVA

n/a


56


n/a


64


Total risk-weighted assets

$

1,407


$

1,482


$

1,399


$

1,530


n/a = not applicable


31 Bank of America




Table 14 presents a reconciliation of regulatory capital in accordance with Basel 3 Standardized – Transition to the Basel 3 Standardized approach fully phased-in estimates and Basel 3 Advanced approaches fully phased-in estimates at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 .

Table 14

Regulatory Capital Reconciliations between Basel 3 Transition to Fully Phased-in (1)

(Dollars in millions)

September 30
2017

December 31
2016

Common equity tier 1 capital (transition)

$

176,094


$

168,866


Deferred tax assets arising from net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards phased in during transition

(1,357

)

(3,318

)

Accumulated OCI phased in during transition

(747

)

(1,899

)

Intangibles phased in during transition

(316

)

(798

)

Defined benefit pension fund assets phased in during transition

(187

)

(341

)

DVA related to liabilities and derivatives phased in during transition

158


276


Other adjustments and deductions phased in during transition

(77

)

(57

)

Common equity tier 1 capital (fully phased-in)

173,568


162,729


Additional Tier 1 capital (transition)

20,344


21,449


Deferred tax assets arising from net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards phased out during transition

1,357


3,318


Defined benefit pension fund assets phased out during transition

187


341


DVA related to liabilities and derivatives phased out during transition

(158

)

(276

)

Other transition adjustments to additional Tier 1 capital

(7

)

(2

)

Additional Tier 1 capital (fully phased-in)

21,723


24,830


Tier 1 capital (fully phased-in)

195,291


187,559


Tier 2 capital (transition)

27,376


28,666


Nonqualifying capital instruments phased out during transition

(1,893

)

(2,271

)

Other adjustments to Tier 2 capital

9,005


9,176


Tier 2 capital (fully phased-in)

34,488


35,571


Basel 3 Standardized approach Total capital (fully phased-in)

229,779


223,130


Change in Tier 2 qualifying allowance for credit losses

(9,034

)

(9,206

)

Basel 3 Advanced approaches Total capital (fully phased-in)

$

220,745


$

213,924


Risk-weighted assets – As reported to Basel 3 (fully phased-in)

Basel 3 Standardized approach risk-weighted assets as reported

$

1,407,093


$

1,399,477


Changes in risk-weighted assets from reported to fully phased-in

12,710


17,638


Basel 3 Standardized approach risk-weighted assets (fully phased-in)

$

1,419,803


$

1,417,115


Basel 3 Advanced approaches risk-weighted assets as reported

$

1,481,919


$

1,529,903


Changes in risk-weighted assets from reported to fully phased-in

(21,768

)

(18,113

)

Basel 3 Advanced approaches risk-weighted assets (fully phased-in) (2)

$

1,460,151


$

1,511,790


(1)

See Table 11 , footnote 1.

(2)

Basel 3 fully phased-in Advanced approaches estimates assume approval by U.S. banking regulators of our IMM for calculating counterparty credit risk regulatory capital for derivatives. As of September 30, 2017, we did not have regulatory approval of the IMM model. Basel 3 fully phased-in Common equity tier 1 capital ratio would be reduced by approximately 25 bps if IMM is not used.

Bank of America, N.A. Regulatory Capital

Table 15 presents transition regulatory capital information for BANA in accordance with Basel 3 Standardized and Advanced approaches as measured at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 . As of September 30, 2017 , BANA met the definition of "well capitalized" under the PCA framework.

Table 15

Bank of America, N.A. Regulatory Capital under Basel 3

September 30, 2017

Standardized Approach

Advanced Approaches

(Dollars in millions)

Ratio

Amount

Minimum
Required
 (1)

Ratio

Amount

Minimum
Required 
(1)

Common equity tier 1 capital

12.8

%

$

151,761


6.5

%

14.8

%

$

151,761


6.5

%

Tier 1 capital

12.8


151,761


8.0


14.8


151,761


8.0


Total capital

13.9


164,735


10.0


15.2


156,071


10.0


Tier 1 leverage

9.2


151,761


5.0


9.2


151,761


5.0


December 31, 2016

Common equity tier 1 capital

12.7

%

$

149,755


6.5

%

14.3

%

$

149,755


6.5

%

Tier 1 capital

12.7


149,755


8.0


14.3


149,755


8.0


Total capital

13.9


163,471


10.0


14.8


154,697


10.0


Tier 1 leverage

9.3


149,755


5.0


9.3


149,755


5.0


(1)

Percent required to meet guidelines to be considered "well capitalized" under the PCA framework.


Bank of America 32


Regulatory Developments

Minimum Total Loss-Absorbing Capacity

The Federal Reserve has established a final rule effective January 1, 2019, which includes minimum external total loss-absorbing capacity (TLAC) requirements to improve the resolvability and resiliency of large, interconnected BHCs. We estimate our minimum required external TLAC would be the greater of 22.5 percent of risk-weighted assets or 9.5 percent of SLR leverage exposure. In addition, U.S. G-SIBs must meet a minimum long-term debt requirement. Our minimum required long-term debt is estimated to be the greater of 8.5 percent of risk-weighted assets or 4.5 percent of SLR leverage exposure. As of September 30, 2017, the Corporation's TLAC and long-term debt exceeded our estimated 2019 minimum requirements.

Revisions to Approaches for Measuring Risk-weighted Assets

The Basel Committee has several open proposals to revise key methodologies for measuring risk-weighted assets. The proposals include a standardized approach for credit risk, standardized approach for operational risk, revisions to the credit valuation adjustment (CVA) risk framework and constraints on the use of internal models. The Basel Committee has also finalized a revised standardized model for counterparty credit risk, revisions to the securitization framework and its fundamental review of the trading book, which updates both modeled and standardized approaches for market risk measurement. These revisions are to be coupled with a proposed capital floor framework to limit the extent to which banks can reduce risk-weighted asset levels through the use of internal models, both at the input parameter and aggregate risk-weighted asset level. After the outstanding proposals are finalized by the Basel Committee, U.S. banking regulators may update the U.S. Basel 3 rules to incorporate the Basel Committee revisions.

Revisions to the G-SIB Assessment Framework

On March 30, 2017, the Basel Committee issued a consultative document with proposed revisions to the G-SIB surcharge assessment framework. The proposed revisions would include removing the cap on the substitutability category, expanding the scope of consolidation to include insurance subsidiaries in three categories (size, interconnectedness and complexity) and modifying the substitutability category weights with the

introduction of a new trading volume indicator. The Basel Committee has also requested feedback on a new short-term wholesale funding indicator, which would be included in the interconnectedness category. The U.S. banking regulators may update the U.S. G-SIB surcharge rule to incorporate the Basel Committee revisions.

For more information on our Regulatory Developments, see Capital Management – Regulatory Developments in the MD&A of the Corporation's 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K .

Broker-dealer Regulatory Capital and Securities Regulation

The Corporation's principal U.S. broker-dealer subsidiaries are Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated (MLPF&S) and Merrill Lynch Professional Clearing Corp (MLPCC). MLPCC is a fully-guaranteed subsidiary of MLPF&S and provides clearing and settlement services. Both entities are subject to the net capital requirements of Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Rule 15c3-1. Both entities are also registered as futures commission merchants and are subject to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission Regulation 1.17.

MLPF&S has elected to compute the minimum capital requirement in accordance with the Alternative Net Capital Requirement as permitted by SEC Rule 15c3-1. At September 30, 2017 , MLPF&S's regulatory net capital as defined by Rule 15c3-1 was $12.9 billion and exceeded the minimum requirement of $1.7 billion by $11.2 billion. MLPCC's net capital of $3.4 billion exceeded the minimum requirement of $600 million by $2.8 billion.

In accordance with the Alternative Net Capital Requirements, MLPF&S is required to maintain tentative net capital in excess of $1.0 billion, net capital in excess of $500 million and notify the SEC in the event its tentative net capital is less than $5.0 billion. At September 30, 2017 , MLPF&S had tentative net capital and net capital in excess of the minimum and notification requirements.

Merrill Lynch International (MLI), a U.K. investment firm, is regulated by the Prudential Regulation Authority and the Financial Conduct Authority, and is subject to certain regulatory capital requirements. At September 30, 2017 , MLI's capital resources were $35.3 billion which exceeded the minimum Pillar 1 requirement of $15.9 billion.



33 Bank of America




Common and Preferred Stock Dividends

Table 16 is a summary of our cash dividend declarations on preferred stock during the third quarter of 2017 and through October 30, 2017 . During the third quarter of 2017 , we recognized $465 million of cash dividends on preferred stock. For more information on preferred stock and a summary of our declared quarterly cash dividends on common stock, see Note 11 – Shareholders' Equity to the Consolidated Financial Statements .

Table 16

Preferred Stock Cash Dividend Summary

September 30, 2017

Preferred Stock

Outstanding
Notional
Amount

(in millions)

Declaration Date

Record Date

Payment Date

Per Annum

Dividend Rate

Dividend Per

Share

Series B  (1)

$

1


October 25, 2017

January 11, 2018

January 25, 2018

7.00

%

$

1.75


July 26, 2017

October 11, 2017

October 25, 2017

7.00


1.75


Series D  (2)

$

654


October 9, 2017

November 30, 2017

December 14, 2017

6.204

%

$

0.38775


July 5, 2017

August 31, 2017

September 14, 2017

6.204


0.38775


Series E  (2)

$

317


October 9, 2017

October 31, 2017

November 15, 2017

Floating


$

0.25556


July 5, 2017

July 31, 2017

August 15, 2017

Floating


0.25556


Series F

$

141


October 9, 2017

November 30, 2017

December 15, 2017

Floating


$

1,011.11111


July 5, 2017

August 31, 2017

September 15, 2017

Floating


1,022.22222


Series G

$

493


October 9, 2017

November 30, 2017

December 15, 2017

Adjustable


$

1,011.11111


July 5, 2017

August 31, 2017

September 15, 2017

Adjustable


1,022.22222


Series I  (2)

$

365


October 9, 2017

December 15, 2017

January 2, 2018

6.625

%

$

0.4140625


July 5, 2017

September 15, 2017

October 2, 2017

6.625


0.4140625


Series K (3, 4)

$

1,544


July 5, 2017

July 15, 2017

July 31, 2017

Fixed-to-floating


$

40.00


Series L

$

3,080


September 18, 2017

October 1, 2017

October 30, 2017

7.25

%

$

18.125


Series M (3, 4)

$

1,310


October 9, 2017

October 31, 2017

November 15, 2017

Fixed-to-floating


$

40.625


Series T  (5)

$

35


July 26, 2017

September 25, 2017

October 10, 2017

6.00

%

$

1,500.00


October 25, 2017

December 26, 2017

January 10, 2018

6.00


1,500.00


Series U  (3, 4)

$

1,000


October 9, 2017

November 15, 2017

December 1, 2017

Fixed-to-floating


$

26.00


Series V  (3, 4)

$

1,500


October 9, 2017

December 1, 2017

December 18, 2017

Fixed-to-floating


$

25.625


Series W  (2)

$

1,100


October 9, 2017

November 15, 2017

December 11, 2017

6.625

%

$

0.4140625


July 5, 2017

August 15, 2017

September 11, 2017

6.625


0.4140625


Series X  (3, 4)

$

2,000


July 5, 2017

August 15, 2017

September 5, 2017

Fixed-to-floating


$

31.25


Series Y (2)

$

1,100


September 18, 2017

October 1, 2017

October 27, 2017

6.50

%

$

0.40625


Series Z (3,4)

$

1,400


September 18, 2017

October 1, 2017

October 23, 2017

FIxed-to-floating


$

32.50


Series AA  (3, 4)

$

1,900


July 5, 2017

September 1, 2017

September 18, 2017

Fixed-to-floating


$

30.50


Series CC  (2)

$

1,100


September 18, 2017

October 1, 2017

October 30, 2017

6.20

%

$

0.3875


Series DD (3,4)

$

1,000


July 5, 2017

August 15, 2017

September 11, 2017

Fixed-to-floating


$

31.50


Series EE (2)

$

900


September 18, 2017

October 1, 2017

October 25, 2017

6.00

%

$

0.375


Series 1  (6)

$

98


October 9, 2017

November 15, 2017

November 28, 2017

Floating


$

0.18750


July 5, 2017

August 15, 2017

August 29, 2017

Floating


0.18750


Series 2  (6)

$

299


October 9, 2017

November 15, 2017

November 28, 2017

Floating


$

0.19167


July 5, 2017

August 15, 2017

August 29, 2017

Floating


0.19167


Series 3  (6)

$

653


October 9, 2017

November 15, 2017

November 28, 2017

6.375

%

$

0.3984375


July 5, 2017

August 15, 2017

August 28, 2017

6.375


0.3984375


Series 4  (6)

$

210


October 9, 2017

November 15, 2017

November 28, 2017

Floating


$

0.25556


July 5, 2017

August 15, 2017

August 29, 2017

Floating


0.25556


Series 5  (6)

$

422


October 9, 2017

November 1, 2017

November 21, 2017

Floating


$

0.25556


July 5, 2017

August 1, 2017

August 21, 2017

Floating


0.25556


(1)

Dividends are cumulative.

(2)

Dividends per depositary share, each representing a 1/1,000 th interest in a share of preferred stock.

(3)

Initially pays dividends semi-annually.

(4)

Dividends per depositary share, each representing a 1/25 th interest in a share of preferred stock.

(5)

The Series T outstanding notional amount represents Series T shares that were not surrendered in the exercise of the warrants. For additional information, see Recent Events on page 3 .

(6)

Dividends per depositary share, each representing a 1/1,200 th interest in a share of preferred stock.


Bank of America 34


Liquidity Risk

Funding and Liquidity Risk Management

Our primary liquidity risk management objective is to meet expected or unexpected cash flow and collateral needs while continuing to support our businesses and customers under a range of economic conditions. To achieve that objective, we analyze and monitor our liquidity risk under expected and stressed conditions, maintain liquidity and access to diverse funding sources, including our stable deposit base, and seek to align liquidity-related incentives and risks.

We define liquidity as readily available assets, limited to cash and high-quality, liquid, unencumbered securities that we can use to meet our contractual and contingent financial obligations as those obligations arise. We manage our liquidity position through line of business and ALM activities, as well as through our legal entity funding strategy, on both a forward and current (including intraday) basis under both expected and stressed conditions. We believe that a centralized approach to funding and liquidity management enhances our ability to monitor liquidity requirements, maximizes access to funding sources, minimizes borrowing costs and facilitates timely responses to liquidity events. For more information regarding global funding and liquidity risk management, see Liquidity Risk – Time-to-required Funding and Liquidity Stress Analysis in the MD&A of the Corporation's 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K .

NB Holdings Corporation

In 2016, we entered into intercompany arrangements with certain key subsidiaries under which we transferred certain of our parent company assets, and agreed to transfer certain additional parent company assets not needed to satisfy anticipated near-term expenditures, to NB Holdings Corporation, a wholly-owned holding company subsidiary (NB Holdings). The parent company is expected to continue to have access to the same flow of dividends, interest and other amounts of cash necessary to service its debt, pay dividends and perform other obligations as it would have had if it had not entered into these arrangements and transferred any assets.

In consideration for the transfer of assets, NB Holdings issued a subordinated note to the parent company in a principal amount equal to the value of the transferred assets. The aggregate principal amount of the note will increase by the amount of any future asset transfers. NB Holdings also provided the parent company with a committed line of credit that allows the parent company to draw funds necessary to service near-term cash needs. These arrangements support our preferred single point of entry resolution strategy, under which only the parent company would be resolved under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. These arrangements include provisions to terminate the line of credit, forgive the subordinated note and require the parent company to transfer its remaining financial assets to NB Holdings if our projected liquidity resources deteriorate so severely that resolution of the parent company becomes imminent.

Global Liquidity Sources and Other Unencumbered Assets

We maintain liquidity available to the Corporation, including the parent company and selected subsidiaries, in the form of cash and high-quality, liquid, unencumbered securities. Our liquidity buffer, referred to as Global Liquidity Sources (GLS), is comprised of assets that are readily available to the parent company and selected subsidiaries, including holding company, bank and broker-

dealer subsidiaries, even during stressed market conditions. Our cash is primarily on deposit with the Federal Reserve and, to a lesser extent, central banks outside of the U.S. We limit the composition of high-quality, liquid, unencumbered securities to U.S. government securities, U.S. agency securities, U.S. agency MBS and a select group of non-U.S. government securities. We can quickly obtain cash for these securities, even in stressed conditions, through repurchase agreements or outright sales. We hold our GLS in legal entities that allow us to meet the liquidity requirements of our global businesses, and we consider the impact of potential regulatory, tax, legal and other restrictions that could limit the transferability of funds among entities.

For the three months ended September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , our average GLS were $517 billion and $515 billion , and were as shown in Table 17 .

Table 17

Average Global Liquidity Sources

Three Months Ended

(Dollars in billions)

September 30
2017

December 31
2016

Parent company and NB Holdings

$

85


$

77


Bank subsidiaries

381


389


Other regulated entities

51


49


Total Average Global Liquidity Sources

$

517


$

515


Parent company and NB Holdings average liquidity was $85 billion and $77 billion for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 . The increase in parent company and NB Holdings liquidity was primarily due to debt issuances outpacing maturities. Typically, parent company and NB Holdings liquidity is in the form of cash deposited with BANA.

Average liquidity held at our bank subsidiaries was $381 billion and $389 billion for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 . Our bank subsidiaries' liquidity is primarily driven by deposit and lending activity, as well as securities valuation and net debt activity. Liquidity at bank subsidiaries excludes the cash deposited by the parent company and NB Holdings. Our bank subsidiaries can also generate incremental liquidity by pledging a range of unencumbered loans and securities to certain Federal Home Loan Banks (FHLBs) and the Federal Reserve Discount Window. The cash we could have obtained by borrowing against this pool of specifically-identified eligible assets was $304 billion and $310 billion at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , with the decrease due to FHLB borrowings, which reduced available borrowing capacity, and adjustments to our valuation model. We have established operational procedures to enable us to borrow against these assets, including regularly monitoring our total pool of eligible loans and securities collateral. Eligibility is defined in guidelines from the FHLBs and the Federal Reserve and is subject to change at their discretion. Due to regulatory restrictions, liquidity generated by the bank subsidiaries can generally be used only to fund obligations within the bank subsidiaries and transfers to the parent company or nonbank subsidiaries may be subject to prior regulatory approval.

Average liquidity held at our other regulated entities, comprised primarily of broker-dealer subsidiaries, was $51 billion and $49 billion for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 . Our other regulated entities also held unencumbered investment-grade securities and equities that we believe could be used to generate additional liquidity. Liquidity held in an other regulated entity is primarily available to meet the


35 Bank of America




obligations of that entity and transfers to the parent company or to any other subsidiary may be subject to prior regulatory approval due to regulatory restrictions and minimum requirements.

Table 18 presents the composition of average GLS at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 .

Table 18

Average Global Liquidity Sources Composition

Three Months Ended

(Dollars in billions)

September 30
2017

December 31
2016

Cash on deposit

$

117


$

118


U.S. Treasury securities

62


58


U.S. agency securities and mortgage-backed securities

324


322


Non-U.S. government securities

14


17


Total Average Global Liquidity Sources

$

517


$

515


Our GLS are substantially the same in composition to what qualifies as High Quality Liquid Assets (HQLA) under the final U.S. Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) rules. However, HQLA for purposes of calculating LCR is not reported at market value, but at a lower value that incorporates regulatory deductions and the exclusion of excess liquidity held at certain subsidiaries. The LCR is calculated as the amount of a financial institution's unencumbered HQLA relative to the estimated net cash outflows the institution could encounter over a 30-day period of significant liquidity stress, expressed as a percentage. For the three months ended September 30, 2017 , our average consolidated HQLA, on a net basis, was $439 billion and the consolidated Corporation's average LCR was 126 percent. Our LCR will fluctuate due to normal business flows from customer activity.

Time-to-required Funding and Liquidity Stress Analysis

We use a variety of metrics to determine the appropriate amounts of liquidity to maintain at the parent company and our subsidiaries. One metric we use to evaluate the appropriate level of liquidity at the parent company and NB Holdings is "time-to-required funding (TTF)." This debt coverage measure indicates the number of months the parent company can continue to meet its unsecured contractual obligations as they come due using only the parent company and NB Holdings' liquidity sources without issuing any new debt or accessing any additional liquidity sources. We define unsecured contractual obligations for purposes of this metric as maturities of senior or subordinated debt issued or guaranteed by Bank of America Corporation. These include certain unsecured debt instruments, primarily structured liabilities, which we may be required to settle for cash prior to maturity. TTF was 52 months at September 30, 2017 compared to 35 months at December 31, 2016 . The increase in TTF was driven by debt issuances outpacing maturities.

We also utilize liquidity stress analysis to assist us in determining the appropriate amounts of liquidity to maintain at the parent company and our subsidiaries. The liquidity stress testing process is an integral part of analyzing our potential contractual and contingent cash outflows. We evaluate the liquidity requirements under a range of scenarios with varying levels of severity and time horizons. The scenarios we consider and utilize incorporate market-wide and Corporation-specific events, including potential credit rating downgrades for the parent company and our subsidiaries, and more severe events including potential resolution scenarios. The scenarios are based on our historical experience, experience of distressed and failed financial

institutions, regulatory guidance, and both expected and unexpected future events.

The types of potential contractual and contingent cash outflows we consider in our scenarios may include, but are not limited to, upcoming contractual maturities of unsecured debt and reductions in new debt issuance; diminished access to secured financing markets; potential deposit withdrawals; increased draws on loan commitments, liquidity facilities and letters of credit; additional collateral that counterparties could call if our credit ratings were downgraded; collateral and margin requirements arising from market value changes; and potential liquidity required to maintain businesses and finance customer activities. Changes in certain market factors, including, but not limited to, credit rating downgrades, could negatively impact potential contractual and contingent outflows and the related financial instruments, and in some cases these impacts could be material to our financial results.

We consider all sources of funds that we could access during each stress scenario and focus particularly on matching available sources with corresponding liquidity requirements by legal entity. We also use the stress modeling results to manage our asset and liability profile and establish limits and guidelines on certain funding sources and businesses.

Net Stable Funding Ratio

U.S. banking regulators have issued a proposal for a Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR) requirement applicable to U.S. financial institutions following the Basel Committee's final standard. The U.S. NSFR would apply to the Corporation on a consolidated basis and to our insured depository institutions beginning on January 1, 2018, if finalized as proposed. We expect to meet the NSFR requirement within the regulatory timeline. The standard is intended to reduce funding risk over a longer time horizon. The NSFR is designed to ensure an appropriate amount of stable funding, generally capital and liabilities maturing beyond one year, given the mix of assets and off-balance sheet items.

Diversified Funding Sources

We fund our assets primarily with a mix of deposits and secured and unsecured liabilities through a centralized, globally coordinated funding approach diversified across products, programs, markets, currencies and investor groups.

The primary benefits of our centralized funding approach include greater control, reduced funding costs, wider name recognition by investors and greater flexibility to meet the variable funding requirements of subsidiaries. Where regulations, time zone differences or other business considerations make parent company funding impractical, certain other subsidiaries may issue their own debt.

We fund a substantial portion of our lending activities through our deposits, which were $1.28 trillion and $1.26 trillion at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 . Deposits are primarily generated by our Consumer Banking , GWIM and Global Banking segments. These deposits are diversified by clients, product type and geography, and the majority of our U.S. deposits are insured by the FDIC. We consider a substantial portion of our deposits to be a stable, low-cost and consistent source of funding. We believe this deposit funding is generally less sensitive to interest rate changes, market volatility or changes in our credit ratings than wholesale funding sources. Our lending activities may also be financed through secured borrowings, including credit card securitizations and securitizations with government-sponsored


Bank of America 36


enterprises, the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) and private-label investors, as well as FHLB loans.

Our trading activities in other regulated entities are primarily funded on a secured basis through securities lending and repurchase agreements and these amounts will vary based on customer activity and market conditions. We believe funding these activities in the secured financing markets is more cost-efficient and less sensitive to changes in our credit ratings than unsecured financing. Repurchase agreements are generally short-term and often overnight. Disruptions in secured financing markets for financial institutions have occurred in prior market cycles which resulted in adverse changes in terms or significant reductions in the availability of such financing. We manage the liquidity risks arising from secured funding by sourcing funding globally from a diverse group of counterparties, providing a range of securities collateral and pursuing longer durations, when appropriate. For more information on secured financing agreements, see Note 9 – Federal Funds Sold or Purchased, Securities Financing Agreements and Short-term Borrowings to the Consolidated Financial Statements .

We issue long-term unsecured debt in a variety of maturities and currencies to achieve cost-efficient funding and to maintain an appropriate maturity profile. While the cost and availability of unsecured funding may be negatively impacted by general market conditions or by matters specific to the financial services industry or the Corporation, we seek to mitigate refinancing risk by actively managing the amount of our borrowings that we anticipate will mature within any month or quarter.

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 , we issued $17.1 billion and $50.5 billion of long-term debt consisting of $14.0 billion and $37.5 billion for Bank of America Corporation, substantially all of which was TLAC compliant, $2.1 billion and $7.2 billion for Bank of America, N.A. and $974 million and $5.8 billion of other debt.

Table 19 presents the carrying value of aggregate annual contractual maturities of long-term debt as of September 30, 2017 . During the nine months ended September 30, 2017 , we had total long-term debt maturities and purchases of $44.1 billion consisting of $24.7 billion for Bank of America Corporation, $13.3 billion for Bank of America, N.A. and $6.1 billion of other debt.

Table 19

Long-term Debt by Maturity

(Dollars in millions)

Remainder of 2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

Thereafter

Total

Bank of America Corporation

Senior notes

$

3,576


$

19,634


$

18,257


$

12,389


$

17,975


$

72,582


$

144,413


Senior structured notes

518


2,909


1,470


1,001


426


9,368


15,692


Subordinated notes

-


2,922


1,537


-


372


21,311


26,142


Junior subordinated notes

-


-


-


-


-


3,835


3,835


Total Bank of America Corporation

4,094


25,465


21,264


13,390


18,773


107,096


190,082


Bank of America, N.A.



Senior notes

-


5,784


-


-


-


21


5,805


Subordinated notes

-


-


1


-


-


1,691


1,692


Advances from Federal Home Loan Banks

5


2,009


2,013


11


2


113


4,153


Securitizations and other Bank VIEs (1)

-


2,300


3,201


3,097


-


42


8,640


Other

25


82


201


19


-


194


521


Total Bank of America, N.A.

30


10,175


5,416


3,127


2


2,061


20,811


Other debt

Structured liabilities

129


4,667


2,001


1,378


790


7,960


16,925


Nonbank VIEs (1)

12


22


50


-


-


733


817


Other

-


-


-


-


-


31


31


Total other debt

141


4,689


2,051


1,378


790


8,724


17,773


Total long-term debt

$

4,265


$

40,329


$

28,731


$

17,895


$

19,565


$

117,881


$

228,666


(1)

Represents the total long-term debt included in the liabilities of consolidated variable interest entities (VIEs) on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

Table 20 presents our long-term debt by major currency at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 .

Table 20

Long-term Debt by Major Currency

September 30
2017

December 31
2016

(Dollars in millions)

U.S. dollar

$

177,505


$

172,082


Euro

34,813


28,236


British pound

6,951


6,588


Australian dollar

3,050


2,900


Japanese yen

2,938


3,919


Canadian dollar

1,958


1,049


Other

1,451


2,049


Total long-term debt

$

228,666


$

216,823


Total long-term debt increased $11.8 billion , or five percent , in the nine months ended September 30, 2017 , primarily due to issuances outpacing maturities. We may, from time to time, purchase outstanding debt instruments in various transactions, depending on prevailing market conditions, liquidity and other factors. In addition, our other regulated entities may make markets in our debt instruments to provide liquidity for investors. For information on funding and liquidity risk management, see Liquidity Risk – Time-to-required Funding and Liquidity Stress Analysis in the MD&A of the Corporation's 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K and for information regarding long-term debt funding, see Note 11 – Long-term Debt to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Corporation's 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K .

We use derivative transactions to manage the duration, interest rate and currency risks of our borrowings, considering the characteristics of the assets they are funding. For more information on our ALM activities, see Interest Rate Risk Management for the Banking Book on page 63 .


37 Bank of America




We may also issue unsecured debt in the form of structured notes for client purposes, certain of which qualify as TLAC eligible debt. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 , we issued $1.6 billion and $3.9 billion of structured notes, which are debt obligations that pay investors returns linked to other debt or equity securities, indices, currencies or commodities. We typically hedge the returns we are obligated to pay on these liabilities with derivatives and/or investments in the underlying instruments, so that from a funding perspective, the cost is similar to our other unsecured long-term debt. We could be required to settle certain structured note obligations for cash or other securities prior to maturity under certain circumstances, which we consider for liquidity planning purposes. We believe, however, that a portion of such borrowings will remain outstanding beyond the earliest put or redemption date.

Substantially all of our senior and subordinated debt obligations contain no provisions that could trigger a requirement for an early repayment, require additional collateral support, result in changes to terms, accelerate maturity or create additional financial obligations upon an adverse change in our credit ratings, financial ratios, earnings, cash flows or stock price.

Contingency Planning

We maintain contingency funding plans that outline our potential responses to liquidity stress events at various levels of severity. These policies and plans are based on stress scenarios and include potential funding strategies and communication and notification procedures that we would implement in the event we experienced stressed liquidity conditions. We periodically review and test the contingency funding plans to validate efficacy and assess readiness.

Our U.S. bank subsidiaries can access contingency funding through the Federal Reserve Discount Window. Certain non-U.S. subsidiaries have access to central bank facilities in the jurisdictions in which they operate. While we do not rely on these sources in our liquidity modeling, we maintain the policies, procedures and governance processes that would enable us to access these sources if necessary.

Credit Ratings

Credit ratings and outlooks are opinions expressed by rating agencies on our creditworthiness and that of our obligations or securities, including long-term debt, short-term borrowings, preferred stock and other securities, including asset securitizations. Table 21 presents the Corporation's current long-term/short-term senior debt ratings and outlooks expressed by the rating agencies.

On September 28, 2017, Fitch Ratings (Fitch) completed its latest review of 12 large, complex securities trading and universal banks, including Bank of America. The agency affirmed the long-term and short-term senior debt ratings of the Corporation and its rated subsidiaries, including BANA, and maintained its stable outlook on those ratings.

On September 12, 2017, Moody's Investor Service (Moody's) placed the long-term ratings of the Corporation and its rated subsidiaries, including BANA, on review for upgrade, citing our improved profitability and commitment to a conservative risk profile as drivers of the review. A rating review indicates that those ratings are under consideration for a change in the near term, which typically concludes within 90 days. Moody's concurrently affirmed the short-term ratings of the Corporation and its rated subsidiaries.

The ratings from Standard & Poor's Global Ratings (S&P) have not changed from those disclosed in the Corporation's 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

For more information on credit ratings, see Liquidity Risk – Credit Ratings in the MD&A of the Corporation's 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K . For more information on the additional collateral and termination payments that could be required in connection with certain over-the-counter (OTC) derivative contracts and other trading agreements as a result of such a credit rating downgrade, see Note 2 – Derivatives to the Consolidated Financial Statements herein and Item 1A. Risk Factors of the Corporation's 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K .

Table 21

Senior Debt Ratings

Moody ' s Investors Service

Standard & Poor ' s Global Ratings

Fitch Ratings

Long-term

Short-term

Outlook

Long-term

Short-term

Outlook

Long-term

Short-term

Outlook

Bank of America Corporation

Baa1

P-2

Review for upgrade

BBB+

A-2

Stable

A

F1

Stable

Bank of America, N.A.

A1

P-1

Review for upgrade

A+

A-1

Stable

A+

F1

Stable

Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated

NR

NR

NR

A+

A-1

Stable

A+

F1

Stable

Merrill Lynch International

NR

NR

NR

A+

A-1

Stable

A

F1

Stable

NR = not rated

Credit Risk Management

For more information on our credit risk management activities, see Consumer Portfolio Credit Risk Management below, Commercial Portfolio Credit Risk Management on page 48 , Non-U.S. Portfolio on page 56 , Provision for Credit Losses on page 57 , Allowance for Credit Losses on page 57 , and Note 4 – Outstanding Loans and Leases and Note 5 – Allowance for Credit Losses to the Consolidated Financial Statements .

During the third quarter of 2017, hurricanes impacted the southern United States and the Caribbean, bringing widespread

flooding and wind damage to communities across the region. In the weeks after these storms, we have been supporting our customers and clients in these communities by providing mobile financial centers and ATMs to supplement local financial centers in affected areas. In addition, we are providing support for the recovery efforts including proactive fee refunds in affected areas, as well as home loan and other credit assistance, including payment deferrals, for impacted individuals and businesses. While we are continuing our assessment, we do not believe that these storms will have a material financial impact on the Corporation.



Bank of America 38


Consumer Portfolio Credit Risk Management

Credit risk management for the consumer portfolio begins with initial underwriting and continues throughout a borrower's credit cycle. Statistical techniques in conjunction with experiential judgment are used in all aspects of portfolio management including underwriting, product pricing, risk appetite, setting credit limits, and establishing operating processes and metrics to quantify and balance risks and returns. Statistical models are built using detailed behavioral information from external sources such as credit bureaus and/or internal historical experience and are a component of our consumer credit risk management process. These models are used in part to assist in making both new and ongoing credit decisions, as well as portfolio management strategies, including authorizations and line management, collection practices and strategies, and determination of the allowance for loan and lease losses and allocated capital for credit risk.

Consumer Credit Portfolio

Improvement in the U.S. unemployment rate and home prices continued in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 resulting in improved credit quality and lower credit losses in the consumer real estate portfolio, partially offset by seasoning and loan growth in the credit card portfolio compared to the same periods in 2016 .

Improved credit quality, the sale of the non-U.S. consumer credit card business in the second quarter of 2017, continued loan balance run-off and sales in the consumer real estate portfolio drove a $640 million decrease in the consumer allowance for loan and lease losses during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 to $5.6 billion at September 30, 2017 . For additional information, see Allowance for Credit Losses on page 57 .

For more information on our accounting policies regarding delinquencies, nonperforming status, charge-offs and troubled debt restructurings (TDRs) for the consumer portfolio, see Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Principles to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Corporation's 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Table 22 presents our outstanding consumer loans and leases, and the PCI loan portfolio. In addition to being included in the "Outstandings" columns in Table 22 , PCI loans are also shown separately in the "Purchased Credit-impaired Loan Portfolio" columns. The impact of the PCI loan portfolio on certain credit statistics is reported where appropriate. For more information on PCI loans, see Consumer Portfolio Credit Risk Management – Purchased Credit-impaired Loan Portfolio on page 45 and Note 4 – Outstanding Loans and Leases to the Consolidated Financial Statements .

Table 22

Consumer Loans and Leases

Outstandings

Purchased Credit-impaired Loan Portfolio

(Dollars in millions)

September 30
2017

December 31
2016

September 30
2017

December 31
2016

Residential mortgage

$

199,446


$

191,797


$

8,399


$

10,127


Home equity

59,752


66,443


2,913


3,611


U.S. credit card

92,602


92,278


n/a


n/a


Non-U.S. credit card

-


9,214


n/a


n/a


Direct/Indirect consumer  (1)

93,391


94,089


n/a


n/a


Other consumer  (2)

2,424


2,499


n/a


n/a


Consumer loans excluding loans accounted for under the fair value option

447,615


456,320


11,312


13,738


Loans accounted for under the fair value option (3)

978


1,051


n/a


n/a


Total consumer loans and leases (4)

$

448,593


$

457,371


$

11,312


$

13,738


(1)

Outstandings include auto and specialty lending loans of $50.0 billion and $48.9 billion , unsecured consumer lending loans of $484 million and $585 million , U.S. securities-based lending loans of $39.3 billion and $40.1 billion , non-U.S. consumer loans of $2.9 billion and $3.0 billion , student loans of $0 and $497 million and other consumer loans of $682 million and $1.1 billion at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 .

(2)

Outstandings include consumer leases of $2.3 billion and $1.9 billion , consumer overdrafts of $160 million and $157 million and consumer finance loans of $0 and $465 million at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 .

(3)

Consumer loans accounted for under the fair value option include residential mortgage loans of $615 million and $710 million and home equity loans of $363 million and $341 million at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 . For more information on the fair value option, see Note 15 – Fair Value Option to the Consolidated Financial Statements .

(4)

Includes $9.2 billion of non-U.S. credit card loans, which were included in assets of business held for sale on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2016 . During the second quarter of 2017, the Corporation sold its non-U.S. consumer credit card business.

n/a = not applicable

Table 23 presents consumer nonperforming loans and accruing consumer loans past due 90 days or more. Nonperforming loans do not include past due consumer credit card loans, other unsecured loans and in general, consumer loans not secured by real estate (loans discharged in Chapter 7 bankruptcy are included) as these loans are typically charged off no later than the end of the month in which the loan becomes 180 days past due. Real estate-secured past due consumer loans that are insured by the FHA or individually insured under long-term standby agreements with Fannie Mae (FNMA) and Freddie Mac (FHLMC) (collectively,

the fully-insured loan portfolio) are reported as accruing as opposed to nonperforming since the principal repayment is insured. Fully-insured loans included in accruing past due 90 days or more are primarily from our repurchases of delinquent FHA loans pursuant to our servicing agreements with the Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA). Additionally, nonperforming loans and accruing balances past due 90 days or more do not include the PCI loan portfolio or loans accounted for under the fair value option even though the customer may be contractually past due.


39 Bank of America




Table 23

Consumer Credit Quality

Nonperforming

Accruing Past Due 90 Days or More

(Dollars in millions)

September 30
2017

December 31
2016

September 30
2017

December 31
2016

Residential mortgage (1)

$

2,518


$

3,056


$

3,372


$

4,793


Home equity 

2,691


2,918


-


-


U.S. credit card

n/a


n/a


810


782


Non-U.S. credit card

n/a


n/a


-


66


Direct/Indirect consumer

43


28


31


34


Other consumer

-


2


1


4


Total (2)

$

5,252


$

6,004


$

4,214


$

5,679


Consumer loans and leases as a percentage of outstanding consumer loans and leases (2)

1.17

%

1.32

%

0.94

%

1.24

%

Consumer loans and leases as a percentage of outstanding loans and leases, excluding PCI and fully-insured loan portfolios (2)

1.28


1.45


0.20


0.21


(1)

Residential mortgage loans accruing past due 90 days or more are fully-insured loans. At September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , residential mortgage included $2.3 billion and $3.0 billion of loans on which interest has been curtailed by the FHA, and therefore are no longer accruing interest, although principal is still insured, and $1.1 billion and $1.8 billion of loans on which interest was still accruing.

(2)

Balances exclude consumer loans accounted for under the fair value option. At September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , $27 million and $48 million of loans accounted for under the fair value option were past due 90 days or more and not accruing interest.

n/a = not applicable

Table 24 presents net charge-offs and related ratios for consumer loans and leases.

Table 24

Consumer Net Charge-offs and Related Ratios

Net Charge-offs (1)

Net Charge-off Ratios (1, 2)

Three Months Ended
September 30

Nine Months Ended
September 30

Three Months Ended
September 30

Nine Months Ended
September 30

(Dollars in millions)

2017

2016

2017

2016

2017

2016

2017

2016

Residential mortgage

$

(82

)

$

4


$

(84

)

$

129


(0.16

)%

0.01

%

(0.06

)%

0.09

%

Home equity

83


97


197


335


0.54


0.55


0.42


0.61


U.S. credit card

612


543


1,858


1,703


2.65


2.45


2.75


2.60


Non-U.S. credit card

-


43


75


134


-


1.83


1.91


1.84


Direct/Indirect consumer

67


34


147


91


0.28


0.14


0.21


0.13


Other consumer

51


57


116


152


7.23


9.74


5.83


9.09


Total

$

731


$

778


$

2,309


$

2,544


0.65


0.69


0.69


0.76


(1)

Net charge-offs exclude write-offs in the PCI loan portfolio. For more information on PCI write-offs, see Consumer Portfolio Credit Risk Management – Purchased Credit-impaired Loan Portfolio on page 45 .

(2)

Net charge-off ratios are calculated as annualized net charge-offs divided by average outstanding loans and leases excluding loans accounted for under the fair value option.

Net charge-offs, as shown in Tables 24 and 25 , exclude write-offs in the PCI loan portfolio of $62 million and $112 million in residential mortgage for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to $33 million and $109 million for the same periods in 2016 . Net charge-offs, as shown in Tables 24 and 25 , exclude write-offs in the PCI loan portfolio of $11 million and $49 million in home equity for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to $50 million and $161 million for the same periods in 2016 . Net charge-off (recovery) ratios including the PCI write-offs were (0.04) percent and 0.02 percent for residential mortgage for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to 0.08 percent and 0.17 percent for the same periods in 2016 . Net charge-off ratios including the PCI write-offs were 0.61 percent and 0.52 percent for home equity for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to 0.83 percent and 0.91 percent for the same periods in 2016 . For more information on PCI write-offs, see Consumer Portfolio Credit Risk Management – Purchased Credit-impaired Loan Portfolio on page 45 .

Table 25 presents outstandings, nonperforming balances, net charge-offs, allowance for loan and lease losses and provision for

loan and lease losses for the core and non-core portfolios within the consumer real estate portfolio. We categorize consumer real estate loans as core and non-core based on loan and customer characteristics such as origination date, product type, LTV, FICO score and delinquency status consistent with our current consumer and mortgage servicing strategy. Generally, loans that were originated after January 1, 2010, qualified under government-sponsored enterprise underwriting guidelines, or otherwise met our underwriting guidelines in place in 2015 are characterized as core loans. Loans held in legacy private-label securitizations, government-insured loans originated prior to 2010, loan products no longer originated, and loans originated prior to 2010 and classified as nonperforming or modified in a TDR prior to 2016 are generally characterized as non-core loans, and are principally run-off portfolios. Core loans as reported in Table 25 include loans held in the Consumer Banking and GWIM segments, as well as loans held for ALM activities in All Other . For more information on core and non-core loans, see Note 4 – Outstanding Loans and Leases to the Consolidated Financial Statements .



Bank of America 40


As shown in Table 25 , outstanding core consumer real estate loans increased $10.2 billion during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 driven by an increase of $14.2 billion in residential mortgage, partially offset by a $4.0 billion decrease in home equity.

Table 25

Consumer Real Estate Portfolio (1)

Outstandings

Nonperforming

Net Charge-offs (2)

September 30
2017

December 31
2016

September 30
2017

December 31
2016

Three Months Ended
September 30

Nine Months Ended
September 30

(Dollars in millions)

2017

2016

2017

2016

Core portfolio






Residential mortgage

$

170,657


$

156,497


$

1,076


$

1,274


$

(42

)

$

(12

)

$

(40

)

$

(23

)

Home equity

45,377


49,373


1,046


969


26


35


85


81


Total core portfolio

216,034


205,870


2,122


2,243


(16

)

23


45


58


Non-core portfolio




Residential mortgage

28,789


35,300


1,442


1,782


(40

)

16


(44

)

152


Home equity

14,375


17,070


1,645


1,949


57


62


112


254


Total non-core portfolio

43,164


52,370


3,087


3,731


17


78


68


406


Consumer real estate portfolio







Residential mortgage

199,446


191,797


2,518


3,056


(82

)

4


(84

)

129


Home equity

59,752


66,443


2,691


2,918


83


97


197


335


Total consumer real estate portfolio

$

259,198


$

258,240


$

5,209


$

5,974


$

1


$

101


$

113


$

464


Allowance for Loan

and Lease Losses

Provision for Loan

and Lease Losses

September 30
2017

December 31
2016

Three Months Ended
September 30

Nine Months Ended
September 30

2017

2016

2017

2016

Core portfolio

Residential mortgage

$

231


$

252


$

(49

)

$

(33

)

$

(60

)

$

(86

)

Home equity

456


560


(10

)

2


(19

)

10


Total core portfolio

687


812


(59

)

(31

)

(79

)

(76

)

Non-core portfolio



Residential mortgage

582


760


(59

)

(34

)

(111

)

(88

)

Home equity

763


1,178


(86

)

29


(255

)

(27

)

Total non-core portfolio

1,345


1,938


(145

)

(5

)

(366

)

(115

)

Consumer real estate portfolio





Residential mortgage

813


1,012


(108

)

(67

)

(171

)

(174

)

Home equity

1,219


1,738


(96

)

31


(274

)

(17

)

Total consumer real estate portfolio

$

2,032


$

2,750


$

(204

)

$

(36

)

$

(445

)

$

(191

)

(1)

Outstandings and nonperforming loans exclude loans accounted for under the fair value option. Consumer loans accounted for under the fair value option include residential mortgage loans of $615 million and $710 million and home equity loans of $363 million and $341 million at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 . For more information on the fair value option, see Note 15 – Fair Value Option to the Consolidated Financial Statements .

(2)

Net charge-offs exclude write-offs in the PCI loan portfolio. For more information on PCI write-offs, see Consumer Portfolio Credit Risk Management – Purchased Credit-impaired Loan Portfolio on page 45 .

We believe that the presentation of information adjusted to exclude the impact of the PCI loan portfolio, the fully-insured loan portfolio and loans accounted for under the fair value option is more representative of the ongoing operations and credit quality of the business. As a result, in the following discussions of the residential mortgage and home equity portfolios, we provide information that excludes the impact of the PCI loan portfolio, the fully-insured loan portfolio and loans accounted for under the fair value option in certain credit quality statistics. We separately disclose information on the PCI loan portfolio on page 45 .

Residential Mortgage

The residential mortgage portfolio makes up the largest percentage of our consumer loan portfolio at 45 percent of consumer loans and leases at September 30, 2017 . Approximately 35 percent of the residential mortgage portfolio is in Consumer Banking and approximately 35 percent is in GWIM. The remaining portion is in All Other and is comprised of originated

loans, purchased loans used in our overall ALM activities, delinquent FHA loans repurchased pursuant to our servicing agreements with GNMA as well as loans repurchased related to our representations and warranties.

Outstanding balances in the residential mortgage portfolio, excluding loans accounted for under the fair value option, increased $7.6 billion during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 as retention of new originations was partially offset by loan sales of $3.2 billion, and run-off.

At September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , the residential mortgage portfolio included $24.8 billion and $28.7 billion of outstanding fully-insured loans. On this portion of the residential mortgage portfolio, we are protected against principal loss as a result of either FHA insurance or long-term standby agreements that provide for the transfer of credit risk to FNMA and FHLMC. At September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , $18.3 billion and $22.3 billion had FHA insurance with the remainder protected by long-term standby agreements. At September 30,


41 Bank of America




2017 and December 31, 2016 , $5.5 billion and $7.4 billion of the FHA-insured loan population were repurchases of delinquent FHA loans pursuant to our servicing agreements with GNMA.

Table 26 presents certain residential mortgage key credit statistics on both a reported basis excluding loans accounted for under the fair value option, and excluding the PCI loan portfolio, the fully-insured loan portfolio and loans accounted for under the fair value option. Additionally, in the "Reported Basis" columns in

the table below, accruing balances past due and nonperforming loans do not include the PCI loan portfolio, in accordance with our accounting policies, even though the customer may be contractually past due. As such, the following discussion presents the residential mortgage portfolio excluding the PCI loan portfolio, the fully-insured loan portfolio and loans accounted for under the fair value option. For more information on the PCI loan portfolio, see page 45 .

Table 26

Residential Mortgage – Key Credit Statistics

Reported Basis (1)

Excluding Purchased
Credit-impaired and
Fully-insured Loans

(Dollars in millions)

September 30
2017

December 31
2016

September 30
2017

December 31
2016

Outstandings

$

199,446


$

191,797


$

166,262


$

152,941


Accruing past due 30 days or more

6,613


8,232


1,893


1,835


Accruing past due 90 days or more

3,372


4,793


-


 -


Nonperforming loans

2,518


3,056


2,518


3,056


Percent of portfolio





Refreshed LTV greater than 90 but less than or equal to 100

3

 %

5

%

3

 %

3

%

Refreshed LTV greater than 100

3


4


2


3


Refreshed FICO below 620

7


9


3


4


2006 and 2007 vintages (2)

10


13


9


12


Reported Basis

Excluding Purchased Credit-impaired and Fully-Insured Loans

Three Months Ended
September 30

Nine Months Ended
September 30

Three Months Ended
September 30

Nine Months Ended
September 30

2017

2016

2017

2016

2017

2016

2017

2016

Net charge-off ratio (3)

(0.16

)%

0.01

%

(0.06

)%

0.09

%

(0.20

)%

0.01

%

(0.07

)%

0.12

%

(1)

Outstandings, accruing past due, nonperforming loans and percentages of portfolio exclude loans accounted for under the fair value option.

(2)

These vintages of loans account for $825 million, or 33 percent , and $931 million, or 31 percent of nonperforming residential mortgage loans at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 .

(3)

Net charge-off ratios are calculated as annualized net charge-offs divided by average outstanding loans excluding loans accounted for under the fair value option.

Nonperforming residential mortgage loans decreased $538 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 as outflows, including sales of $386 million, outpaced new inflows which included the addition of $140 million of nonperforming loans as a result of clarifying regulatory guidance related to bankruptcy loans. Of the nonperforming residential mortgage loans at September 30, 2017 , $880 million, or 35 percent, were current on contractual payments. Loans accruing past due 30 days or more increased $58 million due in part to the timing impact of a consumer real estate servicer conversion that occurred during the third quarter of 2017.

Net charge-offs decreased $86 million to an $82 million net recovery and decreased $213 million to an $84 million net recovery for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 , compared to the same periods in 2016 . These decreases in net charge-offs were primarily driven by net recoveries of $88 million and $102 million related to loan sales during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 , compared to loan sale-related net recoveries of $7 million and net charge-offs of $35 million for the same periods in 2016 . Additionally, net charge-offs declined due to favorable portfolio trends and decreased write-downs on loans greater than 180 days past due driven by improvement in home prices and the U.S. economy.

Loans with a refreshed LTV greater than 100 percent represented two percent and three percent of the residential mortgage loan portfolio at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 . Of the loans with a refreshed LTV greater than 100 percent, 99 percent and 98 percent were performing at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 . Loans with a refreshed LTV

greater than 100 percent reflect loans where the outstanding carrying value of the loan is greater than the most recent valuation of the property securing the loan. The majority of these loans have a refreshed LTV greater than 100 percent primarily due to home price deterioration since 2006, partially offset by subsequent appreciation.

Of the $166.3 billion in total residential mortgage loans outstanding at September 30, 2017 , as shown in Table 27 , 34 percent were originated as interest-only loans. The outstanding balance of interest-only residential mortgage loans that have entered the amortization period was $10.5 billion, or 18 percent, at September 30, 2017 . Residential mortgage loans that have entered the amortization period generally have experienced a higher rate of early stage delinquencies and nonperforming status compared to the residential mortgage portfolio as a whole. At September 30, 2017 , $300 million, or three percent of outstanding interest-only residential mortgages that had entered the amortization period were accruing past due 30 days or more compared to $1.9 billion , or one percent for the entire residential mortgage portfolio. In addition, at September 30, 2017 , $475 million, or five percent of outstanding interest-only residential mortgage loans that had entered the amortization period were nonperforming, of which $255 million were contractually current, compared to $2.5 billion , or two percent for the entire residential mortgage portfolio, of which $880 million were contractually current. Loans that have yet to enter the amortization period in our interest-only residential mortgage portfolio are primarily well-collateralized loans to our wealth management clients and have an interest-only period of three to ten years. More than 80 percent


Bank of America 42


of these loans that have yet to enter the amortization period will not be required to make a fully-amortizing payment until 2020 or later.

Table 27 presents outstandings, nonperforming loans and net charge-offs by certain state concentrations for the residential mortgage portfolio. The Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana

Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) within California represented 16 percent and 15 percent of outstandings at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 . In the New York area, the New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island MSA made up 13 percent and 12 percent of outstandings at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 .

Table 27

Residential Mortgage State Concentrations

Outstandings (1)

Nonperforming (1)

Net Charge-offs (2)

September 30
2017

December 31
2016

September 30
2017

December 31
2016

Three Months Ended
September 30

Nine Months Ended
September 30

(Dollars in millions)

2017

2016

2017

2016

California

$

65,407


$

58,295


$

453


$

554


$

(59

)

$

(21

)

$

(84

)

$

(51

)

New York (3)

16,705


14,476


238


290


(1

)

(1

)

(2

)

17


Florida (3)

10,613


10,213


264


322


(9

)

2


(11

)

19


Texas

7,046


6,607


120


132


1


-


2


8


Massachusetts

5,691


5,344


63


77


(1

)

-


(1

)

4


Other U.S./Non-U.S.

60,800


58,006


1,380


1,681


(13

)

24


12


132


Residential mortgage loans (4)

$

166,262


$

152,941


$

2,518


$

3,056


$

(82

)

$

4


$

(84

)

$

129


Fully-insured loan portfolio

24,785


28,729






Purchased credit-impaired residential mortgage loan portfolio (5)

8,399


10,127






Total residential mortgage loan portfolio

$

199,446


$

191,797






(1)

Outstandings and nonperforming loans exclude loans accounted for under the fair value option.

(2)

Net charge-offs exclude $ 62 million and $112 million of write-offs in the residential mortgage PCI loan portfolio for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to $ 33 million and $ 109 million for the same periods in 2016. For more information on PCI write-offs, see Consumer Portfolio Credit Risk Management – Purchased Credit-impaired Loan Portfolio on page 45 .

(3)

In these states, foreclosure requires a court order following a legal proceeding (judicial states).

(4)

Amounts exclude the PCI residential mortgage and fully-insured loan portfolios.

(5)

At September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , 47 percent and 48 percent of PCI residential mortgage loans were in California. There were no other significant single state concentrations.

Home Equity

At September 30, 2017 , the home equity portfolio made up 13 percent of the consumer portfolio and is comprised of home equity lines of credit (HELOCs), home equity loans and reverse mortgages.

At September 30, 2017 , our HELOC portfolio had an outstanding balance of $52.8 billion , or 88 percent of the total home equity portfolio compared to $58.6 billion, also 88 percent, at December 31, 2016 . HELOCs generally have an initial draw period of 10 years and the borrowers typically are only required to pay the interest due on the loans on a monthly basis. After the initial draw period ends, the loans generally convert to 15-year amortizing loans.

At September 30, 2017 , our home equity loan portfolio had an outstanding balance of $4.7 billion , or eight percent of the total home equity portfolio compared to $5.9 billion, or nine percent, at December 31, 2016 . Home equity loans are almost all fixed-rate loans with amortizing payment terms of 10 to 30 years and of the $4.7 billion at September 30, 2017 , 57 percent have 25- to 30-year terms. At September 30, 2017 , our reverse mortgage portfolio had an outstanding balance, excluding loans accounted for under the fair value option, of $2.2 billion , or four percent of the total home equity portfolio compared to $1.9 billion, or three percent, at December 31, 2016 . We no longer originate reverse mortgages.

At September 30, 2017 , approximately 69 percent of the home equity portfolio was in Consumer Banking , 24 percent was in All Other and the remainder of the portfolio was primarily in GWIM . Outstanding balances in the home equity portfolio, excluding loans accounted for under the fair value option, decreased $6.7 billion during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 primarily due to paydowns and charge-offs outpacing new originations and draws on existing lines. Of the total home equity portfolio at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , $19.0 billion and $19.6 billion, or 32 percent and 29 percent, were in first-lien positions ( 33 percent and 31 percent excluding the PCI home equity portfolio). At September 30, 2017 , outstanding balances in the home equity portfolio that were in a second-lien or more junior-lien position and where we also held the first-lien loan totaled $9.8 billion, or 17 percent of our total home equity portfolio excluding the PCI loan portfolio.

Unused HELOCs totaled $45.4 billion at September 30, 2017 compared to $47.2 billion at December 31, 2016 . The decrease was primarily due to accounts reaching the end of their draw period, which automatically eliminates open line exposure, and customers choosing to close accounts. Both of these more than offset the impact of new production. The HELOC utilization rate was 54 percent at September 30, 2017 compared to 55 percent at December 31, 2016 .


43 Bank of America




Table 28 presents certain home equity portfolio key credit statistics on both a reported basis excluding loans accounted for under the fair value option, and excluding the PCI loan portfolio and loans accounted for under the fair value option. Additionally, in the "Reported Basis" columns in the table below, accruing balances past due 30 days or more and nonperforming loans do

not include the PCI loan portfolio, in accordance with our accounting policies, even though the customer may be contractually past due. As such, the following discussion presents the home equity portfolio excluding the PCI loan portfolio and loans accounted for under the fair value option. For more information on the PCI loan portfolio, see page 45 .

Table 28

Home Equity – Key Credit Statistics

Reported Basis (1)

Excluding Purchased
Credit-impaired Loans

(Dollars in millions)

September 30
2017

December 31
2016

September 30
2017

December 31
2016

Outstandings

$

59,752


$

66,443


$

56,839


$

62,832


Accruing past due 30 days or more (2)

581


566


581


566


Nonperforming loans (2)

2,691


2,918


2,691


2,918


Percent of portfolio

Refreshed CLTV greater than 90 but less than or equal to 100

4

%

5

%

3

%

4

%

Refreshed CLTV greater than 100

6


8


5


7


Refreshed FICO below 620

7


7


6


6


2006 and 2007 vintages (3)

31


37


28


34


Reported Basis

Excluding Purchased Credit-impaired

Three Months Ended
September 30

Nine Months Ended
September 30

Three Months Ended
September 30

Nine Months Ended
September 30

2017

2016

2017

2016

2017

2016

2017

2016

Net charge-off ratio (4)

0.54

%

0.55

%

0.42

%

0.61

%

0.56

%

0.58

%

0.44

%

0.65

%

(1)

Outstandings, accruing past due, nonperforming loans and percentages of the portfolio exclude loans accounted for under the fair value option.

(2)

Accruing past due 30 days or more includes $74 million and $81 million and nonperforming loans include $329 million and $340 million of loans where we serviced the underlying first-lien at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 .

(3)

These vintages of loans have higher refreshed combined loan-to-value (CLTV) ratios and accounted for 52 percent and 50 percent of nonperforming home equity loans at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , and 81 percent and 86 percent of net charge-offs for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 57 percent and 47 percent for the same periods in 2016.

(4)

Net charge-off ratios are calculated as annualized net charge-offs divided by average outstanding loans excluding loans accounted for under the fair value option.

Nonperforming outstanding balances in the home equity portfolio decreased $227 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 as outflows, including $66 million of net transfers to held-for-sale and $38 million of sales, outpaced new inflows, which included the addition of $135 million of nonperforming loans as a result of clarifying regulatory guidance related to bankruptcy loans. Of the nonperforming home equity portfolio at September 30, 2017 , $1.5 billion, or 55 percent, were current on contractual payments. Nonperforming loans that are contractually current primarily consist of collateral-dependent TDRs, including those that have been discharged in Chapter 7 bankruptcy, junior-lien loans where the underlying first-lien is 90 days or more past due, as well as loans that have not yet demonstrated a sustained period of payment performance following a TDR. In addition, $713 million, or 26 percent of nonperforming home equity loans were 180 days or more past due and had been written down to the estimated fair value of the collateral, less costs to sell. Accruing loans that were 30 days or more past due increased $15 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 .

In some cases, the junior-lien home equity outstanding balance that we hold is performing, but the underlying first-lien is not. For outstanding balances in the home equity portfolio on which we service the first-lien loan, we are able to track whether the first-lien loan is in default. For loans where the first-lien is serviced by a third party, we utilize credit bureau data to estimate the delinquency status of the first-lien. Given that the credit bureau database we use does not include a property address for the mortgages, we are unable to identify with certainty whether a reported delinquent first-lien mortgage pertains to the same property for which we hold a junior-lien loan. For certain loans, we

utilize a third-party vendor to combine credit bureau and public record data to better link a junior-lien loan with the underlying first-lien mortgage. At September 30, 2017 , we estimate that $856 million of current and $151 million of 30 to 89 days past due junior-lien loans were behind a delinquent first-lien loan. We service the first-lien loans on $191 million of these combined amounts, with the remaining $816 million serviced by third parties. Of the $1.0 billion of current to 89 days past due junior-lien loans, based on available credit bureau data and our own internal servicing data, we estimate that approximately $336 million had first-lien loans that were 90 days or more past due.

Net charge-offs decreased $14 million to $83 million and decreased $138 million to $197 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to same periods in 2016 . These decreases in net charge-offs were driven by favorable portfolio trends due in part to improvement in home prices and the U.S. economy, partially offset by $32 million of charge-offs as a result of clarifying regulatory guidance related to bankruptcy loans.

Outstanding balances with a refreshed CLTV greater than 100 percent comprised five percent and seven percent of the home equity portfolio at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 . Outstanding balances in the home equity portfolio with a refreshed CLTV greater than 100 percent reflect loans where our loan and available line of credit combined with any outstanding senior liens against the property are equal to or greater than the most recent valuation of the property securing the loan. Depending on the value of the property, there may be collateral in excess of the first-lien that is available to reduce the severity of loss on the second-lien. Of those outstanding balances with a refreshed CLTV greater than 100 percent, 95 percent of the customers were current on their


Bank of America 44


home equity loan and 91 percent of second-lien loans with a refreshed CLTV greater than 100 percent were current on both their second-lien and underlying first-lien loans at September 30, 2017 .

Of the $56.8 billion in total home equity portfolio outstandings at September 30, 2017 , as shown in Table 29 , 35 percent require interest-only payments. The outstanding balance of HELOCs that have entered the amortization period was $17.8 billion at September 30, 2017 . The HELOCs that have entered the amortization period have experienced a higher percentage of early stage delinquencies and nonperforming status when compared to the HELOC portfolio as a whole. At September 30, 2017 , $379 million, or two percent of outstanding HELOCs that had entered the amortization period were accruing past due 30 days or more. In addition, at September 30, 2017 , $2.0 billion, or 11 percent of outstanding HELOCs that had entered the amortization period were nonperforming, of which $1.1 billion were contractually current. Loans in our HELOC portfolio generally have an initial draw period of 10 years and 16 percent of these loans will enter the amortization period through 2018 and will be required to make fully-amortizing payments. We communicate to contractually current customers more than a year prior to the end of their draw period to inform them of the potential change to the payment structure before entering the amortization period, and provide payment options to customers prior to the end of the draw period.

Although we do not actively track how many of our home equity customers pay only the minimum amount due on their home equity loans and lines, we can infer some of this information through a review of our HELOC portfolio that we service and that is still in its revolving period (i.e., customers may draw on and repay their line of credit, but are generally only required to pay interest on a monthly basis). During the three months ended September 30, 2017 , approximately 35 percent of these customers with an outstanding balance did not pay any principal on their HELOCs.

Table 29 presents outstandings, nonperforming balances and net charge-offs by certain state concentrations for the home equity portfolio. In the New York area, the New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island MSA made up 13 percent of the outstanding home equity portfolio at both September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 . For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 , loans within this MSA contributed 29 percent and 26 percent of net charge-offs within the home equity portfolio compared to 15 percent and 16 percent of net charge-offs for the same periods in 2016 . The Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana MSA within California made up 11 percent of the outstanding home equity portfolio at both September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 . For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 , loans within this MSA contributed net recoveries of $7 million and $16 million within the home equity portfolio compared to net charge-offs of $0 and $2 million for the same periods in 2016 .

Table 29

Home Equity State Concentrations

Outstandings (1)

Nonperforming (1)

Net Charge-offs (2)

September 30
2017

December 31
2016

September 30
2017

December 31
2016

Three Months Ended
September 30

Nine Months Ended
September 30

(Dollars in millions)

2017

2016

2017

2016

California

$

15,699


$

17,563


$

782


$

829


$

(9

)

$

3


$

(24

)

$

12


Florida (3)

6,508


7,319


405


442


13


18


34


59


New Jersey (3)

4,683


5,102


195


201


16


12


37


37


New York (3)

4,330


4,720


254


271


14


11


31


37


Massachusetts

2,846


3,078


94


100


5


2


7


10


Other U.S./Non-U.S.

22,773


25,050


961


1,075


44


51


112


180


Home equity loans  (4)

$

56,839


$

62,832


$

2,691


$

2,918


$

83


$

97


$

197


$

335


Purchased credit-impaired home equity portfolio (5)

2,913


3,611






Total home equity loan portfolio

$

59,752


$

66,443






(1)

Outstandings and nonperforming loans exclude loans accounted for under the fair value option.

(2)

Net charge-offs exclude $11 million and $49 million of write-offs in the home equity PCI loan portfolio for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to $50 million and $161 million for the same periods in 2016. For more information on PCI write-offs, see Consumer Portfolio Credit Risk Management – Purchased Credit-impaired Loan Portfolio on page 45 .

(3)

In these states, foreclosure requires a court order following a legal proceeding (judicial states).

(4)

Amount excludes the PCI home equity portfolio.

(5)

At September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , 28 percent and 29 percent of PCI home equity loans were in California. There were no other significant single state concentrations.

Purchased Credit-impaired Loan Portfolio

Loans acquired with evidence of credit quality deterioration since origination and for which it is probable at purchase that we will be unable to collect all contractually required payments are accounted for under the accounting standards for PCI loans. For more information on PCI loans, see Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Principles to the Consolidated Financial Statements of

the Corporation's 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K and Note 4 – Outstanding Loans and Leases to the Consolidated Financial Statements .

Table 30 presents the unpaid principal balance, carrying value, related valuation allowance and the net carrying value as a percentage of the unpaid principal balance for the PCI loan portfolio.


45 Bank of America




Table 30

Purchased Credit-impaired Loan Portfolio

September 30, 2017

(Dollars in millions)

Unpaid
Principal
Balance

Gross Carrying
Value

Related
Valuation
Allowance

Carrying
Value Net of
Valuation
Allowance

Percent of Unpaid
Principal
Balance

Residential mortgage (1)

$

8,515


$

8,399


$

134


$

8,265


97.06

%

Home equity

2,988


2,913


181


2,732


91.43


Total purchased credit-impaired loan portfolio

$

11,503


$

11,312


$

315


$

10,997


95.60


December 31, 2016

Residential mortgage (1)

$

10,330


$

10,127


$

169


$

9,958


96.40

%

Home equity

3,689


3,611


250


3,361


91.11


Total purchased credit-impaired loan portfolio

$

14,019


$

13,738


$

419


$

13,319


95.01


(1)

At September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , pay option loans had an unpaid principal balance of $1.5 billion and $1.9 billion and a carrying value of $1.5 billion and $1.8 billion. This includes $1.3 billion and $1.6 billion of loans that were credit-impaired upon acquisition and $152 million and $226 million of loans that are 90 days or more past due at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 . The total unpaid principal balance of pay option loans with accumulated negative amortization was $177 million and $303 million, including $10 million and $16 million of negative amortization at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 .

The total PCI unpaid principal balance decreased $2.5 billion , or 18 percent , during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 primarily driven by payoffs, paydowns and write-offs. During the nine months ended September 30, 2017 , we sold PCI loans with a carrying value of $742 million compared to sales of $435 million for the same period in 2016 .

Of the unpaid principal balance of $11.5 billion at September 30, 2017 , $10.1 billion, or 88 percent, was current based on the contractual terms, $811 million, or seven percent, was in early stage delinquency, and $394 million was 180 days or more past due, including $331 million of first-lien mortgages and $63 million of home equity loans.

The PCI residential mortgage loan portfolio represented 74 percent of the total PCI loan portfolio at September 30, 2017 . Those loans to borrowers with a refreshed FICO score below 620 represented 25 percent of the PCI residential mortgage loan portfolio at September 30, 2017 . Loans with a refreshed LTV greater than 90 percent, after consideration of purchase accounting adjustments and the related valuation allowance, represented 16 percent of the PCI residential mortgage loan portfolio and 17 percent based on the unpaid principal balance at September 30, 2017 .

The PCI home equity portfolio represented 26 percent of the total PCI loan portfolio at September 30, 2017 . Those loans with a refreshed FICO score below 620 represented 16 percent of the PCI home equity portfolio at September 30, 2017 . Loans with a

refreshed CLTV greater than 90 percent, after consideration of purchase accounting adjustments and the related valuation allowance, represented 35 percent of the PCI home equity portfolio and 38 percent based on the unpaid principal balance at September 30, 2017 .

U.S. Credit Card

At September 30, 2017 , 97 percent of the U.S. credit card portfolio was managed in Consumer Banking with the remainder in GWIM .

Outstandings in the U.S. credit card portfolio remained relatively unchanged at $92.6 billion at September 30, 2017. Net charge-offs increased $69 million to $612 million , and $155 million to $1.9 billion for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to the same periods in 2016 due to portfolio seasoning and loan growth. U.S. credit card loans 30 days or more past due and still accruing interest increased $62 million and loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing interest increased $28 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 , driven by portfolio seasoning and loan growth.

Unused lines of credit for U.S. credit card totaled $332.0 billion and $321.6 billion at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 . The increase was driven by a seasonal decrease in line utilization due to a decrease in transaction volume as well as account growth and lines of credit increases.

Table 31 presents certain state concentrations for the U.S. credit card portfolio.

Table 31

U.S. Credit Card State Concentrations

Outstandings

Accruing Past Due
90 Days or More

Net Charge-offs

September 30
2017

December 31
2016

September 30
2017

December 31
2016

Three Months Ended
September 30

Nine Months Ended
September 30

(Dollars in millions)

2017

2016

2017

2016

California

$

14,533


$

14,251


$

125


$

115


$

104


$

86


$

303


$

269


Florida

8,030


7,864


74


85


58


60


195


184


Texas

7,211


7,037


67


65


46


40


143


122


New York

5,762


5,683


78


60


59


39


155


120


Washington

4,177


4,128


20


18


13


13


41


42


Other U.S.

52,889


53,315


446


439


332


305


1,021


966


Total U.S. credit card portfolio

$

92,602


$

92,278


$

810


$

782


$

612


$

543


$

1,858


$

1,703



Bank of America 46


Direct/Indirect Consumer

At September 30, 2017 , approximately 54 percent of the direct/indirect portfolio was included in Consumer Banking (consumer auto and specialty lending – automotive, marine, aircraft, recreational vehicle loans and consumer personal loans) and 46 percent was included in GWIM (principally securities-based lending loans).

Outstandings in the direct/indirect portfolio decreased $698 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2017

primarily driven by lower draws and utilization in the securities-based lending portfolio.

Net charge-offs increased $33 million to $67 million , and $56 million to $ 147 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to the same periods in 2016 due largely to recent clarifying regulatory guidance related to bankruptcy and repossessed loans.

Table 32 presents certain state concentrations for the direct/indirect consumer loan portfolio.

Table 32

Direct/Indirect State Concentrations

Outstandings

Accruing Past Due
90 Days or More

Net Charge-offs

September 30
2017

December 31
2016

September 30
2017

December 31
2016

Three Months Ended
September 30

Nine Months Ended
September 30

(Dollars in millions)

2017

2016

2017

2016

California

$

11,039


$

11,300


$

3


$

3


$

7


$

4


$

14


$

9


Florida

10,469


9,418


4


3


15


7


31


20


Texas

10,410


9,406


3


5


13


6


29


14


New York

6,085


5,253


2


1


2


-


3


1


Illinois

3,436


2,996


1


1


3


1


5


3


Other U.S./Non-U.S.

51,952


55,716


18


21


27


16


65


44


Total direct/indirect loan portfolio

$

93,391


$

94,089


$

31


$

34


$

67


$

34


$

147


$

91


Other Consumer

At September 30, 2017 , approximately 93 percent of the $2.4 billion other consumer portfolio was consumer auto leases included in Consumer Banking. The remainder is primarily associated with certain consumer finance businesses that we previously exited.

Nonperforming Consumer Loans, Leases and Foreclosed Properties Activity

Table 33 presents nonperforming consumer loans, leases and foreclosed properties activity for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 . For more information on nonperforming loans, see Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Principles to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Corporation's 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K and Note 4 – Outstanding Loans and Leases to the Consolidated Financial Statements . During the nine months ended September 30, 2017 , nonperforming consumer loans declined $752 million to $5.3 billion driven in part by loan sales of $423 million and net transfers of loans to held-for-sale of $198 million. Additionally, nonperforming loans declined as outflows outpaced new inflows, which included the addition of $295 million of nonperforming loans as a result of clarifying regulatory guidance related to bankruptcy loans.

The outstanding balance of a real estate-secured loan that is in excess of the estimated property value less costs to sell is charged off no later than the end of the month in which the loan becomes 180 days past due unless repayment of the loan is fully insured. At September 30, 2017 , $1.9 billion, or 35 percent of nonperforming consumer real estate loans and foreclosed properties had been written down to their estimated property value less costs to sell, including $1.7 billion of nonperforming loans 180 days or more past due and $259 million of foreclosed

properties. In addition, at September 30, 2017 , $2.3 billion, or 45 percent of nonperforming consumer loans were modified and are now current after successful trial periods, or are current loans classified as nonperforming loans in accordance with applicable policies.

Foreclosed properties decreased $104 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 as liquidations outpaced additions. PCI loans are excluded from nonperforming loans as these loans were written down to fair value at the acquisition date; however, once we acquire the underlying real estate upon foreclosure of the delinquent PCI loan, it is included in foreclosed properties. Not included in foreclosed properties at September 30, 2017 was $879 million of real estate that was acquired upon foreclosure of certain delinquent government-guaranteed loans (principally FHA-insured loans). We exclude these amounts from our nonperforming loans and foreclosed properties activity as we expect we will be reimbursed once the property is conveyed to the guarantor for principal and, up to certain limits, costs incurred during the foreclosure process and interest accrued during the holding period.

Nonperforming loans also include certain loans that have been modified in TDRs where economic concessions have been granted to borrowers experiencing financial difficulties. These concessions typically result from our loss mitigation activities and could include reductions in the interest rate, payment extensions, forgiveness of principal, forbearance or other actions. Certain TDRs are classified as nonperforming at the time of restructuring and may only be returned to performing status after considering the borrower's sustained repayment performance for a reasonable period, generally six months. Nonperforming TDRs, excluding those modified loans in the PCI loan portfolio, are included in Table 33 .


47 Bank of America




Table 33

Nonperforming Consumer Loans, Leases and Foreclosed Properties Activity (1)

Three Months Ended September 30

Nine Months Ended
September 30

(Dollars in millions)

2017

2016

2017

2016

Nonperforming loans and leases, beginning of period

$

5,282


$

6,705


$

6,004


$

8,165


Additions

999


831


2,499


2,581


Reductions:

Paydowns and payoffs

(117

)

(220

)

(517

)

(605

)

Sales

(162

)

(237

)

(423

)

(1,331

)

Returns to performing status  (2)

(347

)

(383

)

(1,101

)

(1,220

)

Charge-offs

(346

)

(279

)

(845

)

(1,008

)

Transfers to foreclosed properties

(57

)

(67

)

(167

)

(232

)

Transfers to loans held-for-sale

-


-


(198

)

-


Total net reductions to nonperforming loans and leases

(30

)

(355

)

(752

)

(1,815

)

Total nonperforming loans and leases, September 30  (3)

5,252


6,350


5,252


6,350


Total foreclosed properties, September 30 (4)

259


372


259


372


Nonperforming consumer loans, leases and foreclosed properties, September 30

$

5,511


$

6,722


$

5,511


$

6,722


Nonperforming consumer loans and leases as a percentage of outstanding consumer loans and leases (5)

1.17

%

1.41

%

Nonperforming consumer loans, leases and foreclosed properties as a percentage of outstanding consumer loans, leases and foreclosed properties (5)

1.23


1.49


(1)

Balances do not include nonperforming LHFS of $1 million and $12 million and nonaccruing TDRs removed from the PCI loan portfolio prior to January 1, 2010 of $24 million and $27 million at September 30, 2017 and 2016 as well as loans accruing past due 90 days or more as presented in Table 23 and Note 4 – Outstanding Loans and Leases to the Consolidated Financial Statements .

(2)

Consumer loans may be returned to performing status when all principal and interest is current and full repayment of the remaining contractual principal and interest is expected, or when the loan otherwise becomes well-secured and is in the process of collection.

(3)

At September 30, 2017 , 32 percent of nonperforming loans were 180 days or more past due.

(4)

Foreclosed property balances do not include properties insured by certain government-guaranteed loans, principally FHA-insured loans, of $879 million and $1.3 billion at September 30, 2017 and 2016 .

(5)

Outstanding consumer loans and leases exclude loans accounted for under the fair value option.

We classify junior-lien home equity loans as nonperforming when the first-lien loan becomes 90 days past due even if the junior-lien loan is performing. At September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , $336 million and $428 million of such junior-lien home equity loans were included in nonperforming loans and leases.

Table 34 presents TDRs for the consumer real estate portfolio. Performing TDR balances are excluded from nonperforming loans and leases in Table 33 .

Table 34

Consumer Real Estate Troubled Debt Restructurings

September 30, 2017

December 31, 2016

(Dollars in millions)

Total

Nonperforming

Performing

Total

Nonperforming

Performing

Residential mortgage (1, 2)

$

10,251


$

1,575


$

8,676


$

12,631


$

1,992


$

10,639


Home equity (3)

2,871


1,480


1,391


2,777


1,566


1,211


Total consumer real estate troubled debt restructurings

$

13,122


$

3,055


$

10,067


$

15,408


$

3,558


$

11,850


(1)

At September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , residential mortgage TDRs deemed collateral dependent totaled $2.9 billion and $3.5 billion , and included $1.3 billion and $1.6 billion of loans classified as nonperforming and $1.6 billion and $1.9 billion of loans classified as performing.

(2)

Residential mortgage performing TDRs included $4.1 billion and $5.3 billion of loans that were fully-insured at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 .

(3)

Home equity TDRs deemed collateral dependent totaled $1.6 billion and included $1.3 billion of loans classified as nonperforming for both periods, and $382 million and $301 million of loans classified as performing at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 .

In addition to modifying consumer real estate loans, we work with customers who are experiencing financial difficulty by modifying credit card and other consumer loans. Credit card and other consumer loan modifications generally involve a reduction in the customer's interest rate on the account and placing the customer on a fixed payment plan not exceeding 60 months, all of which are considered TDRs (the renegotiated TDR portfolio).

Modifications of credit card and other consumer loans are made through renegotiation programs utilizing direct customer contact, but may also utilize external renegotiation programs. The renegotiated TDR portfolio is excluded in large part from Table 33 as substantially all of the loans remain on accrual status until either charged off or paid in full. At September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , our renegotiated TDR portfolio was $485 million and $610 million , of which $428 million and $493 million were current or less than 30 days past due under the modified terms. The decline in the renegotiated TDR portfolio was primarily

driven by paydowns and charge-offs as well as lower program enrollments. For more information on the renegotiated TDR portfolio, see Note 4 – Outstanding Loans and Leases to the Consolidated Financial Statements .

Commercial Portfolio Credit Risk Management

Commercial credit risk is evaluated and managed with the goal that concentrations of credit exposure do not result in undesirable levels of risk. We review, measure and manage concentrations of credit exposure by industry, product, geography, customer relationship and loan size. We also review, measure and manage commercial real estate loans by geographic location and property type. In addition, within our non-U.S. portfolio, we evaluate exposures by region and by country. Tables 39 , 42 and 47 summarize our concentrations. We also utilize syndications of exposure to third parties, loan sales, hedging and other risk mitigation techniques to manage the size and risk profile of the


Bank of America 48


commercial credit portfolio. For more information on our industry concentrations, including our utilized exposure to the energy sector, which was three percent of total commercial utilized exposure at both September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , see Commercial Portfolio Credit Risk Management – Industry Concentrations on page 53 and Table 42 .

For more information on our accounting policies regarding delinquencies, nonperforming status and net charge-offs for the commercial portfolio, see Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Principles to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Corporation's 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Commercial Credit Portfolio

During the nine months ended September 30, 2017 , other than in the higher risk energy sub-sectors, credit quality among large corporate borrowers was strong. We saw further improvement in the energy sector in the nine months ended September 30, 2017 .

Credit quality of commercial real estate borrowers continued to be strong with conservative LTV ratios, stable market rents in most sectors and vacancy rates remaining low.

Outstanding commercial loans and leases increased $20.0 billion during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 primarily in U.S. commercial. Nonperforming commercial loans and leases decreased $433 million to $1.4 billion and reservable criticized balances decreased $1.5 billion to $14.8 billion during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 driven by improvements in the energy sector. The allowance for loan and lease losses for the commercial portfolio decreased $147 million to $5.1 billion at September 30, 2017 compared to December 31, 2016 . For more information, see Allowance for Credit Losses on page 57 .

Table 35 presents our commercial loans and leases portfolio and related credit quality information at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 .

Table 35

Commercial Loans and Leases

Outstandings

Nonperforming

Accruing Past Due

90 Days or More

(Dollars in millions)

September 30
2017

December 31
2016

September 30
2017

December 31
2016

September 30
2017

December 31
2016

U.S. commercial

$

282,677


$

270,372


$

863


$

1,256


$

82


$

106


Commercial real estate  (1)

59,628


57,355


130


72


-


7


Commercial lease financing

21,413


22,375


26


36


38


19


Non-U.S. commercial

95,896


89,397


244


279


-


5


459,614


439,499


1,263


1,643


120


137


U.S. small business commercial  (2)

13,603


12,993


55


60


68


71


Commercial loans excluding loans accounted for under the fair value option

473,217


452,492


1,318


1,703


188


208


Loans accounted for under the fair value option  (3)

5,307


6,034


36


84


-


-


Total commercial loans and leases

$

478,524


$

458,526


$

1,354


$

1,787


$

188


$

208


(1)

Includes U.S. commercial real estate of $55.5 billion and $54.3 billion and non-U.S. commercial real estate of $4.2 billion and $3.1 billion at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 .

(2)

Includes card-related products.

(3)

Commercial loans accounted for under the fair value option include U.S. commercial of $2.8 billion and $2.9 billion and non-U.S. commercial of $2.5 billion and $3.1 billion at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 . For more information on the fair value option, see Note 15 – Fair Value Option to the Consolidated Financial Statements .

Table 36 presents net charge-offs and related ratios for our commercial loans and leases for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 . The increase in net charge-offs of $59 million and $36 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to the same periods in 2016 was driven by higher energy losses, partially offset by lower charge-offs in commercial lease financing. Also, the prior-year period included commercial real estate recoveries.

Table 36

Commercial Net Charge-offs and Related Ratios

Net Charge-offs

Net Charge-off Ratios  (1)

Three Months Ended
September 30

Nine Months Ended
September 30

Three Months Ended
September 30

Nine Months Ended
September 30

(Dollars in millions)

2017

2016

2017

2016

2017

2016

2017

2016

U.S. commercial

$

80


$

62


$

176


$

155


0.11

 %

0.10

 %

0.09

%

0.08

 %

Commercial real estate

2


(23

)

3


(31

)

0.02


(0.16

)

0.01


(0.07

)

Commercial lease financing

(1

)

6


-


19


(0.02

)

0.11


-


0.12


Non-U.S. commercial

33


10


94


97


0.14


0.04


0.14


0.14


114


55


273


240


0.10


0.05


0.08


0.08


U.S. small business commercial

55


55


160


157


1.61


1.67


1.60


1.62


Total commercial

$

169


$

110


$

433


$

397


0.14


0.10


0.13


0.12


(1)

Net charge-off ratios are calculated as annualized net charge-offs divided by average outstanding loans and leases excluding loans accounted for under the fair value option.


49 Bank of America




Table 37 presents commercial credit exposure by type for utilized, unfunded and total binding committed credit exposure. Commercial utilized credit exposure includes standby letters of credit (SBLCs) and financial guarantees, bankers' acceptances and commercial letters of credit that have been issued and for which we are legally bound to advance funds under prescribed conditions during a specified time period and excludes exposure related to trading account assets. Although funds have not yet been advanced, these exposure types are considered utilized for credit risk management purposes.

Total commercial utilized credit exposure increased $21.5 billion during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 primarily driven by increases in loans and leases. The utilization rate for loans and leases, SBLCs and financial guarantees, commercial letters of credit and bankers acceptances, in the aggregate, was 59 percent and 58 percent at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 .

Table 37

Commercial Credit Exposure by Type

Commercial Utilized  (1)

Commercial Unfunded (2, 3, 4)

Total Commercial Committed

(Dollars in millions)

September 30
2017

December 31
2016

September 30
2017

December 31
2016

September 30
2017

December 31
2016

Loans and leases (5)

$

484,565


$

464,260


$

354,927


$

366,106


$

839,492


$

830,366


Derivative assets  (6)

38,384


42,512


-


-


38,384


42,512


Standby letters of credit and financial guarantees

33,967


33,135


723


660


34,690


33,795


Debt securities and other investments

26,190


26,244


5,092


5,474


31,282


31,718


Loans held-for-sale

10,998


6,510


2,246


3,824


13,244


10,334


Commercial letters of credit

1,414


1,464


83


112


1,497


1,576


Bankers' acceptances

389


395


-


13


389


408


Other

514


372


-


-


514


372


Total

$

596,421


$

574,892


$

363,071


$

376,189


$

959,492


$

951,081


(1)

Commercial utilized exposure includes loans of $5.3 billion and $6.0 billion and issued letters of credit with a notional amount of $234 million and $284 million accounted for under the fair value option at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 .

(2)

Commercial unfunded exposure includes commitments accounted for under the fair value option with a notional amount of $4.7 billion and $6.7 billion at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 .

(3)

Excludes unused business card lines which are not legally binding.

(4)

Includes the notional amount of unfunded legally binding lending commitments net of amounts distributed (e.g., syndicated or participated) to other financial institutions. The distributed amounts were $11.3 billion and $12.1 billion at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 .

(5)

Includes credit risk exposure associated with assets under operating lease arrangements of $6.0 billion and $5.7 billion at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 .

(6)

Derivative assets are carried at fair value, reflect the effects of legally enforceable master netting agreements and have been reduced by cash collateral of $35.6 billion and $43.3 billion at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 . Not reflected in utilized and committed exposure is additional non-cash derivative collateral held of $25.6 billion and $25.3 billion at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , which consists primarily of other marketable securities.

Table 38 presents commercial utilized reservable criticized exposure by loan type. Criticized exposure corresponds to the Special Mention, Substandard and Doubtful asset categories as defined by regulatory authorities. Total commercial utilized reservable criticized exposure decreased $1.5 billion , or nine

percent , during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 primarily driven by paydowns and upgrades in the energy portfolio. Approximately 80 percent and 76 percent of commercial utilized reservable criticized exposure was secured at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 .

Table 38

Commercial Utilized Reservable Criticized Exposure

September 30, 2017

December 31, 2016

(Dollars in millions)

Amount (1)

Percent (2)

Amount (1)

Percent (2)

U.S. commercial 

$

10,098


3.24

%

$

10,311


3.46

%

Commercial real estate

628


1.03


399


0.68


Commercial lease financing

650


3.04


810


3.62


Non-U.S. commercial

2,573


2.54


3,974


4.17


13,949


2.82


15,494


3.27


U.S. small business commercial

875


6.43


826


6.36


Total commercial utilized reservable criticized exposure

$

14,824


2.91


$

16,320


3.35


(1)

Total commercial utilized reservable criticized exposure includes loans and leases of $13.6 billion and $14.9 billion and commercial letters of credit of $1.3 billion and $1.4 billion at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 .

(2)

Percentages are calculated as commercial utilized reservable criticized exposure divided by total commercial utilized reservable exposure for each exposure category.

U.S. Commercial

At September 30, 2017 , 70 percent of the U.S. commercial loan portfolio, excluding small business, was managed in Global Banking, 17 percent in Global Markets , 11 percent in GWIM (generally business-purpose loans for high net worth clients) and the remainder primarily in Consumer Banking . U.S. commercial loans, excluding loans accounted for under the fair value option, increased $12.3 billion , or five percent , during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 due to growth across most of the

commercial businesses. Reservable criticized balances decreased $213 million, or two percent, and nonperforming loans and leases decreased $393 million, or 31 percent, in the nine months ended September 30, 2017 driven by improvements in the energy sector. Net charge-offs increased $18 million and $21 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to the same periods in 2016 . The increase was driven by higher energy losses.



Bank of America 50


Commercial Real Estate

Commercial real estate primarily includes commercial loans and leases secured by non-owner-occupied real estate and is dependent on the sale or lease of the real estate as the primary source of repayment. The portfolio remains diversified across property types and geographic regions. California represented the largest state concentration at 24 percent and 23 percent of the commercial real estate loans and leases portfolio at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 . The commercial real estate portfolio is predominantly managed in Global Banking and consists of loans made primarily to public and private developers, and commercial real estate firms. Outstanding loans increased $2.3 billion , or four percent , during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 due to new originations outpacing paydowns.

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 , we continued to see low default rates and solid credit quality in both the residential and non-residential portfolios. We use a number of proactive risk mitigation initiatives to reduce adversely

rated exposure in the commercial real estate portfolio, including transfers of deteriorating exposures to management by independent special asset officers and the pursuit of loan restructurings or asset sales to achieve the best results for our customers and the Corporation.

Nonperforming commercial real estate loans and foreclosed properties increased $83 million, or 95 percent, driven by a small number of clients across property types. Reservable criticized balances increased $ 229 million , or 57 percent , during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 primarily due to loan downgrades. Net charge-offs were $2 million and $3 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to net recoveries of $23 million and $31 million for the same periods in 2016 .

Table 39 presents outstanding commercial real estate loans by geographic region, based on the geographic location of the collateral, and by property type.

Table 39

Outstanding Commercial Real Estate Loans

(Dollars in millions)

September 30
2017

December 31
2016

By Geographic Region 



California

$

14,274


$

13,450


Northeast

10,173


10,329


Southwest

7,515


7,567


Southeast

5,415


5,630


Midwest

3,901


4,380


Florida

3,253


3,213


Midsouth

3,069


2,346


Northwest

2,706


2,430


Illinois

2,422


2,408


Non-U.S. 

4,159


3,103


Other  (1)

2,741


2,499


Total outstanding commercial real estate loans

$

59,628


$

57,355


By Property Type



Non-residential

Office

$

17,891


$

16,643


Shopping centers / Retail

9,046


8,794


Multi-family rental

8,427


8,817


Hotels / Motels

6,388


5,550


Industrial / Warehouse

5,429


5,357


Multi-use

2,804


2,822


Unsecured

2,243


1,730


Land and land development

236


357


Other

5,785


5,595


Total non-residential

58,249


55,665


Residential

1,379


1,690


Total outstanding commercial real estate loans

$

59,628


$

57,355


(1)

Includes unsecured loans to real estate investment trusts and national home builders whose portfolios of properties span multiple geographic regions and properties in the states of Colorado, Utah, Hawaii, Wyoming and Montana.

At September 30, 2017 , total committed non-residential exposure was $80.1 billion compared to $76.9 billion at December 31, 2016 , of which $58.2 billion and $55.7 billion were funded loans. Non-residential nonperforming loans and foreclosed properties increased $84 million, or 104 percent, to $165 million at September 30, 2017 compared to December 31, 2016 driven by a small number of clients across property types. The non-residential nonperforming loans and foreclosed properties represented 0.28 percent and 0.14 percent of total non-residential loans and foreclosed properties at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 . Non-residential utilized reservable criticized exposure increased $173 million, or 44 percent, to $570 million

at September 30, 2017 compared to $397 million at December 31, 2016 , which represented 0.96 percent and 0.70 percent of non-residential utilized reservable exposure. For the non-residential portfolio, net charge-offs increased $26 million to $3 million and increased $34 million to $4 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to the same periods in 2016 .

At September 30, 2017 , total committed residential exposure was $3.1 billion compared to $3.7 billion at December 31, 2016 , of which $1.4 billion and $1.7 billion were funded secured loans. The nonperforming loans, leases and foreclosed properties and the utilized reservable criticized ratios for the residential portfolio


51 Bank of America




were 0.33 percent and 4.08 percent at September 30, 2017 compared to 0.35 percent and 0.16 percent at December 31, 2016 .

At September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , the commercial real estate loan portfolio included $7.1 billion and $6.8 billion of funded construction and land development loans that were originated to fund the construction and/or rehabilitation of commercial properties. Reservable criticized construction and land development loans totaled $213 million and $107 million, and nonperforming construction and land development loans and foreclosed properties totaled $39 million and $44 million at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 . During a property's construction phase, interest income is typically paid from interest reserves that are established at the inception of the loan. As construction is completed and the property is put into service, these interest reserves are depleted and interest payments from operating cash flows begin. We do not recognize interest income on nonperforming loans regardless of the existence of an interest reserve.

Non-U.S. Commercial

At September 30, 2017 , 80 percent of the non-U.S. commercial loan portfolio was managed in Global Banking and 20 percent in Global Markets . Outstanding loans, excluding loans accounted for under the fair value option, increased $6.5 billion during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 . Net charge-offs increased $23 million to $33 million and decreased $3 million to $94 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to the same periods in 2016 . The three-month increase was driven by higher energy losses. For more information on the non-U.S. commercial portfolio, see Non-U.S. Portfolio on page 56 .

U.S. Small Business Commercial

The U.S. small business commercial loan portfolio is comprised of small business card loans and small business loans managed in Consumer Banking . Credit card-related products were 51 percent and 48 percent of the U.S. small business commercial portfolio at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 . Net charge-offs remained relatively unchanged at $55 million and $160 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to the same periods in 2016 . Of the U.S. small business commercial net charge-offs, 92 percent and 90 percent were credit card-related products for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to 79 percent and 85 percent for the same periods in 2016 .

Nonperforming Commercial Loans, Leases and Foreclosed Properties Activity

Table 40 presents the nonperforming commercial loans, leases and foreclosed properties activity during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 . Nonperforming loans do not include loans accounted for under the fair value option. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 , nonperforming commercial loans and leases decreased $202 million and $385 million to $1.3 billion . Approximately 81 percent of commercial nonperforming loans, leases and foreclosed properties were secured and approximately 63 percent were contractually current. Commercial nonperforming loans were carried at approximately 84 percent of their unpaid principal balance before consideration of the allowance for loan and lease losses as the carrying value of these loans has been reduced to the estimated property value less costs to sell.

Table 40

Nonperforming Commercial Loans, Leases and Foreclosed Properties Activity (1, 2)

Three Months Ended
September 30

Nine Months Ended
September 30

(Dollars in millions)

2017

2016

2017

2016

Nonperforming loans and leases, beginning of period

$

1,520


$

1,659


$

1,703


$

1,212


Additions

412


892


1,172


2,089


Reductions:



Paydowns

(270

)

(267

)

(803

)

(598

)

Sales

(61

)

(73

)

(116

)

(166

)

Returns to performing status  (3)

(100

)

(101

)

(240

)

(177

)

Charge-offs

(145

)

(102

)

(312

)

(350

)

Transfers to foreclosed properties (4)

-


-


(27

)

(2

)

Transfers to loans held-for-sale

(38

)

(9

)

(59

)

(9

)

Total net additions/(reductions) to nonperforming loans and leases

(202

)

340


(385

)

787


Total nonperforming loans and leases, September 30

1,318


1,999


1,318


1,999


Total foreclosed properties, September 30 (4)

40


16


40


16


Nonperforming commercial loans, leases and foreclosed properties, September 30

$

1,358


$

2,015


$

1,358


$

2,015


Nonperforming commercial loans and leases as a percentage of outstanding commercial loans and leases  (5)

0.28

%

0.45

%

Nonperforming commercial loans, leases and foreclosed properties as a percentage of outstanding commercial loans, leases and foreclosed properties  (5)

0.29


0.45


(1)

Balances do not include nonperforming LHFS of $322 million and $262 million at September 30, 2017 and 2016 .

(2)

Includes U.S. small business commercial activity. Small business card loans are excluded as they are not classified as nonperforming.

(3)

Commercial loans and leases may be returned to performing status when all principal and interest is current and full repayment of the remaining contractual principal and interest is expected, or when the loan otherwise becomes well-secured and is in the process of collection. TDRs are generally classified as performing after a sustained period of demonstrated payment performance.

(4)

New foreclosed properties represents transfers of nonperforming loans to foreclosed properties net of charge-offs recorded during the first 90 days after transfer of a loan to foreclosed properties.

(5)

Outstanding commercial loans exclude loans accounted for under the fair value option.


Bank of America 52


Table 41 presents our commercial TDRs by product type and performing status. U.S. small business commercial TDRs are comprised of renegotiated small business card loans and small business loans. The renegotiated small business card loans are not classified as nonperforming as they are charged off no later than the end of the month in which the loan becomes 180 days past due. For more information on TDRs, see Note 4 – Outstanding Loans and Leases to the Consolidated Financial Statements .

Table 41

Commercial Troubled Debt Restructurings

September 30, 2017

December 31, 2016

(Dollars in millions)

Nonperforming

Performing

Total

Nonperforming

Performing

Total

U.S. commercial

$

377


$

944


$

1,321


$

720


$

1,140


$

1,860


Commercial real estate

40


15


55


45


95


140


Commercial lease financing

-


12


12


2


2


4


Non-U.S. commercial

12


220


232


25


283


308


429


1,191


1,620


792


1,520


2,312


U.S. small business commercial

4


15


19


2


13


15


Total commercial troubled debt restructurings

$

433


$

1,206


$

1,639


$

794


$

1,533


$

2,327


Industry Concentrations

Table 42 presents commercial committed and utilized credit exposure by industry and the total net credit default protection purchased to cover the funded and unfunded portions of certain credit exposures. Our commercial credit exposure is diversified across a broad range of industries. Total commercial committed exposure increased $8.4 billion , or one percent, during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 to $959.5 billion . The increase in commercial committed exposure was concentrated in the Food, Beverage and Tobacco, Diversified Financials and Materials sectors. Increases were partially offset by reduced exposure to the Healthcare Equipment and Services, Banking and Telecommunications sectors.

Industry limits are used internally to manage industry concentrations and are based on committed exposure that is allocated on an industry-by-industry basis. A risk management framework is in place to set and approve industry limits as well as to provide ongoing monitoring. The Management Risk Committee oversees industry limit governance.

Diversified Financials, our largest industry concentration, with committed exposure of $128.9 billion , increased $4.3 billion , or three percent , during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 . The increase primarily reflected an increase in exposure to several counterparties.

Real estate, our second largest industry concentration, with committed exposure of $85.4 billion , increased $1.7 billion , or two percent , during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 . For more information on the commercial real estate and related portfolios, see Commercial Portfolio Credit Risk Management – Commercial Real Estate on page 51 .

Retailing, our third largest industry concentration, with committed exposure of $68.7 billion , increased $158 million , or less than one percent, during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 . The modest increase in committed exposure occurred as increases in Diversified Wholesalers and Vehicle Dealers were offset by decreases Multiline and Specialty retailers.

Our energy-related committed exposure decreased $2.6 billion , or seven percent , to $36.6 billion during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 . Energy sector net charge-offs were $131 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to $226 million for the same period in 2016 . Energy sector reservable criticized exposure decreased $2.4 billion to $3.2 billion during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 due to improvement in credit quality of some borrowers coupled with exposure reductions and fewer new criticized exposures. The energy allowance for credit losses decreased $265 million to $660 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 .


53 Bank of America




Table 42

Commercial Credit Exposure by Industry  (1)

Commercial

Utilized

Total Commercial

Committed (2)

(Dollars in millions)

September 30
2017

December 31
2016

September 30
2017

December 31
2016

Diversified financials

$

81,120


$

81,156


$

128,879


$

124,535


Real estate (3)

64,030


61,203


85,351


83,658


Retailing

43,061


41,630


68,665


68,507


Capital goods

35,919


34,278


67,385


64,202


Healthcare equipment and services

38,201


37,656


57,425


64,663


Government and public education

46,537


45,694


56,494


54,626


Materials

24,463


22,578


47,546


44,357


Banking

38,578


39,877


43,637


47,799


Food, beverage and tobacco

23,471


19,669


42,650


37,145


Consumer services

27,446


27,413


42,410


42,523


Energy

16,251


19,686


36,629


39,231


Commercial services and supplies

22,137


21,241


35,448


35,360


Transportation

21,781


19,805


30,124


27,483


Utilities

12,078


11,349


27,281


27,140


Media

13,400


13,419


25,998


27,116


Individuals and trusts

18,860


16,364


24,728


21,764


Pharmaceuticals and biotechnology

7,568


5,539


20,231


18,910


Software and services

9,256


7,991


18,440


19,790


Technology hardware and equipment

7,972


7,793


17,519


18,429


Insurance, including monolines

6,731


7,406


13,021


13,936


Telecommunication services

5,870


6,317


12,935


16,925


Automobiles and components

5,710


5,459


12,687


12,969


Consumer durables and apparel

6,403


6,042


12,224


11,460


Food and staples retailing

5,006


4,795


9,367


8,869


Religious and social organizations

4,196


4,423


6,133


6,252


Other

10,376


6,109


16,285


13,432


Total commercial credit exposure by industry

$

596,421


$

574,892


$

959,492


$

951,081


Net credit default protection purchased on total commitments  (4)



$

(2,098

)

$

(3,477

)

(1)

Includes U.S. small business commercial exposure.

(2)

Includes the notional amount of unfunded legally binding lending commitments net of amounts distributed (e.g., syndicated or participated) to other financial institutions. The distributed amounts were $ 11.3 billion and $12.1 billion at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 .

(3)

Industries are viewed from a variety of perspectives to best isolate the perceived risks. For purposes of this table, the real estate industry is defined based on the borrowers' or counterparties' primary business activity using operating cash flows and primary source of repayment as key factors.

(4)

Represents net notional credit protection purchased. For additional information, see Commercial Portfolio Credit Risk Management – Risk Mitigation below.

Risk Mitigation

We purchase credit protection to cover the funded portion as well as the unfunded portion of certain credit exposures. To lower the cost of obtaining our desired credit protection levels, we may add credit exposure within an industry, borrower or counterparty group by selling protection.

At September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , net notional credit default protection purchased in our credit derivatives portfolio to hedge our funded and unfunded exposures for which we elected the fair value option, as well as certain other credit exposures, was $2.1 billion and $3.5 billion . We recorded net losses of $10 million and $57 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to net losses of $80 million and $408 million for the same periods in 2016 on these positions. The gains and losses on these instruments were offset by gains and losses on the related exposures. The Value-at-Risk (VaR)

results for these exposures are included in the fair value option portfolio information in Table 50 . For additional information, see Trading Risk Management on page 60 .

Tables 43 and 44 present the maturity profiles and the credit exposure debt ratings of the net credit default protection portfolio at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 .

Table 43

Net Credit Default Protection by Maturity

September 30
2017

December 31
2016

Less than or equal to one year

42

%

56

%

Greater than one year and less than or equal to five years

55


41


Greater than five years

3


3


Total net credit default protection

100

%

100

%



Bank of America 54


Table 44

Net Credit Default Protection by Credit Exposure Debt Rating

September 30, 2017

December 31, 2016

(Dollars in millions)

Net

Notional (1)

Percent of

Total

Net

Notional (1)

Percent of

Total

Ratings  (2, 3)





A

$

(280

)

13.3

%

$

(135

)

3.9

%

BBB

(597

)

28.5


(1,884

)

54.2


BB

(570

)

27.2


(871

)

25.1


B

(528

)

25.2


(477

)

13.7


CCC and below

(101

)

4.8


(81

)

2.3


NR  (4)

(22

)

1.0


(29

)

0.8


Total net credit default protection

$

(2,098

)

100.0

%

$

(3,477

)

100.0

%

(1)

Represents net credit default protection purchased.

(2)

Ratings are refreshed on a quarterly basis.

(3)

Ratings of BBB- or higher are considered to meet the definition of investment grade.

(4)

NR is comprised of index positions held and any names that have not been rated.

In addition to our net notional credit default protection purchased to cover the funded and unfunded portion of certain credit exposures, credit derivatives are used for market-making activities for clients and establishing positions intended to profit from directional or relative value changes. We execute the majority of our credit derivative trades in the OTC market with large, multinational financial institutions, including broker-dealers and, to a lesser degree, with a variety of other investors. Because these

transactions are executed in the OTC market, we are subject to settlement risk. We are also subject to credit risk in the event that these counterparties fail to perform under the terms of these contracts. In most cases, credit derivative transactions are executed on a daily margin basis. Therefore, events such as a credit downgrade, depending on the ultimate rating level, or a breach of credit covenants would typically require an increase in the amount of collateral required by the counterparty, where applicable, and/or allow us to take additional protective measures such as early termination of all trades.

Table 45 presents the total contract/notional amount of credit derivatives outstanding and includes both purchased and written credit derivatives. The credit risk amounts are measured as net asset exposure by counterparty, taking into consideration all contracts with the counterparty. For more information on our written credit derivatives, see Note 2 – Derivatives to the Consolidated Financial Statements .

The credit risk amounts discussed above and presented in Table 45 take into consideration the effects of legally enforceable master netting agreements while amounts disclosed in Note 2 – Derivatives to the Consolidated Financial Statements are shown on a gross basis. Credit risk reflects the potential benefit from offsetting exposure to non-credit derivative products with the same counterparties that may be netted upon the occurrence of certain events, thereby reducing our overall exposure.

Table 45

Credit Derivatives

September 30, 2017

December 31, 2016

(Dollars in millions)

Contract/

Notional

Credit Risk

Contract/

Notional

Credit Risk

Purchased credit derivatives:





Credit default swaps

$

522,839


$

2,397


$

603,979


$

2,732


Total return swaps/other

57,591


263


21,165


433


Total purchased credit derivatives

$

580,430


$

2,660


$

625,144


$

3,165


Written credit derivatives:





Credit default swaps

$

514,479


n/a


$

614,355


n/a


Total return swaps/other

55,313


n/a


25,354


n/a


Total written credit derivatives

$

569,792


n/a


$

639,709


n/a


n/a = not applicable

Counterparty Credit Risk Valuation Adjustments

We record counterparty credit risk valuation adjustments on certain derivative assets, including our credit default protection purchased, in order to properly reflect the credit risk of the counterparty, as presented in Table 46 . We calculate CVA based on a modeled expected exposure that incorporates current market risk factors including changes in market spreads and non-credit related market factors that affect the value of a derivative. The exposure also takes into consideration credit mitigants such as legally enforceable master netting agreements and collateral. For additional information, see Note 2 – Derivatives to the Consolidated Financial Statements .

We enter into risk management activities to offset market driven exposures. We often hedge the counterparty spread risk in CVA with credit default swaps (CDS). We hedge other market risks in CVA primarily with currency and interest rate swaps. In certain instances, the net-of-hedge amounts in the following table move

in the same direction as the gross amount or may move in the opposite direction. This movement is a consequence of the complex interaction of the risks being hedged, resulting in limitations in the ability to perfectly hedge all of the market exposures at all times.

Table 46

Credit Valuation Gains and Losses

Three Months Ended September 30

(Dollars in millions)

2017

2016

Gains (Losses)

Gross

Hedge

Net

Gross

Hedge

Net

Credit valuation

$

23


$

(8

)

$

15


$

280


$

(214

)

$

66


Nine Months Ended September 30

2017

2016

Gross

Hedge

Net

Gross

Hedge

Net

Credit valuation

$

281


$

(188

)

$

93


$

45


$

106


$

151




55 Bank of America




Non-U.S. Portfolio

Our non-U.S. credit and trading portfolios are subject to country risk. We define country risk as the risk of loss from unfavorable economic and political conditions, currency fluctuations, social instability and changes in government policies. A risk management framework is in place to measure, monitor and manage non-U.S. risk and exposures. In addition to the direct risk of doing business in a country, we also are exposed to indirect country risks (e.g., related to the collateral received on secured financing transactions or related to client clearing activities). These indirect exposures are managed in the normal course of business through credit, market and operational risk governance, rather than through country risk governance.

Table 47 presents our 20 largest non-U.S. country exposures as of September 30, 2017 . These exposures accounted for 87 percent and 88 percent of our total non-U.S. exposure at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 . Net country exposure for these 20 countries increased $10.3 billion in the nine months ended September 30, 2017 primarily driven by increases in China, Mexico, Belgium, South Korea and Japan, partially offset by decreases in Switzerland, Brazil and the U.K. On a product basis, the increase was driven by increased funded commitments in China, the Netherlands, Mexico and Belgium, along with increased sovereign securities in Japan, India and Korea. These increases were partially offset by the sale of the non-

U.S. consumer credit card business in the second quarter of 2017, and lower unfunded commitments in Switzerland and lower funded commitments in Brazil.

Non-U.S. exposure is presented on an internal risk management basis and includes sovereign and non-sovereign credit exposure, securities and other investments issued by or domiciled in countries other than the U.S.

Funded loans and loan equivalents include loans, leases, and other extensions of credit and funds, including letters of credit and due from placements, which have not been reduced by collateral, hedges or credit default protection. Unfunded commitments are the undrawn portion of legally binding commitments related to loans and loan equivalents.

Net counterparty exposure includes the fair value of derivatives, including the counterparty risk associated with CDS, and secured financing transactions.

Securities and other investments are carried at fair value and long securities exposures are netted against short exposures with the same underlying issuer to, but not below, zero (i.e., negative issuer exposures are reported as zero).

Net country exposure represents country exposure less hedges and credit default protection purchased, net of credit default protection sold. For more information on our non-U.S. credit and trading portfolios, see Non-U.S. Portfolio in the MD&A of the Corporation's 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K .

Table 47

Top 20 Non-U.S. Countries Exposure

(Dollars in millions)

Funded Loans and Loan Equivalents

Unfunded Loan Commitments

Net Counterparty Exposure

Securities/
Other

Investments

Country Exposure at September 30
2017

Hedges and Credit Default Protection

Net Country Exposure at September 30
2017

Increase (Decrease) from December 31
2016

United Kingdom

$

28,518


$

14,359


$

5,020


$

2,619


$

50,516


$

(4,814

)

$

45,702


$

(2,031

)

Germany

12,374


9,093


1,720


3,603


26,790


(3,607

)

23,183


805


Canada

7,942


7,725


2,012


2,460


20,139


(647

)

19,492


718


Japan

11,234


549


1,720


4,823


18,326


(1,690

)

16,636


1,625


China

11,852


711


509


1,345


14,417


(234

)

14,183


3,298


Brazil

7,665


379


382


3,476


11,902


(315

)

11,587


(2,079

)

France

5,047


5,711


2,141


4,245


17,144


(5,654

)

11,490


796


India

6,792


265


385


3,573


11,015


(953

)

10,062


834


Australia

5,096


2,810


415


1,994


10,315


(515

)

9,800


877


Netherlands

5,137


3,488


763


1,428


10,816


(2,015

)

8,801


1,403


Hong Kong

6,845


200


580


704


8,329


(43

)

8,286


807


South Korea

4,984


610


757


2,048


8,399


(418

)

7,981


1,875


Mexico

3,901


1,616


228


1,650


7,395


(548

)

6,847


2,363


Singapore

2,996


315


790


2,128


6,229


(65

)

6,164


746


Switzerland

3,414


3,093


300


107


6,914


(1,613

)

5,301


(4,345

)

Italy

2,483


1,479


587


566


5,115


(1,114

)

4,001


(86

)

Belgium

2,274


777


114


1,051


4,216


(313

)

3,903


1,977


Turkey

2,741


60


37


272


3,110


(1

)

3,109


419


Spain

1,740


1,156


299


1,023


4,218


(1,172

)

3,046


500


United Arab Emirates

2,186


111


284


78


2,659


(91

)

2,568


(175

)

Total top 20 non-U.S. countries exposure

$

135,221


$

54,507


$

19,043


$

39,193


$

247,964


$

(25,822

)

$

222,142


$

10,327


A number of economic conditions and geopolitical events have given rise to risk aversion in certain emerging markets. Our two largest emerging market country exposures at September 30, 2017 were China and Brazil. At September 30, 2017 , net exposure to China was $14.2 billion , concentrated in large state-owned

companies, subsidiaries of multinational corporations and commercial banks. At September 30, 2017 , net exposure to Brazil was $11.6 billion , concentrated in sovereign securities, oil and gas companies and commercial banks.


Bank of America 56


The outlook for policy direction and therefore economic performance in the European Union (EU) remains uncertain as a consequence of reduced political cohesion among EU countries. Additionally, we believe that the uncertainty on the U.K.'s ability to negotiate a favorable exit from the EU will further weigh on economic performance. Our largest EU country exposure at September 30, 2017 was the U.K. At September 30, 2017 , net exposure to the U.K. was $45.7 billion , concentrated in multinational corporations and sovereign clients. For additional information, see Executive Summary – Third Quarter 2017 Economic and Business Environment on page 3 .

Provision for Credit Losses

The provision for credit losses decreased $16 million to $834 million , and $428 million to $2.4 billion for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to the same periods in 2016 . The provision for credit losses was $66 million and $347 million lower than net charge-offs for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 , resulting in a reduction in the allowance for credit losses. This compared to a reduction of $38 million and $118 million in the allowance for credit losses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 .

The provision for credit losses for the consumer portfolio increased $25 million to $730 million , and $268 million to $2.1 billion for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to the same periods in 2016 . The increase for both periods was primarily driven by a provision increase of $218 million and $554 million in the U.S. credit card portfolio due to portfolio seasoning and loan growth, largely offset by improvement in the home equity portfolio due to increased home prices and lower nonperforming loans. Included in the provision is an expense of $12 million and $56 million related to the PCI loan portfolio for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to an expense of $8 million and a benefit of $81 million for the same periods in 2016 .

The provision for credit losses for the commercial portfolio, including unfunded lending commitments, decreased $41 million to $104 million , and $696 million to $287 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to the same periods in 2016 driven by reductions in energy exposures.

Allowance for Credit Losses

Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses

The allowance for loan and lease losses is comprised of two components. The first component covers nonperforming commercial loans and TDRs. The second component covers loans and leases on which there are incurred losses that are not yet individually identifiable, as well as incurred losses that may not be represented in the loss forecast models. We evaluate the adequacy of the allowance for loan and lease losses based on the total of these two components. The allowance for loan and lease losses excludes LHFS and loans accounted for under the fair value option as the fair value reflects a credit risk component. For more information on the allowance for loan and lease losses, see Allowance for Credit Losses in the MD&A of the Corporation's 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K .

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 , the factors that impacted the allowance for loan and lease losses included improvements in the credit quality of the consumer real estate portfolios driven by continuing improvements in the U.S. economy and labor markets, proactive credit risk management

initiatives and the impact of high credit quality originations. Evidencing the improvements in the U.S. economy and labor markets are downward unemployment trends and increases in home prices. In addition to these improvements, in the consumer portfolio, nonperforming consumer loans decreased $752 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2017 as returns to performing status, charge-offs, paydowns and loan sales continued to outpace new nonaccrual loans. During the nine months ended September 30, 2017 , the allowance for loan and lease losses in the commercial portfolio reflected decreased energy reserves primarily driven by reductions in energy exposures.

The allowance for loan and lease losses for the consumer portfolio, as presented in Table 49 , was $5.6 billion at September 30, 2017 , a decrease of $640 million from December 31, 2016 . The decrease was primarily in the home equity portfolio and the non-U.S. card portfolio which was sold during the second quarter of 2017, partially offset by an increase in the U.S. credit card portfolio. The reduction in the home equity portfolio was due to improved home prices, lower nonperforming loans and a decrease in loan balances. The increase in the U.S. credit card portfolio was driven by portfolio seasoning and loan growth.

The allowance for loan and lease losses for the commercial portfolio, as presented in Table 49 , was $5.1 billion at September 30, 2017 , a decrease of $147 million from December 31, 2016 driven by decreased energy reserves due to reductions in the higher risk energy sub-sectors. Commercial utilized reservable criticized exposure decreased to $14.8 billion at September 30, 2017 from $16.3 billion (to 2.91 percent from 3.35 percent of total commercial utilized reservable exposure) at December 31, 2016 , largely due to paydowns and net upgrades in the energy portfolio. Nonperforming commercial loans decreased to $1.3 billion at September 30, 2017 from $1.7 billion (to 0.28 percent from 0.38 percent of outstanding commercial loans excluding loans accounted for under the fair value option) at December 31, 2016 . See Tables 35 , 36 and 38 for additional details on key commercial credit statistics.

The allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of total loans and leases outstanding was 1.16 percent at September 30, 2017 compared to 1.26 percent at December 31, 2016 . The September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 ratios above include the PCI loan portfolio. Excluding the PCI loan portfolio, the allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of total loans and leases outstanding was 1.14 percent and 1.24 percent at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 .

Reserve for Unfunded Lending Commitments

In addition to the allowance for loan and lease losses, we also estimate probable losses related to unfunded lending commitments such as letters of credit, financial guarantees, unfunded bankers' acceptances and binding loan commitments, excluding commitments accounted for under the fair value option. For more information on the reserve for unfunded lending commitments, see Allowance for Credit Losses in the MD&A of the Corporation's 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K .

The reserve for unfunded lending commitments was $762 million at both September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 .

Table 48 presents a rollforward of the allowance for credit losses, which includes the allowance for loan and lease losses and the reserve for unfunded lending commitments, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 .


57 Bank of America




Table 48

Allowance for Credit Losses

Three Months Ended September 30

Nine Months Ended September 30

(Dollars in millions)

2017

2016

2017

2016

Allowance for loan and lease losses, beginning of period

$

10,875


$

11,837


$

11,237


$

12,234


Loans and leases charged off

Residential mortgage

(51

)

(66

)

(157

)

(339

)

Home equity

(180

)

(180

)

(476

)

(589

)

U.S. credit card

(727

)

(648

)

(2,198

)

(2,021

)

Non-U.S. credit card  (1)

-


(59

)

(103

)

(183

)

Direct/Indirect consumer

(135

)

(98

)

(356

)

(287

)

Other consumer

(57

)

(63

)

(162

)

(173

)

Total consumer charge-offs

(1,150

)

(1,114

)

(3,452

)

(3,592

)

U.S. commercial  (2)

(171

)

(141

)

(449

)

(423

)

Commercial real estate

(4

)

(1

)

(12

)

(9

)

Commercial lease financing

(3

)

(9

)

(9

)

(26

)

Non-U.S. commercial

(34

)

(12

)

(100

)

(101

)

Total commercial charge-offs

(212

)

(163

)

(570

)

(559

)

Total loans and leases charged off

(1,362

)

(1,277

)

(4,022

)

(4,151

)

Recoveries of loans and leases previously charged off

Residential mortgage

133


62


241


210


Home equity

97


83


279


254


U.S. credit card

115


105


340


318


Non-U.S. credit card

-


16


28


49


Direct/Indirect consumer

68


64


209


196


Other consumer

6


6


46


21


Total consumer recoveries

419


336


1,143


1,048


U.S. commercial  (3)

36


24


113


111


Commercial real estate

2


24


9


40


Commercial lease financing

4


3


9


7


Non-U.S. commercial

1


2


6


4


Total commercial recoveries

43


53


137


162


Total recoveries of loans and leases previously charged off

462


389


1,280


1,210


Net charge-offs

(900

)

(888

)

(2,742

)

(2,941

)

Write-offs of PCI loans

(73

)

(83

)

(161

)

(270

)

Provision for loan and lease losses

829


834


2,395


2,802


Other  (4)

(38

)

(8

)

(36

)

(133

)

Allowance for loan and lease losses, September 30

10,693


11,692


10,693


11,692


Reserve for unfunded lending commitments, beginning of period

757


750


762


646


Provision for unfunded lending commitments

5


16


-


21


Other  (4)

-


1


-


100


Reserve for unfunded lending commitments, September 30

762


767


762


767


Allowance for credit losses, September 30

$

11,455


$

12,459


$

11,455


$

12,459


(1)

Represents net charge-offs of non-U.S. credit card loans, which were previously included in assets of business held for sale. During the second quarter of 2017, the Corporation sold its non-U.S. consumer credit card business.

(2)

Includes U.S. small business commercial charge-offs of $65 million and $193 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to $66 million and $189 million for the same periods in 2016 .

(3)

Includes U.S. small business commercial recoveries of $10 million and $33 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to $11 million and $32 million for the same periods in 2016 .

(4)

Primarily represents the net impact of portfolio sales, consolidations and deconsolidations, foreign currency translation adjustments, transfers to held-for-sale and certain other reclassifications.


Bank of America 58


Table 48

Allowance for Credit Losses (continued)

Three Months Ended September 30

Nine Months Ended September 30

(Dollars in millions)

2017

2016

2017

2016

Loan and allowance ratios:

Loans and leases outstanding at September 30  (5)

$

920,832


$

896,900


$

920,832


$

896,900


Allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of total loans and leases outstanding at September 30  (5)

1.16

%

1.30

%

1.16

%

1.30

%

Consumer allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of total consumer loans and leases outstanding at September 30 (6)

1.25


1.42


1.25


1.42


Commercial allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of total commercial loans and leases outstanding at September 30  (7)

1.08


1.19


1.08


1.19


Average loans and leases outstanding  (5)

$

911,945


$

892,207


$

908,670


$

889,498


Annualized net charge-offs as a percentage of average loans and leases outstanding  (5, 8)

0.39

%

0.40

%

0.40

%

0.44

%

Annualized net charge-offs and PCI write-offs as a percentage of average loans and leases outstanding  (5)

0.42


0.43


0.43


0.48


Allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of total nonperforming loans and leases at September 30 (5, 9)

163


140


163


140


Ratio of the allowance for loan and lease losses at September 30 to annualized net charge-offs  (8)

3.00


3.31


2.92


2.98


Ratio of the allowance for loan and lease losses at September 30 to annualized net charge-offs and PCI write-offs

2.77


3.03


2.76


2.73


Amounts included in allowance for loan and lease losses for loans and leases that are excluded from nonperforming loans and leases at September 30 (10)

$

3,880


$

4,068


$

3,880


$

4,068


Allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of total nonperforming loans and leases, excluding the allowance for loan and lease losses for loans and leases that are excluded from nonperforming loans and leases at September 30  (5, 10)

104

%

91

%

104

%

91

%

Loan and allowance ratios excluding PCI loans and the related valuation allowance: (11)


Allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of total loans and leases outstanding at September 30  (5)

1.14

%

1.27

%

1.14

%

1.27

%

Consumer allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of total consumer loans and leases outstanding at September 30 (6)

1.21


1.36


1.21


1.36


Annualized net charge-offs as a percentage of average loans and leases outstanding  (5)

0.40


0.40


0.41


0.45


Allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of total nonperforming loans and leases at September 30 (5, 9)

158


135


158


135


Ratio of the allowance for loan and lease losses at September 30 to annualized net charge-offs

2.91


3.18


2.83


2.86


(5)

Outstanding loan and lease balances and ratios do not include loans accounted for under the fair value option of $6.3 billion and $8.1 billion at September 30, 2017 and 2016 . Average loans accounted for under the fair value option were $6.2 billion and $7.0 billion for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to $8.4 billion and $8.3 billion for the same periods in 2016 .

(6)

Excludes consumer loans accounted for under the fair value option of $978 million and $1.8 billion at September 30, 2017 and 2016 .

(7)

Excludes commercial loans accounted for under the fair value option of $5.3 billion and $6.3 billion at September 30, 2017 and 2016 .

(8)

Net charge-offs exclude $73 million and $161 million of write-offs in the PCI loan portfolio for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to $83 million and $270 million for the same periods in 2016 . For more information on PCI write-offs, see Consumer Portfolio Credit Risk Management – Purchased Credit-impaired Loan Portfolio on page 45 .

(9)

For more information on our definition of nonperforming loans, see pages 48 and 52 .

(10)

Primarily includes amounts allocated to U.S. credit card and unsecured consumer lending portfolios in Consumer Banking , PCI loans and the non-U.S. credit card portfolio in All Other .

(11)

For more information on the PCI loan portfolio and the valuation allowance for PCI loans, see Note 4 – Outstanding Loans and Leases and Note 5 – Allowance for Credit Losses to the Consolidated Financial Statements .


59 Bank of America




For reporting purposes, we allocate the allowance for credit losses across products as presented in Table 49 .

Table 49

Allocation of the Allowance for Credit Losses by Product Type

September 30, 2017

December 31, 2016

(Dollars in millions)

Amount

Percent of

Total

Percent of
Loans and
Leases

Outstanding  (1)

Amount

Percent of

Total

Percent of
Loans and
Leases

Outstanding  (1)

Allowance for loan and lease losses







Residential mortgage

$

813


7.60

%

0.41

%

$

1,012


8.82

%

0.53

%

Home equity

1,219


11.40


2.04


1,738


15.14


2.62


U.S. credit card

3,263


30.52


3.52


2,934


25.56


3.18


Non-U.S. credit card

-


-


-


243


2.12


2.64


Direct/Indirect consumer

255


2.38


0.27


244


2.13


0.26


Other consumer

32


0.30


1.32


51


0.44


2.01


Total consumer

5,582


52.20


1.25


6,222


54.21


1.36


U.S. commercial  (2)

3,199


29.92


1.08


3,326


28.97


1.17


Commercial real estate

956


8.94


1.60


920


8.01


1.60


Commercial lease financing

144


1.35


0.67


138


1.20


0.62


Non-U.S. commercial

812


7.59


0.85


874


7.61


0.98


Total commercial

5,111


47.80


1.08


5,258


45.79


1.16


Allowance for loan and lease losses (3)

10,693


100.00

%

1.16


11,480


100.00

%

1.26


Less: Allowance included in assets of business held for sale (4)

-


(243

)

Total allowance for loan and lease losses

10,693


11,237


Reserve for unfunded lending commitments

762


762



Allowance for credit losses

$

11,455


$

11,999



(1)

Ratios are calculated as allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of loans and leases outstanding excluding loans accounted for under the fair value option. Consumer loans accounted for under the fair value option included residential mortgage loans of $615 million and $710 million and home equity loans of $363 million and $341 million at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 . Commercial loans accounted for under the fair value option included U.S. commercial loans of $2.8 billion and $2.9 billion and non-U.S. commercial loans of $2.5 billion and $3.1 billion at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 .

(2)

Includes allowance for loan and lease losses for U.S. small business commercial loans of $422 million and $416 million at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 .

(3)

Includes $315 million and $419 million of valuation allowance presented with the allowance for loan and lease losses related to PCI loans at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 .

(4)

Represents allowance for loan and lease losses related to the non-U.S. credit card loan portfolio, which was included in assets of business held for sale on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2016. During the second quarter of 2017, the Corporation sold its non-U.S. consumer credit card business.

Market Risk Management

For more information on our market risk management process, see Market Risk Management in the MD&A of the Corporation's 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K .

Trading Risk Management

To evaluate risk arising from trading activities, the Corporation focuses on the actual and potential volatility of revenues generated by individual positions as well as portfolios of positions.

VaR is a common statistic used to measure market risk as it allows the aggregation of market risk factors, including the effects of portfolio diversification. A VaR model simulates the value of a portfolio under a range of scenarios in order to generate a distribution of potential gains and losses. VaR represents the loss a portfolio is not expected to exceed more than a certain number of times per period, based on a specified holding period, confidence level and window of historical data. We use one VaR model consistently across the trading portfolios and it uses a historical simulation approach based on a three-year window of historical data. Our primary VaR statistic is equivalent to a 99 percent confidence level. This means that for a VaR with a one-day holding period, there should not be losses in excess of VaR, on average, 99 out of 100 trading days. For more information on our trading risk management process, see Trading Risk Management in the MD&A of the Corporation's 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K .

Table 50 presents the total market-based trading portfolio VaR which is the combination of the covered positions trading portfolio and the impact from less liquid trading exposures. Covered positions are defined by regulatory standards as trading assets

and liabilities, both on- and off-balance sheet, that meet a defined set of specifications. These specifications identify the most liquid trading positions which are intended to be held for a short-term horizon and where we are able to hedge the material risk elements in a two-way market. Positions in less liquid markets, or where there are restrictions on the ability to trade the positions, typically do not qualify as covered positions. Foreign exchange and commodity positions are always considered covered positions, except for structural foreign currency positions that are excluded with prior regulatory approval. In addition, Table 50 presents our fair value option portfolio, which includes substantially all of the funded and unfunded exposures for which we elect the fair value option, and their corresponding hedges. The fair value option portfolio combined with the total market-based trading portfolio VaR represents our total market-based portfolio VaR. Additionally, market risk VaR for trading activities as presented in Table 50 differs from VaR used for regulatory capital calculations due to the holding period being used. The holding period for VaR used for regulatory capital calculations is 10 days, while for the market risk VaR presented below, it is one day. Both measures utilize the same process and methodology.

The total market-based portfolio VaR results in Table 50 include market risk to which we are exposed from all business segments, excluding CVA and DVA. The majority of this portfolio is in the Global Markets segment. Table 50 presents period-end, average, high and low daily trading VaR for the three months ended September 30, 2017 , June 30, 2017 and September 30, 2016 , as well as average daily trading VaR for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 , using a 99 percent confidence level.


Bank of America 60


Table 50

Market Risk VaR for Trading Activities

Nine Months Ended

September 30

Three Months Ended

September 30, 2017

June 30, 2017

September 30, 2016

(Dollars in millions)

Period End

Average

High  (1)

Low  (1)

Period End

Average

High  (1)

Low  (1)

Period End

Average

High  (1)

Low  (1)

2017 Average

2016 Average

Foreign exchange

$

6


$

10


$

15


$

5


$

11


$

13


$

25


$

3


$

7


$

8


$

11


$

6


$

12


$

9


Interest rate

15


21


41


14


18


23


33


15


15


20


25


15


20


21


Credit

24


25


29


23


26


25


29


22


31


29


37


25


25


30


Equity

17


17


33


12


19


18


26


13


16


17


24


11


18


19


Commodity

4


5


7


4


6


6


9


4


8


7


10


5


5


6


Portfolio diversification

(40

)

(44

)

-


-


(45

)

(47

)

-


-


(45

)

(47

)

-


-


(45

)

(47

)

Total covered positions trading portfolio

26


34


51


24


35


38


53


26


32


34


46


28


35


38


Impact from less liquid exposures

3


7


-


-


3


5


-


-


12


6


-


-


6


5


Total market-based trading portfolio

29


41


63


26


38


43


60


32


44


40


50


31


41


43


Fair value option loans

10


10


12


9


9


10


12


9


16


18


23


16


11


26


Fair value option hedges

8


8


9


6


6


5


7


4


7


8


11


6


6


13


Fair value option portfolio diversification

(11

)

(9

)

-


-


(6

)

(6

)

-


-


(12

)

(15

)

-


-


(8

)

(24

)

Total fair value option portfolio

7


9


10


7


9


9


11


8


11


11


16


9


9


15


Portfolio diversification

(4

)

(3

)

-


-


(5

)

(4

)

-


-


(3

)

(4

)

-


-


(4

)

(8

)

Total market-based portfolio

$

32


$

47


69


29


$

42


$

48


66


36


$

52


$

47


61


36


$

46


$

50


(1)

The high and low for each portfolio may have occurred on different trading days than the high and low for the components. Therefore the impact from less liquid exposures and the amount of portfolio diversification, which is the difference between the total portfolio and the sum of the individual components, is not relevant.

The graph below presents the daily total market-based trading portfolio VaR for the previous five quarters, corresponding to the data in Table 50 .

Additional VaR statistics produced within our single VaR model are provided in Table 51 at the same level of detail as in Table 50 . Evaluating VaR with additional statistics allows for an increased understanding of the risks in the portfolio as the historical market data used in the VaR calculation does not necessarily follow a predefined statistical distribution. Table 51 presents average trading VaR statistics at 99 percent and 95 percent confidence levels for the three months ended September 30, 2017 , June 30, 2017 and September 30, 2016 .


61 Bank of America




Table 51

Average Market Risk VaR for Trading Activities – 99 percent and 95 percent VaR Statistics

Three Months Ended

September 30, 2017

June 30, 2017

September 30, 2016

(Dollars in millions)

99 percent

95 percent

99 percent

95 percent

99 percent

95 percent

Foreign exchange

$

10


$

6


$

13


$

7


$

8


$

4


Interest rate

21


14


23


16


20


13


Credit

25


15


25


15


29


18


Equity

17


9


18


9


17


10


Commodity

5


3


6


4


7


4


Portfolio diversification

(44

)

(30

)

(47

)

(30

)

(47

)

(30

)

Total covered positions trading portfolio

34


17


38


21


34


19


Impact from less liquid exposures

7


2


5


2


6


3


Total market-based trading portfolio

41


19


43


23


40


22


Fair value option loans

10


6


10


6


18


10


Fair value option hedges

8


6


5


4


8


6


Fair value option portfolio diversification

(9

)

(7

)

(6

)

(5

)

(15

)

(9

)

Total fair value option portfolio

9


5


9


5


11


7


Portfolio diversification

(3

)

(3

)

(4

)

(3

)

(4

)

(3

)

Total market-based portfolio

$

47


$

21


$

48


$

25


$

47


$

26


Backtesting

The accuracy of the VaR methodology is evaluated by backtesting, which compares the daily VaR results, utilizing a one-day holding period, against a comparable subset of trading revenue. A backtesting excess occurs when a trading loss exceeds the VaR for the corresponding day. These excesses are evaluated to understand the positions and market moves that produced the trading loss and to ensure that the VaR methodology accurately represents those losses. For more information on our backtesting process, see Trading Risk Management – Backtesting in the MD&A of the Corporation's 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K .

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 , there were no days in which there was a backtesting excess for our total market-based portfolio VaR, utilizing a one-day holding period.

Total Trading-related Revenue

Total trading-related revenue, excluding brokerage fees, and CVA, DVA and funding valuation adjustment (FVA) gains (losses), represents the total amount earned from trading positions, including market-based net interest income, which are taken in a diverse range of financial instruments and markets. Trading account assets and liabilities are reported at fair value. For more

information on fair value, see Note 14 – Fair Value Measurements to the Consolidated Financial Statements . Trading-related revenue can be volatile and is largely driven by general market conditions and customer demand. Also, trading-related revenue is dependent on the volume and type of transactions, the level of risk assumed, and the volatility of price and rate movements at any given time within the ever-changing market environment. Significant daily revenue by business is monitored and the primary drivers of these are reviewed.

The following histogram is a graphic depiction of trading volatility and illustrates the daily level of trading-related revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2017 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2017 and March 31, 2017 . During the three months ended September 30, 2017 , positive trading-related revenue was recorded for 100 percent of the trading days, of which 77 percent were daily trading gains of over $25 million. This compares to the three months ended June 30, 2017 , where positive trading-related revenue was recorded for all of the trading days, of which 80 percent were daily trading gains of over $25 million. During the three months ended March 31, 2017 , positive trading-related revenue was recorded for all of the trading days, of which 89 percent were daily trading gains of over $25 million.


Bank of America 62


Trading Portfolio Stress Testing

Because the very nature of a VaR model suggests results can exceed our estimates and it is dependent on a limited historical window, we also stress test our portfolio using scenario analysis. This analysis estimates the change in the value of our trading portfolio that may result from abnormal market movements. For additional information, see Trading Risk Management – Trading Portfolio Stress Testing in the MD&A of the Corporation's 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K .

Interest Rate Risk Management for the Banking Book

The following discussion presents net interest income for banking book activities.

Interest rate risk represents the most significant market risk exposure to our banking book balance sheet. Interest rate risk is measured as the potential change in net interest income caused by movements in market interest rates. Client-facing activities, primarily lending and deposit-taking, create interest rate sensitive positions on our balance sheet.

We prepare forward-looking forecasts of net interest income. The baseline forecast takes into consideration expected future business growth, ALM positioning and the direction of interest rate movements as implied by the market-based forward curve. We then measure and evaluate the impact that alternative interest rate scenarios have on the baseline forecast in order to assess interest rate sensitivity under varied conditions. The net interest income forecast is frequently updated for changing assumptions and differing outlooks based on economic trends, market conditions and business strategies. Thus, we continually monitor

our balance sheet position in order to maintain an acceptable level of exposure to interest rate changes.

The interest rate scenarios that we analyze incorporate balance sheet assumptions such as loan and deposit growth and pricing, changes in funding mix, product repricing, maturity characteristics and investment securities premium amortization. Our overall goal is to manage interest rate risk so that movements in interest rates do not significantly adversely affect earnings and capital.

Table 52 presents the spot and 12-month forward rates used in our baseline forecasts at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 .

Table 52

Forward Rates

September 30, 2017

Federal

Funds

Three-month

LIBOR

10-Year

Swap

Spot rates

1.25

%

1.33

%

2.29

%

12-month forward rates

1.75


1.77


2.40


December 31, 2016

Spot rates

0.75

%

1.00

%

2.34

%

12-month forward rates

1.25


1.51


2.49


Table 53 shows the pre-tax dollar impact to forecasted net interest income over the next 12 months from September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , resulting from instantaneous parallel and non-parallel shocks to the market-based forward curve. Periodically we evaluate the scenarios presented so that they are meaningful in the context of the current rate environment.


63 Bank of America




In the nine months ended September 30, 2017 , the asset sensitivity of our balance sheet to rising rates was largely unchanged. We continue to be asset sensitive to a parallel move in interest rates with the majority of that benefit coming from the short end of the yield curve. Additionally, higher interest rates impact the fair value of debt securities and, accordingly, for debt securities classified as available-for-sale (AFS), may adversely affect accumulated OCI and thus capital levels under the Basel 3 capital rules. Under instantaneous upward parallel shifts, the near-term adverse impact to Basel 3 capital is reduced over time by offsetting positive impacts to net interest income. For more information on the transition provisions of Basel 3, see Capital Management – Regulatory Capital on page 29 .

Table 53

Estimated Banking Book Net Interest Income Sensitivity

Short

Rate (bps)

Long

Rate (bps)

(Dollars in millions)

September 30
2017

December 31
2016

Curve Change

Parallel Shifts

+100 bps

instantaneous shift

+100

+100

$

3,234


$

3,370


-50 bps

instantaneous shift

-50


-50


(2,306

)

(2,900

)

Flatteners




Short-end

instantaneous change

+100

-


2,203


2,473


Long-end

instantaneous change

-


-50


(1,166

)

(961

)

Steepeners



Short-end

instantaneous change

-50


-


(1,125

)

(1,918

)

Long-end

instantaneous change

-


+100

1,042


928


The sensitivity analysis in Table 53 assumes that we take no action in response to these rate shocks and does not assume any change in other macroeconomic variables normally correlated with changes in interest rates. As part of our ALM activities, we use securities, certain residential mortgages, and interest rate and foreign exchange derivatives in managing interest rate sensitivity.

The behavior of our deposit portfolio in the baseline forecast and in alternate interest rate scenarios is a key assumption in our projected estimates of net interest income. The sensitivity analysis in Table 53 assumes no change in deposit portfolio size or mix from the baseline forecast in alternate rate environments. In higher rate scenarios, any customer activity resulting in the replacement of low-cost or noninterest-bearing deposits with higher-yielding deposits or market-based funding would reduce our benefit in those scenarios.

Interest Rate and Foreign Exchange Derivative Contracts

Interest rate and foreign exchange derivative contracts are utilized in our ALM activities and serve as an efficient tool to manage our interest rate and foreign exchange risk. We use derivatives to hedge the variability in cash flows or changes in fair value on our balance sheet due to interest rate and foreign exchange components. For more information on our hedging activities, see Note 2 – Derivatives to the Consolidated Financial Statements .

Our interest rate contracts are generally non-leveraged generic interest rate and foreign exchange basis swaps, options, futures and forwards. In addition, we use foreign exchange contracts, including cross-currency interest rate swaps, foreign currency futures contracts, foreign currency forward contracts and options to mitigate the foreign exchange risk associated with foreign currency-denominated assets and liabilities.

Changes to the composition of our derivatives portfolio during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 reflect actions taken for interest rate and foreign exchange rate risk management. The decisions to reposition our derivatives portfolio are based on the current assessment of economic and financial conditions including the interest rate and foreign currency environments, balance sheet composition and trends, and the relative mix of our cash and derivative positions.

Table 54 presents derivatives utilized in our ALM activities including those designated as accounting and economic hedging instruments and shows the notional amount, fair value, weighted-average receive-fixed and pay-fixed rates, expected maturity and average estimated durations of our open ALM derivatives at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 . These amounts do not include derivative hedges on our MSRs.


Bank of America 64


Table 54

Asset and Liability Management Interest Rate and Foreign Exchange Contracts

September 30, 2017

Expected Maturity

(Dollars in millions, average estimated duration in years)

Fair

Value

Total

Remainder of 2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

Thereafter

Average
Estimated

Duration

Receive-fixed interest rate swaps (1)

$

3,591









5.31


Notional amount


$

151,504


$

5,780


$

21,850


$

21,783


$

15,115


$

5,307


$

81,669



Weighted-average fixed-rate


2.50

%

3.60

%

3.20

%

1.87

%

1.87

%

3.18

%

2.48

%


Pay-fixed interest rate swaps (1)

(202

)








5.63


Notional amount


$

25,330


$

-


$

6,408


$

-


$

-


$

-


$

18,922



Weighted-average fixed-rate


2.09

%

-

%

1.60

%

-

%

-

%

-

%

2.26

%


Same-currency basis swaps  (2)

(29

)









Notional amount


$

43,551


$

4,935


$

11,028


$

6,790


$

1,180


$

2,809


$

16,809



Foreign exchange basis swaps (1, 3, 4)

(1,830

)









Notional amount


113,011


5,294


24,124


11,947


13,325


9,393


48,928



Option products (5)

6










Notional amount (6)


1,869


671


1,182


-


-


-


16



Foreign exchange contracts (1, 4, 7)

1,463










Notional amount (6)

3,623


(6,908

)

(6,169

)

2,201


(20

)

2,438


12,081



Net ALM contracts

$

2,999










December 31, 2016

Expected Maturity

(Dollars in millions, average estimated duration in years)

Fair

Value

Total

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

Thereafter

Average

Estimated

Duration

Receive-fixed interest rate swaps (1)

$

4,055









4.81


Notional amount


$

118,603


$

21,453


$

25,788


$

10,283


$

7,515


$

5,307


$

48,257



Weighted-average fixed-rate


2.83

%

3.64

%

2.81

%

2.31

%

2.07

%

3.18

%

2.67

%


Pay-fixed interest rate swaps (1)

159









2.77


Notional amount


$

22,400


$

1,527


$

9,168


$

2,072


$

7,975


$

213


$

1,445



Weighted-average fixed-rate


1.37

%

1.84

%

1.47

%

0.97

%

1.08

%

1.00

%

2.45

%


Same-currency basis swaps (2)

(26

)









Notional amount


$

59,274


$

20,775


$

11,027


$

6,784


$

1,180


$

2,799


$

16,709



Foreign exchange basis swaps (1, 3, 4)

(4,233

)









Notional amount


125,522


26,509


22,724


12,178


12,150


8,365


43,596



Option products (5)

5










Notional amount (6)


1,687


1,673


-


-


-


-


14



Foreign exchange contracts (1, 4, 7)

3,180










Notional amount (6)


(20,285

)

(30,199

)

197


1,961


(8

)

881


6,883



Futures and forward rate contracts

19










Notional amount (6)


37,896


37,896


-


-


-


-


-



Net ALM contracts

$

3,159










(1)

Does not include basis adjustments on either fixed-rate debt issued by the Corporation or AFS debt securities, which are hedged using derivatives designated as fair value hedging instruments, that substantially offset the fair values of these derivatives.

(2)

At September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , the notional amount of same-currency basis swaps included $43.6 billion and $59.3 billion in both foreign currency and U.S. dollar-denominated basis swaps in which both sides of the swap are in the same currency.

(3)

Foreign exchange basis swaps consisted of cross-currency variable interest rate swaps used separately or in conjunction with receive-fixed interest rate swaps.

(4)

Does not include foreign currency translation adjustments on certain non-U.S. debt issued by the Corporation that substantially offset the fair values of these derivatives.

(5)

The notional amount of option products of $1.9 billion and $1.7 billion at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 was substantially all in foreign exchange options.

(6)

Reflects the net of long and short positions. Amounts shown as negative reflect a net short position.

(7)

The notional amount of foreign exchange contracts of $3.6 billion at September 30, 2017 was comprised of $41.7 billion in foreign currency-denominated and cross-currency receive-fixed swaps, $(32.6) billion in net foreign currency forward rate contracts, $(6.5) billion in foreign currency-denominated pay-fixed swaps and $1.0 billion in net foreign currency futures contracts. Foreign exchange contracts of $(20.3) billion at December 31, 2016 were comprised of $21.5 billion in foreign currency-denominated and cross-currency receive-fixed swaps, $(38.5) billion in net foreign currency forward rate contracts, $(4.6) billion in foreign currency-denominated pay-fixed swaps and $1.3 billion in foreign currency futures contracts.


65 Bank of America




We use interest rate derivative instruments to hedge the variability in the cash flows of our assets and liabilities and other forecasted transactions (collectively referred to as cash flow hedges). The net losses on both open and terminated cash flow hedge derivative instruments recorded in accumulated OCI were $1.2 billion and $1.4 billion , on a pre-tax basis, at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 . These net losses are expected to be reclassified into earnings in the same period as the hedged cash flows affect earnings and will decrease income or increase expense on the respective hedged cash flows. Assuming no change in open cash flow derivative hedge positions and no changes in prices or interest rates beyond what is implied in forward yield curves at September 30, 2017 , the pre-tax net losses are expected to be reclassified into earnings as follows: $164 million , or 14 percent within the next year, 51 percent in years two through five, and 23 percent in years six through 10, with the remaining 12 percent thereafter. For more information on derivatives designated as cash flow hedges, see Note 2 – Derivatives to the Consolidated Financial Statements .

We hedge our net investment in non-U.S. operations determined to have functional currencies other than the U.S. dollar using forward foreign exchange contracts that typically settle in less than 180 days, cross-currency basis swaps and foreign exchange options. We recorded net after-tax losses on derivatives in accumulated OCI associated with net investment hedges which were offset by gains on our net investments in consolidated non-U.S. entities at September 30, 2017 .

Mortgage Banking Risk Management

We originate, fund and service mortgage loans, which subject us to credit, liquidity and interest rate risks, among others. We determine whether loans will be held-for-investment or held-for-sale at the time of commitment and manage credit and liquidity risks by selling or securitizing a portion of the loans we originate.

Interest rate risk and market risk can be substantial in the mortgage business. Changes in interest rates and other market factors impact the volume of mortgage originations. Changes in interest rates also impact the value of IRLCs and the related residential first mortgage LHFS between the date of the IRLC and the date the loans are sold to the secondary market. An increase in mortgage interest rates typically leads to a decrease in the value of these instruments. Conversely, the value of the MSRs will increase driven by lower prepayment expectations when there is an increase in interest rates. Because the interest rate risks of these two hedged items offset, we combine them into one overall hedged item with one combined economic hedge portfolio consisting of derivative contracts and securities.

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 , we recorded gains in mortgage banking income of $34 million and $100 million related to the change in fair value of the MSRs, IRLCs and LHFS, net of gains and losses on the hedge portfolio, compared to gains of $136 million and $318 million for the same periods in 2016. For more information on MSRs, see Note 14 – Fair Value Measurements to the Consolidated Financial Statements and for more information on mortgage banking income, see Consumer Banking on page 14 .

Complex Accounting Estimates

Our significant accounting principles are essential in understanding the MD&A. Many of our significant accounting principles require complex judgments to estimate the values of assets and liabilities. We have procedures and processes in place to facilitate making these judgments. For additional information, see Complex Accounting Estimates of the MD&A of the Corporation's 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K and Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Principles to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Corporation's 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K .



Bank of America 66


Non-GAAP Reconciliations


Tables 55 and 56 provide reconciliations of certain non-GAAP financial measures to GAAP financial measures.

Table 55

Quarterly and Year-to-Date Supplemental Financial Data and Reconciliations to GAAP Financial Measures

Three Months Ended September 30

2017

2016

(Dollars in millions)

As Reported

Fully taxable-equivalent adjustment

Fully taxable-equivalent basis

As Reported

Fully taxable-equivalent adjustment

Fully taxable-equivalent basis

Net interest income

$

11,161


$

240


$

11,401


$

10,201


$

228


$

10,429


Total revenue, net of interest expense

21,839


240


22,079


21,635


228


21,863


Income tax expense

2,279


240


2,519


2,349


228


2,577


Nine Months Ended September 30

2017

2016

Net interest income

$

33,205


$

674


$

33,879


$

30,804


$

666


$

31,470


Total revenue, net of interest expense

66,916


674


67,590


63,711


666


64,377


Income tax expense

7,096


674


7,770


5,888


666


6,554


Table 56

Period-end and Average Supplemental Financial Data and Reconciliations to GAAP Financial Measures

Average

Period-end

Three Months Ended September 30

Nine Months Ended September 30

(Dollars in millions)

September 30
2017

December 31
2016

2017

2016

2017

2016

Common shareholders' equity

$

250,136


$

241,620


$

249,624


$

243,679


$

246,195


$

240,440


Goodwill

(68,968

)

(69,744

)

(68,969

)

(69,744

)

(69,398

)

(69,752

)

Intangible assets (excluding MSRs)

(2,459

)

(2,989

)

(2,549

)

(3,276

)

(2,737

)

(3,480

)

Related deferred tax liabilities

1,435


1,545


1,465


1,628


1,503


1,666


Tangible common shareholders' equity

$

180,144


$

170,432


$

179,571


$

172,287


$

175,563


$

168,874


Shareholders' equity

$

272,459


$

266,840


$

273,648


$

268,899


$

271,012


$

264,907


Goodwill

(68,968

)

(69,744

)

(68,969

)

(69,744

)

(69,398

)

(69,752

)

Intangible assets (excluding MSRs)

(2,459

)

(2,989

)

(2,549

)

(3,276

)

(2,737

)

(3,480

)

Related deferred tax liabilities

1,435


1,545


1,465


1,628


1,503


1,666


Tangible shareholders' equity

$

202,467


$

195,652


$

203,595


$

197,507


$

200,380


$

193,341


Total assets

$

2,283,896


$

2,187,702


Goodwill

(68,968

)

(69,744

)

Intangible assets (excluding MSRs)

(2,459

)

(2,989

)

Related deferred tax liabilities

1,435


1,545


Tangible assets

$

2,213,904


$

2,116,514


Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

See Market Risk Management on page 60 in the MD&A and the sections referenced therein for Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of the end of the period covered by this report, the Corporation's management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness and design of the Corporation's disclosure controls and procedures (as that term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Exchange Act). Based upon that evaluation, the Corporation's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Corporation's disclosure controls and procedures were effective, as of the end of the period covered by this report, in recording, processing, summarizing and reporting information required to be disclosed by the Corporation in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There have been no changes in the Corporation's internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act) during the three months ended September 30, 2017 , that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Corporation's internal control over financial reporting.


Bank of America 67


Part I. Financial Information

Item 1. Financial Statements

Bank of America Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statement of Income

Three Months Ended September 30

Nine Months Ended September 30

(Dollars in millions, except per share information)

2017

2016

2017

2016

Interest income



Loans and leases

$

9,203


$

8,358


$

26,877


$

24,837


Debt securities

2,629


2,144


7,764


6,922


Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell

659


267


1,658


803


Trading account assets

1,091


1,076


3,330


3,330


Other interest income

1,075


765


2,884


2,300


Total interest income

14,657


12,610


42,513


38,192


Interest expense



Deposits

624


266


1,252


736


Short-term borrowings

944


569


2,508


1,808


Trading account liabilities

319


244


890


778


Long-term debt

1,609


1,330


4,658


4,066


Total interest expense

3,496


2,409


9,308


7,388


Net interest income

11,161


10,201


33,205


30,804


Noninterest income



Card income

1,429


1,455


4,347


4,349


Service charges

1,968


1,952


5,863


5,660


Investment and brokerage services

3,303


3,160


9,882


9,543


Investment banking income

1,477


1,458


4,593


4,019


Trading account profits

1,837


2,141


6,124


5,821


Mortgage banking income (loss)

(20

)

589


332


1,334


Gains on sales of debt securities

125


51


278


490


Other income

559


628


2,292


1,691


Total noninterest income

10,678


11,434


33,711


32,907


Total revenue, net of interest expense

21,839


21,635


66,916


63,711


Provision for credit losses

834


850


2,395


2,823


Noninterest expense



Personnel

7,483


7,704


24,353


24,278


Occupancy

999


1,005


3,000


3,069


Equipment

416


443


1,281


1,357


Marketing

461


410


1,235


1,243


Professional fees

476


536


1,417


1,433


Amortization of intangibles

151


181


473


554


Data processing

777


685


2,344


2,240


Telecommunications

170


189


538


551


Other general operating

2,206


2,328


7,072


7,065


Total noninterest expense

13,139


13,481


41,713


41,790


Income before income taxes

7,866


7,304


22,808


19,098


Income tax expense

2,279


2,349


7,096


5,888


Net income

$

5,587


$

4,955


$

15,712


$

13,210


Preferred stock dividends

465


503


1,328


1,321


Net income applicable to common shareholders

$

5,122


$

4,452


$

14,384


$

11,889


Per common share information



Earnings

$

0.50


$

0.43


$

1.42


$

1.15


Diluted earnings

0.48


0.41


1.35


1.10


Dividends paid

0.12


0.075


0.27


0.175


Average common shares issued and outstanding (in thousands)

10,197,891


10,250,124


10,103,386


10,312,878


Average diluted common shares issued and outstanding (in thousands)

10,725,482


11,000,473


10,820,425


11,046,807


See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


Bank of America 68


Bank of America Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income

Three Months Ended September 30

Nine Months Ended September 30

(Dollars in millions)

2017

2016

2017

2016

Net income

$

5,587


$

4,955


$

15,712


$

13,210


Other comprehensive income (loss), net-of-tax:

Net change in debt and marketable equity securities

462


208


931


3,319


Net change in debit valuation adjustments

(80

)

(65

)

(149

)

49


Net change in derivatives

24


127


156


277


Employee benefit plan adjustments

26


6


80


29


Net change in foreign currency translation adjustments

5


(8

)

102


(17

)

Other comprehensive income

437


268


1,120


3,657


Comprehensive income

$

6,024


$

5,223


$

16,832


$

16,867





See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


69 Bank of America




Bank of America Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Balance Sheet

(Dollars in millions)

September 30
2017

December 31
2016

Assets



Cash and due from banks

$

30,819


$

30,719


Interest-bearing deposits with the Federal Reserve, non-U.S. central banks and other banks

141,562


117,019


Cash and cash equivalents

172,381


147,738


Time deposits placed and other short-term investments

9,493


9,861


Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell (includes $56,780  and $49,750 measured at fair value)

217,214


198,224


Trading account assets (includes $119,458  and $106,057 pledged as collateral)

210,319


180,209


Derivative assets

38,384


42,512


Debt securities:


Carried at fair value (includes $32,146  and $29,804 pledged as collateral)

316,864


313,660


Held-to-maturity, at cost (fair value – $121,185  and $115,285 ; $5,043  and $8,233 pledged as collateral)

122,345


117,071


Total debt securities

439,209


430,731


Loans and leases (includes $6,285  and $7,085 measured at fair value and $36,362 and $31,805 pledged as collateral)

927,117


906,683


Allowance for loan and lease losses

(10,693

)

(11,237

)

Loans and leases, net of allowance

916,424


895,446


Premises and equipment, net

8,971


9,139


Mortgage servicing rights

2,407


2,747


Goodwill

68,968


68,969


Intangible assets

2,459


2,922


Loans held-for-sale (includes $3,128  and $4,026 measured at fair value)

13,243


9,066


Customer and other receivables (includes $230 measured at fair value at September 30, 2017)

55,855


58,759


Assets of business held for sale (includes $619 measured at fair value at December 31, 2016)

-


10,670


Other assets (includes $19,341  and $13,802 measured at fair value)

128,569


120,709


Total assets

$

2,283,896


$

2,187,702


Assets of consolidated variable interest entities included in total assets above (isolated to settle the liabilities of the variable interest entities)

Trading account assets

$

5,142


$

5,773


Loans and leases

50,022


56,001


Allowance for loan and lease losses

(1,023

)

(1,032

)

Loans and leases, net of allowance

48,999


54,969


Loans held-for-sale

66


188


All other assets

662


1,596


Total assets of consolidated variable interest entities

$

54,869


$

62,526



See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


Bank of America 70


Bank of America Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Balance Sheet (continued)

(Dollars in millions)

September 30
2017

December 31
2016

Liabilities



Deposits in U.S. offices:



Noninterest-bearing

$

429,861


$

438,125


Interest-bearing (includes $468  and $731 measured at fair value)

776,756


750,891


Deposits in non-U.S. offices:

Noninterest-bearing

14,126


12,039


Interest-bearing

63,674


59,879


Total deposits

1,284,417


1,260,934


Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase (includes $38,852  and $35,766 measured at fair value)

189,790


170,291


Trading account liabilities

86,434


63,031


Derivative liabilities

31,781


39,480


Short-term borrowings (includes $1,904  and $2,024 measured at fair value)

32,679


23,944


Accrued expenses and other liabilities (includes $22,369  and $14,630 measured at fair value and $762  and $762 of reserve for unfunded lending commitments)

157,670


146,359


Long-term debt (includes $29,897  and $30,037 measured at fair value)

228,666


216,823


Total liabilities

2,011,437


1,920,862


Commitments and contingencies (Note 6 – Securitizations and Other Variable Interest Entities, Note 7 – Representations and Warranties Obligations and Corporate Guarantees  and Note 10 – Commitments and Contingencies)





Shareholders' equity



Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; authorized – 100,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding – 3,837,683  and 3,887,329 shares

22,323


25,220


Common stock and additional paid-in capital, $0.01 par value; authorized – 12,800,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding – 10,457,473,674  and 10,052,625,604 shares

142,818


147,038


Retained earnings

113,486


101,870


Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

(6,168

)

(7,288

)

Total shareholders' equity

272,459


266,840


Total liabilities and shareholders' equity

$

2,283,896


$

2,187,702


Liabilities of consolidated variable interest entities included in total liabilities above



Short-term borrowings

$

122


$

348


Long-term debt (includes $9,398  and $10,417 of non-recourse debt)

9,457


10,646


All other liabilities (includes $52  and $38 of non-recourse liabilities)

54


41


Total liabilities of consolidated variable interest entities

$

9,633


$

11,035


See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


71 Bank of America




Bank of America Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders' Equity

Preferred

Stock

Common Stock and

Additional Paid-in

Capital

Retained

Earnings

Accumulated
Other

Comprehensive

Income (Loss)

Total

Shareholders'

Equity

(Dollars in millions, shares in thousands)

Shares

Amount

Balance, December 31, 2015

$

22,273


10,380,265


$

151,042


$

88,219


$

(5,358

)

$

256,176


Net income

13,210


13,210


Net change in debt and marketable equity securities

3,319


3,319


Net change in debit valuation adjustments

49


49


Net change in derivatives

277


277


Employee benefit plan adjustments

29


29


Net change in foreign currency translation adjustments

(17

)

(17

)

Dividends declared:

Common

(1,805

)

(1,805

)

Preferred

(1,321

)

(1,321

)

Issuance of preferred stock

2,947


2,947


Common stock issued under employee plans, net, and related tax effects

5,082


1,001


1,001


Common stock repurchased

(261,502

)

(3,782

)

(3,782

)

Balance, September 30, 2016

$

25,220


10,123,845


$

148,261


$

98,303


$

(1,701

)

$

270,083


Balance, December 31, 2016

$

25,220


10,052,626


$

147,038


$

101,870


$

(7,288

)

$

266,840


Net income

15,712


15,712


Net change in debt and marketable equity securities

931


931


Net change in debit valuation adjustments

(149

)

(149

)

Net change in derivatives

156


156


Employee benefit plan adjustments

80


80


Net change in foreign currency translation adjustments

102


102


Dividends declared:

Common

(2,768

)

(2,768

)

Preferred

(1,292

)

(1,292

)

Common stock issued in connection with exercise of warrants and exchange of preferred stock

(2,897

)

700,000


2,933


(36

)

-


Common stock issued under employee plans, net and other

39,496


792


792


Common stock repurchased

(334,648

)

(7,945

)

(7,945

)

Balance, September 30, 2017

$

22,323


10,457,474


$

142,818


$

113,486


$

(6,168

)

$

272,459






























See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


Bank of America 72


Bank of America Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows

Nine Months Ended September 30

(Dollars in millions)

2017

2016

Operating activities

Net income

$

15,712


$

13,210


Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

Provision for credit losses

2,395


2,823


Gains on sales of debt securities

(278

)

(490

)

Depreciation and premises improvements amortization

1,115


1,138


Amortization of intangibles

473


554


Net amortization of premium/discount on debt securities

1,647


2,203


Deferred income taxes

5,043


5,072


Stock-based compensation

1,465


1,087


Loans held-for-sale:

Originations and purchases

(31,404

)

(24,154

)

Proceeds from sales and paydowns of loans originally classified as held-for-sale

27,006


21,068


Net change in:

Trading and derivative instruments

(11,844

)

9,068


Other assets

(9,809

)

(612

)

Accrued expenses and other liabilities

11,201


(4,845

)

Other operating activities, net

4,729


595


Net cash provided by operating activities

17,451


26,717


Investing activities

Net change in:

Time deposits placed and other short-term investments

368


(762

)

Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell

(18,990

)

(26,328

)

Debt securities carried at fair value:

Proceeds from sales

64,597


67,681


Proceeds from paydowns and maturities

71,628


81,404


Purchases

(134,915

)

(156,537

)

Held-to-maturity debt securities:

Proceeds from paydowns and maturities

12,194


12,827


Purchases

(17,850

)

(29,085

)

Loans and leases:

Proceeds from sales

8,643


14,870


Purchases

(4,511

)

(9,347

)

Other changes in loans and leases, net

(29,654

)

(17,832

)

Other investing activities, net

8,451


109


Net cash used in investing activities

(40,039

)

(63,000

)

Financing activities

Net change in:

Deposits

23,483


35,636


Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase

19,987


3,904


Short-term borrowings

8,583


(1,069

)

Long-term debt:

Proceeds from issuance

50,702


24,681


Retirement of long-term debt

(44,724

)

(41,458

)

Preferred stock: Proceeds from issuance

-


2,947


Common stock repurchased

(7,945

)

(3,782

)

Cash dividends paid

(4,124

)

(3,031

)

Other financing activities, net

(609

)

(58

)

Net cash provided by financing activities

45,353


17,770


Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

1,878


2,594


Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

24,643


(15,919

)

Cash and cash equivalents at January 1

147,738


159,353


Cash and cash equivalents at September 30

$

172,381


$

143,434


See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


73 Bank of America




Bank of America Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

NOTE 1

Summary of Significant Accounting Principles

Bank of America Corporation, a bank holding company and a financial holding company, provides a diverse range of financial services and products throughout the U.S. and in certain international markets. The term "the Corporation" as used herein may refer to Bank of America Corporation individually, Bank of America Corporation and its subsidiaries, or certain of Bank of America Corporation's subsidiaries or affiliates.

Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation

The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of the Corporation and its majority-owned subsidiaries and those variable interest entities (VIEs) where the Corporation is the primary beneficiary. Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. Results of operations of acquired companies are included from the dates of acquisition and for VIEs, from the dates that the Corporation became the primary beneficiary. Assets held in an agency or fiduciary capacity are not included in the Consolidated Financial Statements. The Corporation accounts for investments in companies for which it owns a voting interest and for which it has the ability to exercise significant influence over operating and financing decisions using the equity method of accounting. These investments are included in other assets. Equity method investments are subject to impairment testing, and the Corporation's proportionate share of income or loss is included in other income.

The preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts and disclosures. Realized results could differ from those estimates and assumptions.

These unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the audited Consolidated Financial Statements of the Corporation's 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The nature of the Corporation's business is such that the results of any interim period are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, which consist of normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair statement of the interim period results have been made. The Corporation evaluates subsequent events through the date of filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain prior-period amounts have been reclassified to conform to current period presentation.

On June 1, 2017, the Corporation completed the sale of its non-U.S. consumer credit card business to a third party. The Corporation has indemnified the purchaser for substantially all payment protection insurance (PPI) exposure above reserves assumed by the purchaser. The impact of the sale was an after-tax gain of $103 million , and is presented in the Consolidated Statement of Income as other income of $793 million and an income tax expense of $690 million . The income tax expense was related to gains on the derivatives used to hedge the currency risk of the net investment. Total cash proceeds from the sale were $10.9 billion . The assets of the business sold primarily included consumer credit card receivables of $9.8 billion and $9.2 billion

at June 1, 2017 and December 31, 2016 and goodwill of $775 million at both of those period ends. This business was included in All Other .

New Accounting Pronouncements

Accounting for Financial Instruments -- Credit Losses

The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued a new accounting standard effective on January 1, 2020, with early adoption permitted on January 1, 2019, that will require the earlier recognition of credit losses on loans and other financial instruments based on an expected loss model, replacing the incurred loss model that is currently in use. The standard also requires expanded credit quality disclosures, including credit quality indicators disaggregated by vintage. The Corporation is in the process of identifying and implementing required changes to loan loss estimation models and processes and evaluating the impact of this new accounting standard, which at the date of adoption is expected to increase the allowance for credit losses with a resulting negative adjustment to retained earnings.

Hedge Accounting

The FASB issued a new accounting standard effective on January 1, 2019, with early adoption permitted, that makes targeted improvements to simplify the application of hedge accounting guidance. The Corporation is evaluating the timing of adoption. The ongoing implementation efforts include identifying current hedge strategies and systems and processes that will need to be modified to comply with the standard, which could impact the timing of adoption. The Corporation does not expect the new accounting standard to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or disclosures in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Lease Accounting

The FASB issued a new accounting standard effective on January 1, 2019 that requires substantially all leases to be recorded as assets and liabilities on the balance sheet. This new accounting standard uses a modified retrospective transition that will be applied to all prior periods presented. The Corporation is in the process of reviewing its existing lease portfolios, as well as other service contracts for embedded leases, to evaluate the impact of the new accounting standard on the financial statements, as well as the impact to regulatory capital and risk-weighted assets. The effect of the adoption will depend on its lease portfolio at the time of transition; however, the Corporation does not expect the new accounting standard to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or disclosures in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities

The FASB issued a new accounting standard effective on January 1, 2018, with early adoption permitted for the provisions related to debit valuation adjustments (DVA), on recognition and measurement of financial instruments, including certain equity investments and financial liabilities recorded at fair value under the fair value option. In 2015, the Corporation early adopted, retrospective to January 1, 2015, the provisions of this new accounting standard related to DVA on financial liabilities accounted for under the fair value option. The Corporation does


Bank of America 74


not expect the remaining provisions of this new accounting standard to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or disclosures in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Revenue Recognition

The FASB issued a new accounting standard effective on January 1, 2018 for recognizing revenue from contracts with customers. The customer contracts within the scope of the new standard have been identified, and the Corporation's current evaluation indicates that the new standard will not impact the timing or measurement of its revenue recognition. The Corporation continues to evaluate the presentation of certain costs as either operating expenses or net against noninterest income; consequently, there may be an insignificant change in the Consolidated Statement of Income for the presentation of these costs. Overall, the Corporation does not expect the new accounting standard to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or disclosures in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.


NOTE 2

Derivatives

Derivative Balances

Derivatives are entered into on behalf of customers, for trading or to support risk management activities. Derivatives used in risk management activities include derivatives that may or may not be designated in qualifying hedge accounting relationships. Derivatives that are not designated in qualifying hedge accounting relationships are referred to as other risk management derivatives. For more information on the Corporation's derivatives and hedging activities, see Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Principles to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Corporation's 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The following tables present derivative instruments included on the Consolidated Balance Sheet in derivative assets and liabilities at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 . Balances are presented on a gross basis, prior to the application of counterparty and cash collateral netting. Total derivative assets and liabilities are adjusted on an aggregate basis to take into consideration the effects of legally enforceable master netting agreements and have been reduced by the cash collateral received or paid.

September 30, 2017

Gross Derivative Assets

Gross Derivative Liabilities

(Dollars in billions)

Contract/

Notional  (1)

Trading and Other Risk Management Derivatives

Qualifying
Accounting

Hedges

Total

Trading and Other Risk Management Derivatives

Qualifying
Accounting

Hedges

Total

Interest rate contracts








Swaps (2)

$

18,602.5


$

179.5


$

5.1


$

184.6


$

176.7


$

1.3


$

178.0


Futures and forwards (2)

5,957.2


0.9


-


0.9


0.8


-


0.8


Written options

1,467.4


-


-


-


36.3


-


36.3


Purchased options

1,390.7


38.5


-


38.5


-


-


-


Foreign exchange contracts






Swaps

2,011.9


36.6


2.5


39.1


37.0


3.1


40.1


Spot, futures and forwards

4,313.6


46.6


0.9


47.5


46.9


0.8


47.7


Written options

367.3


-


-


-


5.7


-


5.7


Purchased options

335.7


5.2


-


5.2


-


-


-


Equity contracts







Swaps

236.2


4.6


-


4.6


4.6


-


4.6


Futures and forwards

100.9


1.9


-


1.9


1.2


-


1.2


Written options

524.9


-


-


-


25.1


-


25.1


Purchased options

467.0


25.2


-


25.2


-


-


-


Commodity contracts








Swaps

47.6


1.7


-


1.7


4.2


-


4.2


Futures and forwards

51.5


3.5


-


3.5


0.6


-


0.6


Written options

25.0


-


-


-


1.2


-


1.2


Purchased options

26.1


1.4


-


1.4


-


-


-


Credit derivatives (3)








Purchased credit derivatives:






Credit default swaps (2)

522.8


4.8


-


4.8


11.2


-


11.2


Total return swaps/other

57.6


0.1


-


0.1


1.3


-


1.3


Written credit derivatives:













Credit default swaps (2)

514.5


10.9


-


10.9


4.2


-


4.2


Total return swaps/other

55.3


0.8


-


0.8


0.2


-


0.2


Gross derivative assets/liabilities

$

362.2


$

8.5


$

370.7


$

357.2


$

5.2


$

362.4


Less: Legally enforceable master netting agreements (2)




(296.7

)



(296.7

)

Less: Cash collateral received/paid (2)




(35.6

)



(33.9

)

Total derivative assets/liabilities




$

38.4




$

31.8


(1)

Represents the total contract/notional amount of derivative assets and liabilities outstanding.

(2)

Derivative assets and liabilities reflect the effects of contractual amendments by two central clearing counterparties to legally re-characterize daily cash variation margin from collateral, which secures an outstanding exposure, to settlement, which discharges an outstanding exposure. One of these central clearing counterparties amended its governing documents, which became effective in January 2017. In addition, the Corporation elected to transfer its existing positions to the settlement platform for the other central clearing counterparty in September 2017.

(3)

The net derivative asset and notional amount of written credit derivatives for which the Corporation held purchased credit derivatives with identical underlying referenced names were $6.2 billion and $494.1 billion at September 30, 2017 .



75 Bank of America




December 31, 2016

Gross Derivative Assets

Gross Derivative Liabilities

(Dollars in billions)

Contract/

Notional  (1)

Trading and Other Risk Management Derivatives

Qualifying
Accounting

Hedges

Total

Trading and Other Risk Management Derivatives

Qualifying
Accounting

Hedges

Total

Interest rate contracts








Swaps

$

16,977.7


$

385.0


$

5.9


$

390.9


$

386.9


$

2.0


$

388.9


Futures and forwards

5,609.5


2.2


-


2.2


2.1


-


2.1


Written options

1,146.2


-


-


-


52.2


-


52.2


Purchased options

1,178.7


53.3


-


53.3


-


-


-


Foreign exchange contracts







Swaps

1,828.6


54.6


4.2


58.8


58.8


6.2


65.0


Spot, futures and forwards

3,410.7


58.8


1.7


60.5


56.6


0.8


57.4


Written options

356.6


-


-


-


9.4


-


9.4


Purchased options

342.4


8.9


-


8.9


-


-


-


Equity contracts








Swaps

189.7


3.4


-


3.4


4.0


-


4.0


Futures and forwards

68.7


0.9


-


0.9


0.9


-


0.9


Written options

431.5


-


-


-


21.4


-


21.4


Purchased options

385.5


23.9


-


23.9


-


-


-


Commodity contracts








Swaps

48.2


2.5


-


2.5


5.1


-


5.1


Futures and forwards

49.1


3.6


-


3.6


0.5


-


0.5


Written options

29.3


-


-


-


1.9


-


1.9


Purchased options

28.9


2.0


-


2.0


-


-


-


Credit derivatives (2)








Purchased credit derivatives:








Credit default swaps

604.0


8.1


-


8.1


10.3


-


10.3


Total return swaps/other

21.2


0.4


-


0.4


1.5


-


1.5


Written credit derivatives:







Credit default swaps

614.4


10.7


-


10.7


7.5


-


7.5


Total return swaps/other

25.4


1.0


-


1.0


0.2


-


0.2


Gross derivative assets/liabilities


$

619.3


$

11.8


$

631.1


$

619.3


$

9.0


$

628.3


Less: Legally enforceable master netting agreements




(545.3

)



(545.3

)

Less: Cash collateral received/paid




(43.3

)



(43.5

)

Total derivative assets/liabilities




$

42.5




$

39.5


(1)

Represents the total contract/notional amount of derivative assets and liabilities outstanding.

(2)

The net derivative asset and notional amount of written credit derivatives for which the Corporation held purchased credit derivatives with identical underlying referenced names were $2.2 billion and $548.9 billion at December 31, 2016 .

Offsetting of Derivatives

The Corporation enters into International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. (ISDA) master netting agreements or similar agreements with substantially all of the Corporation's derivative counterparties. Where legally enforceable, these master netting agreements give the Corporation, in the event of default by the counterparty, the right to liquidate securities held as collateral and to offset receivables and payables with the same counterparty. For additional information on the offsetting of derivative assets and liabilities, see Note 2 – Derivatives to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Corporation's 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The following table presents derivative instruments included in derivative assets and liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 by primary risk (e.g., interest rate risk) and the platform, where applicable, on which these derivatives are transacted. Balances are presented on a gross basis, prior to the application of counterparty and cash collateral netting. Total gross derivative assets and liabilities are adjusted on an aggregate basis to take into consideration the effects of legally enforceable master netting agreements which includes reducing the balance for counterparty netting and cash collateral received or paid.

For more information on offsetting of securities financing agreements, see Note 9 – Federal Funds Sold or Purchased, Securities Financing Agreements and Short-term Borrowings .



Bank of America 76


Offsetting of Derivatives (1)

September 30, 2017

December 31, 2016

(Dollars in billions)

Derivative

Assets

Derivative Liabilities

Derivative

Assets

Derivative Liabilities

Interest rate contracts





Over-the-counter

$

219.1


$

211.3


$

267.3


$

258.2


Over-the-counter cleared (2)

2.3


2.3


177.2


182.8


Foreign exchange contracts

Over-the-counter

88.2


90.7


124.3


126.7


Over-the-counter cleared

0.7


0.6


0.3


0.3


Equity contracts

Over-the-counter

18.3


17.3


15.6


13.7


Exchange-traded

9.5


9.7


11.4


10.8


Commodity contracts

Over-the-counter

2.7


4.0


3.7


4.9


Exchange-traded

0.7


0.6


1.1


1.0


Credit derivatives

Over-the-counter

10.1


10.5


15.3


14.7


Over-the-counter cleared (2)

6.1


6.0


4.3


4.3


Total gross derivative assets/liabilities, before netting

Over-the-counter

338.4


333.8


426.2


418.2


Exchange-traded

10.2


10.3


12.5


11.8


Over-the-counter cleared (2)

9.1


8.9


181.8


187.4


Less: Legally enforceable master netting agreements and cash collateral received/paid

Over-the-counter

(314.9

)

(312.8

)

(398.2

)

(392.6

)

Exchange-traded

(9.2

)

(9.2

)

(8.9

)

(8.9

)

Over-the-counter cleared (2)

(8.2

)

(8.6

)

(181.5

)

(187.3

)

Derivative assets/liabilities, after netting

25.4


22.4


31.9


28.6


Other gross derivative assets/liabilities (3)

13.0


9.4


10.6


10.9


Total derivative assets/liabilities

38.4


31.8


42.5


39.5


Less: Financial instruments collateral (4)

(11.3

)

(9.6

)

(13.5

)

(10.5

)

Total net derivative assets/liabilities

$

27.1


$

22.2


$

29.0


$

29.0


(1)

Over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives include bilateral transactions between the Corporation and a particular counterparty. OTC-cleared derivatives include bilateral transactions between the Corporation and a counterparty where the transaction is cleared through a clearinghouse, and exchange-traded derivatives include listed options transacted on an exchange.

(2)

Derivative assets and liabilities reflect the effects of contractual amendments by two central clearing counterparties to legally re-characterize daily cash variation margin from collateral, which secures an outstanding exposure, to settlement, which discharges an outstanding exposure. One of these central clearing counterparties amended its governing documents, which became effective in January 2017. In addition, the Corporation elected to transfer its existing positions to the settlement platform for the other central clearing counterparty in September 2017.

(3)

Consists of derivatives entered into under master netting agreements where the enforceability of these agreements is uncertain under bankruptcy laws in some countries or industries.

(4)

Amounts are limited to the derivative asset/liability balance and, accordingly, do not include excess collateral received/pledged. Financial instruments collateral includes securities collateral received or pledged and cash securities held and posted at third-party custodians that are not offset on the Consolidated Balance Sheet but shown as a reduction to derive net derivative assets and liabilities.

ALM and Risk Management Derivatives

The Corporation's asset and liability management (ALM) and risk management activities include the use of derivatives to mitigate risk to the Corporation including derivatives designated in qualifying hedge accounting relationships and derivatives used in other risk management activities. For additional information, see Note 2 – Derivatives to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Corporation's 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Derivatives Designated as Accounting Hedges

The Corporation uses various types of interest rate, commodity and foreign exchange derivative contracts to protect against changes in the fair value of its assets and liabilities due to fluctuations in interest rates, commodity prices and exchange rates (fair value hedges). The Corporation also uses these types of contracts and equity derivatives to protect against changes in the cash flows of its assets and liabilities, and other forecasted transactions (cash flow hedges). The Corporation hedges its net investment in consolidated non-U.S. operations determined to

have functional currencies other than the U.S. dollar using forward exchange contracts and cross-currency basis swaps, and by issuing foreign currency-denominated debt (net investment hedges).

Fair Value Hedges

The following table summarizes information related to fair value hedges for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 , including hedges of interest rate risk on long-term debt that were acquired as part of a business combination and redesignated at that time. At redesignation, the fair value of the derivatives was positive. As the derivatives mature, the fair value will approach zero. As a result, ineffectiveness will occur and the fair value changes in the derivatives and the long-term debt being hedged may be directionally the same in certain scenarios. Based on a regression analysis, the derivatives continue to be highly effective at offsetting changes in the fair value of the long-term debt attributable to interest rate risk.


77 Bank of America




Derivatives Designated as Fair Value Hedges

Gains (Losses)

Three Months Ended September 30, 2017

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017

(Dollars in millions)

Derivative

Hedged
Item

Hedge
Ineffectiveness

Derivative

Hedged
Item

Hedge
Ineffectiveness

Interest rate risk on long-term debt  (1)

$

(273

)

$

169


$

(104

)

$

(751

)

$

313


$

(438

)

Interest rate and foreign currency risk on long-term debt  (1)

607


(593

)

14


1,631


(1,603

)

28


Interest rate risk on available-for-sale securities (2)

(8

)

7


(1

)

(71

)

40


(31

)

Price risk on commodity inventory  (3)

-


(1

)

(1

)

8


(8

)

-


Total

$

326


$

(418

)

$

(92

)

$

817


$

(1,258

)

$

(441

)

Three Months Ended September 30, 2016

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016

Interest rate risk on long-term debt  (1)

$

(758

)

$

580


$

(178

)

$

3,166


$

(3,654

)

$

(488

)

Interest rate and foreign currency risk on long-term debt  (1)

16


(10

)

6


360


(369

)

(9

)

Interest rate risk on available-for-sale securities (2)

235


(250

)

(15

)

(131

)

80


(51

)

Price risk on commodity inventory  (3)

6


(6

)

-


-


-


-


Total

$

(501

)

$

314


$

(187

)

$

3,395


$

(3,943

)

$

(548

)

(1)

Amounts are recorded in interest expense on long-term debt and in other income.

(2)

Amounts are recorded in interest income on debt securities.

(3)

Amounts relating to commodity inventory are recorded in trading account profits.

Cash Flow and Net Investment Hedges

The table below summarizes certain information related to cash flow hedges and net investment hedges for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 . Of the $739 million after-tax net loss ( $1.2 billion pre-tax) on derivatives in accumulated other comprehensive income (OCI) at September 30, 2017 , $102 million after-tax ( $164 million pre-tax) is expected to be reclassified into earnings in the next 12 months. These net

losses reclassified into earnings are expected to primarily reduce net interest income related to the respective hedged items. Amounts related to price risk on restricted stock awards reclassified from accumulated OCI are recorded in personnel expense. For terminated cash flow hedges, the time period over which the majority of the forecasted transactions are hedged is approximately seven years, with a maximum length of time for certain forecasted transactions of 19 years.

Derivatives Designated as Cash Flow and Net Investment Hedges

Three Months Ended September 30, 2017

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017



(Dollars in millions, amounts pre-tax)

Gains (Losses)
Recognized in
Accumulated OCI on Derivatives

Gains (Losses)
in Income
Reclassified from
Accumulated OCI

Hedge
Ineffectiveness and Amounts Excluded
from Effectiveness
Testing
(1)

Gains (Losses)
Recognized in
Accumulated OCI on Derivatives

Gains (Losses)
in Income
Reclassified from
Accumulated OCI

Hedge
Ineffectiveness and Amounts Excluded
from Effectiveness
Testing
(1)

Cash flow hedges

Interest rate risk on variable-rate portfolios

$

11


$

(54

)

$

(1

)

$

38


$

(274

)

$

4


Price risk on restricted stock awards (2)

7


32


-


41


103


-


Total

$

18


$

(22

)

$

(1

)

$

79


$

(171

)

$

4


Net investment hedges




Foreign exchange risk (3)

$

(427

)

$

(3

)

$

(33

)

$

(1,541

)

$

1,811


$

(82

)

Three Months Ended September 30, 2016

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016

Cash flow hedges

Interest rate risk on variable-rate portfolios

$

(8

)

$

(119

)

$

(4

)

$

50


$

(447

)

$

2


Price risk on restricted stock awards  (2)

85


(8

)

-


(114

)

(61

)

-


Total

$

77


$

(127

)

$

(4

)

$

(64

)

$

(508

)

$

2


Net investment hedges




Foreign exchange risk

$

214


$

2


$

(68

)

$

173


$

3


$

(234

)

(1)

Amounts related to cash flow hedges represent hedge ineffectiveness and amounts related to net investment hedges represent amounts excluded from effectiveness testing.

(2)

Gains (losses) recognized in accumulated OCI are primarily related to the change in the Corporation's stock price for the period.

(3)

For the nine months ended September 30, 2017 , substantially all of the gains in income reclassified from accumulated OCI were comprised of the gain recognized on derivatives used to hedge the currency risk of the Corporation's net investment in its non-U.S. consumer credit card business, which was sold during the second quarter of 2017. For additional information, see Note 12 – Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) .


Bank of America 78


Other Risk Management Derivatives

Other risk management derivatives are used by the Corporation to reduce certain risk exposures. These derivatives are not qualifying accounting hedges because either they did not qualify for or were not designated as accounting hedges. The table below presents gains (losses) on these derivatives for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 . These gains (losses) are largely offset by the income or expense that is recorded on the hedged item.

Other Risk Management Derivatives

Gains (Losses)

Three Months Ended September 30

Nine Months Ended September 30

(Dollars in millions)

2017

2016

2017

2016

Interest rate risk on mortgage banking income (1)

$

1


$

57


$

32


$

882


Credit risk on loans  (2)

-


(7

)

(3

)

(103

)

Interest rate and foreign currency risk on ALM activities  (3)

26


(262

)

(26

)

(1,970

)

Price risk on restricted stock awards (4)

33


199


161


(569

)

Other

-


-


5


40


(1)

Net gains on these derivatives are recorded in mortgage banking income as they are used to mitigate the interest rate risk related to mortgage servicing rights (MSRs), interest rate lock commitments (IRLCs) and mortgage loans held-for-sale, all of which are measured at fair value with changes in fair value recorded in mortgage banking income. The net gains on IRLCs related to the origination of mortgage loans that are held-for-sale, which are not included in the table but are considered derivative instruments, were $76 million and $ 192 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to $ 185 million and $ 514 million for the same periods in 2016.

(2)

Primarily related to derivatives that are economic hedges of credit risk on loans. Net gains (losses) on these derivatives are recorded in other income.

(3)

Primarily related to hedges of debt securities carried at fair value and hedges of foreign currency-denominated debt. Gains (losses) on these derivatives and the related hedged items are recorded in other income.

(4)

Gains (losses) on these derivatives are recorded in personnel expense.

Transfers of Financial Assets with Risk Retained through Derivatives

The Corporation enters into certain transactions involving the transfer of financial assets that are accounted for as sales where substantially all of the economic exposure to the transferred financial assets is retained through derivatives (e.g., interest rate and/or credit), but the Corporation does not retain control over the assets transferred. Through September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , the Corporation transferred $6.2 billion and $6.6 billion of non-U.S. government-guaranteed mortgage-backed

securities (MBS) to a third-party trust and retained economic exposure to the transferred assets through derivative contracts. In connection with these transfers, the Corporation received gross cash proceeds of $6.2 billion and $6.6 billion at the transfer dates. At both September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , the fair value of the transferred securities was $6.3 billion . Derivative assets of $44 million and $43 million and liabilities of $5 million and $10 million were recorded at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , and are included in credit derivatives in the derivative instruments table on page 75 .



79 Bank of America




Sales and Trading Revenue

The Corporation enters into trading derivatives to facilitate client transactions and to manage risk exposures arising from trading account assets and liabilities. It is the Corporation's policy to include these derivative instruments in its trading activities which include derivatives and non-derivative cash instruments. The resulting risk from these derivatives is managed on a portfolio basis as part of the Corporation's Global Markets business segment. For more information on sales and trading revenue, see Note 2 – Derivatives to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Corporation's 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The following table, which includes both derivatives and non-derivative cash instruments, identifies the amounts in the respective income statement line items attributable to the Corporation's sales and trading revenue in Global Markets , categorized by primary risk, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 . The difference between total trading account profits in the following table and in the Consolidated Statement of Income represents trading activities in business segments other than Global Markets . This table includes DVA and funding valuation adjustment (FVA) gains (losses). Global Markets results in Note 17 – Business Segment Information are presented on a fully taxable-equivalent (FTE) basis. The following table is not presented on an FTE basis.

Sales and Trading Revenue

Three Months Ended September 30, 2017

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017

(Dollars in millions)

Trading Account Profits

Net Interest Income

Other (1)

Total

Trading Account Profits

Net Interest Income

Other (1)

Total

Interest rate risk

$

441


$

224


$

91


$

756


$

1,115


$

763


$

325


$

2,203


Foreign exchange risk

348


2


(40

)

310


1,063


(2

)

(119

)

942


Equity risk

640


(142

)

464


962


2,088


(372

)

1,426


3,142


Credit risk

251


624


104


979


1,200


1,886


450


3,536


Other risk

34


8


17


59


168


18


67


253


Total sales and trading revenue

$

1,714


$

716


$

636


$

3,066


$

5,634


$

2,293


$

2,149


$

10,076


Three Months Ended September 30, 2016

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016

Interest rate risk

$

511


$

307


$

83


$

901


$

1,430


$

1,073


$

210


$

2,713


Foreign exchange risk

319


(4

)

(39

)

276


1,003


(7

)

(112

)

884


Equity risk

463


31


467


961


1,481


15


1,573


3,069


Credit risk

598


634


123


1,355


1,224


1,895


380


3,499


Other risk

43


7


8


58


263


(19

)

34


278


Total sales and trading revenue

$

1,934


$

975


$

642


$

3,551


$

5,401


$

2,957


$

2,085


$

10,443


(1)

Represents amounts in investment and brokerage services and other income that are recorded in Global Markets and included in the definition of sales and trading revenue. Includes investment and brokerage services revenue of $ 488 million and $ 1.5 billion for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and $ 485 million and $ 1.6 billion for the same periods in 2016.

Credit Derivatives

The Corporation enters into credit derivatives primarily to facilitate client transactions and to manage credit risk exposures. Credit derivatives derive value based on an underlying third-party referenced obligation or a portfolio of referenced obligations and generally require the Corporation, as the seller of credit protection, to make payments to a buyer upon the occurrence of a pre-defined credit event. Such credit events generally include bankruptcy of the referenced credit entity and failure to pay under the obligation, as well as acceleration of indebtedness and payment repudiation

or moratorium. For credit derivatives based on a portfolio of referenced credits or credit indices, the Corporation may not be required to make payment until a specified amount of loss has occurred and/or may only be required to make payment up to a specified amount.

Credit derivative instruments where the Corporation is the seller of credit protection and their expiration at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 are summarized in the following table.


Bank of America 80


Credit Derivative Instruments

September 30, 2017

Carrying Value

(Dollars in millions)

Less than

One Year

One to

Three Years

Three to

Five Years

Over Five

Years

Total

Credit default swaps:






Investment grade

$

10


$

27


$

175


$

389


$

601


Non-investment grade

237


571


462


2,343


3,613


Total

247


598


637


2,732


4,214


Total return swaps/other:






Investment grade

39


-


-


-


39


Non-investment grade

153


-


-


-


153


Total

192


-


-


-


192


Total credit derivatives

$

439


$

598


$

637


$

2,732


$

4,406


Credit-related notes:






Investment grade

$

-


$

-


$

84


$

702


$

786


Non-investment grade

20


12


31


1,416


1,479


Total credit-related notes

$

20


$

12


$

115


$

2,118


$

2,265


Maximum Payout/Notional

Credit default swaps:






Investment grade

$

76,594


$

117,714


$

109,875


$

38,025


$

342,208


Non-investment grade

62,935


43,775


44,094


21,466


172,270


Total

139,529


161,489


153,969


59,491


514,478


Total return swaps/other:






Investment grade

36,743


-


-


-


36,743


Non-investment grade

13,232


4,792


143


404


18,571


Total

49,975


4,792


143


404


55,314


Total credit derivatives

$

189,504


$

166,281


$

154,112


$

59,895


$

569,792


December 31, 2016

Carrying Value

Credit default swaps:

Investment grade

$

10


$

64


$

535


$

783


$

1,392


Non-investment grade

771


1,053


908


3,339


6,071


Total

781


1,117


1,443


4,122


7,463


Total return swaps/other:






Investment grade

16


-


-


-


16


Non-investment grade

127


10


2


1


140


Total

143


10


2


1


156


Total credit derivatives

$

924


$

1,127


$

1,445


$

4,123


$

7,619


Credit-related notes:






Investment grade

$

-


$

12


$

542


$

1,423


$

1,977


Non-investment grade

70


22


60


1,318


1,470


Total credit-related notes

$

70


$

34


$

602


$

2,741


$

3,447


Maximum Payout/Notional

Credit default swaps:

Investment grade

$

121,083


$

143,200


$

116,540


$

21,905


$

402,728


Non-investment grade

84,755


67,160


41,001


18,711


211,627


Total

205,838


210,360


157,541


40,616


614,355


Total return swaps/other:






Investment grade

12,792


-


-


-


12,792


Non-investment grade

6,638


5,127


589


208


12,562


Total

19,430


5,127


589


208


25,354


Total credit derivatives

$

225,268


$

215,487


$

158,130


$

40,824


$

639,709


Credit derivatives are classified as investment and non-investment grade based on the credit quality of the underlying referenced obligation. The Corporation considers ratings of BBB- or higher as investment grade. Non-investment grade includes non-rated credit derivative instruments. The Corporation discloses internal categorizations of investment grade and non-investment grade consistent with how risk is managed for these instruments.


81 Bank of America




The notional amount represents the maximum amount payable by the Corporation for most credit derivatives. However, the Corporation does not monitor its exposure to credit derivatives based solely on the notional amount because this measure does not take into consideration the probability of occurrence. As such, the notional amount is not a reliable indicator of the Corporation's exposure to these contracts. Instead, a risk framework is used to define risk tolerances and establish limits to help ensure that certain credit risk-related losses occur within acceptable, predefined limits.

Credit-related notes in the table on page 81 include investments in securities issued by collateralized debt obligation (CDO), collateralized loan obligation and credit-linked note vehicles. These instruments are primarily classified as trading securities. The carrying value of these instruments equals the Corporation's maximum exposure to loss. The Corporation is not obligated to make any payments to the entities under the terms of the securities owned.

Credit-related Contingent Features and Collateral

The majority of the Corporation's derivative contracts contain credit-risk related features, primarily in the form of ISDA master netting agreements and credit support documentation that enhance the creditworthiness of these instruments. Therefore, events such as a credit rating downgrade or a breach of credit covenants would typically require an increase in the amount of collateral required of the counterparty, where applicable, and/or allow the Corporation to take additional protective measures such as early termination of all trades. At September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , the Corporation held cash and securities collateral of $77.4 billion and $85.5 billion , and posted cash and securities collateral of $58.4 billion and $71.1 billion in the normal course of business under derivative agreements, excluding cross-product margining agreements where clients are permitted to margin on a net basis for both derivative and secured financing arrangements.

In connection with certain OTC derivative contracts and other trading agreements, the Corporation can be required to provide additional collateral or to terminate transactions with certain counterparties in the event of a downgrade of the senior debt ratings of the Corporation or certain subsidiaries. At September 30, 2017 , the amount of collateral, calculated based on the terms of the contracts, that the Corporation and certain subsidiaries could be required to post to counterparties but had not yet posted to counterparties was approximately $2.0 billion , including $1.2 billion for Bank of America, National Association. For more information on credit-related contingent features and collateral, see Note 2 – Derivatives to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Corporation's 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Some counterparties are currently able to unilaterally terminate certain contracts, or the Corporation or certain subsidiaries may be required to take other action such as find a suitable replacement or obtain a guarantee. At September 30, 2017 , the liability recorded for these derivative contracts was $23 million .

The following table presents the amount of additional collateral that would have been contractually required by derivative contracts and other trading agreements at September 30, 2017 if the rating agencies had downgraded their long-term senior debt ratings for the Corporation or certain subsidiaries by one incremental notch and by an additional second incremental notch.

Additional Collateral Required to be Posted Upon Downgrade

September 30, 2017

(Dollars in millions)

One

incremental notch

Second

incremental notch

Bank of America Corporation

$

512


$

668


Bank of America, N.A. and subsidiaries (1)

387


300


(1)

Included in Bank of America Corporation collateral requirements in this table.

The table below presents the derivative liabilities that would be subject to unilateral termination by counterparties and the amounts of collateral that would have been contractually required at September 30, 2017 if the long-term senior debt ratings for the Corporation or certain subsidiaries had been lower by one incremental notch and by an additional second incremental notch.

Derivative Liabilities Subject to Unilateral Termination Upon Downgrade

September 30, 2017

(Dollars in millions)

One

incremental notch

Second

incremental notch

Derivative liabilities

$

468


$

1,122


Collateral posted

387


857


Valuation Adjustments on Derivatives

The table below presents credit valuation adjustment (CVA), DVA and FVA gains (losses) on derivatives, which are recorded in trading account profits, on a gross and net of hedge basis for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 . For more information on the valuation adjustments on derivatives, see Note 2 – Derivatives to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Corporation's 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Valuation Adjustments on Derivatives (1)

Gains (Losses)

Three Months Ended September 30

2017

2016

(Dollars in millions)

Gross

Net

Gross

Net

Derivative assets (CVA)

$

23


$

15


$

280


$

66


Derivative assets/liabilities (FVA)

37


43


42


51


Derivative liabilities (DVA)

29


17


(125

)

(103

)

Nine Months Ended September 30

2017

2016

Gross

Net

Gross

Net

Derivative assets (CVA)

$

281


$

93


$

45


$

151


Derivative assets/liabilities (FVA)

113


140


9


20


Derivative liabilities (DVA)

(249

)

(201

)

106


(60

)

(1)

At September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , cumulative CVA reduced the derivative assets balance by $726 million and $1.0 billion , cumulative FVA reduced the net derivatives balance by $182 million and $296 million , and cumulative DVA reduced the derivative liabilities balance by $525 million and $774 million , respectively.



Bank of America 82


NOTE 3

Securities

The table below presents the amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses, and fair value of available-for-sale (AFS) debt securities, other debt securities carried at fair value, held-to-maturity (HTM) debt securities and AFS marketable equity securities at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 .

Debt Securities and Available-for-Sale Marketable Equity Securities

September 30, 2017

(Dollars in millions)

Amortized

Cost

Gross
Unrealized

Gains

Gross
Unrealized

Losses

Fair

Value

Available-for-sale debt securities

Mortgage-backed securities:


Agency

$

196,530


$

850


$

(1,186

)

$

196,194


Agency-collateralized mortgage obligations

7,021


73


(45

)

7,049


Commercial

12,584


48


(168

)

12,464


Non-agency residential  (1)

2,345


333


(21

)

2,657


Total mortgage-backed securities

218,480


1,304


(1,420

)

218,364


U.S. Treasury and agency securities

50,824


70


(626

)

50,268


Non-U.S. securities

5,432


9


(1

)

5,440


Other taxable securities, substantially all asset-backed securities

6,964


77


(3

)

7,038


Total taxable securities

281,700


1,460


(2,050

)

281,110


Tax-exempt securities

19,117


167


(92

)

19,192


Total available-for-sale debt securities

300,817


1,627


(2,142

)

300,302


Other debt securities carried at fair value

16,265


345


(48

)

16,562


Total debt securities carried at fair value

317,082


1,972


(2,190

)

316,864


Held-to-maturity debt securities, substantially all U.S. agency mortgage-backed securities

122,345


267


(1,427

)

121,185


Total debt securities (2)

$

439,427


$

2,239


$

(3,617

)

$

438,049


Available-for-sale marketable equity securities  (3)

$

22


$

28


$

-


$

50


December 31, 2016

Available-for-sale debt securities

Mortgage-backed securities:





Agency

$

190,809


$

640


$

(1,963

)

$

189,486


Agency-collateralized mortgage obligations

8,296


85


(51

)

8,330


Commercial

12,594


21


(293

)

12,322


Non-agency residential  (1)

1,863


181


(31

)

2,013


Total mortgage-backed securities

213,562


927


(2,338

)

212,151


U.S. Treasury and agency securities

48,800


204


(752

)

48,252


Non-U.S. securities

6,372


13


(3

)

6,382


Other taxable securities, substantially all asset-backed securities

10,573


64


(23

)

10,614


Total taxable securities

279,307


1,208


(3,116

)

277,399


Tax-exempt securities

17,272


72


(184

)

17,160


Total available-for-sale debt securities

296,579


1,280


(3,300

)

294,559


Less: Available-for-sale securities of business held for sale  (4)

(619

)

-


-


(619

)

Other debt securities carried at fair value

19,748


121


(149

)

19,720


Total debt securities carried at fair value

315,708


1,401


(3,449

)

313,660


Held-to-maturity debt securities, substantially all U.S. agency mortgage-backed securities

117,071


248


(2,034

)

115,285


Total debt securities (2)

$

432,779


$

1,649


$

(5,483

)

$

428,945


Available-for-sale marketable equity securities  (3)

$

325


$

51


$

(1

)

$

375


(1)

At September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , the underlying collateral type included approximately 70 percent and 60 percent prime, 13 percent and 19 percent Alt-A, and 17 percent and 21 percent subprime.

(2)

The Corporation had debt securities from Fannie Mae (FNMA) and Freddie Mac (FHLMC) that each exceeded 10 percent of shareholders' equity, with an amortized cost of $165.1 billion and $48.2 billion , and a fair value of $164.2 billion and $48.1 billion at September 30, 2017 , and an amortized cost of $156.4 billion and $48.7 billion , and a fair value of $154.4 billion and $48.3 billion at December 31, 2016 .

(3)

Classified in other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

(4)

Represents AFS debt securities of business held for sale. During the second quarter of 2017, the Corporation sold its non-U.S. consumer credit card business.

At September 30, 2017 , the accumulated net unrealized loss on AFS debt securities included in accumulated OCI was $312 million , net of the related income tax benefit of $203 million . At both September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , the Corporation had nonperforming AFS debt securities of $121 million .


83 Bank of America




The table below presents the components of other debt securities carried at fair value where the changes in fair value are reported in other income. In the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 , the Corporation recorded unrealized mark-to-market net gains of $124 million and $323 million , and realized

net losses of $11 million and $129 million , compared to unrealized mark-to-market net gains of $47 million and net losses of $25 million , and realized net losses of $28 million and $65 million for the same periods in 2016 . These amounts exclude hedge results.

Other Debt Securities Carried at Fair Value

(Dollars in millions)

September 30
2017

December 31
2016

Mortgage-backed securities:

Agency-collateralized mortgage obligations

$

5


$

5


Non-agency residential

3,058


3,139


Total mortgage-backed securities

3,063


3,144


Non-U.S. securities (1)

13,260


16,336


Other taxable securities, substantially all asset-backed securities

239


240


Total

$

16,562


$

19,720


(1)

These securities are primarily used to satisfy certain international regulatory liquidity requirements.

The gross realized gains and losses on sales of AFS debt securities for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 are presented in the table below.

Gains and Losses on Sales of AFS Debt Securities

Three Months Ended September 30

Nine Months Ended September 30

(Dollars in millions)

2017

2016

2017

2016

Gross gains

$

130


$

57


$

286


$

513


Gross losses

(5

)

(6

)

(8

)

(23

)

Net gains on sales of AFS debt securities

$

125


$

51


$

278


$

490


Income tax expense attributable to realized net gains on sales of AFS debt securities

$

48


$

19


$

106


$

186



Bank of America 84


The table below presents the fair value and the associated gross unrealized losses on AFS debt securities and whether these securities have had gross unrealized losses for less than 12 months or for 12 months or longer at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 .

Temporarily Impaired and Other-than-temporarily Impaired AFS Debt Securities

September 30, 2017

Less than Twelve Months

Twelve Months or Longer

Total

(Dollars in millions)

Fair

Value

Gross Unrealized Losses

Fair

Value

Gross Unrealized Losses

Fair

Value

Gross Unrealized Losses

Temporarily impaired AFS debt securities







Mortgage-backed securities:

Agency

$

96,106


$

(681

)

$

17,570


$

(505

)

$

113,676


$

(1,186

)

Agency-collateralized mortgage obligations

2,137


(15

)

1,051


(30

)

3,188


(45

)

Commercial

5,068


(59

)

2,819


(109

)

7,887


(168

)

Non-agency residential

140


(7

)

118


(8

)

258


(15

)

Total mortgage-backed securities

103,451


(762

)

21,558


(652

)

125,009


(1,414

)

U.S. Treasury and agency securities

20,685


(144

)

17,035


(482

)

37,720


(626

)

Non-U.S. securities

774


(1

)

-


-


774


(1

)

Other taxable securities, substantially all asset-backed securities

-


-


384


(3

)

384


(3

)

Total taxable securities

124,910


(907

)

38,977


(1,137

)

163,887


(2,044

)

Tax-exempt securities

-


-


2,682


(92

)

2,682


(92

)

Total temporarily impaired AFS debt securities

124,910


(907

)

41,659


(1,229

)

166,569


(2,136

)

Other-than-temporarily impaired AFS debt securities (1)

Non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities

27


(1

)

30


(5

)

57


(6

)

Total temporarily impaired and other-than-temporarily impaired

AFS debt securities

$

124,937


$

(908

)

$

41,689


$

(1,234

)

$

166,626


$

(2,142

)

December 31, 2016

Temporarily impaired AFS debt securities

Mortgage-backed securities:

Agency

$

135,210


$

(1,846

)

$

3,770


$

(117

)

$

138,980


$

(1,963

)

Agency-collateralized mortgage obligations

3,229


(25

)

1,028


(26

)

4,257


(51

)

Commercial

9,018


(293

)

-


-


9,018


(293

)

Non-agency residential

212


(1

)

204


(13

)

416


(14

)

Total mortgage-backed securities

147,669


(2,165

)

5,002


(156

)

152,671


(2,321

)

U.S. Treasury and agency securities

28,462


(752

)

-


-


28,462


(752

)

Non-U.S. securities

52


(1

)

142


(2

)

194


(3

)

Other taxable securities, substantially all asset-backed securities

762


(5

)

1,438


(18

)

2,200


(23

)

Total taxable securities

176,945


(2,923

)

6,582


(176

)

183,527


(3,099

)

Tax-exempt securities

4,782


(148

)

1,873


(36

)

6,655


(184

)

Total temporarily impaired AFS debt securities

181,727


(3,071

)

8,455


(212

)

190,182


(3,283

)

Other-than-temporarily impaired AFS debt securities (1)

Non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities

94


(1

)

401


(16

)

495


(17

)

Total temporarily impaired and other-than-temporarily impaired

AFS debt securities

$

181,821


$

(3,072

)

$

8,856


$

(228

)

$

190,677


$

(3,300

)

(1)

Includes other-than-temporary impaired AFS debt securities on which an other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) loss, primarily related to changes in interest rates, remains in accumulated OCI.

The Corporation had $0 and $33 million of credit-related OTTI losses on AFS debt securities that were recognized in other income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and $2 million and $14 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 . The amount of noncredit-related OTTI losses, which are recognized in OCI, was insignificant for all periods presented.

The cumulative credit loss component of OTTI losses that have been recognized in income related to AFS debt securities that the Corporation does not intend to sell was $284 million and $248 million at September 30, 2017 and 2016.

The Corporation estimates the portion of a loss on a security that is attributable to credit using a discounted cash flow model and estimates the expected cash flows of the underlying collateral

using internal credit, interest rate and prepayment risk models that incorporate management's best estimate of current key assumptions such as default rates, loss severity and prepayment rates. Assumptions used for the underlying loans that support the MBS can vary widely from loan to loan and are influenced by such factors as loan interest rate, geographic location of the borrower, borrower characteristics and collateral type. Based on these assumptions, the Corporation then determines how the underlying collateral cash flows will be distributed to each MBS issued from the applicable special purpose entity. Expected principal and interest cash flows on an impaired AFS debt security are discounted using the effective yield of each individual impaired AFS debt security.



85 Bank of America




Significant assumptions used in estimating the expected cash flows for measuring credit losses on non-agency RMBS were as follows at September 30, 2017 .

Significant Assumptions

Range (1)

Weighted-
average

10th

Percentile (2)

90th

Percentile (2)

Prepayment speed

12.0

%

3.0

%

20.6

%

Loss severity

19.8


9.1


36.5


Life default rate

21.0


1.2


77.7


(1)

Represents the range of inputs/assumptions based upon the underlying collateral.

(2)

The value of a variable below which the indicated percentile of observations will fall.

Annual constant prepayment speed and loss severity rates are projected considering collateral characteristics such as loan-to-value (LTV), creditworthiness of borrowers as measured using Fair

Isaac Corporation (FICO) scores, and geographic concentrations. The weighted-average severity by collateral type was 17.5 percent for prime, 18.4 percent for Alt-A and 29.5 percent for subprime at September 30, 2017 . Additionally, default rates are projected by considering collateral characteristics including, but not limited to, LTV, FICO and geographic concentration. Weighted-average life default rates by collateral type were 15.6 percent for prime, 21.7 percent for Alt-A and 22.1 percent for subprime at September 30, 2017 .

The remaining contractual maturity distribution and yields of the Corporation's debt securities carried at fair value and HTM debt securities at September 30, 2017 are summarized in the table below. Actual duration and yields may differ as prepayments on the loans underlying the mortgages or other asset-backed securities (ABS) are passed through to the Corporation.

Maturities of Debt Securities Carried at Fair Value and Held-to-maturity Debt Securities

September 30, 2017

Due in One

Year or Less

Due after One Year

through Five Years

Due after Five Years

through Ten Years

Due after

Ten Years

Total

(Dollars in millions)

Amount

Yield  (1)

Amount

Yield  (1)

Amount

Yield  (1)

Amount

Yield  (1)

Amount

Yield  (1)

Amortized cost of debt securities carried at fair value











Mortgage-backed securities:











Agency

$

6


4.67

%

$

25


3.38

%

$

593


2.56

%

$

195,906


3.23

%

$

196,530


3.23

%

Agency-collateralized mortgage obligations

-


-


-


-


34


2.50


6,991


3.18


7,025


3.18


Commercial

48


8.11


847


2.06


11,183


2.44


506


2.70


12,584


2.45


Non-agency residential

-


-


-


-


26


0.01


5,106


9.05


5,132


9.00


Total mortgage-backed securities

54


7.73


872


2.10


11,836


2.44


208,509


3.37


221,271


3.32


U.S. Treasury and agency securities

516


0.39


21,254


1.40


29,033


1.96


21


2.42


50,824


1.71


Non-U.S. securities

16,563


0.50


1,839


1.24


110


1.34


177


6.52


18,689


0.63


Other taxable securities, substantially all asset-backed securities

1,747


2.28


2,865


2.59


1,418


2.95


1,151


3.28


7,181


2.70


Total taxable securities

18,880


0.68


26,830


1.54


42,397


2.13


209,858


3.37


297,965


2.86


Tax-exempt securities

1,175


1.46


6,428


1.77


9,155


1.66


2,359


2.03


19,117


1.73


Total amortized cost of debt securities carried at fair value

$

20,055


0.73


$

33,258


1.58


$

51,552


2.04


$

212,217


3.36


$

317,082


2.79


Amortized cost of HTM debt securities  (2)

$

-


-


$

35


3.66


$

1,074


2.56


$

121,236


3.03


$

122,345


3.03


Debt securities carried at fair value











Mortgage-backed securities:











Agency

$

6



$

25



$

598



$

195,565



$

196,194



Agency-collateralized mortgage obligations

-



-



33



7,021



7,054



Commercial

48



848



11,072



496



12,464



Non-agency residential

-



-



35



5,680



5,715



Total mortgage-backed securities

54


873


11,738


208,762


221,427


U.S. Treasury and agency securities

516


20,992


28,739


21


50,268


Non-U.S. securities

16,563



1,844



111



182



18,700



Other taxable securities, substantially all asset-backed securities

1,747



2,845



1,450



1,235



7,277



Total taxable securities

18,880



26,554



42,038



210,200



297,672



Tax-exempt securities

1,174



6,451



9,202



2,365



19,192



Total debt securities carried at fair value

$

20,054



$

33,005



$

51,240



$

212,565



$

316,864



Fair value of HTM debt securities (2)

$

-


$

27


$

896


$

120,262


$

121,185


(1)

The average yield is computed based on a constant effective interest rate over the contractual life of each security. The average yield considers the contractual coupon and the amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts, excluding the effect of related hedging derivatives.

(2)

Substantially all U.S. agency MBS.



Bank of America 86


NOTE 4

Outstanding Loans and Leases

The following tables present total outstanding loans and leases and an aging analysis for the Consumer Real Estate, Credit Card and Other Consumer, and Commercial portfolio segments, by class of financing receivables, at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 .

During the second quarter of 2017, the Corporation sold its non-U.S. consumer credit card business. This business, which at

December 31, 2016 included $9.2 billion of non-U.S. credit card loans and the related allowance for loan and lease losses of $243 million , was presented in assets of business held for sale on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. In this Note, all applicable amounts for December 31, 2016 include these balances, unless otherwise noted. For additional information, see Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Principles .

September 30, 2017

(Dollars in millions)

30-59 Days Past Due (1)

60-89 Days Past Due (1)

90 Days or
More

Past Due (2)

Total Past
Due 30 Days

or More

Total Current or Less Than 30 Days Past Due (3)

Purchased
Credit-impaired
(4)

Loans Accounted for Under the Fair Value Option

Total

Outstandings

Consumer real estate








Core portfolio

Residential mortgage

$

1,583


$

306


$

986


$

2,875


$

167,782


$

170,657


Home equity

246


111


435


792


44,585


45,377


Non-core portfolio

Residential mortgage (5)

1,144


540


3,728


5,412


14,978


$

8,399


28,789


Home equity

269


131


613


1,013


10,449


2,913


14,375


Credit card and other consumer

U.S. credit card

492


355


810


1,657


90,945


92,602


Direct/Indirect consumer  (6)

273


82


33


388


93,003


93,391


Other consumer  (7)

7


1


1


9


2,415


2,424


Total consumer

4,014


1,526


6,606


12,146


424,157


11,312


447,615


Consumer loans accounted for under the fair value option (8)







$

978


978


Total consumer loans and leases

4,014


1,526


6,606


12,146


424,157


11,312


978


448,593


Commercial

U.S. commercial

459


176


349


984


281,693


282,677


Commercial real estate  (9)

13


2


51


66


59,562


59,628


Commercial lease financing

39


56


45


140


21,273


21,413


Non-U.S. commercial

9


14


-


23


95,873


95,896


U.S. small business commercial

63


38


80


181


13,422


13,603


Total commercial

583


286


525


1,394


471,823


473,217


Commercial loans accounted for under the fair value option  (8)







5,307


5,307


Total commercial loans and leases

583


286


525


1,394


471,823


5,307


478,524


Total loans and leases (10)

$

4,597


$

1,812


$

7,131


$

13,540


$

895,980


$

11,312


$

6,285


$

927,117


Percentage of outstandings

0.50

%

0.19

%

0.77

%

1.46

%

96.64

%

1.22

%

0.68

%

100.00

%

(1)

Consumer real estate loans 30-59 days past due includes fully-insured loans of $905 million and nonperforming loans of $282 million . Consumer real estate loans 60-89 days past due includes fully-insured loans of $443 million and nonperforming loans of $201 million .

(2)

Consumer real estate includes fully-insured loans of $3.4 billion .

(3)

Consumer real estate includes $2.3 billion and direct/indirect consumer includes $39 million of nonperforming loans.

(4)

Purchased credit-impaired (PCI) loan amounts are shown gross of the valuation allowance.

(5)

Total outstandings includes pay option loans of $1.5 billion . The Corporation no longer originates this product.

(6)

Total outstandings includes auto and specialty lending loans of $50.0 billion , unsecured consumer lending loans of $484 million , U.S. securities-based lending loans of $39.3 billion , non-U.S. consumer loans of $2.9 billion and other consumer loans of $682 million .

(7)

Total outstandings includes consumer leases of $2.3 billion and consumer overdrafts of $160 million .

(8)

Consumer loans accounted for under the fair value option were residential mortgage loans of $615 million and home equity loans of $363 million . Commercial loans accounted for under the fair value option were U.S. commercial loans of $2.8 billion and non-U.S. commercial loans of $2.5 billion . For additional information, see Note 14 – Fair Value Measurements and Note 15 – Fair Value Option .

(9)

Total outstandings includes U.S. commercial real estate loans of $55.5 billion and non-U.S. commercial real estate loans of $4.2 billion .

(10)

The Corporation pledged $152.9 billion of loans to secure potential borrowing capacity with the Federal Reserve Bank and Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB). This amount is not included in the parenthetical disclosure of loans and leases pledged as collateral on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as there were no related outstanding borrowings.


87 Bank of America




December 31, 2016

(Dollars in millions)

30-59 Days
Past Due (1)

60-89 Days Past Due (1)

90 Days or
More
Past Due (2)

Total Past
Due 30 Days
or More

Total

Current or

Less Than

30 Days

Past Due (3)

Purchased
Credit-impaired (4)

Loans

Accounted

for Under

the Fair

Value Option

Total Outstandings

Consumer real estate








Core portfolio

Residential mortgage

$

1,340


$

425


$

1,213


$

2,978


$

153,519





$

156,497


Home equity

239


105


451


795


48,578





49,373


Non-core portfolio








Residential mortgage (5)

1,338


674


5,343


7,355


17,818


$

10,127



35,300


Home equity

260


136


832


1,228


12,231


3,611



17,070


Credit card and other consumer








U.S. credit card

472


341


782


1,595


90,683



92,278


Non-U.S. credit card

37


27


66


130


9,084



9,214


Direct/Indirect consumer  (6)

272


79


34


385


93,704



94,089


Other consumer  (7)

26


8


6


40


2,459



2,499


Total consumer

3,984


1,795


8,727


14,506


428,076


13,738



456,320


Consumer loans accounted for under the fair value option (8)

$

1,051



1,051


Total consumer loans and leases

3,984


1,795


8,727


14,506


428,076


13,738


1,051


457,371


Commercial








U.S. commercial

952


263


400


1,615


268,757



270,372


Commercial real estate  (9)

20


10


56


86


57,269



57,355


Commercial lease financing

167


21


27


215


22,160



22,375


Non-U.S. commercial

348


4


5


357


89,040



89,397


U.S. small business commercial

96


49


84


229


12,764



12,993


Total commercial

1,583


347


572


2,502


449,990



452,492


Commercial loans accounted for under the fair value option  (8)

6,034


6,034


Total commercial loans and leases

1,583


347


572


2,502


449,990


6,034


458,526


Total consumer and commercial loans and leases  (10)

$

5,567


$

2,142


$

9,299


$

17,008


$

878,066


$

13,738


$

7,085


$

915,897


Less: Loans of business held for sale  (10)

(9,214

)

Total loans and leases (11)

$

906,683


Percentage of outstandings (10)

0.61

%

0.23

%

1.02

%

1.86

%

95.87

%

1.50

%

0.77

%

100.00

%

(1)

Consumer real estate loans 30-59 days past due includes fully-insured loans of $1.1 billion and nonperforming loans of $266 million . Consumer real estate loans 60-89 days past due includes fully-insured loans of $547 million and nonperforming loans of $216 million .

(2)

Consumer real estate includes fully-insured loans of $4.8 billion .

(3)

Consumer real estate includes $2.5 billion and direct/indirect consumer includes $27 million of nonperforming loans.

(4)

PCI loan amounts are shown gross of the valuation allowance.

(5)

Total outstandings includes pay option loans of $1.8 billion . The Corporation no longer originates this product.

(6)

Total outstandings includes auto and specialty lending loans of $48.9 billion , unsecured consumer lending loans of $585 million , U.S. securities-based lending loans of $40.1 billion , non-U.S. consumer loans of $3.0 billion , student loans of $497 million and other consumer loans of $1.1 billion .

(7)

Total outstandings includes consumer finance loans of $465 million , consumer leases of $1.9 billion and consumer overdrafts of $157 million .

(8)

Consumer loans accounted for under the fair value option were residential mortgage loans of $710 million and home equity loans of $341 million . Commercial loans accounted for under the fair value option were U.S. commercial loans of $2.9 billion and non-U.S. commercial loans of $3.1 billion . For more information, see Note 14 – Fair Value Measurements and Note 15 – Fair Value Option .

(9)

Total outstandings includes U.S. commercial real estate loans of $54.3 billion and non-U.S. commercial real estate loans of $3.1 billion .

(10)

Includes non-U.S. credit card loans, which were included in assets of business held for sale on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

(11)

The Corporation pledged $143.1 billion of loans to secure potential borrowing capacity with the Federal Reserve Bank and FHLB. This amount is not included in the parenthetical disclosure of loans and leases pledged as collateral on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as there were no related outstanding borrowings.

The Corporation categorizes consumer real estate loans as core and non-core based on loan and customer characteristics such as origination date, product type, LTV, FICO score and delinquency status consistent with its current consumer and mortgage servicing strategy. Generally, loans that were originated after January 1, 2010, qualified under government-sponsored enterprise (GSE) underwriting guidelines, or otherwise met the Corporation's underwriting guidelines in place in 2015 are characterized as core loans. Loans held in legacy private-label securitizations, government-insured loans originated prior to 2010, loan products no longer originated, and loans originated prior to 2010 and classified as nonperforming or modified in a troubled debt restructuring (TDR) prior to 2016 are generally characterized as non-core loans, and are principally run-off portfolios.

The Corporation has entered into long-term credit protection agreements with FNMA and FHLMC on loans totaling $6.5 billion

and $6.4 billion at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , providing full credit protection on residential mortgage loans that become severely delinquent. All of these loans are individually insured and therefore the Corporation does not record an allowance for credit losses related to these loans.

Nonperforming Loans and Leases

The Corporation classifies junior-lien home equity loans as nonperforming when the first-lien loan becomes 90 days past due even if the junior-lien loan is performing. At September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , $336 million and $428 million of such junior-lien home equity loans were included in nonperforming loans.

The Corporation classifies consumer real estate loans that have been discharged in Chapter 7 bankruptcy and not reaffirmed by the borrower as TDRs, irrespective of payment history or delinquency status, even if the repayment terms for the loan have


Bank of America 88


not been otherwise modified. The Corporation continues to have a lien on the underlying collateral. At September 30, 2017 , nonperforming loans discharged in Chapter 7 bankruptcy with no change in repayment terms were $379 million of which $224 million were current on their contractual payments, while $127 million were 90 days or more past due. Of the contractually current nonperforming loans, approximately 78 percent were discharged in Chapter 7 bankruptcy over 12 months ago, and approximately 68 percent were discharged 24 months or more ago.

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 , the Corporation sold nonperforming and other delinquent consumer real estate loans with a carrying value of $700 million and $1.2 billion , including $538 million and $742 million of PCI loans, compared to $360 million and $1.8 billion , including $111 million and $435 million of PCI loans, for the same periods in 2016 . The Corporation recorded net recoveries of $ 88 million and $102 million related to these sales for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to net recoveries of $6 million and net charge-offs of $39 million for the same periods in 2016 . Gains related to these sales of $38 million and $50 million

were recorded in other income in the Consolidated Statement of Income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to gains of $19 million and $63 million for the same periods in 2016 . During the nine months ended September 30, 2017 , the Corporation transferred nonperforming loans with a net carrying value of $198 million to held-for-sale, which have been subsequently sold during the nine-month period. There were no transfers of nonperforming loans to held-for-sale for the same period in 2016.

The table below presents the Corporation's nonperforming loans and leases including nonperforming TDRs, and loans accruing past due 90  days or more at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 . Nonperforming loans held-for-sale (LHFS) are excluded from nonperforming loans and leases as they are recorded at either fair value or the lower of cost or fair value. For more information on the criteria for classification as nonperforming, see Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Principles to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Corporation's 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Credit Quality

Nonperforming Loans and Leases

Accruing Past Due

90 Days or More

(Dollars in millions)

September 30
2017

December 31
2016

September 30
2017

December 31
2016

Consumer real estate





Core portfolio

Residential mortgage  (1)

$

1,076


$

1,274


$

396


$

486


Home equity

1,046


969


-


-


Non-core portfolio




Residential mortgage  (1)

1,442


1,782


2,976


4,307


Home equity

1,645


1,949


-


-


Credit card and other consumer



U.S. credit card

n/a


n/a


810


782


Non-U.S. credit card

n/a


n/a


-


66


Direct/Indirect consumer

43


28


31


34


Other consumer

-


2


1


4


Total consumer

5,252


6,004


4,214


5,679


Commercial





U.S. commercial

863


1,256


82


106


Commercial real estate

130


72


-


7


Commercial lease financing

26


36


38


19


Non-U.S. commercial

244


279


-


5


U.S. small business commercial

55


60


68


71


Total commercial

1,318


1,703


188


208


Total loans and leases

$

6,570


$

7,707


$

4,402


$

5,887


(1)

Residential mortgage loans in the core and non-core portfolios accruing past due 90  days or more are fully-insured loans. At September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , residential mortgage includes $2.3 billion and $3.0 billion of loans on which interest has been curtailed by the Federal Housing Administration (FHA), and therefore are no longer accruing interest, although principal is still insured, and $1.1 billion and $1.8 billion of loans on which interest is still accruing.

n/a = not applicable


Credit Quality Indicators

The Corporation monitors credit quality within its Consumer Real Estate, Credit Card and Other Consumer, and Commercial portfolio segments based on primary credit quality indicators. Within the consumer portfolio segments, the primary credit quality indicators are refreshed LTV and refreshed FICO score. Refreshed LTV measures the carrying value of the loan as a percentage of the value of the property securing the loan, refreshed quarterly. FICO score measures the creditworthiness of the borrower based on the financial obligations of the borrower and the borrower's credit history. FICO scores are typically refreshed quarterly or more

frequently. Within the Commercial portfolio segment, loans are evaluated using the internal classifications of pass rated or reservable criticized as the primary credit quality indicators. In addition to these primary credit quality indicators, the Corporation uses other credit quality indicators for certain types of loans. For more information on the portfolio segments and credit quality indicators, see Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Principles and Note 4 – Outstanding Loans and Leases to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Corporation's 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.



89 Bank of America




The following tables present certain credit quality indicators for the Corporation's Consumer Real Estate, Credit Card and Other Consumer, and Commercial portfolio segments, by class of financing receivables, at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 .

Consumer Real Estate – Credit Quality Indicators (1)

September 30, 2017

(Dollars in millions)

Core Residential

Mortgage (2)

Non-core Residential
Mortgage
(2)

Residential Mortgage PCI (3)

Core Home Equity (2)

Non-core Home Equity (2)

Home

Equity PCI

Refreshed LTV  (4)





Less than or equal to 90 percent

$

146,679


$

12,603


$

7,095


$

43,942


$

8,128


$

1,881


Greater than 90 percent but less than or equal to 100 percent

3,288


1,016


624


660


1,211


420


Greater than 100 percent

1,444


1,231


680


775


2,123


612


Fully-insured loans  (5)

19,246


5,540


-


-


-


-


Total consumer real estate

$

170,657


$

20,390


$

8,399


$

45,377


$

11,462


$

2,913


Refreshed FICO score

Less than 620

$

2,285


$

2,560


$

2,102


$

1,192


$

2,268


$

470


Greater than or equal to 620 and less than 680

4,652


2,260


1,740


2,416


2,506


495


Greater than or equal to 680 and less than 740

22,153


3,720


2,446


8,484


2,860


862


Greater than or equal to 740

122,321


6,310


2,111


33,285


3,828


1,086


Fully-insured loans  (5)

19,246


5,540


-


-


-


-


Total consumer real estate

$

170,657


$

20,390


$

8,399


$

45,377


$

11,462


$

2,913


(1)

Excludes $978 million of loans accounted for under the fair value option.

(2)

Excludes PCI loans.

(3)

Includes $1.3 billion of pay option loans. The Corporation no longer originates this product.

(4)

Refreshed LTV percentages for PCI loans are calculated using the carrying value net of the related valuation allowance.

(5)

Credit quality indicators are not reported for fully-insured loans as principal repayment is insured.

Credit Card and Other Consumer – Credit Quality Indicators

September 30, 2017

(Dollars in millions)

U.S. Credit

Card

Direct/Indirect

Consumer

Other

Consumer

Refreshed FICO score




Less than 620

$

4,612


$

1,578


$

42


Greater than or equal to 620 and less than 680

12,195


2,003


125


Greater than or equal to 680 and less than 740

34,796


12,161


364


Greater than or equal to 740

40,999


34,731


1,730


Other internal credit metrics (1, 2)

-


42,918


163


Total credit card and other consumer

$

92,602


$

93,391


$

2,424


(1)

Other internal credit metrics may include delinquency status, geography or other factors.

(2)

Direct/indirect consumer includes $42.2 billion of securities-based lending which is overcollateralized and therefore has minimal credit risk.

Commercial – Credit Quality Indicators (1)

September 30, 2017

(Dollars in millions)

U.S.

Commercial

Commercial

Real Estate

Commercial
Lease

Financing

Non-U.S.

Commercial

U.S. Small
Business

Commercial (2)

Risk ratings






Pass rated

$

273,670


$

59,001


$

20,763


$

93,498


$

354


Reservable criticized

9,007


627


650


2,398


50


Refreshed FICO score (3)


Less than 620





224


Greater than or equal to 620 and less than 680

615


Greater than or equal to 680 and less than 740

1,842


Greater than or equal to 740

3,683


Other internal credit metrics (3, 4)

6,835


Total commercial

$

282,677


$

59,628


$

21,413


$

95,896


$

13,603


(1)

Excludes $5.3 billion of loans accounted for under the fair value option.

(2)

U.S. small business commercial includes $825 million of criticized business card and small business loans which are evaluated using refreshed FICO scores or internal credit metrics, including delinquency status, rather than risk ratings. At September 30, 2017 , 99 percent of the balances where internal credit metrics are used was current or less than 30 days past due.

(3)

Refreshed FICO score and other internal credit metrics are applicable only to the U.S. small business commercial portfolio.

(4)

Other internal credit metrics may include delinquency status, application scores, geography or other factors.


Bank of America 90


Consumer Real Estate – Credit Quality Indicators (1)

December 31, 2016

(Dollars in millions)

Core Residential

Mortgage (2)

Non-core Residential
Mortgage (2)

Residential Mortgage PCI (3)

Core Home Equity (2)

Non-core Home Equity (2)

Home

Equity PCI

Refreshed LTV (4)





Less than or equal to 90 percent

$

129,737


$

14,280


$

7,811


$

47,171


$

8,480


$

1,942


Greater than 90 percent but less than or equal to 100 percent

3,634


1,446


1,021


1,006


1,668


630


Greater than 100 percent

1,872


1,972


1,295


1,196


3,311


1,039


Fully-insured loans  (5)

21,254


7,475


-


-


-


-


Total consumer real estate

$

156,497


$

25,173


$

10,127


$

49,373


$

13,459


$

3,611


Refreshed FICO score







Less than 620

$

2,479


$

3,198


$

2,741


$

1,254


$

2,692


$

559


Greater than or equal to 620 and less than 680

5,094


2,807


2,241


2,853


3,094


636


Greater than or equal to 680 and less than 740

22,629


4,512


2,916


10,069


3,176


1,069


Greater than or equal to 740

105,041


7,181


2,229


35,197


4,497


1,347


Fully-insured loans  (5)

21,254


7,475


-


-


-


-


Total consumer real estate

$

156,497


$

25,173


$

10,127


$

49,373


$

13,459


$

3,611


(1)

Excludes $1.1 billion of loans accounted for under the fair value option.

(2)

Excludes PCI loans.

(3)

Includes $1.6 billion of pay option loans. The Corporation no longer originates this product.

(4)

Refreshed LTV percentages for PCI loans are calculated using the carrying value net of the related valuation allowance.

(5)

Credit quality indicators are not reported for fully-insured loans as principal repayment is insured.

Credit Card and Other Consumer – Credit Quality Indicators

December 31, 2016

(Dollars in millions)

U.S. Credit

Card

Non-U.S.

Credit Card

Direct/Indirect

Consumer

Other

Consumer (1)

Refreshed FICO score





Less than 620

$

4,431


$

-


$

1,478


$

187


Greater than or equal to 620 and less than 680

12,364


-


2,070


222


Greater than or equal to 680 and less than 740

34,828


-


12,491


404


Greater than or equal to 740

40,655


-


33,420


1,525


Other internal credit metrics (2, 3, 4)

-


9,214


44,630


161


Total credit card and other consumer

$

92,278


$

9,214


$

94,089


$

2,499


(1)

At December 31, 2016 , 19 percent of the other consumer portfolio was associated with portfolios from certain consumer finance businesses that the Corporation previously exited.

(2)

Other internal credit metrics may include delinquency status, geography or other factors.

(3)

Direct/indirect consumer includes $43.1 billion of securities-based lending which is overcollateralized and therefore has minimal credit risk and $499 million of loans the Corporation no longer originates, primarily student loans.

(4)

Non-U.S. credit card represents the U.K. credit card portfolio which was evaluated using internal credit metrics, including delinquency status. At December 31, 2016 , 98 percent of this portfolio was current or less than 30 days past due, one percent was 30-89 days past due and one percent was 90 days or more past due.

Commercial – Credit Quality Indicators (1)

December 31, 2016

(Dollars in millions)

U.S.

Commercial

Commercial

Real Estate

Commercial
Lease

Financing

Non-U.S.

Commercial

U.S. Small
Business

Commercial (2)

Risk ratings






Pass rated

$

261,214


$

56,957


$

21,565


$

85,689


$

453


Reservable criticized

9,158


398


810


3,708


71


Refreshed FICO score (3)

Less than 620

200


Greater than or equal to 620 and less than 680

591


Greater than or equal to 680 and less than 740

1,741


Greater than or equal to 740

3,264


Other internal credit metrics (3, 4)

6,673


Total commercial

$

270,372


$

57,355


$

22,375


$

89,397


$

12,993


(1)

Excludes $6.0 billion of loans accounted for under the fair value option.

(2)

U.S. small business commercial includes $755 million of criticized business card and small business loans which are evaluated using refreshed FICO scores or internal credit metrics, including delinquency status, rather than risk ratings. At December 31, 2016 , 98 percent of the balances where internal credit metrics are used was current or less than 30 days past due.

(3)

Refreshed FICO score and other internal credit metrics are applicable only to the U.S. small business commercial portfolio.

(4)

Other internal credit metrics may include delinquency status, application scores, geography or other factors.


91 Bank of America




Impaired Loans and Troubled Debt Restructurings

A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information, it is probable that the Corporation will be unable to collect all amounts due from the borrower in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan. Impaired loans include nonperforming commercial loans and all consumer and commercial TDRs. Impaired loans exclude nonperforming consumer loans and nonperforming commercial leases unless they are classified as TDRs. Loans accounted for under the fair value option are also excluded. PCI loans are excluded and reported separately on page 97 . For more information, see Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Principles to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Corporation's 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Consumer Real Estate

Impaired consumer real estate loans within the Consumer Real Estate portfolio segment consist entirely of TDRs. Excluding PCI loans, most modifications of consumer real estate loans meet the definition of TDRs when a binding offer is extended to a borrower. For more information on impaired consumer real estate loans, see Note 4 – Outstanding Loans and Leases to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Corporation's 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Consumer real estate loans that have been discharged in Chapter 7 bankruptcy with no change in repayment terms and not reaffirmed by the borrower of $1.2 billion were included in TDRs at September 30, 2017 , of which $379 million were classified as nonperforming and $442 million were loans fully-insured by the

FHA. For more information on loans discharged in Chapter 7 bankruptcy, see Nonperforming Loans and Leases in this Note.

At both September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , remaining commitments to lend additional funds to debtors whose terms have been modified in a consumer real estate TDR were immaterial. Consumer real estate foreclosed properties totaled $259 million and $363 million at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 . The carrying value of consumer real estate loans, including fully-insured and PCI loans, for which formal foreclosure proceedings were in process at September 30, 2017 was $3.7 billion . During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 , the Corporation reclassified $198 million and $624 million of consumer real estate loans to foreclosed properties or, for properties acquired upon foreclosure of certain government-guaranteed loans (principally FHA-insured loans), to other assets. This compared to reclassifications of $326 million and $1.1 billion for the same periods in 2016 . The reclassifications represent non-cash investing activities and, accordingly, are not reflected in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows.

The table below provides the unpaid principal balance, carrying value and related allowance at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , and the average carrying value and interest income recognized for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 for impaired loans in the Corporation's Consumer Real Estate portfolio segment. Certain impaired consumer real estate loans do not have a related allowance as the current valuation of these impaired loans exceeded the carrying value, which is net of previously recorded charge-offs.

Impaired Loans – Consumer Real Estate

September 30, 2017

December 31, 2016

(Dollars in millions)

Unpaid
Principal

Balance

Carrying

Value

Related

Allowance

Unpaid
Principal

Balance

Carrying

Value

Related

Allowance

With no recorded allowance






Residential mortgage

$

9,212


$

7,172


$

-


$

11,151


$

8,695


$

-


Home equity

3,644


1,962


-


3,704


1,953


-


With an allowance recorded


Residential mortgage

$

3,167


$

3,079


$

188


$

4,041


$

3,936


$

219


Home equity

990


909


181


910


824


137


Total




Residential mortgage

$

12,379


$

10,251


$

188


$

15,192


$

12,631


$

219


Home equity

4,634


2,871


181


4,614


2,777


137


Three Months Ended September 30

Nine Months Ended September 30

2017

2016

2017

2016

Average
Carrying
Value

Interest
Income
Recognized
(1)

Average
Carrying
Value

Interest
Income
Recognized (1)

Average
Carrying
Value

Interest
Income
Recognized
(1)

Average
Carrying
Value

Interest
Income
Recognized (1)

With no recorded allowance



Residential mortgage

$

7,498


$

77


$

9,673


$

83


$

7,964


$

237


$

10,523


$

277


Home equity

2,000


27


1,964


37


2,001


82


1,883


67


With an allowance recorded

Residential mortgage

$

3,254


$

29


$

4,676


$

36


$

3,565


$

97


$

5,371


$

133


Home equity

873


6


822


7


850


18


863


18


Total



Residential mortgage

$

10,752


$

106


$

14,349


$

119


$

11,529


$

334


$

15,894


$

410


Home equity

2,873


33


2,786


44


2,851


100


2,746


85


(1)

Interest income recognized includes interest accrued and collected on the outstanding balances of accruing impaired loans as well as interest cash collections on nonaccruing impaired loans for which the principal is considered collectible.


Bank of America 92


The table below presents the September 30, 2017 and 2016 unpaid principal balance, carrying value, and average pre- and post-modification interest rates on consumer real estate loans that were modified in TDRs during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 , and net charge-offs recorded during the period in which the modification occurred. The following Consumer Real Estate portfolio segment tables include loans that were initially classified as TDRs during the period and also loans that had previously been classified as TDRs and were modified again during the period.

Consumer Real Estate – TDRs Entered into During the Three Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 (1)

September 30, 2017

Three Months Ended September 30, 2017

(Dollars in millions)

Unpaid Principal Balance

Carrying

Value

Pre-Modification Interest Rate

Post-Modification Interest Rate (2)

Net

Charge-offs (3)

Residential mortgage

$

294


$

263


4.42

%

4.33

%

$

2


Home equity

212


172


4.01


3.96


15


Total

$

506


$

435


4.25


4.17


$

17


September 30, 2016

Three Months Ended September 30, 2016

Residential mortgage

$

487


$

445


4.83

%

4.51

%

$

4


Home equity

292


223


4.95


3.41


17


Total

$

779


$

668


4.87


4.10


$

21


Consumer Real Estate – TDRs Entered into During the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 (1)

September 30, 2017

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017

Residential mortgage

$

738


$

657


4.49

%

4.25

%

$

5


Home equity

630


491


4.16


3.52


32


Total

$

1,368


$

1,148


4.33


3.90


$

37


September 30, 2016

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016

Residential mortgage

$

1,039


$

942


4.77

%

4.29

%

$

9


Home equity

718


552


4.03


2.87


43


Total

$

1,757


$

1,494


4.47


3.71


$

52


(1)

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 , there was no forgiveness of principal related to residential mortgage loans in connection with TDRs compared to $1 million and $12 million for the same periods in 2016 .

(2)

The post-modification interest rate reflects the interest rate applicable only to permanently completed modifications, which exclude loans that are in a trial modification period.

(3)

Net charge-offs include amounts recorded on loans modified during the period that are no longer held by the Corporation at September 30, 2017 and 2016 due to sales and other dispositions.

The table below presents the September 30, 2017 and 2016 carrying value for consumer real estate loans that were modified in a TDR during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 by type of modification.

Consumer Real Estate – Modification Programs

TDRs Entered into During the

Three Months Ended September 30

Nine Months Ended September 30

(Dollars in millions)

2017

2016

2017

2016

Modifications under government programs

Contractual interest rate reduction

$

10


$

18


$

56


$

121


Principal and/or interest forbearance

1


2


4


11


Other modifications (1)

7


3


22


21


Total modifications under government programs

18


23


82


153


Modifications under proprietary programs

Contractual interest rate reduction

15


20


178


143


Capitalization of past due amounts

12


4


47


27


Principal and/or interest forbearance

2


2


28


47


Other modifications  (1)

1


45


45


72


Total modifications under proprietary programs

30


71


298


289


Trial modifications

329


490


605


853


Loans discharged in Chapter 7 bankruptcy (2)

58


84


163


199


Total modifications

$

435


$

668


$

1,148


$

1,494


(1)

Includes other modifications such as term or payment extensions and repayment plans.

(2)

Includes loans discharged in Chapter 7 bankruptcy with no change in repayment terms that are classified as TDRs.


93 Bank of America




The table below presents the carrying value of consumer real estate loans that entered into payment default during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 that were modified in a TDR during the 12 months preceding payment default. A payment default for consumer real estate TDRs is recognized when a borrower has missed three monthly payments (not necessarily consecutively) since modification.

Consumer Real Estate – TDRs Entering Payment Default that were Modified During the Preceding 12 Months

Three Months Ended September 30

Nine Months Ended September 30

(Dollars in millions)

2017

2016

2017

2016

Modifications under government programs

$

16


$

51


$

62


$

230


Modifications under proprietary programs

32


40


99


145


Loans discharged in Chapter 7 bankruptcy (1)

16


42


93


124


Trial modifications (2)

54


161


312


648


Total modifications

$

118


$

294


$

566


$

1,147


(1)

Includes loans discharged in Chapter 7 bankruptcy with no change in repayment terms that are classified as TDRs.

(2)

Includes trial modification offers to which the customer did not respond.


Credit Card and Other Consumer

Impaired loans within the Credit Card and Other Consumer portfolio segment consist entirely of loans that have been modified in TDRs. The Corporation seeks to assist customers that are experiencing financial difficulty by modifying loans while ensuring compliance with federal, local and international laws and guidelines. Credit card and other consumer loan modifications generally involve reducing the interest rate on the account and placing the customer on a fixed payment plan not exceeding 60 months, all of which are considered TDRs. In substantially all cases, the customer's available line of credit is canceled. The Corporation makes loan modifications directly with borrowers for debt held only by the Corporation (internal programs). Additionally, the Corporation makes loan modifications for borrowers working with third-party

renegotiation agencies that provide solutions to customers' entire unsecured debt structures (external programs). The Corporation classifies other secured consumer loans that have been discharged in Chapter 7 bankruptcy as TDRs which are written down to collateral value and placed on nonaccrual status no later than the time of discharge. For more information on the regulatory guidance on loans discharged in Chapter 7 bankruptcy, see Nonperforming Loans and Leases in this Note.

The table below provides the unpaid principal balance, carrying value and related allowance at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , and the average carrying value and interest income recognized for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 on TDRs within the Credit Card and Other Consumer portfolio segment.

Impaired Loans – Credit Card and Other Consumer

September 30, 2017

December 31, 2016

(Dollars in millions)

Unpaid
Principal

Balance

Carrying

Value (1)

Related

Allowance

Unpaid
Principal

Balance

Carrying

Value (1)

Related

Allowance

With no recorded allowance




Direct/Indirect consumer

$

53


$

25


$

-


$

49


$

22


$

-


With an allowance recorded




U.S. credit card

$

452


$

458


$

125


$

479


$

485


$

128


Non-U.S. credit card

n/a


n/a


n/a


88


100


61


Direct/Indirect consumer

1


2


-


3


3


-


Total






U.S. credit card

$

452


$

458


$

125


$

479


$

485


$

128


Non-U.S. credit card

n/a


n/a


n/a


88


100


61


Direct/Indirect consumer

54


27


-


52


25


-


Three Months Ended September 30

Nine Months Ended September 30

2017

2016

2017

2016

Average
Carrying
Value

Interest
Income
Recognized
(2)

Average
Carrying
Value

Interest
Income
Recognized (2)

Average
Carrying
Value

Interest
Income
Recognized
(2)

Average
Carrying
Value

Interest
Income
Recognized (2)

With no recorded allowance

Direct/Indirect consumer

$

20


$

-


$

21


$

-


$

19


$

-


$

21


$

-


With an allowance recorded





U.S. credit card

$

457


$

6


$

539


$

7


$

466


$

18


$

571


$

24


Non-U.S. credit card

-


-


107


-


62


1


115


2


Direct/Indirect consumer

2


-


7


-


2


-


12


-


Total





U.S. credit card

$

457


$

6


$

539


$

7


$

466


$

18


$

571


$

24


Non-U.S. credit card

-


-


107


-


62


1


115


2


Direct/Indirect consumer

22


-


28


-


21


-


33


-


(1)

Includes accrued interest and fees.

(2)

Interest income recognized includes interest accrued and collected on the outstanding balances of accruing impaired loans as well as interest cash collections on nonaccruing impaired loans for which the principal is considered collectible.

n/a = not applicable


Bank of America 94


The table below provides information on the Corporation's primary modification programs for the Credit Card and Other Consumer TDR portfolio at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 .

Credit Card and Other Consumer – TDRs by Program Type

Internal Programs

External Programs

Other (1)

Total

Percent of Balances Current or Less Than 30 Days Past Due

(Dollars in millions)

September 30
2017

December 31
2016

September 30
2017

December 31
2016

September 30
2017

December 31
2016

September 30
2017

December 31
2016

September 30
2017

December 31
2016

U.S. credit card

$

201


$

220


$

256


$

264


$

1


$

1


$

458


$

485


88.30

%

88.99

%

Non-U.S. credit card

n/a


11


n/a


7


n/a


82


n/a


100


n/a


38.47


Direct/Indirect consumer

1


2


1


1


25


22


27


25


89.05


90.49


Total TDRs by program type

$

202


$

233


$

257


$

272


$

26


$

105


$

485


$

610


88.34


80.79


(1)

Other TDRs for non-U.S. credit card included modifications of accounts that are ineligible for a fixed payment plan.

n/a = not applicable

The table below provides information on the Corporation's Credit Card and Other Consumer TDR portfolio including the September 30, 2017 and 2016 unpaid principal balance, carrying value, and average pre- and post-modification interest rates of loans that were modified in TDRs during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 , and net charge-offs recorded during the period in which the modification occurred.

Credit Card and Other Consumer – TDRs Entered into During the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016

Three Months Ended September 30

Nine Months Ended September 30

2017

(Dollars in millions)

Unpaid Principal Balance

Carrying Value (1)

Pre-Mod Interest Rate

Post-Mod Interest Rate

Unpaid Principal Balance

Carrying Value (1)

Pre-Mod Interest Rate

Post-Mod Interest Rate

U.S. credit card

$

60


$

64


17.96

%

5.40

%

$

152


$

161


17.88

%

5.49

%

Direct/Indirect consumer

22


14


4.92


4.53


29


18


4.99


4.37


Total (2)

$

82


$

78


15.64


5.25


$

181


$

179


16.57


5.37


2016

U.S. credit card

$

46


$

50


17.48

%

5.33

%

$

126


$

134


17.42

%

5.45

%

Non-U.S. credit card

32


36


24.11


0.38


63


73


23.93


0.44


Direct/Indirect consumer

7


4


4.13


4.08


16


9


4.50


4.33


Total (2)

$

85


$

90


19.55


3.27


$

205


$

216


19.05


3.72


(1)

Includes accrued interest and fees.

(2)

Net charge-offs were $14 million and $33 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to $26 million and $43 million for the same periods in 2016.

Credit card and other consumer loans are deemed to be in payment default during the quarter in which a borrower misses the second of two consecutive payments. Payment defaults are one of the factors considered when projecting future cash flows in the calculation of the allowance for loan and lease losses for impaired credit card and other consumer loans. Based on historical experience, the Corporation estimates that 13 percent of both new U.S. credit card TDRs and new direct/indirect consumer TDRs may be in payment default within 12 months after modification. Loans that entered into payment default during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 that had been modified in a TDR during the preceding 12 months were $7 million and $19 million for U.S. credit card and $1 million and $3 million for direct/indirect consumer. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 , loans that entered into payment default that had been modified in a TDR during the preceding 12 months were $7 million

and $23 million for U.S. credit card, $31 million and $95 million for non-U.S. credit card, and $0 and $2 million for direct/indirect consumer.

Commercial Loans

Impaired commercial loans include nonperforming loans and TDRs (both performing and nonperforming). For more information on impaired commercial loans, see Note 4 – Outstanding Loans and Leases to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Corporation's 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

At September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , remaining commitments to lend additional funds to debtors whose terms have been modified in a commercial loan TDR were $279 million and $461 million .

Commercial foreclosed properties totaled $40 million and $14 million at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 .



95 Bank of America




The table below provides information on impaired loans in the Commercial loan portfolio segment including the unpaid principal balance, carrying value and related allowance at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , and the average carrying value and interest income recognized for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 . Certain impaired commercial loans do not have a related allowance as the valuation of these impaired loans exceeded the carrying value, which is net of previously recorded charge-offs.

Impaired Loans – Commercial

September 30, 2017

December 31, 2016

(Dollars in millions)

Unpaid
Principal

Balance

Carrying

Value

Related

Allowance

Unpaid
Principal

Balance

Carrying

Value

Related

Allowance

With no recorded allowance






U.S. commercial

$

683


$

675


$

-


$

860


$

827


$

-


Commercial real estate

117


106


-


77


71


-


Non-U.S. commercial

44


27


-


130


130


-


With an allowance recorded


U.S. commercial

$

1,466


$

1,132


$

123


$

2,018


$

1,569


$

132


Commercial real estate

151


39


13


243


96


10


Commercial lease financing

13


12


2


6


4


-


Non-U.S. commercial

497


437


67


545


432


104


U.S. small business commercial  (1)

82


70


27


85


73


27


Total




U.S. commercial

$

2,149


$

1,807


$

123


$

2,878


$

2,396


$

132


Commercial real estate

268


145


13


320


167


10


Commercial lease financing

13


12


2


6


4


-


Non-U.S. commercial

541


464


67


675


562


104


U.S. small business commercial  (1)

82


70


27


85


73


27


Three Months Ended September 30

Nine Months Ended September 30

2017

2016

2017

2016

Average
Carrying
Value

Interest
Income
Recognized
(2)

Average
Carrying
Value

Interest
Income
Recognized (2)

Average
Carrying
Value

Interest
Income
Recognized
(2)

Average
Carrying
Value

Interest
Income
Recognized (2)

With no recorded allowance





U.S. commercial

$

726


$

3


$

940


$

5


$

822


$

9


$

726


$

10


Commercial real estate

77


1


59


-


61


1


67


-


Non-U.S. commercial

14


-


32


-


55


-


18


-


With an allowance recorded

U.S. commercial

$

1,166


$

9


$

1,624


$

16


$

1,305


$

25


$

1,570


$

46


Commercial real estate

72


-


87


1


85


2


95


3


Commercial lease financing

10


-


4


-


6


-


2


-


Non-U.S. commercial

463


3


397


5


466


9


372


11


U.S. small business commercial  (1)

72


-


81


1


74


-


91


1


Total





U.S. commercial

$

1,892


$

12


$

2,564


$

21


$

2,127


$

34


$

2,296


$

56


Commercial real estate

149


1


146


1


146


3


162


3


Commercial lease financing

10


-


4


-


6


-


2


-


Non-U.S. commercial

477


3


429


5


521


9


390


11


U.S. small business commercial (1)

72


-


81


1


74


-


91


1


(1)

Includes U.S. small business commercial renegotiated TDR loans and related allowance.

(2)

Interest income recognized includes interest accrued and collected on the outstanding balances of accruing impaired loans as well as interest cash collections on nonaccruing impaired loans for which the principal is considered collectible.


Bank of America 96


The table below presents the September 30, 2017 and 2016 unpaid principal balance and carrying value of commercial loans that were modified as TDRs during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 , and net charge-offs that were recorded during the period in which the modification occurred. The table below includes loans that were initially classified as TDRs during the period and also loans that had previously been classified as TDRs and were modified again during the period.

Commercial – TDRs Entered into During the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016

Three Months Ended September 30

Nine Months Ended September 30

2017

(Dollars in millions)

Unpaid Principal Balance

Carrying Value

Unpaid Principal Balance

Carrying Value

U.S. commercial

$

357


$

322


$

763


$

700


Commercial real estate

-


-


16


9


Commercial lease financing

12


12


12


12


Non-U.S. commercial

105


105


105


105


U.S. small business commercial (1)

3


3


11


12


Total (2)

$

477


$

442


$

907


$

838


2016

U.S. commercial

$

793


$

768


$

1,483


$

1,447


Commercial real estate

4


4


11


11


Commercial lease financing

2


2


7


4


Non-U.S. commercial

17


17


265


201


U.S. small business commercial (1)

1


1


4


4


Total (2)

$

817


$

792


$

1,770


$

1,667


(1)

U.S. small business commercial TDRs are comprised of renegotiated small business card loans.

(2)

Net charge-offs were $27 million and $89 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to $14 million and $94 million for the same periods in 2016.

A commercial TDR is generally deemed to be in payment default when the loan is 90 days or more past due, including delinquencies that were not resolved as part of the modification. U.S. small business commercial TDRs are deemed to be in payment default during the quarter in which a borrower misses the second of two consecutive payments. Payment defaults are one of the factors considered when projecting future cash flows, along with observable market prices or fair value of collateral when measuring the allowance for loan and lease losses. TDRs that were in payment default had a carrying value of $57 million and $123 million for U.S. commercial, $32 million and $17 million for commercial real estate and $0 and $2 million for U.S. small business commercial at September 30, 2017 and 2016 .

Purchased Credit-impaired Loans

The table below shows activity for the accretable yield on PCI loans, which include the Countrywide Financial Corporation (Countrywide) portfolio and loans repurchased in connection with the 2013 settlement with FNMA. The amount of accretable yield is affected by changes in credit outlooks, including metrics such as default rates and loss severities, prepayment speeds, which can change the amount and period of time over which interest payments are expected to be received, and the interest rates on variable rate loans. The reclassifications from nonaccretable difference in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 were primarily due to an increase in the expected principal and interest cash flows due to lower default estimates.


Rollforward of Accretable Yield

(Dollars in millions)

Three Months Ended September 30, 2017

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017

Accretable yield, beginning of period

$

3,288


$

3,805


Accretion

(147

)

(465

)

Disposals/transfers

(282

)

(521

)

Reclassifications from nonaccretable difference

80


120


Accretable yield, September 30, 2017

$

2,939


$

2,939


During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 , the Corporation sold PCI loans with a carrying value of $538 million and $742 million , which excludes the related allowance of $45 million and $80 million . During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 , the Corporation sold PCI loans with a carrying value of $111 million and $435 million , which excludes the related allowance of $11 million and $50 million . For more information on PCI loans, see Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Principles to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Corporation's 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K, and for the carrying value and valuation allowance for PCI loans, see Note 5 – Allowance for Credit Losses .

Loans Held-for-sale

The Corporation had LHFS of $13.2 billion and $9.1 billion at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 . Cash and non-cash proceeds from sales and paydowns of loans originally classified as LHFS were $28.0 billion and $22.1 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 . Cash used for originations and purchases of LHFS totaled $31.4 billion and $24.2 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 .




97 Bank of America




NOTE 5

Allowance for Credit Losses

The table below summarizes the changes in the allowance for credit losses by portfolio segment for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 .

Three Months Ended September 30, 2017

(Dollars in millions)

Consumer

Real Estate (1)

Credit Card and Other Consumer

Commercial

Total

Allowance

Allowance for loan and lease losses, July 1

$

2,309


$

3,386


$

5,180


$

10,875


Loans and leases charged off

(231

)

(919

)

(212

)

(1,362

)

Recoveries of loans and leases previously charged off

230


189


43


462


Net charge-offs

(1

)

(730

)

(169

)

(900

)

Write-offs of PCI loans (2)

(73

)

-


-


(73

)

Provision for loan and lease losses (3)

(204

)

934


99


829


Other (4)

1


(40

)

1


(38

)

Allowance for loan and lease losses, September 30

2,032


3,550


5,111


10,693


Reserve for unfunded lending commitments, July 1

-


-


757


757


Provision for unfunded lending commitments

-


-


5


5


Reserve for unfunded lending commitments, September 30

-


-


762


762


Allowance for credit losses, September 30

$

2,032


$

3,550


$

5,873


$

11,455


Three Months Ended September 30, 2016

Allowance for loan and lease losses, July 1

$

3,209


$

3,334


$

5,294


$

11,837


Loans and leases charged off

(246

)

(868

)

(163

)

(1,277

)

Recoveries of loans and leases previously charged off

145


191


53


389


Net charge-offs

(101

)

(677

)

(110

)

(888

)

Write-offs of PCI loans (2)

(83

)

-


-


(83

)

Provision for loan and lease losses (3)

(36

)

741


129


834


Other (4)

-


(8

)

-


(8

)

Allowance for loan and lease losses, September 30

2,989


3,390


5,313


11,692


Reserve for unfunded lending commitments, July 1

-


-


750


750


Provision for unfunded lending commitments

-


-


16


16


Other (4)

-


-


1


1


Reserve for unfunded lending commitments, September 30

-


-


767


767


Allowance for credit losses, September 30

$

2,989


$

3,390


$

6,080


$

12,459


Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017

Allowance for loan and lease losses, January 1

$

2,750


$

3,229


$

5,258


$

11,237


Loans and leases charged off

(633

)

(2,819

)

(570

)

(4,022

)

Recoveries of loans and leases previously charged off

520


623


137


1,280


Net charge-offs (5)

(113

)

(2,196

)

(433

)

(2,742

)

Write-offs of PCI loans (2)

(161

)

-


-


(161

)

Provision for loan and lease losses (3)

(445

)

2,553


287


2,395


Other (4)

1


(36

)

(1

)

(36

)

Allowance for loan and lease losses, September 30

2,032


3,550


5,111


10,693


Reserve for unfunded lending commitments, January 1

-


-


762


762


Provision for unfunded lending commitments

-


-


-


-


Reserve for unfunded lending commitments, September 30

-


-


762


762


Allowance for credit losses, September 30

$

2,032


$

3,550


$

5,873


$

11,455


Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016

Allowance for loan and lease losses, January 1

$

3,914


$

3,471


$

4,849


$

12,234


Loans and leases charged off

(928

)

(2,664

)

(559

)

(4,151

)

Recoveries of loans and leases previously charged off

464


584


162


1,210


Net charge-offs

(464

)

(2,080

)

(397

)

(2,941

)

Write-offs of PCI loans (2)

(270

)

-


-


(270

)

Provision for loan and lease losses (3)

(191

)

2,031


962


2,802


Other (4)

-


(32

)

(101

)

(133

)

Allowance for loan and lease losses, September 30

2,989


3,390


5,313


11,692


Reserve for unfunded lending commitments, January 1

-


-


646


646


Provision for unfunded lending commitments

-


-


21


21


Other  (4)

-


-


100


100


Reserve for unfunded lending commitments, September 30

-


-


767


767


Allowance for credit losses, September 30

$

2,989


$

3,390


$

6,080


$

12,459


(1)

Includes valuation allowance associated with the PCI loan portfolio.

(2)

Write-offs included $45 million and $80 million associated with the sale of PCI loans during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to $11 million and $50 million for the same periods in 2016 .

(3)

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 , for the PCI loan portfolio, the Corporation recorded provision expense of $12 million and $56 million compared to provision expense of $8 million and a benefit of $81 million for the same periods in 2016 .

(4)

Primarily represents the net impact of portfolio sales, consolidations and deconsolidations, foreign currency translation adjustments, transfers to held-for-sale and certain other reclassifications.

(5)

Includes net charge-offs of non-U.S. credit card loans, which were previously included in assets of business held for sale. During the second quarter of 2017, the Corporation sold its non-U.S. consumer credit card business.



Bank of America 98


The table below presents the allowance and the carrying value of outstanding loans and leases by portfolio segment at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 .

Allowance and Carrying Value by Portfolio Segment

September 30, 2017

(Dollars in millions)

Consumer

 Real Estate

Credit Card and Other Consumer

Commercial

Total

Impaired loans and troubled debt restructurings (1)





Allowance for loan and lease losses  (2)

$

369


$

125


$

232


$

726


Carrying value (3)

13,122


485


2,498


16,105


Allowance as a percentage of carrying value

2.81

%

25.77

%

9.29

%

4.51

%

Loans collectively evaluated for impairment





Allowance for loan and lease losses

$

1,348


$

3,425


$

4,879


$

9,652


Carrying value  (3, 4)

234,764


187,932


470,719


893,415


Allowance as a percentage of carrying value  (4)

0.57

%

1.82

%

1.04

%

1.08

%

Purchased credit-impaired loans




Valuation allowance

$

315


n/a


n/a


$

315


Carrying value gross of valuation allowance

11,312


n/a


n/a


11,312


Valuation allowance as a percentage of carrying value

2.78

%

n/a


n/a


2.78

%

Total





Total allowance for loan and lease losses

$

2,032


$

3,550


$

5,111


$

10,693


Carrying value  (3, 4)

259,198


188,417


473,217


920,832


Total allowance as a percentage of carrying value  (4)

0.78

%

1.88

%

1.08

%

1.16

%

December 31, 2016

Impaired loans and troubled debt restructurings (1)





Allowance for loan and lease losses  (2)

$

356


$

189


$

273


$

818


Carrying value (3)

15,408


610


3,202


19,220


Allowance as a percentage of carrying value

2.31

%

30.98

%

8.53

%

4.26

%

Loans collectively evaluated for impairment




Allowance for loan and lease losses

$

1,975


$

3,283


$

4,985


$

10,243


Carrying value  (3, 4)

229,094


197,470


449,290


875,854


Allowance as a percentage of carrying value  (4)

0.86

%

1.66

%

1.11

%

1.17

%

Purchased credit-impaired loans



Valuation allowance

$

419


n/a


n/a


$

419


Carrying value gross of valuation allowance

13,738


n/a


n/a


13,738


Valuation allowance as a percentage of carrying value

3.05

%

n/a


n/a


3.05

%

Less: Assets of business held for sale (5)

Allowance for loan and lease losses  (6)

n/a


$

(243

)

n/a


$

(243

)

Carrying value (3)

n/a


(9,214

)

n/a


(9,214

)

Total




Allowance for loan and lease losses

$

2,750


$

3,229


$

5,258


$

11,237


Carrying value  (3, 4)

258,240


188,866


452,492


899,598


Allowance as a percentage of carrying value  (4)

1.06

%

1.71

%

1.16

%

1.25

%

(1)

Impaired loans include nonperforming commercial loans and all TDRs, including both commercial and consumer TDRs. Impaired loans exclude nonperforming consumer loans unless they are TDRs, and all consumer and commercial loans accounted for under the fair value option.

(2)

Allowance for loan and lease losses includes $27 million related to impaired U.S. small business commercial at both September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 .

(3)

Amounts are presented gross of the allowance for loan and lease losses.

(4)

Outstanding loan and lease balances and ratios do not include loans accounted for under the fair value option of $6.3 billion and $7.1 billion at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 .

(5)

Represents allowance for loan and lease losses and loans related to the non-U.S. credit card loan portfolio, which was included in assets of business held for sale on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2016 . During the second quarter of 2017, the Corporation sold its non-U.S. consumer credit card business.

(6)

Includes $61 million of allowance for loan and lease losses related to impaired loans and TDRs and $ 182 million related to loans collectively evaluated for impairment at December 31, 2016 .

n/a = not applicable



99 Bank of America




NOTE 6

Securitizations and Other Variable Interest Entities

The Corporation utilizes VIEs in the ordinary course of business to support its own and its customers' financing and investing needs. For more information on the Corporation's use of VIEs, see Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Principles and Note 6 – Securitizations and Other Variable Interest Entities to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Corporation's 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The tables in this Note present the assets and liabilities of consolidated and unconsolidated VIEs at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , in situations where the Corporation has continuing involvement with transferred assets or if the Corporation otherwise has a variable interest in the VIE. The tables also present the Corporation's maximum loss exposure at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 resulting from its involvement with consolidated VIEs and unconsolidated VIEs in which the Corporation holds a variable interest. The Corporation's maximum loss exposure is based on the unlikely event that all of the assets in the VIEs become worthless and incorporates not only potential losses associated with assets recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheet but also potential losses associated with off-balance sheet commitments, such as unfunded liquidity commitments and other contractual arrangements. The Corporation's maximum loss exposure does not include losses previously recognized through write-downs of assets.

The Corporation invests in ABS issued by third-party VIEs with which it has no other form of involvement and enters into certain commercial lending arrangements that may also incorporate the use of VIEs, for example to hold collateral. These securities and

loans are included in Note 3 – Securities or Note 4 – Outstanding Loans and Leases . In addition, the Corporation uses VIEs such as trust preferred securities trusts in connection with its funding activities. For additional information, see Note 11 – Long-term Debt to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Corporation's 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The Corporation uses VIEs, such as common trust funds managed within Global Wealth & Investment Management ( GWIM) , to provide investment opportunities for clients. These VIEs, which are generally not consolidated by the Corporation, as applicable, are not included in the tables herein.

Except as described below, the Corporation did not provide financial support to consolidated or unconsolidated VIEs during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 or the year ended December 31, 2016 that it was not previously contractually required to provide, nor does it intend to do so.

First-lien Mortgage Securitizations

First-lien Mortgages

As part of its mortgage banking activities, the Corporation securitizes a portion of the first-lien residential mortgage loans it originates or purchases from third parties. Except as described below and in Note 7 – Representations and Warranties Obligations and Corporate Guarantees , the Corporation does not provide guarantees or recourse to the securitization trusts other than standard representations and warranties.

The table below summarizes select information related to first-lien mortgage securitizations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 .

First-lien Mortgage Securitizations

Residential Mortgage - Agency

Commercial Mortgage

Three Months Ended September 30

Nine Months Ended September 30

Three Months Ended September 30

Nine Months Ended September 30

(Dollars in millions)

2017

2016

2017

2016

2017

2016

2017

2016

Cash proceeds from new securitizations  (1)

$

3,833


$

7,131


$

11,791


$

18,580


$

1,225


$

1,052


$

2,931


$

3,031


Gains on securitizations  (2)

40


89


140


322


14


27


67


18


Repurchases from securitization trusts (3)

609


684


2,083


2,058


-


-


-


-


(1)

The Corporation transfers residential mortgage loans to securitizations sponsored by the GSEs or Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA) in the normal course of business and receives RMBS in exchange which may then be sold into the market to third-party investors for cash proceeds.

(2)

A majority of the first-lien residential and commercial mortgage loans securitized are initially classified as LHFS and accounted for under the fair value option. Gains recognized on these LHFS prior to securitization, which totaled $63 million and $195 million , net of hedges, during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to $149 million and $349 million for the same periods in 2016 , are not included in the table above.

(3)

The Corporation may have the option to repurchase delinquent loans out of securitization trusts, which reduces the amount of servicing advances it is required to make. The Corporation may also repurchase loans from securitization trusts to perform modifications. Repurchased loans include FHA-insured mortgages collateralizing GNMA securities.

In addition to cash proceeds as reported in the table above, the Corporation received securities with an initial fair value of $770 million and $1.3 billion in connection with first-lien mortgage securitizations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to $1.2 billion and $3.1 billion for the same periods in 2016 . The receipt of these securities represents non-cash operating and investing activities and, accordingly, is not reflected in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows. Substantially all of these securities were initially classified as Level 2 assets within the fair value hierarchy. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 , there were no changes to the initial classification.

The Corporation recognizes consumer MSRs from the sale or securitization of consumer real estate loans. The unpaid principal balance of loans serviced for investors, including residential mortgage and home equity loans, totaled $289.3 billion and $355.0 billion at September 30, 2017 and 2016 . Servicing fee and ancillary fee income on serviced loans was $213 million and

$691 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to $286 million and $887 million for the same periods in 2016 . Servicing advances on serviced loans, including loans serviced for others and loans held for investment were $4.7 billion and $6.2 billion at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 . For more information on MSRs, see Note 14 – Fair Value Measurements .

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 , the Corporation deconsolidated agency residential mortgage securitization vehicles with total assets of $326 million and $3.1 billion following the sale of retained interests to third parties, after which the Corporation no longer had the unilateral ability to liquidate the vehicles. Gains on sale of $11 million and $125 million related to these deconsolidations were recorded in other income in the Consolidated Statement of Income. No deconsolidations of agency residential mortgage securitization vehicles occurred during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 .


Bank of America 100


The following table summarizes select information related to first-lien mortgage securitization trusts in which the Corporation held a variable interest at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 .

First-lien Mortgage VIEs

Residential Mortgage





Non-agency



Agency

Prime

Subprime

Alt-A

Commercial Mortgage

(Dollars in millions)

September 30
2017

December 31
2016

September 30
2017

December 31
2016

September 30
2017

December 31
2016

September 30
2017

December 31
2016

September 30
2017

December 31
2016

Unconsolidated VIEs











Maximum loss exposure  (1)

$

19,585


$

22,661


$

623


$

757


$

2,677


$

2,750


$

464


$

560


$

420


$

344


On-balance sheet assets











Senior securities

    held (2) :











Trading account assets

$

300


$

1,399


$

18


$

20


$

51


$

112


$

35


$

118


$

58


$

51


Debt securities carried at FV

15,827


17,620


359


441


2,226


2,235


318


305


-


-


Held-to-maturity securities

3,447


3,630


-


-


-


-


-


-


160


64


Subordinate securities held (2) :











Trading account assets

-


-


1


1


22


23


1


1


11


14


Debt securities carried at FV

-


-


6


8


2


2


20


23


48


54


Held-to-maturity securities

-


-


-


-


-


-


-


-


-


13


Residual interests held

-


-


-


-


-


-


-


-


25


25


All other assets (3)

11


12


23


28


-


-


90


113


-


-


Total retained positions

$

19,585


$

22,661


$

407


$

498


$

2,301


$

2,372


$

464


$

560


$

302


$

221


Principal balance outstanding (4)

$

242,353


$

265,332


$

11,152


$

16,280


$

10,993


$

19,373


$

29,550


$

35,788


$

24,945


$

23,826


Consolidated VIEs











Maximum loss exposure  (1)

$

15,040


$

18,084


$

337


$

-


$

-


$

-


$

-


$

25


$

-


$

-


On-balance sheet assets











Trading account

assets

$

37


$

434


$

330


$

-


$

-


$

-


$

-


$

99


$

-


$

-


Loans and leases

14,762


17,223


-


-


-


-


-


-


-


-


All other assets

241


427


7


-


-


-


-


-


-


-


Total assets

$

15,040


$

18,084


$

337


$

-


$

-


$

-


$

-


$

99


$

-


$

-


On-balance sheet liabilities











Long-term debt

$

-


$

-


$

-


$

-


$

-


$

-


$

-


$

74


$

-


$

-


All other liabilities

2


4


-


-


-


-


-


-


-


-


Total liabilities

$

2


$

4


$

-


$

-


$

-


$

-


$

-


$

74


$

-


$

-


(1)

Maximum loss exposure includes obligations under loss-sharing reinsurance and other arrangements for non-agency residential mortgage and commercial mortgage securitizations, but excludes the reserve for representations and warranties obligations and corporate guarantees and also excludes servicing advances and other servicing rights and obligations. For additional information, see Note 7 – Representations and Warranties Obligations and Corporate Guarantees and Note 14 – Fair Value Measurements .

(2)

As a holder of these securities, the Corporation receives scheduled principal and interest payments. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 , the Corporation recognized $0 and $16 million compared to $1 million and $5 million for the same periods in 2016 of credit-related impairment losses in earnings on those securities classified as AFS debt securities. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 , the Corporation recognized no credit-related impairment losses in earnings on those securities classified as HTM.

(3)

Not included in the table above are all other assets of $147 million and $189 million , representing the unpaid principal balance of mortgage loans eligible for repurchase from unconsolidated residential mortgage securitization vehicles, principally guaranteed by GNMA, and all other liabilities of $147 million and $189 million , representing the principal amount that would be payable to the securitization vehicles if the Corporation was to exercise the repurchase option, at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 .

(4)

Principal balance outstanding includes loans where the Corporation was the transferor to securitization vehicles with which it has continuing involvement, which may include servicing the loans.


101 Bank of America




Other Asset-backed Securitizations

The table below summarizes select information related to home equity loan, credit card and other asset-backed VIEs in which the Corporation held a variable interest at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 .

Home Equity Loan, Credit Card and Other Asset-backed VIEs

Home Equity Loan (1)

Credit Card (2, 3)

Resecuritization Trusts

Municipal Bond Trusts

(Dollars in millions)

September 30
2017

December 31
2016

September 30
2017

December 31
2016

September 30
2017

December 31
2016

September 30
2017

December 31
2016

Unconsolidated VIEs







Maximum loss exposure

$

1,632


$

2,732


$

-


$

-


$

9,107


$

9,906


$

1,566


$

1,635


On-balance sheet assets







Senior securities held (4) :







Trading account assets

$

-


$

-


$

-


$

-


$

1,246


$

902


$

9


$

-


Debt securities carried at fair value

39


46


-


-


1,891


2,338


-


-


Held-to-maturity securities

-


-


-


-


5,866


6,569


-


-


Subordinate securities held (4) :







Trading account assets

-


-


-


-


30


27


-


-


Debt securities carried at fair value

-


-


-


-


74


70


-


-


Total retained positions

$

39


$

46


$

-


$

-


$

9,107


$

9,906


$

9


$

-


Total assets of VIEs (5)

$

2,598


$

4,274


$

-


$

-


$

21,822


$

22,155


$

2,250


$

2,406


Consolidated VIEs







Maximum loss exposure

$

119


$

149


$

22,937


$

25,859


$

343


$

420


$

1,215


$

1,442


On-balance sheet assets







Trading account assets

$

-


$

-


$

-


$

-


$

864


$

1,428


$

1,214


$

1,454


Loans and leases

192


244


32,281


35,135


-


-


-


-


Allowance for loan and lease losses

(13

)

(16

)

(1,002

)

(1,007

)

-


-


-


-


All other assets

6


7


276


793


-


-


1


-


Total assets

$

185


$

235


$

31,555


$

34,921


$

864


$

1,428


$

1,215


$

1,454


On-balance sheet liabilities







Short-term borrowings

$

-


$

-


$

-


$

-


$

-


$

-


$

122


$

348


Long-term debt

82


108


8,598


9,049


521


1,008


-


12


All other liabilities

-


-


20


13


-


-


-


-


Total liabilities

$

82


$

108


$

8,618


$

9,062


$

521


$

1,008


$

122


$

360


(1)

For unconsolidated home equity loan VIEs, the maximum loss exposure includes outstanding trust certificates issued by trusts in rapid amortization, net of recorded reserves. For both consolidated and unconsolidated home equity loan VIEs, the maximum loss exposure excludes the reserve for representations and warranties obligations and corporate guarantees. For additional information, see Note 7 – Representations and Warranties Obligations and Corporate Guarantees .

(2)

At September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , loans and leases in the consolidated credit card trust included $15.3 billion and $17.6 billion of seller's interest.

(3)

At September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , all other assets in the consolidated credit card trust included restricted cash, certain short-term investments, and unbilled accrued interest and fees.

(4)

The retained senior and subordinate securities were valued using quoted market prices or observable market inputs (Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy).

(5)

Total assets include loans the Corporation transferred with which it has continuing involvement, which may include servicing the loan.

Home Equity Loans

The Corporation retains interests in home equity securitization trusts to which it transferred home equity loans. These retained interests include senior and subordinate securities and residual interests. In addition, the Corporation may be obligated to provide subordinate funding to the trusts during a rapid amortization event. This obligation is included in the maximum loss exposure in the table above. The charges that will ultimately be recorded as a result of the rapid amortization events depend on the undrawn available credit on the home equity lines, performance of the loans, the amount of subsequent draws and the timing of related cash flows.

Credit Card Securitizations

The Corporation securitizes originated and purchased credit card loans. The Corporation's continuing involvement with the securitization trust includes servicing the receivables, retaining an undivided interest (seller's interest) in the receivables, and holding certain retained interests including senior and subordinate securities, subordinate interests in accrued interest and fees on the securitized receivables, and cash reserve accounts.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2017 , $3.1 billion of new senior debt securities were issued to third-party investors from the credit card securitization trust compared to $750 million for the same period in 2016.

At September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , the Corporation held subordinate securities issued by the credit card securitization trust with a notional principal amount of $7.4 billion and $7.5 billion . These securities serve as a form of credit enhancement to the senior debt securities and have a stated interest rate of zero percent . There were $500 million of these subordinate securities issued for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to $121 million for the same period in 2016 .

Resecuritization Trusts

The Corporation transfers securities, typically MBS, into resecuritization vehicles at the request of customers seeking securities with specific characteristics. Generally, there are no significant ongoing activities performed in a resecuritization trust and no single investor has the unilateral ability to liquidate the trust.

The Corporation resecuritized $5.0 billion and $20.1 billion of securities during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to $5.6 billion and $20.3 billion for the same periods in 2016 . Securities transferred into resecuritization vehicles during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 were measured at fair value with changes in fair value recorded in trading account profits prior to the resecuritization and no gain or loss on sale was recorded. Resecuritization proceeds included securities with an initial fair


Bank of America 102


value of $855 million and $2.7 billion during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to $430 million and $2.6 billion for the same periods in 2016 . All of the securities received as resecuritization proceeds were classified as trading securities and were categorized as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy.

Municipal Bond Trusts

The Corporation administers municipal bond trusts that hold highly-rated, long-term, fixed-rate municipal bonds. The trusts obtain financing by issuing floating-rate trust certificates that reprice on a weekly or other short-term basis to third-party investors.

The Corporation's liquidity commitments to unconsolidated municipal bond trusts, including those for which the Corporation was transferor, totaled $1.6 billion at both September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 . The weighted-average remaining life of bonds held in the trusts at September 30, 2017 was 5.6 years. There were no material write-downs or downgrades of assets or issuers during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 .

Other Variable Interest Entities

The table below summarizes select information related to other VIEs in which the Corporation held a variable interest at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 .

Other VIEs

September 30, 2017

December 31, 2016

(Dollars in millions)

Consolidated

Unconsolidated

Total

Consolidated

Unconsolidated

Total

Maximum loss exposure

$

5,398


$

19,676


$

25,074


$

6,114


$

17,754


$

23,868


On-balance sheet assets







Trading account assets

$

2,697


$

303


$

3,000


$

2,358


$

233


$

2,591


Debt securities carried at fair value

-


197


197


-


122


122


Loans and leases

2,787


4,200


6,987


3,399


3,249


6,648


Allowance for loan and lease losses

(8

)

(33

)

(41

)

(9

)

(24

)

(33

)

Loans held-for-sale

66


843


909


188


464


652


All other assets

131


13,717


13,848


369


13,156


13,525


Total

$

5,673


$

19,227


$

24,900


$

6,305


$

17,200


$

23,505


On-balance sheet liabilities







Long-term debt (1)

$

256


$

-


$

256


$

395


$

-


$

395


All other liabilities

32


3,146


3,178


24


2,959


2,983


Total

$

288


$

3,146


$

3,434


$

419


$

2,959


$

3,378


Total assets of VIEs

$

5,673


$

69,817


$

75,490


$

6,305


$

62,269


$

68,574


(1)

Includes $13 million and $229 million of long-term debt at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 issued by other consolidated VIEs, which has recourse to the general credit of the Corporation.

Customer Vehicles

Customer vehicles include credit-linked, equity-linked and commodity-linked note vehicles, repackaging vehicles, and asset acquisition vehicles, which are typically created on behalf of customers who wish to obtain market or credit exposure to a specific company, index, commodity or financial instrument.

The Corporation's maximum loss exposure to consolidated and unconsolidated customer vehicles totaled $2.4 billion and $2.9 billion at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , including the notional amount of derivatives to which the Corporation is a counterparty, net of losses previously recorded, and the Corporation's investment, if any, in securities issued by the vehicles. The Corporation also had liquidity commitments, including written put options and collateral value guarantees, with certain unconsolidated vehicles of $55 million and $323 million at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , that are included in the table above.

Collateralized Debt Obligation Vehicles

The Corporation receives fees for structuring CDO vehicles, which hold diversified pools of fixed-income securities, typically corporate debt or ABS, which the CDO vehicles fund by issuing multiple tranches of debt and equity securities. CDOs are generally managed by third-party portfolio managers. The Corporation typically transfers assets to these CDOs, holds securities issued by the CDOs and may be a derivative counterparty to the CDOs. The Corporation's maximum loss exposure to consolidated and unconsolidated CDOs totaled $428 million and $430 million at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 .

Investment Vehicles

The Corporation sponsors, invests in or provides financing, which may be in connection with the sale of assets, to a variety of investment vehicles that hold loans, real estate, debt securities or other financial instruments and are designed to provide the desired investment profile to investors or the Corporation. At September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , the Corporation's consolidated investment vehicles had total assets of $683 million and $846 million . The Corporation also held investments in unconsolidated vehicles with total assets of $24.1 billion and $17.3 billion at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 . The Corporation's maximum loss exposure associated with both consolidated and unconsolidated investment vehicles totaled $6.4 billion and $5.1 billion at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 comprised primarily of on-balance sheet assets less non-recourse liabilities.

In prior periods, the Corporation transferred servicing advance receivables to independent third parties in connection with the sale of MSRs. Portions of the receivables were transferred into unconsolidated securitization trusts. The Corporation retained senior interests in such receivables with a maximum loss exposure and funding obligation of $90 million and $150 million , including a funded balance of $45 million and $75 million at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , which were classified in other debt securities carried at fair value.

Leveraged Lease Trusts

The Corporation's net investment in consolidated leveraged lease trusts totaled $2.3 billion and $2.6 billion at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 . The trusts hold long-lived equipment such as rail cars, power generation and distribution equipment, and commercial aircraft. The Corporation structures the trusts and holds a significant residual interest. The net investment


103 Bank of America




represents the Corporation's maximum loss exposure to the trusts in the unlikely event that the leveraged lease investments become worthless. Debt issued by the leveraged lease trusts is non-recourse to the Corporation.

Tax Credit Vehicles

The Corporation holds investments in unconsolidated limited partnerships and similar entities that construct, own and operate affordable housing, wind and solar projects. An unrelated third party is typically the general partner or managing member and has control over the significant activities of the vehicle. The Corporation earns a return primarily through the receipt of tax credits allocated to the projects. The maximum loss exposure included in the Other VIEs table was $13.4 billion and $12.6 billion at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 . The Corporation's risk of loss is generally mitigated by policies requiring that the project qualify for the expected tax credits prior to making its investment.

The Corporation's investments in affordable housing partnerships, which are reported in other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet, totaled $7.6 billion and $7.4 billion , including unfunded commitments to provide capital contributions of $2.8 billion and $2.7 billion at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 . The unfunded commitments are expected to be paid over the next five years . The Corporation recognized tax credits and other tax benefits from investments in affordable housing partnerships of $293 million and $825 million , and reported pre-tax losses in other noninterest income of $209 million and $612 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 . For the same periods in 2016 , the Corporation recognized tax credits and other tax benefits of $337 million and $819 million , and pre-tax losses of $200 million and $596 million . Tax credits are recognized as part of the Corporation's annual effective tax rate used to determine tax expense in a given quarter. Accordingly, the portion of a year's expected tax benefits recognized in any given quarter may differ from 25 percent . The Corporation may from time to time be asked to invest additional amounts to support a troubled affordable housing project. Such additional investments have not been and are not expected to be significant.

NOTE 7

Representations and Warranties Obligations and Corporate Guarantees

For information on representations and warranties obligations and corporate guarantees and related settlement actions, see Note 7 – Representations and Warranties Obligations and Corporate Guarantees to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Corporation's 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K .

Unresolved Repurchase Claims

Unresolved representations and warranties repurchase claims represent the notional amount of repurchase claims made by counterparties, typically the outstanding principal balance or the unpaid principal balance at the time of default. In the case of first-lien mortgages, the claim amount is often significantly greater than the expected loss amount due to the benefit of collateral and, in some cases, mortgage insurance (MI) or mortgage guarantee payments. Claims received from a counterparty remain outstanding until the underlying loan is repurchased, the claim is rescinded by the counterparty, the Corporation determines that

the applicable statute of limitations has expired, or representations and warranties claims with respect to the applicable trust are settled, and fully and finally released. The Corporation does not include duplicate claims in the amounts disclosed.

The following table presents unresolved repurchase claims at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 . The unresolved repurchase claims include only claims where the Corporation believes that the counterparty has the contractual right to submit claims. The unresolved repurchase claims predominantly relate to subprime and pay option first-lien loans and home equity loans. For more information, see Private-label Securitizations and Whole-loan Sales Experience in the MD&A of the Corporation's 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K , as well as Note 12 – Commitments and Contingencies to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Corporation's 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K .

Unresolved Repurchase Claims by Counterparty, Net of Duplicate Claims

(Dollars in millions)

September 30
2017

December 31
2016

By counterparty



Private-label securitization trustees, whole-loan investors, including third-party securitization sponsors and other  (1)

$

16,019


$

16,685


Monolines

1,578


1,583


GSEs

5


9


Total unresolved repurchase claims by counterparty, net of duplicate claims

$

17,602


$

18,277


(1)

Includes $11.3 billion and $11.9 billion of claims based on individual file reviews and $4.7 billion and $4.8 billion of claims submitted without individual file reviews at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 .

During the nine months ended September 30, 2017 , the Corporation received $71 million in new repurchase claims and $746 million in claims were resolved, including $640 million related to settlements. Of the remaining unresolved monoline claims, substantially all of the claims pertain to second-lien loans and are currently the subject of litigation with a single monoline insurer. There may be additional claims or file requests in the future.

In addition to the unresolved repurchase claims in the Unresolved Repurchase Claims by Counterparty, net of Duplicate Claims table, the Corporation has received notifications from a sponsor of third-party securitizations with whom the Corporation engaged in whole-loan transactions indicating that the Corporation may have indemnity obligations with respect to specific loans for which the Corporation has not received a repurchase request. These notifications were received prior to 2015, and totaled $1.3 billion at both September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 . During the three months ended September 30, 2017, the Corporation reached an agreement with the party requesting indemnity, subject to acceptance of a settlement agreement by a securitization trustee; the impact of this agreement is included in the reserve for representations and warranties.

The presence of repurchase claims on a given trust, receipt of notices of indemnification obligations and receipt of other communications, as discussed above, are all factors that inform the Corporation's reserve for representations and warranties and the corresponding estimated range of possible loss.



Bank of America 104


Private-label Securitizations and Whole-loan Sales Experience

Prior to 2009, legacy companies and certain subsidiaries sold pools of first-lien residential mortgage loans and home equity loans as private-label securitizations or in the form of whole loans. For more information on private-label securitizations and whole-loan sales experience, see Note 7 – Representations and Warranties Obligations and Corporate Guarantees to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Corporation's 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K .

At September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , the notional amount of unresolved repurchase claims submitted by private-label securitization trustees, whole-loan investors, including third-party securitization sponsors, and others was $16.0 billion and $16.7 billion . The notional amount of unresolved repurchase claims at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 included $6.9 billion and $5.6 billion of claims related to loans in specific private-label securitization groups or tranches where the Corporation owns substantially all of the outstanding securities or will otherwise realize the benefit of any repurchase claims paid.

The overall decrease in the notional amount of outstanding unresolved repurchase claims in the nine months ended September 30, 2017 was primarily due to claims that were resolved as a result of settlements. Outstanding repurchase claims remained unresolved primarily due to (1) the level of detail, support and analysis accompanying such claims, which impact

overall claim quality and, therefore, claims resolution, and (2) the lack of an established process to resolve disputes related to these claims.

Reserve for Representations and Warranties and Corporate Guarantees and Estimated Range of Possible Loss

The reserve for representations and warranties and corporate guarantees is included in accrued expenses and other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet and the related provision is included in mortgage banking income in the Consolidated Statement of Income.

The Corporation's representations and warranties reserve and the corresponding estimated range of possible loss at September 30, 2017 considers, among other things, the repurchase experience implied in the settlements with BNY Mellon and other counterparties. Since the securitization trusts that were included in the settlements with BNY Mellon and other counterparties differ from other securitization trusts, the Corporation adjusts the experience implied by those prior settlements based on the characteristics of those trusts where the Corporation has a continuing possibility of timely claims in order to determine the representations and warranties reserve and the corresponding estimated range of possible loss.

The table below presents a rollforward of the reserve for representations and warranties and corporate guarantees.

Representations and Warranties and Corporate Guarantees

Three Months Ended September 30

Nine Months Ended September 30

(Dollars in millions)

2017

2016

2017

2016

Reserve for representations and warranties and corporate guarantees, beginning of period

$

2,248


$

2,723


$

2,339


$

11,326


Additions for new sales

1


1


3


3


Payments (1)

(297

)

(23

)

(385

)

(8,687

)

Provision

198


99


193


158


Reserve for representations and warranties and corporate guarantees, September 30

$

2,150


$

2,800


$

2,150


$

2,800


(1)

In February 2016, the Corporation made an $8.5 billion settlement payment to BNY Mellon as part of the settlement with BNY Mellon.

The representations and warranties reserve represents the Corporation's best estimate of probable incurred losses as of September 30, 2017 . However, it is reasonably possible that future representations and warranties losses may occur in excess of the amounts recorded for these exposures. The Corporation currently estimates that the range of possible loss for representations and warranties exposures could be up to $2 billion over existing accruals at September 30, 2017 . The Corporation treats claims that are time-barred as resolved and does not consider such claims in the estimated range of possible loss. The estimated range of possible loss reflects principally exposures related to loans in private-label securitization trusts, including related indemnity claims. It represents a reasonably possible loss, but does not

represent a probable loss, and is based on currently available information, significant judgment and a number of assumptions that are subject to change. For more information on the reserve for representations and warranties exposures and the corresponding estimated range of possible loss, see Note 7 – Representations and Warranties Obligations and Corporate Guarantees to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Corporation's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2017 , and Note 7 – Representations and Warranties Obligations and Corporate Guarantees to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Corporation's 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K .




105 Bank of America




NOTE 8

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Goodwill

The table below presents goodwill balances by business segment and All Other at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 . The reporting units utilized for goodwill impairment testing are the operating segments or one level below. For additional information, see Note 8 – Goodwill and Intangible Assets to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Corporation's 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Goodwill

(Dollars in millions)

September 30
2017

December 31
2016

Consumer Banking

$

30,123


$

30,123


Global Wealth & Investment Management

9,680


9,681


Global Banking

23,923


23,923


Global Markets

5,197


5,197


All Other

45


820


Less: Goodwill of business held for sale (1)

-


(775

)

Total goodwill

$

68,968


$

68,969


(1)

Reflects the goodwill assigned to the non-U.S. consumer credit card business, which was included in assets of business held for sale on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2016 . During the second quarter of 2017, the Corporation sold its non-U.S. consumer credit card business.

Intangible Assets

The table below presents the gross and net carrying values and accumulated amortization for intangible assets at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 .

Intangible Assets (1, 2)

September 30, 2017

December 31, 2016

(Dollars in millions)

Gross

Carrying Value

Accumulated

Amortization

Net
Carrying Value

Gross

Carrying Value

Accumulated

Amortization

Net
Carrying Value

Purchased credit card and affinity relationships

$

5,919


$

5,553


$

366


$

6,830


$

6,243


$

587


Core deposit and other intangibles (3)

3,835


2,120


1,715


3,836


2,046


1,790


Customer relationships

3,886


3,509


377


3,887


3,275


612


Total intangible assets  (4)

$

13,640


$

11,182


$

2,458


$

14,553


$

11,564


$

2,989


(1)

Excludes fully amortized intangible assets.

(2)

At both September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , none of the intangible assets were impaired.

(3)

Includes $1.6 billion at both September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 of intangible assets associated with trade names that have an indefinite life and, accordingly, are not amortized.

(4)

Includes $67 million at December 31, 2016 of intangible assets assigned to the non-U.S. consumer credit card business, which was included in assets of business held for sale on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2016.

Amortization of intangibles expense was $151 million and $473 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to $181 million and $554 million for the same periods in 2016. The Corporation estimates aggregate amortization expense will be $147 million for the remainder of 2017, and $538 million , $105 million and $53 million for the years through 2020 and none for the years thereafter.


Bank of America 106


NOTE 9

Federal Funds Sold or Purchased, Securities Financing Agreements and Short-term Borrowings

The following table presents federal funds sold or purchased, securities financing agreements, which include securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase, and short-term borrowings. The Corporation elects to account for certain securities financing agreements and short-term borrowings under the fair value option. For more information on the election of the fair value option, see Note 15 – Fair Value Option .

Three Months Ended September 30

Nine Months Ended September 30

2017

2016

2017

2016

(Dollars in millions)

Amount

Rate

Amount

Rate

Amount

Rate

Amount

Rate

Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell






Average during period

$

223,585


1.17

%

$

214,254


0.50

%

$

222,255


1.00

%

$

215,476


0.50

%

Maximum month-end balance during period

224,815


n/a


222,489


n/a


237,064


n/a


225,015


n/a


Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase








Average during period

$

197,794


1.37

%

$

177,883


0.93

%

$

199,433


1.18

%

$

184,500


1.00

%

Maximum month-end balance during period

197,604


n/a


192,536


n/a


218,017


n/a


196,631


n/a


Short-term borrowings








Average during period

32,153


2.54


29,751


2.02


38,329


2.43


30,631


1.85


Maximum month-end balance during period

32,679


n/a


31,935


n/a


46,202


n/a


33,051


n/a


n/a = not applicable

Offsetting of Securities Financing Agreements

The Corporation enters into securities financing agreements to accommodate customers (also referred to as "matched-book transactions"), obtain securities to cover short positions, and to finance inventory positions. Substantially all of the Corporation's securities financing activities are transacted under legally enforceable master repurchase agreements or legally enforceable master securities lending agreements that give the Corporation, in the event of default by the counterparty, the right to liquidate securities held and to offset receivables and payables with the same counterparty. For more information, see Note 10 – Federal Funds Sold or Purchased, Securities Financing Agreements and Short-term Borrowings to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Corporation's 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K .

The Securities Financing Agreements table presents securities financing agreements included on the Consolidated Balance Sheet in federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell, and in federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 . Balances are presented on a gross basis, prior to the application of counterparty netting. Gross assets and liabilities are adjusted on an aggregate basis to take into consideration the effects of legally enforceable master netting agreements. For more information on the offsetting of derivatives, see Note 2 – Derivatives .

Securities Financing Agreements

September 30, 2017

(Dollars in millions)

Gross Assets/Liabilities (1)

Amounts Offset

Net Balance Sheet Amount

Financial Instruments (2)

Net Assets/Liabilities

Securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell (3)

$

362,065


$

(144,851

)

$

217,214


$

(165,776

)

$

51,438


Securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase

$

334,627


$

(144,851

)

$

189,776


$

(161,131

)

$

28,645


Other (4)

22,258


-


22,258


(22,258

)

-


Total

$

356,885


$

(144,851

)

$

212,034


$

(183,389

)

$

28,645


December 31, 2016

Securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell (3)

$

326,970


$

(128,746

)

$

198,224


$

(154,974

)

$

43,250


Securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase

$

299,028


$

(128,746

)

$

170,282


$

(140,774

)

$

29,508


Other (4)

14,448


-


14,448


(14,448

)

-


Total

$

313,476


$

(128,746

)

$

184,730


$

(155,222

)

$

29,508


(1)

Includes activity where uncertainty exists as to the enforceability of certain master netting agreements under bankruptcy laws in some countries or industries.

(2)

Financial instruments includes securities collateral received or pledged under repurchase or securities lending agreements where there is a legally enforceable master netting agreement. These amounts are not offset on the Consolidated Balance Sheet but are shown as a reduction to derive a net asset or liability. Securities collateral received or pledged where the legal enforceability of the master netting agreements is uncertain is excluded from the table.

(3)

Excludes repurchase activity of $11.1 billion and $10.1 billion reported in loans and leases on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 .

(4)

Balance is reported in accrued expenses and other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet and relates to transactions where the Corporation acts as the lender in a securities lending agreement and receives securities that can be pledged as collateral or sold. In these transactions, the Corporation recognizes an asset at fair value, representing the securities received, and a liability, representing the obligation to return those securities.


107 Bank of America




Repurchase Agreements and Securities Loaned Transactions Accounted for as Secured Borrowings

The tables below present securities sold under agreements to repurchase and securities loaned by remaining contractual term to maturity and class of collateral pledged. Included in "Other" are transactions where the Corporation acts as the lender in a

securities lending agreement and receives securities that can be pledged as collateral or sold. Certain agreements contain a right to substitute collateral and/or terminate the agreement prior to maturity at the option of the Corporation or the counterparty. Such agreements are included in the table below based on the remaining contractual term to maturity.

Remaining Contractual Maturity

September 30, 2017

(Dollars in millions)

Overnight and Continuous

30 Days or Less

After 30 Days Through 90 Days

Greater than 90 Days (1)

Total

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase

$

119,610


$

89,934


$

41,358


$

59,174


$

310,076


Securities loaned

16,027


404


1,989


6,131


24,551


Other

22,258


-


-


-


22,258


Total

$

157,895


$

90,338


$

43,347


$

65,305


$

356,885


December 31, 2016

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase

$

129,853


$

77,780


$

31,851


$

40,752


$

280,236


Securities loaned

8,564


6,602


1,473


2,153


18,792


Other

14,448


-


-


-


14,448


Total

$

152,865


$

84,382


$

33,324


$

42,905


$

313,476


(1)

No agreements have maturities greater than three years .

Class of Collateral Pledged

September 30, 2017

(Dollars in millions)

Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase

Securities Loaned

Other

Total

U.S. government and agency securities

$

169,501


$

-


$

281


$

169,782


Corporate securities, trading loans and other

8,933


1,339


443


10,715


Equity securities

30,483


17,892


21,479


69,854


Non-U.S. sovereign debt

95,997


5,320


55


101,372


Mortgage trading loans and ABS

5,162


-


-


5,162


Total

$

310,076


$

24,551


$

22,258


$

356,885


December 31, 2016

U.S. government and agency securities

$

153,184


$

-


$

70


$

153,254


Corporate securities, trading loans and other

11,086


1,630


127


12,843


Equity securities

24,007


11,175


14,196


49,378


Non-U.S. sovereign debt

84,171


5,987


55


90,213


Mortgage trading loans and ABS

7,788


-


-


7,788


Total

$

280,236


$

18,792


$

14,448


$

313,476


The Corporation is required to post collateral with a market value equal to or in excess of the principal amount borrowed under repurchase agreements. For securities loaned transactions, the Corporation receives collateral in the form of cash, letters of credit or other securities. To help ensure that the market value of the underlying collateral remains sufficient, collateral is generally valued daily, and the Corporation may be required to deposit

additional collateral or may receive or return collateral pledged when appropriate. Repurchase agreements and securities loaned transactions are generally either overnight, continuous (i.e., no stated term) or short-term. The Corporation manages liquidity risks related to these agreements by sourcing funding from a diverse group of counterparties, providing a range of securities collateral and pursuing longer durations, when appropriate.



Bank of America 108


NOTE 10

Commitments and Contingencies

In the normal course of business, the Corporation enters into a number of off-balance sheet commitments. These commitments expose the Corporation to varying degrees of credit and market risk and are subject to the same credit and market risk limitation reviews as those instruments recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. For more information on commitments and contingencies, see Note 12 – Commitments and Contingencies to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Corporation's 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Credit Extension Commitments

The Corporation enters into commitments to extend credit such as loan commitments, standby letters of credit (SBLCs) and commercial letters of credit to meet the financing needs of its customers. The table below includes the notional amount of unfunded legally binding lending commitments net of amounts distributed (e.g., syndicated or participated) to other financial institutions. The distributed amounts were $11.3 billion and $12.1

billion at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 . At September 30, 2017 , the carrying value of these commitments, excluding commitments accounted for under the fair value option, was $780 million , including deferred revenue of $18 million and a reserve for unfunded lending commitments of $762 million . At December 31, 2016 , the comparable amounts were $779 million , $17 million and $762 million , respectively. The carrying value of these commitments is classified in accrued expenses and other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

The table below also includes the notional amount of commitments of $4.9 billion and $7.0 billion at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 that are accounted for under the fair value option. However, the table below excludes cumulative net fair value of $101 million and $173 million on these commitments, which is classified in accrued expenses and other liabilities. For more information regarding the Corporation's loan commitments accounted for under the fair value option, see Note 15 – Fair Value Option .

Credit Extension Commitments

September 30, 2017

(Dollars in millions)

Expire in One
Year or Less

Expire After One
Year Through
Three Years

Expire After Three
Years Through
Five Years

Expire After Five
Years

Total

Notional amount of credit extension commitments






Loan commitments

$

81,579


$

133,609


$

145,154


$

18,639


$

378,981


Home equity lines of credit

7,400


5,531


2,212


30,265


45,408


Standby letters of credit and other  (1)

21,520


10,814


2,760


1,221


36,315


Letters of credit

1,220


102


95


80


1,497


Legally binding commitments

111,719


150,056


150,221


50,205


462,201


Credit card lines  (2)

365,007


-


-


-


365,007


Total credit extension commitments

$

476,726


$

150,056


$

150,221


$

50,205


$

827,208


December 31, 2016

Notional amount of credit extension commitments






Loan commitments

$

82,609


$

133,063


$

152,854


$

22,129


$

390,655


Home equity lines of credit

8,806


10,701


2,644


25,050


47,201


Standby letters of credit and financial guarantees  (1)

19,165


10,754


3,225


1,027


34,171


Letters of credit

1,285


103


114


53


1,555


Legally binding commitments

111,865


154,621


158,837


48,259


473,582


Credit card lines  (2)

377,773


-


-


-


377,773


Total credit extension commitments

$

489,638


$

154,621


$

158,837


$

48,259


$

851,355


(1)

The notional amounts of SBLCs and financial guarantees classified as investment grade and non-investment grade based on the credit quality of the underlying reference name within the instrument were $26.5 billion and $8.2 billion at September 30, 2017 , and $25.5 billion and $8.3 billion at December 31, 2016 . Amounts in the table include consumer SBLCs of $375 million and $376 million at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 .

(2)

Includes business card unused lines of credit.

Legally binding commitments to extend credit generally have specified rates and maturities. Certain of these commitments have adverse change clauses that help to protect the Corporation against deterioration in the borrower's ability to pay.

Other Commitments

At September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , the Corporation had commitments to purchase loans (e.g., residential mortgage and commercial real estate) of $452 million and $767 million , and commitments to purchase commercial loans of $2.0 billion and $636 million , which upon settlement will be included in loans or LHFS.

At September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , the Corporation had commitments to purchase commodities, primarily liquefied natural gas of $1.6 billion and $1.9 billion , which upon

settlement will be included in trading account assets. At September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , the Corporation had commitments to enter into resale and forward-dated resale and securities borrowing agreements of $77.2 billion and $48.9 billion , and commitments to enter into forward-dated repurchase and securities lending agreements of $47.7 billion and $24.4 billion . These commitments expire primarily within the next 12 months.

The Corporation has entered into agreements to purchase retail automotive loans from certain auto loan originators. These agreements provide for stated purchase amounts and contain cancellation provisions that allow the Corporation to terminate its commitment to purchase at any time, with a minimum notification period. At September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , the Corporation's maximum purchase commitment was $345 million


109 Bank of America




and $475 million . In addition, the Corporation has a commitment to originate or purchase auto loans and leases from a strategic partner up to $950 million for the remainder of 2017 , with this commitment expiring on December 31, 2017.

The Corporation is a party to operating leases for certain of its premises and equipment. Commitments under these leases are approximately $576 million , $2.3 billion , $2.1 billion , $1.9 billion and $1.6 billion for the remainder of 2017 and the years through 2021 , respectively, and $5.8 billion in the aggregate for all years thereafter.

Other Guarantees

Bank-owned Life Insurance Book Value Protection

The Corporation sells products that offer book value protection to insurance carriers who offer group life insurance policies to corporations, primarily banks. At September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , the notional amount of these guarantees, which are recorded as derivatives totaled $14.0 billion and $13.9 billion . At both September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , the Corporation's maximum exposure related to these guarantees totaled $3.2 billion , with estimated maturity dates between 2031 and 2039. The net fair value including the fee receivable associated with these guarantees was $2 million and $4 million at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , and reflects the probability of surrender as well as the multiple structural protection features in the contracts.

Merchant Services

In accordance with credit and debit card association rules, the Corporation sponsors merchant processing servicers that process credit and debit card transactions on behalf of various merchants. In connection with these services, a liability may arise in the event of a billing dispute between the merchant and a cardholder that is ultimately resolved in the cardholder's favor. If the merchant defaults on its obligation to reimburse the cardholder, the cardholder, through its issuing bank, generally has until six months after the date of the transaction to present a chargeback to the merchant processor, which is primarily liable for any losses on covered transactions. However, if the merchant processor fails to meet its obligation to reimburse the cardholder for disputed transactions, then the Corporation, as the sponsor, could be held liable for the disputed amount. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 , the sponsored entities processed and settled $200.4 billion and $591.8 billion of transactions and recorded losses of $7 million and $22 million . For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 , the sponsored entities processed and settled $189.9 billion and $527.7 billion of transactions and recorded losses of $9 million and $23 million . A significant portion of this activity was processed by a joint venture in which the Corporation holds a 49 percent ownership, and is recorded in other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet and in All Other . At both September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , the carrying value of the Corporation's investment in the merchant services joint venture was $2.9 billion .

As of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , the maximum potential exposure for sponsored transactions totaled $334.9 billion and $325.7 billion . However, the Corporation believes that the maximum potential exposure is not representative of the actual potential loss exposure and does not expect to make material payments in connection with these guarantees.

Other Guarantees

The Corporation has entered into additional guarantee agreements and commitments, including sold risk participation swaps, liquidity facilities, lease-end obligation agreements, partial credit guarantees on certain leases, real estate joint venture guarantees, divested business commitments and sold put options that require gross settlement. The maximum potential future payment under these agreements was approximately $6.5 billion and $6.7 billion at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 . The estimated maturity dates of these obligations extend up to 2040. The Corporation has made no material payments under these guarantees.

In the normal course of business, the Corporation periodically guarantees the obligations of its affiliates in a variety of transactions including ISDA-related transactions and non-ISDA related transactions such as commodities trading, repurchase agreements, prime brokerage agreements and other transactions.

Payment Protection Insurance Claims Matter

On June 1, 2017, the Corporation sold its non-U.S. consumer credit card business. Included in the calculation of the gain on sale, the Corporation recorded an obligation to indemnify the purchaser for substantially all PPI exposure above reserves assumed by the purchaser.

Litigation and Regulatory Matters

The following supplements the disclosure in Note 12 – Commitments and Contingencies to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Corporation's 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K and in Note 10 – Commitments and Contingencies to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Corporation's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly periods ended June 30, 2017 and March 31, 2017 (the prior commitments and contingencies disclosure).

In the ordinary course of business, the Corporation and its subsidiaries are routinely defendants in or parties to many pending and threatened legal, regulatory and governmental actions and proceedings.

In view of the inherent difficulty of predicting the outcome of such matters, particularly where the claimants seek very large or indeterminate damages or where the matters present novel legal theories or involve a large number of parties, the Corporation generally cannot predict what the eventual outcome of the matters will be, what the timing of the ultimate resolution of these matters will be, or what the expense, eventual loss, fines or penalties related to each matter may be.


Bank of America 110


In accordance with applicable accounting guidance, the Corporation establishes an accrued liability when those matters present loss contingencies that are both probable and estimable. In such cases, there may be an exposure to loss in excess of any amounts accrued. As a matter develops, the Corporation, in conjunction with any outside counsel handling the matter, evaluates on an ongoing basis whether such matter presents a loss contingency that is probable and estimable. Once the loss contingency is deemed to be both probable and estimable, the Corporation will establish an accrued liability and record a corresponding amount of litigation-related expense. The Corporation continues to monitor the matter for further developments that could affect the amount of the accrued liability that has been previously established. Excluding expenses of internal and external legal service providers, litigation-related expense of $140 million and $606 million was recognized for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to $250 million and $908 million for the same periods in 2016.

For a limited number of the matters disclosed in the prior commitments and contingencies disclosure, for which a loss, whether in excess of a related accrued liability or where there is no accrued liability, is reasonably possible in future periods, the Corporation is able to estimate a range of possible loss. In determining whether it is possible to estimate a range of possible loss, the Corporation reviews and evaluates its matters on an ongoing basis, in conjunction with any outside counsel handling the matter, in light of potentially relevant factual and legal developments. In cases in which the Corporation possesses sufficient appropriate information to estimate a range of possible loss, that estimate is aggregated and disclosed below. There may be other previously disclosed matters for which a loss is probable or reasonably possible but such an estimate of the range of possible loss may not be possible. For those matters where an estimate of the range of possible loss is possible, management currently estimates the aggregate range of possible loss is $0 to $1.5 billion in excess of the accrued liability (if any) related to those matters. This estimated range of possible loss is based upon currently available information and is subject to significant judgment and a variety of assumptions, and known and unknown uncertainties. The matters underlying the estimated range will change from time to time, and actual results may vary significantly from the current estimate. Therefore, this estimated range of possible loss represents what the Corporation believes to be an estimate of possible loss only for certain matters meeting these criteria. It does not represent the Corporation's maximum loss exposure. Information has been provided in the prior commitments and contingencies disclosure regarding the nature of all of these contingencies and, where specified, the amount of the claim associated with these loss contingencies. Based on current knowledge, management does not believe that loss contingencies arising from pending matters, including the matters described in the prior commitments and contingencies disclosure, will have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position or liquidity of the Corporation. However, in light of the inherent uncertainties involved in these matters, some of which are beyond the Corporation's control, and the very large or indeterminate damages sought in some of these matters, an adverse outcome in one or more of these matters could be material to the Corporation's results of operations or liquidity for any particular reporting period.


NOTE 11

Shareholders' Equity

Common Stock

Declared Quarterly Cash Dividends on Common Stock (1)

Declaration Date

Record Date

Payment Date

Dividend Per Share

October 25, 2017

December 1, 2017

December 29, 2017

$

0.12


July 26, 2017

September 1, 2017

September 29, 2017

0.12


April 26, 2017

June 2, 2017

June 30, 2017

0.075


January 26, 2017

March 3, 2017

March 31, 2017

0.075


(1)

In 2017 and through October 30, 2017 .

During the three months ended September 30, 2017 , the Corporation repurchased and retired 124 million shares of common stock in connection with the 2017 Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review capital plan, which reduced shareholders' equity by $3.0 billion . This includes shares repurchased to offset the dilution resulting from certain equity-based compensation awards.

The Corporation has warrants outstanding and exercisable to purchase 122 million shares of its common stock expiring on October 28, 2018, and warrants outstanding and exercisable to purchase 150 million shares of common stock expiring on January 16, 2019. These warrants were originally issued in connection with preferred stock issuances to the U.S. Department of the Treasury in 2009 and 2008, and are listed on the New York Stock Exchange. The exercise price of the warrants expiring on January 16, 2019 is subject to continued adjustment each time the quarterly cash dividend is in excess of $0.01 per common share to compensate the holders of the warrants for dilution resulting from an increased dividend. As a result of the Corporation's third-quarter 2017 dividend of $0.12 per common share, the exercise price of the warrants expiring on January 16, 2019 was adjusted to $12.807 per share. The warrants expiring on October 28, 2018, which have an exercise price of $30.79 per share, also contain this anti-dilution provision except the adjustment is triggered only when the Corporation declares quarterly dividends at a level greater than $0.32 per common share.

On August 24, 2017, the holders of the Corporation's Series T 6% Non-cumulative preferred stock (Series T) exercised warrants to acquire 700 million shares of the Corporation's common stock. The carrying amount of the preferred stock was $2.9 billion and, upon conversion, was recorded as additional paid-in capital. For additional information, see Note 13 - Earnings Per Common Share. During the nine months ended September 30, 2017 , in connection with employee stock plans, the Corporation issued approximately 66 million shares and repurchased approximately 27 million shares of its common stock to satisfy tax withholding obligations. At September 30, 2017 , the Corporation had reserved 873 million unissued shares of common stock for future issuances under employee stock plans, common stock warrants, convertible notes and preferred stock.

Preferred Stock

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 , the Corporation recognized cash dividends of $465 million and $1.3 billion . There were no issuances of preferred stock during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 .



111 Bank of America




NOTE 12

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

The table below presents the changes in accumulated OCI after-tax for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 .

(Dollars in millions)

Debt

Securities

Available-for-
Sale Marketable

Equity Securities

Debit Valuation Adjustments

Derivatives

Employee

Benefit Plans

Foreign

Currency (1)

Total

Balance, December 31, 2015

$

16


$

62


$

(611

)

$

(1,077

)

$

(2,956

)

$

(792

)

$

(5,358

)

Net change

3,362


(43

)

49


277


29


(17

)

3,657


Balance, September 30, 2016

$

3,378


$

19


$

(562

)

$

(800

)

$

(2,927

)

$

(809

)

$

(1,701

)

Balance, December 31, 2016

$

(1,299

)

$

32


$

(767

)

$

(895

)

$

(3,480

)

$

(879

)

$

(7,288

)

Net change

945


(14

)

(149

)

156


80


102


1,120


Balance, September 30, 2017

$

(354

)

$

18


$

(916

)

$

(739

)

$

(3,400

)

$

(777

)

$

(6,168

)

The table below presents the net change in fair value recorded in accumulated OCI, net realized gains and losses reclassified into earnings and other changes for each component of OCI before- and after-tax for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 .

Changes in OCI Components Before- and After-tax

Nine Months Ended September 30

2017

2016

(Dollars in millions)

Before-tax

Tax effect

After-tax

Before-tax

Tax effect

After-tax

Debt securities:

Net increase in fair value

$

1,757


$

(657

)

$

1,100


$

5,896


$

(2,239

)

$

3,657


Reclassifications into earnings:

Gains on sales of debt securities

(278

)

106


(172

)

(490

)

186


(304

)

Other income

33


(16

)

17


14


(5

)

9


Net realized gains reclassified into earnings

(245

)

90


(155

)

(476

)

181


(295

)

Net change

1,512


(567

)

945


5,420


(2,058

)

3,362


Available-for-sale marketable equity securities:

Net increase (decrease) in fair value

45


(17

)

28


(70

)

27


(43

)

Net realized gains reclassified into earnings (2)

(67

)

25


(42

)

-


-


-


Net change

(22

)

8


(14

)

(70

)

27


(43

)

Debit valuation adjustments:

Net increase (decrease) in fair value

(255

)

96


(159

)

61


(23

)

38


Net realized losses reclassified into earnings (2)

30


(20

)

10


18


(7

)

11


Net change

(225

)

76


(149

)

79


(30

)

49


Derivatives:

Net increase (decrease) in fair value

79


(30

)

49


(64

)

23


(41

)

Reclassifications into earnings:

Net interest income

274


(103

)

171


447


(167

)

280


Personnel

(103

)

39


(64

)

61


(23

)

38


Net realized losses reclassified into earnings

171


(64

)

107


508


(190

)

318


Net change

250


(94

)

156


444


(167

)

277


Employee benefit plans:

Reclassifications into earnings:

Prior service cost

3


(1

)

2


3


(1

)

2


Net actuarial losses

125


(47

)

78


61


(24

)

37


Net realized losses reclassified into earnings  (3)

128


(48

)

80


64


(25

)

39


Settlements, curtailments and other

-


-


-


-


(10

)

(10

)

Net change

128


(48

)

80


64


(35

)

29


Foreign currency:

Net increase (decrease) in fair value

(454

)

462


8


123


(140

)

(17

)

Net gains reclassified into earnings (1,2)

(608

)

702


94


-


-


-


Net change

(1,062

)

1,164


102


123


(140

)

(17

)

Total other comprehensive income (loss)

$

581


$

539


$

1,120


$

6,060


$

(2,403

)

$

3,657


(1)

The nine months ended September 30, 2017 included a pre-tax gain on derivatives and related income tax expense associated with the Corporation's net investment in its non-U.S. consumer credit card business, which was sold during the second quarter of 2017. The derivative gain was partially offset by a loss on the related foreign currency translation adjustment.

(2)

Reclassifications of pre-tax AFS marketable equity securities, DVA and foreign currency are recorded in other income in the Consolidated Statement of Income.

(3)

Reclassifications of pre-tax employee benefit plan costs are recorded in personnel expense in the Consolidated Statement of Income.



Bank of America 112


NOTE 13

Earnings Per Common Share

The calculation of earnings per common share (EPS) and diluted EPS for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 is presented below. For more information on the calculation of EPS, see Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Principles to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Corporation's 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K .

Three Months Ended September 30

Nine Months Ended September 30

(Dollars in millions, except per share information; shares in thousands)

2017

2016

2017

2016

Earnings per common share




Net income

$

5,587


$

4,955


$

15,712


$

13,210


Preferred stock dividends

(465

)

(503

)

(1,328

)

(1,321

)

Net income applicable to common shareholders

$

5,122


$

4,452


$

14,384


$

11,889


Average common shares issued and outstanding

10,197,891


10,250,124


10,103,386


10,312,878


Earnings per common share

$

0.50


$

0.43


$

1.42


$

1.15


Diluted earnings per common share





Net income applicable to common shareholders

$

5,122


$

4,452


$

14,384


$

11,889


Add preferred stock dividends due to assumed conversions (1)

36


75


186


225


Net income allocated to common shareholders

$

5,158


$

4,527


$

14,570


$

12,114


Average common shares issued and outstanding

10,197,891


10,250,124


10,103,386


10,312,878


Dilutive potential common shares (2)

527,591


750,349


717,039


733,929


Total diluted average common shares issued and outstanding

10,725,482


11,000,473


10,820,425


11,046,807


Diluted earnings per common share

$

0.48


$

0.41


$

1.35


$

1.10


(1)

Represents the Series T dividends under the "if-converted" method prior to conversion.

(2)

Includes incremental dilutive shares from restricted stock units, restricted stock and warrants.

In connection with an investment in the Corporation's Series T preferred stock in 2011, the Series T holders also received warrants to purchase 700 million shares of the Corporation's common stock at an exercise price of $7.142857 per share. On August 24, 2017, the Series T holders exercised the warrants and acquired the 700 million shares of the Corporation's common stock using the Series T preferred stock as consideration for the exercise price, which increased common shares outstanding, but had no effect on diluted earnings per share as this conversion had been included in the Corporation's diluted earnings per share calculation under the applicable accounting guidance. The use of the Series T preferred stock as consideration represents a non-cash financing activity and, accordingly, is not reflected in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 , the 700 million average dilutive potential common shares were included in the diluted share count under the "if-converted" method.

For both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 , 62 million average dilutive potential common shares associated with the Series L preferred stock were not included in the diluted share count because the result would have been antidilutive under the "if-converted" method. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 , average options to purchase 18 million and 22 million shares of common stock were outstanding but not included in the computation of EPS because the result would have been antidilutive under the treasury stock method compared to 42 million and 46 million for the same periods in 2016 . For both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 , average warrants to purchase 122 million shares of common stock were outstanding but not included in the

computation of EPS because the result would have been antidilutive under the treasury stock method, and average warrants to purchase 150 million shares of common stock were included in the diluted EPS calculation under the treasury stock method.

NOTE 14

Fair Value Measurements

Under applicable accounting standards, fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. The Corporation determines the fair values of its financial instruments under applicable accounting standards and conducts a review of its fair value hierarchy classifications on a quarterly basis. Transfers into or out of fair value hierarchy classifications are considered to be effective as of the beginning of the quarter in which they occur. During the nine months ended September 30, 2017 , there were no changes to valuation approaches or techniques that had, or are expected to have, a material impact on the Corporation's consolidated financial position or results of operations.

For more information regarding the fair value hierarchy and how the Corporation measures fair value and valuation processes and techniques, see Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Principles and Note 20 – Fair Value Measurements to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Corporation's 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K . The Corporation accounts for certain financial instruments under the fair value option. For additional information, see Note 15 – Fair Value Option .



113 Bank of America




Recurring Fair Value

Assets and liabilities carried at fair value on a recurring basis at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , including financial instruments which the Corporation accounts for under the fair value option, are summarized in the following tables.

September 30, 2017

Fair Value Measurements

(Dollars in millions)

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Netting Adjustments (1)

Assets/Liabilities at Fair Value

Assets






Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell

$

-


$

56,780


$

-


$

-


$

56,780


Trading account assets:






U.S. Treasury and agency securities (2)

32,688


589


-


-


33,277


Corporate securities, trading loans and other

535


27,760


1,742


-


30,037


Equity securities

58,886


29,149


244


-


88,279


Non-U.S. sovereign debt

16,623


14,346


552


-


31,521


Mortgage trading loans, MBS and ABS:

U.S. government-sponsored agency guaranteed (2)

-


18,973


-


-


18,973


Mortgage trading loans, ABS and other MBS

-


6,980


1,252


-


8,232


Total trading account assets (3)

108,732


97,797


3,790


-


210,319


Derivative assets  (4, 5)

6,756


360,066


3,878


(332,316

)

38,384


AFS debt securities:






U.S. Treasury and agency securities

48,591


1,677


-


-


50,268


Mortgage-backed securities:






Agency

-


196,194


-


-


196,194


Agency-collateralized mortgage obligations

-


7,049


-


-


7,049


Non-agency residential

-


2,657


-


-


2,657


Commercial

-


12,464


-


-


12,464


Non-U.S. securities

774


4,630


36


-


5,440


Other taxable securities

-


6,555


483


-


7,038


Tax-exempt securities

-


18,725


467


-


19,192


Total AFS debt securities

49,365


249,951


986


-


300,302


Other debt securities carried at fair value:

Mortgage-backed securities:

Agency-collateralized mortgage obligations

-


5


-


-


5


Non-agency residential

-


3,036


22


-


3,058


Non-U.S. securities

11,911


1,349


-


-


13,260


Other taxable securities

-


239


-


-


239


Total other debt securities carried at fair value

11,911


4,629


22


-


16,562


Loans and leases

-


5,667


618


-


6,285


Mortgage servicing rights (6)

-


-


2,407


-


2,407


Loans held-for-sale

-


2,353


775


-


3,128


Customer and other receivables

-


230


-


-


230


Other assets

17,991


1,083


267


-


19,341


Total assets

$

194,755


$

778,556


$

12,743


$

(332,316

)

$

653,738


Liabilities






Interest-bearing deposits in U.S. offices

$

-


$

468


$

-


$

-


$

468


Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase

-


38,852


-


-


38,852


Trading account liabilities:





U.S. Treasury and agency securities

20,390


366


-


-


20,756


Equity securities

31,647


4,018


-


-


35,665


Non-U.S. sovereign debt

16,606


4,118


-


-


20,724


Corporate securities and other

211


9,053


25


-


9,289


Total trading account liabilities

68,854


17,555


25


-


86,434


Derivative liabilities  (4, 5)

6,589


349,863


5,901


(330,572

)

31,781


Short-term borrowings

-


1,904


-


-


1,904


Accrued expenses and other liabilities

21,121


1,239


9


-


22,369


Long-term debt

-


28,007


1,890


-


29,897


Total liabilities

$

96,564


$

437,888


$

7,825


$

(330,572

)

$

211,705


(1)

Amounts represent the impact of legally enforceable master netting agreements and also cash collateral held or placed with the same counterparties.

(2)

Includes $19.5 billion of GSE obligations.

(3)

Includes securities with a fair value of $15.3 billion that were segregated in compliance with securities regulations or deposited with clearing organizations. This amount is included in the parenthetical disclosure on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

(4)

During the nine months ended September 30, 2017 , $3.0 billion of derivative assets and $2.4 billion of derivative liabilities were transferred from Level 1 to Level 2 and $543 million of derivative assets and $496 million of derivative liabilities were transferred from Level 2 to Level 1 based on the inputs used to measure fair value. For further disaggregation of derivative assets and liabilities, see Note 2 – Derivatives .

(5)

Derivative assets and liabilities reflect the effects of contractual amendments by two central clearing counterparties to legally re-characterize daily cash variation margin from collateral, which secures an outstanding exposure, to settlement, which discharges an outstanding exposure. One of these central clearing counterparties amended its governing documents, which became effective in January 2017. In addition, the Corporation elected to transfer its existing positions to the settlement platform for the other central clearing counterparty in September 2017.

(6)

MSRs include the $1.7 billion core MSR portfolio held in Consumer Banking , the $162 million non-core MSR portfolio held in All Other and the $518 million non-U.S. MSR portfolio held in Global Markets.


Bank of America 114


December 31, 2016

Fair Value Measurements

(Dollars in millions)

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Netting Adjustments (1)

Assets/Liabilities at Fair Value

Assets






Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell

$

-


$

49,750


$

-


$

-


$

49,750


Trading account assets:






U.S. Treasury and agency securities (2)

34,587


1,927


-


-


36,514


Corporate securities, trading loans and other

171


22,861


2,777


-


25,809


Equity securities

50,169


21,601


281


-


72,051


Non-U.S. sovereign debt

9,578


9,940


510


-


20,028


Mortgage trading loans, MBS and ABS:

U.S. government-sponsored agency guaranteed (2)

-


15,799


-


-


15,799


Mortgage trading loans, ABS and other MBS

-


8,797


1,211


-


10,008


Total trading account assets (3)

94,505


80,925


4,779


-


180,209


Derivative assets (4)

7,337


619,848


3,931


(588,604

)

42,512


AFS debt securities:






U.S. Treasury and agency securities

46,787


1,465


-


-


48,252


Mortgage-backed securities:






Agency

-


189,486


-


-


189,486


Agency-collateralized mortgage obligations

-


8,330


-


-


8,330


Non-agency residential

-


2,013


-


-


2,013


Commercial

-


12,322


-


-


12,322


Non-U.S. securities

1,934


3,600


229


-


5,763


Other taxable securities

-


10,020


594


-


10,614


Tax-exempt securities

-


16,618


542


-


17,160


Total AFS debt securities

48,721


243,854


1,365


-


293,940


Other debt securities carried at fair value:

Mortgage-backed securities:

Agency-collateralized mortgage obligations

-


5


-


-


5


Non-agency residential

-


3,114


25


-


3,139


Non-U.S. securities

15,109


1,227


-


-


16,336


Other taxable securities

-


240


-


-


240


Total other debt securities carried at fair value

15,109


4,586


25


-


19,720


Loans and leases

-


6,365


720


-


7,085


Mortgage servicing rights (5)

-


-


2,747


-


2,747


Loans held-for-sale

-


3,370


656


-


4,026


Debt securities in assets of business held for sale

619


-


-


-


619


Other assets

11,824


1,739


239


-


13,802


Total assets

$

178,115


$

1,010,437


$

14,462


$

(588,604

)

$

614,410


Liabilities






Interest-bearing deposits in U.S. offices

$

-


$

731


$

-


$

-


$

731


Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase

-


35,407


359


-


35,766


Trading account liabilities:





U.S. Treasury and agency securities

15,854


197


-


-


16,051


Equity securities

25,884


3,014


-


-


28,898


Non-U.S. sovereign debt

9,409


2,103


-


-


11,512


Corporate securities and other

163


6,380


27


-


6,570


Total trading account liabilities

51,310


11,694


27


-


63,031


Derivative liabilities (4)

7,173


615,896


5,244


(588,833

)

39,480


Short-term borrowings

-


2,024


-


-


2,024


Accrued expenses and other liabilities

12,978


1,643


9


-


14,630


Long-term debt

-


28,523


1,514


-


30,037


Total liabilities

$

71,461


$

695,918


$

7,153


$

(588,833

)

$

185,699


(1)

Amounts represent the impact of legally enforceable master netting agreements and also cash collateral held or placed with the same counterparties.

(2)

Includes $17.5 billion of GSE obligations.

(3)

Includes securities with a fair value of $14.6 billion that were segregated in compliance with securities regulations or deposited with clearing organizations. This amount is included in the parenthetical disclosure on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

(4)

During 2016 , $2.3 billion of derivative assets and $2.4 billion of derivative liabilities were transferred from Level 1 to Level 2 and $2.0 billion of derivative assets and $1.8 billion of derivative liabilities were transferred from Level 2 to Level 1 based on the inputs used to measure fair value. For further disaggregation of derivative assets and liabilities, see Note 2 – Derivatives .

(5)

MSRs include the $2.1 billion core MSR portfolio held in Consumer Banking , the $212 million non-core MSR portfolio held in All Other and the $469 million non-U.S. MSR portfolio held in Global Markets.



115 Bank of America




The following tables present a reconciliation of all assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 , including net realized and unrealized gains (losses) included in earnings and accumulated OCI.

Level 3 – Fair Value Measurements (1)

Three Months Ended September 30, 2017

Gross

(Dollars in millions)

Balance

July 1

2017

Total Realized/Unrealized Gains/(Losses) (2)

Gains
(Losses)
in OCI
(3)

Purchases

Sales

Issuances

Settlements

Gross
Transfers
into

Level 3 

Gross
Transfers
out of

Level 3 

Balance
September 30
2017

Change in Unrealized Gains/(Losses) Related to Financial Instruments Still Held (2)

Trading account assets:








Corporate securities, trading loans and other

$

1,777


$

77


$

-


$

35


$

(79

)

$

5


$

(208

)

$

288


$

(153

)

$

1,742


$

35


Equity securities

229


8


-


3


(3

)

-


-


17


(10

)

244


10


Non-U.S. sovereign debt

506


33


18


-


-


-


(5

)

-


-


552


33


Mortgage trading loans, ABS and other MBS

1,232


10


(1

)

150


(157

)

-


(46

)

83


(19

)

1,252


(2

)

Total trading account assets

3,744


128


17


188


(239

)

5


(259

)

388


(182

)

3,790


76


Net derivative assets  (4)

(1,803

)

(252

)

-


150


(367

)

-


278


7


(36

)

(2,023

)

(283

)

AFS debt securities:











Non-U.S. securities

139


1


4


7


-


-


(115

)

-


-


36


-


Other taxable securities

483


-


1


-


-


-


(1

)

-


-


483


-


Tax-exempt securities

518


-


1


-


-


-


(7

)

-


(45

)

467


-


Total AFS debt securities

1,140


1


6


7


-


-


(123

)

-


(45

)

986


-


Other debt securities carried at fair value – Non-agency residential MBS

23


-


-


-


-


-


(1

)

-


-


22


-


Loans and leases  (5, 6)

667


2


-


2


(24

)

-


(29

)

-


-


618


2


Mortgage servicing rights (6, 7)

2,501


54


-


-


(28

)

69


(189

)

-


-


2,407


(20

)

Loans held-for-sale  (5)

766


38


10


-


(4

)

-


(93

)

58


-


775


27


Other assets

294


70


(43

)

-


(52

)

-


(2

)

-


-


267


28


Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase (5)

(135

)

-


-


-


-


-


135


-


-


-


-


Trading account liabilities – Corporate securities and other

(22

)

1


-


-


(3

)

(1

)

-


-


-


(25

)

-


Accrued expenses and other liabilities (5)

(9

)

-


-


-


-


-


-


-


-


(9

)

-


Long-term debt  (5)

(1,646

)

(87

)

(7

)

63


-


(129

)

115


(244

)

45


(1,890

)

(87

)

(1)

Assets (liabilities). For assets, increase (decrease) to Level 3 and for liabilities, (increase) decrease to Level 3.

(2)

Includes gains/losses reported in earnings in the following income statement line items: Trading account assets/liabilities - primarily trading account profits (losses); Net derivative assets - primarily trading account profits (losses) and mortgage banking income (loss); MSRs - primarily mortgage banking income (loss); Long-term debt - trading account profits (losses). For MSRs, the amounts reflect the changes in modeled MSR fair value due to observed changes in interest rates, volatility, spreads and the shape of the forward swap curve, and periodic adjustments to the valuation model to reflect changes in the modeled relationships between inputs and projected cash flows, as well as changes in cash flow assumptions including cost to service.  

(3)

Includes gains/losses in OCI related to unrealized gains/losses on AFS securities, foreign currency translation adjustments and the impact of changes in the Corporation's credit spreads on long-term debt accounted for under the fair value option. For additional information, see Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Principles to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Corporation's 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

(4)

Net derivatives include derivative assets of $3.9 billion and derivative liabilities of $5.9 billion .

(5)

Amounts represent instruments that are accounted for under the fair value option.

(6)

Issuances represent loan originations and MSRs recognized following securitizations or whole-loan sales.

(7)

Settlements represent the net change in fair value of the MSR asset due to the recognition of modeled cash flows and the passage of time.

Significant transfers into Level 3, primarily due to decreased price observability, during the three months ended September 30, 2017 included $388 million of trading account assets and $244 million of long-term debt. Transfers occur on a regular basis for long-term debt instruments due to changes in the impact of

unobservable inputs on the value of the embedded derivative in relation to the instrument as a whole.

Significant transfers out of Level 3, primarily due to increased price observability, during the three months ended September 30, 2017 included $182 million of trading account assets.


Bank of America 116


Level 3 – Fair Value Measurements (1)

Three Months Ended September 30, 2016

Gross

(Dollars in millions)

Balance
July 1

2016

Total Realized/Unrealized Gains/(Losses) (2)

Gains
(Losses)
in OCI (3)

Purchases

Sales

Issuances

Settlements

Gross
Transfers
into

Level 3 

Gross
Transfers
out of

Level 3 

Balance
September 30

2016

Change in Unrealized Gains/(Losses) Related to Financial Instruments Still Held (2)

Trading account assets:







Corporate securities, trading loans and other

$

2,654


$

57


$

-


$

226


$

(245

)

$

-


$

(134

)

$

202


$

(198

)

$

2,562


$

20


Equity securities

455


11


-


10


(98

)

-


-


27


(39

)

366


5


Non-U.S. sovereign debt

630


20


(7

)

-


-


-


(4

)

-


-


639


19


Mortgage trading loans, ABS and other MBS

1,286


102


-


331


(441

)

-


(103

)

15


(24

)

1,166


62


Total trading account assets

5,025


190


(7

)

567


(784

)

-


(241

)

244


(261

)

4,733


106


Net derivative assets (4)

(648

)

(131

)

-


114


(346

)

-


118


(53

)

(41

)

(987

)

(198

)

AFS debt securities:








Non-agency residential MBS

134


-


-


189


-


-


(102

)

6


-


227


-


Other taxable securities

717


1


(1

)

-


-


-


(30

)

-


-


687


-


Tax-exempt securities

559


-


2


-


-


-


-


10


-


571


-


Total AFS debt securities

1,410


1


1


189


-


-


(132

)

16


-


1,485


-


Other debt securities carried at fair value – Non-agency residential MBS

28


(2

)

-


-


-


-


-


-


-


26


-


Loans and leases (5, 6)

1,459


(9

)

-


-


-


-


(54

)

-


(41

)

1,355


(8

)

Mortgage servicing rights (6, 7)

2,269


313


-


-


-


101


(206

)

-


-


2,477


262


Loans held-for-sale (5)

690


13


(4

)

-


(56

)

-


(25

)

4


(35

)

587


10


Other assets

348


11


-


4


-


-


-


-


-


363


17


Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase (5)

(313

)

(17

)

-


-


-


-


10


(19

)

1


(338

)

(17

)

Trading account liabilities – Corporate securities and other

(26

)

2


-


-


(2

)

-


-


-


-


(26

)

1


Accrued expenses and other liabilities (5)

(9

)

-


-


-


-


-


-


-


-


(9

)

-


Long-term debt (5)

(2,156

)

(22

)

(23

)

15


-


(3

)

363


(206

)

98


(1,934

)

(24

)

(1)

Assets (liabilities). For assets, increase (decrease) to Level 3 and for liabilities, (increase) decrease to Level 3.

(2)

Includes gains/losses reported in earnings in the following income statement line items: Trading account assets/liabilities - trading account profits (losses); Net derivative assets - primarily trading account profits (losses) and mortgage banking income (loss); MSRs - primarily mortgage banking income (loss); Long-term debt - trading account profits (losses). For MSRs, the amounts reflect the changes in modeled MSR fair value due principally to observed changes in interest rates, volatility, spreads and the shape of the forward swap curve.

(3)

Includes gains/losses in OCI related to unrealized gains/losses on AFS securities, foreign currency translation adjustments and the impact of changes in the Corporation's credit spreads on long-term debt accounted for under the fair value option.  For additional information, see Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Principles to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Corporation's 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K. 

(4)

Net derivatives include derivative assets of $4.9 billion and derivative liabilities of $5.9 billion .

(5)

Amounts represent instruments that are accounted for under the fair value option.

(6)

Issuances represent loan originations and MSRs recognized following securitizations or whole-loan sales.

(7)

Settlements represent the net change in fair value of the MSR asset due to the recognition of modeled cash flows and the passage of time.

Significant transfers into Level 3, primarily due to decreased price observability, during the three months ended September 30, 2016 included $244 million of trading account assets and $206 million of long-term debt. Transfers occur on a regular basis for long-term debt instruments due to changes in the impact of

unobservable inputs on the value of the embedded derivative in relation to the instrument as a whole.

Significant transfers out of Level 3, primarily due to increased price observability, during the three months ended September 30, 2016 included $261 million of trading account assets.


117 Bank of America




Level 3 – Fair Value Measurements (1)

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017

Gross

(Dollars in millions)

Balance

January 1

2017

Total Realized/Unrealized Gains/(Losses) (2)

Gains
(Losses)
in OCI
(3)

Purchases

Sales

Issuances

Settlements

Gross
Transfers
into

Level 3 

Gross
Transfers
out of

Level 3 

Balance
September 30
2017

Change in Unrealized Gains/(Losses) Related to Financial Instruments Still Held (2)

Trading account assets:








Corporate securities, trading loans and other

$

2,777


$

225


$

-


$

353


$

(679

)

$

5


$

(443

)

$

506


$

(1,002

)

$

1,742


$

72


Equity securities

281


23


-


45


(67

)

-


(10

)

119


(147

)

244


11


Non-U.S. sovereign debt

510


64


12


26


(59

)

-


(73

)

72


-


552


60


Mortgage trading loans, ABS and other MBS

1,211


195


(2

)

747


(846

)

-


(169

)

187


(71

)

1,252


107


Total trading account assets

4,779


507


10


1,171


(1,651

)

5


(695

)

884


(1,220

)

3,790


250


Net derivative assets  (4)

(1,313

)

(1,098

)

-


558


(843

)

-


722


36


(85

)

(2,023

)

(561

)

AFS debt securities:











Non-U.S. securities

229


2


16


49


-


-


(260

)

-


-


36


-


Other taxable securities

594


3


6


5


-


-


(31

)

-


(94

)

483


-


Tax-exempt securities

542


-


1


-


(56

)

-


(10

)

35


(45

)

467


-


Total AFS debt securities

1,365


5


23


54


(56

)

-


(301

)

35


(139

)

986


-


Other debt securities carried at fair value – Non-agency residential MBS

25


(1

)

-


-


-


-


(2

)

-


-


22


-


Loans and leases  (5, 6)

720


20


-


2


(24

)

-


(93

)

-


(7

)

618


18


Mortgage servicing rights (6, 7)

2,747


40


-


-


(22

)

207


(565

)

-


-


2,407


(202

)

Loans held-for-sale  (5)

656


109


7


2


(159

)

-


(281

)

473


(32

)

775


60


Other assets

239


53


(31

)

2


(52

)

-


(8

)

64


-


267


21


Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase (5)

(359

)

(5

)

-


-


-


(12

)

171


(58

)

263


-


(5

)

Trading account liabilities – Corporate securities and other

(27

)

13


-


4


(13

)

(2

)

-


-


-


(25

)

(1

)

Accrued expenses and other liabilities (5)

(9

)

-


-


-


-


-


-


-


-


(9

)

-


Long-term debt  (5)

(1,514

)

(160

)

(18

)

81


-


(279

)

398


(530

)

132


(1,890

)

(158

)

(1)

Assets (liabilities). For assets, increase (decrease) to Level 3 and for liabilities, (increase) decrease to Level 3.

(2)

Includes gains/losses reported in earnings in the following income statement line items: Trading account assets/liabilities - primarily trading account profits (losses); Net derivative assets - primarily trading account profits (losses) and mortgage banking income (loss); MSRs - primarily mortgage banking income (loss); Long-term debt - trading account profits (losses). For MSRs, the amounts reflect the changes in modeled MSR fair value due to observed changes in interest rates, volatility, spreads and the shape of the forward swap curve, and periodic adjustments to the valuation model to reflect changes in the modeled relationships between inputs and projected cash flows, as well as changes in cash flow assumptions including cost to service.  

(3)

Includes gains/losses in OCI related to unrealized gains/losses on AFS securities, foreign currency translation adjustments and the impact of changes in the Corporation's credit spreads on long-term debt accounted for under the fair value option. For additional information, see Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Principles to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Corporation's 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

(4)

Net derivatives include derivative assets of $3.9 billion and derivative liabilities of $5.9 billion .

(5)

Amounts represent instruments that are accounted for under the fair value option.

(6)

Issuances represent loan originations and MSRs recognized following securitizations or whole-loan sales.

(7)

Settlements represent the net change in fair value of the MSR asset due to the recognition of modeled cash flows and the passage of time.

Significant transfers into Level 3, primarily due to decreased price observability, during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 included $884 million of trading account assets, $473 million of LHFS and $530 million of long-term debt. Transfers occur on a regular basis for long-term debt instruments due to changes in the impact of unobservable inputs on the value of the embedded derivative in relation to the instrument as a whole.

Significant transfers out of Level 3, primarily due to increased price observability, during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 included $1.2 billion of trading account assets, $139 million of AFS debt securities, $263 million of federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase and $132 million of long-term debt.



Bank of America 118


Level 3 – Fair Value Measurements (1)

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016

Gross

(Dollars in millions)

Balance
January 1

2016

Total Realized/Unrealized Gains/(Losses) (2)

Gains
(Losses)
in OCI (3)

Purchases

Sales

Issuances

Settlements

Gross
Transfers
into

Level 3 

Gross
Transfers
out of

Level 3 

Balance
September 30

2016

Change in Unrealized Gains/(Losses) Related to Financial Instruments Still Held (2)

Trading account assets:







Corporate securities, trading loans and other

$

2,838


$

118


$

2


$

925


$

(638

)

$

-


$

(479

)

$

432


$

(636

)

$

2,562


$

11


Equity securities

407


93


-


53


(135

)

-


(72

)

60


(40

)

366


(19

)

Non-U.S. sovereign debt

521


112


91


3


(1

)

-


(87

)

-


-


639


110


Mortgage trading loans, ABS and other MBS

1,868


197


(2

)

681


(1,264

)

-


(270

)

91


(135

)

1,166


110


Total trading account assets

5,634


520


91


1,662


(2,038

)

-


(908

)

583


(811

)

4,733


212


Net derivative assets (4)

(441

)

356


-


313


(965

)

-


7


(177

)

(80

)

(987

)

(108

)

AFS debt securities:








Non-agency residential MBS

106


-


3


385


(92

)

-


(181

)

6


-


227


-


Other taxable securities

757


3


(7

)

-


-


-


(66

)

-


-


687


-


Tax-exempt securities

569


-


(8

)

1


-


-


(1

)

10


-


571


-


Total AFS debt securities

1,432


3


(12

)

386


(92

)

-


(248

)

16


-


1,485


-


Other debt securities carried at fair value – Non-agency residential MBS

30


(4

)

-


-


-


-


-


-


-


26


-


Loans and leases (5, 6)

1,620


(13

)

-


69


-


50


(143

)

6


(234

)

1,355


(3

)

Mortgage servicing rights (6, 7)

3,087


(295

)

-


-


-


307


(622

)

-


-


2,477


(457

)

Loans held-for-sale (5)

787


97


51


20


(236

)

-


(77

)

43


(98

)

587


76


Other assets

374


(27

)

-


38


-


-


(24

)

2


-


363


(15

)

Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase (5)

(335

)

12


-


-


-


(14

)

17


(19

)

1


(338

)

(21

)

Trading account liabilities – Corporate securities and other

(21

)

4


-


1


(10

)

-


-


-


-


(26

)

3


Short-term borrowings (5)

(30

)

1


-


-


-


-


29


-


-


-


-


Accrued expenses and other liabilities (5)

(9

)

-


-


-


-


-


-


-


-


(9

)

-


Long-term debt (5)

(1,513

)

(192

)

(41

)

44


-


(326

)

496


(751

)

349


(1,934

)

(208

)

(1)

Assets (liabilities). For assets, increase (decrease) to Level 3 and for liabilities, (increase) decrease to Level 3.

(2)

Includes gains/losses reported in earnings in the following income statement line items: Trading account assets/liabilities - trading account profits (losses); Net derivative assets - primarily trading account profits (losses) and mortgage banking income (loss); MSRs - primarily mortgage banking income (loss); Long-term debt - primarily trading account profits (losses). For MSRs, the amounts reflect the changes in modeled MSR fair value due principally to observed changes in interest rates, volatility, spreads and the shape of the forward swap curve.  

(3)

Includes gains/losses in OCI related to unrealized gains/losses on AFS securities, foreign currency translation adjustments and the impact of changes in the Corporation's credit spreads on long-term debt accounted for under the fair value option.  For additional information, see Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Principles to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Corporation's 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K. 

(4)

Net derivatives include derivative assets of $4.9 billion and derivative liabilities of $5.9 billion .

(5)

Amounts represent instruments that are accounted for under the fair value option.

(6)

Issuances represent loan originations and MSRs recognized following securitizations or whole-loan sales.

(7)

Settlements represent the net change in fair value of the MSR asset due to the recognition of modeled cash flows and the passage of time.

Significant transfers into Level 3, primarily due to decreased price observability, during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 included $583 million of trading account assets, $177 million of net derivative assets and $751 million of long-term debt. Transfers occur on a regular basis for long-term debt instruments due to changes in the impact of unobservable inputs on the value of the embedded derivative in relation to the instrument as a whole.

Significant transfers out of Level 3, primarily due to increased price observability, during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 included $811 million of trading account assets, $234 million of loans and leases and $349 million of long-term debt.



119 Bank of America




The following tables present information about significant unobservable inputs related to the Corporation's material categories of Level 3 financial assets and liabilities at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 .

Quantitative Information about Level 3 Fair Value Measurements at September 30, 2017

(Dollars in millions)

Inputs

Financial Instrument

Fair

Value

Valuation

Technique

Significant Unobservable

Inputs

Ranges of

Inputs

Weighted Average

Loans and Securities (1)

Instruments backed by residential real estate assets

$

914


Discounted cash flow

Yield

0% to 25%


6

%

Trading account assets – Mortgage trading loans, ABS and other MBS

293


Prepayment speed

0% to 22% CPR


12

%

Loans and leases

617


Default rate

0% to 3% CDR


2

%

Loans held-for-sale

4


Loss severity

0% to 54%


18

%

Instruments backed by commercial real estate assets

$

264


Discounted cash flow

Yield

0% to 25%


6

%

Trading account assets – Corporate securities, trading loans and other

218


Price

$0 to $100


$68

Trading account assets – Mortgage trading loans, ABS and other MBS

46


Commercial loans, debt securities and other

$

3,754


Discounted cash flow, Market comparables

Yield

0% to 12%


4

%

Trading account assets – Corporate securities, trading loans and other

1,498


Prepayment speed

10% to 20%


15

%

Trading account assets – Non-U.S. sovereign debt

552


Default rate

3% to 4%


4

%

Trading account assets – Mortgage trading loans, ABS and other MBS

913


Loss severity

35% to 40%


37

%

AFS debt securities – Other taxable securities

19


Price

$0 to $185


$63

Loans and leases



1


Loans held-for-sale


771


Auction rate securities

$

957


Discounted cash flow, Market comparables

Price

$10 to $100


$94

Trading account assets – Corporate securities, trading loans and other

26


AFS debt securities – Other taxable securities

464


AFS debt securities – Tax-exempt securities

467


MSRs

$

2,407


Discounted cash flow

Weighted-average life, fixed rate (4)

0 to 14 years


5 years


Weighted-average life, variable rate (4)

0 to 10 years


3 years


Option Adjusted Spread, fixed rate

9% to 14%


10

%

Option Adjusted Spread, variable rate

9% to 15%


12

%

Structured liabilities

Long-term debt

$

(1,890

)

Discounted cash flow, Market comparables, Industry standard derivative pricing (2)

Equity correlation

3% to 100%


64

%

Long-dated equity volatilities

4% to 76%


22

%

Yield

7.5

%

n/a


Price

$0 to $100


$65

Net derivative assets

Credit derivatives

$

(325

)

Discounted cash flow, Stochastic recovery correlation model

Yield

1% to 5%


3

%

Upfront points

0 points to 100 points


73 points


Credit correlation

12% to 90%


58

%

Prepayment speed

15% to 20% CPR


16

%

Default rate

1% to 4% CDR


2

%

Loss severity

35

%

n/a


Price

$0 to $102


$76

Equity derivatives

$

(2,235

)

Industry standard derivative pricing (2)

Equity correlation

3% to 100%


64

%

Long-dated equity volatilities

4% to 76%


22

%

Commodity derivatives

$

2


Discounted cash flow, Industry standard derivative pricing (2)

Natural gas forward price

$2/MMBtu to $6/MMBtu


$3/MMBtu


Correlation

68% to 90%


85

%

Volatilities

25% to 90%


49

%

Interest rate derivatives

$

535


Industry standard derivative pricing (3)

Correlation (IR/IR)

15% to 90%


53

%

Correlation (FX/IR)

0% to 46%


1

%

Long-dated inflation rates

-10% to 38%


6

%

Long-dated inflation volatilities

0% to 1%


1

%

Total net derivative assets

$

(2,023

)

(1)

The categories are aggregated based upon product type which differs from financial statement classification. The following is a reconciliation to the line items in the table on page 114 : Trading account assets – Corporate securities, trading loans and other of $1.7 billion , Trading account assets – Non-U.S. sovereign debt of $552 million , Trading account assets – Mortgage trading loans, ABS and other MBS of $1.3 billion , AFS debt securities – Other taxable securities of $483 million , AFS debt securities – Tax-exempt securities of $467 million , Loans and leases of $618 million and LHFS of $775 million .

(2)

Includes models such as Monte Carlo simulation and Black-Scholes.

(3)

Includes models such as Monte Carlo simulation, Black-Scholes and other methods that model the joint dynamics of interest, inflation and foreign exchange rates.

(4)

The weighted-average life is a product of changes in market rates of interest, prepayment rates and other model and cash flow assumptions.

CPR = Constant Prepayment Rate

CDR = Constant Default Rate

MMBtu = Million British thermal units

IR = Interest Rate

FX = Foreign Exchange

n/a = not applicable


Bank of America 120


Quantitative Information about Level 3 Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2016

(Dollars in millions)

Inputs

Financial Instrument

Fair
Value

Valuation
Technique

Significant Unobservable
Inputs

Ranges of
Inputs

Weighted Average

Loans and Securities (1)

Instruments backed by residential real estate assets

$

1,066


Discounted cash flow, Market comparables

Yield

0% to 50%


7

%

Trading account assets – Mortgage trading loans, ABS and other MBS

337


Prepayment speed

0% to 27% CPR


14

%

Loans and leases

718


Default rate

0% to 3% CDR


2

%

Loans held-for-sale

11


Loss severity

0% to 54%


18

%

Instruments backed by commercial real estate assets

$

317


Discounted cash flow, Market comparables

Yield

0% to 39%


11

%

Trading account assets – Corporate securities, trading loans and other

178


Price

$0 to $100


$65

Trading account assets – Mortgage trading loans, ABS and other MBS

53


Loans held-for-sale

86


Commercial loans, debt securities and other

$

4,486


Discounted cash flow, Market comparables

Yield

1% to 37%


14

%

Trading account assets – Corporate securities, trading loans and other

2,565


Prepayment speed

5% to 20%


19

%

Trading account assets – Non-U.S. sovereign debt

510


Default rate

3% to 4%


4

%

Trading account assets – Mortgage trading loans, ABS and other MBS

821


Loss severity

0% to 50%


19

%

AFS debt securities – Other taxable securities

29


Price

$0 to $292


$68

Loans and leases

2


Duration

0 to 5 years


3 years

Loans held-for-sale

559


Enterprise value/EBITDA multiple

34x


n/a

Auction rate securities

$

1,141


Discounted cash flow, Market comparables

Price

$10 to $100


$94

Trading account assets – Corporate securities, trading loans and other

34


AFS debt securities – Other taxable securities

565


AFS debt securities – Tax-exempt securities

542


MSRs

$

2,747


Discounted cash flow

Weighted-average life, fixed rate (4)

0 to 15 years


6 years


Weighted-average life, variable rate (4)

0 to 14 years


4 years


Option Adjusted Spread, fixed rate

9% to 14%


10

%

Option Adjusted Spread, variable rate

9% to 15%


12

%

Structured liabilities

Long-term debt

$

(1,514

)

Discounted cash flow, Market comparables Industry standard derivative pricing (2)

Equity correlation

13% to 100%


68

%

Long-dated equity volatilities

4% to 76%


26

%

Yield

6% to 37%


20

%

Price

$12 to $87


$73

Duration

0 to 5 years


3 years


Net derivative assets

Credit derivatives

$

(129

)

Discounted cash flow, Stochastic recovery correlation model

Yield

0% to 24%


13

%

Upfront points

0 to 100 points


72 points


Credit spreads

17 bps to 814 bps


248 bps


Credit correlation

21% to 80%


44

%

Prepayment speed

10% to 20% CPR


18

%

Default rate

1% to 4% CDR


3

%

Loss severity

35

%

n/a


Equity derivatives

$

(1,690

)

Industry standard derivative pricing (2)

Equity correlation

13% to 100%


68

%

Long-dated equity volatilities

4% to 76%


26

%

Commodity derivatives

$

6


Discounted cash flow, Industry standard derivative pricing (2)

Natural gas forward price

$2/MMBtu to $6/MMBtu


$4/MMBtu


Correlation

66% to 95%


85

%

Volatilities

23% to 96%


36

%

Interest rate derivatives

$

500


Industry standard derivative pricing  (3)

Correlation (IR/IR)

15% to 99%


56

%

Correlation (FX/IR)

0% to 40%


2

%

Illiquid IR and long-dated inflation rates

-12% to 35%


5

%

Long-dated inflation volatilities

0% to 2%


1

%

Total net derivative assets

$

(1,313

)

(1)

The categories are aggregated based upon product type which differs from financial statement classification. The following is a reconciliation to the line items in the table on page 115 : Trading account assets – Corporate securities, trading loans and other of $2.8 billion , Trading account assets – Non-U.S. sovereign debt of $510 million , Trading account assets – Mortgage trading loans, ABS and other MBS of $1.2 billion , AFS debt securities – Other taxable securities of $594 million , AFS debt securities – Tax-exempt securities of $542 million , Loans and leases of $720 million and LHFS of $656 million .

(2)

Includes models such as Monte Carlo simulation and Black-Scholes.

(3)

Includes models such as Monte Carlo simulation, Black-Scholes and other methods that model the joint dynamics of interest, inflation and foreign exchange rates.

(4)

The weighted-average life is a product of changes in market rates of interest, prepayment rates and other model and cash flow assumptions.

CPR = Constant Prepayment Rate

CDR = Constant Default Rate

EBITDA = Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization

MMBtu = Million British thermal units

IR = Interest Rate

FX = Foreign Exchange

n/a = not applicable


121 Bank of America




In the previous tables, instruments backed by residential and commercial real estate assets include RMBS, commercial MBS, whole loans and mortgage CDOs. Commercial loans, debt securities and other include corporate CLOs and CDOs, commercial loans and bonds, and securities backed by non-real estate assets. Structured liabilities primarily include equity-linked notes that are accounted for under the fair value option.

The Corporation uses multiple market approaches in valuing certain of its Level 3 financial instruments. For example, market comparables and discounted cash flows are used together. For a given product, such as corporate debt securities, market comparables may be used to estimate some of the unobservable inputs and then these inputs are incorporated into a discounted cash flow model. Therefore, the balances disclosed encompass both of these techniques.

The level of aggregation and diversity within the products disclosed in the tables results in certain ranges of inputs being wide and unevenly distributed across asset and liability categories.

Sensitivity of Fair Value Measurements to Changes in Unobservable Inputs

Loans and Securities

A significant increase in market yields, default rates, loss severities or duration would result in a significantly lower fair value for long positions. Short positions would be impacted in a directionally opposite way. The impact of changes in prepayment speeds would have differing impacts depending on the seniority of the instrument and, in the case of CLOs, whether prepayments can be reinvested. A significant increase in price would result in a significantly higher fair value for long positions and short positions would be impacted in a directionally opposite way.

Mortgage Servicing Rights

The weighted-average lives and fair value of MSRs are sensitive to changes in modeled assumptions. The weighted-average life is a product of changes in market rates of interest, prepayment rates and other model and cash flow assumptions. The weighted-average life represents the average period of time that the MSRs' cash flows are expected to be received. Absent other changes, an increase (decrease) to the weighted-average life would generally result in an increase (decrease) in the fair value of the MSRs. For example, a 10 percent or 20 percent decrease in prepayment rates, which impact the weighted-average life, could result in an increase in fair value of $88 million or $183 million , while a 10 percent or 20 percent increase in prepayment rates could result in a decrease in fair value of $81 million or $156 million . A 100 bp or 200 bp decrease in option-adjusted spread (OAS) levels could result in an increase in fair value of $74 million or $154 million , while a 100 bp or 200 bp increase in OAS levels could result in a decrease in

fair value of $69 million or $135 million . These sensitivities are hypothetical and actual amounts may vary materially. As the amounts indicate, changes in fair value based on variations in assumptions generally cannot be extrapolated because the relationship of the change in assumption to the change in fair value may not be linear. Also, the effect of a variation in a particular assumption on the fair value of MSRs that continue to be held by the Corporation is calculated without changing any other assumption. In reality, changes in one factor may result in changes in another, which might magnify or counteract the sensitivities. In addition, these sensitivities do not reflect any hedge strategies that may be undertaken to mitigate such risk. The Corporation manages the risk in MSRs with derivatives such as options and interest rate swaps, which are not designated as accounting hedges, as well as securities including MBS and U.S. Treasury securities. The securities used to manage the risk in the MSRs are classified in other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

Structured Liabilities and Derivatives

For credit derivatives, a significant increase in market yield, upfront points (i.e., a single upfront payment made by a protection buyer at inception), credit spreads, default rates or loss severities would result in a significantly lower fair value for protection sellers and higher fair value for protection buyers. The impact of changes in prepayment speeds would have differing impacts depending on the seniority of the instrument.

Structured credit derivatives are impacted by credit correlation. Default correlation is a parameter that describes the degree of dependence among credit default rates within a credit portfolio that underlies a credit derivative instrument. The sensitivity of this input on the fair value varies depending on the level of subordination of the tranche. For senior tranches that are net purchases of protection, a significant increase in default correlation would result in a significantly higher fair value. Net short protection positions would be impacted in a directionally opposite way.

For equity derivatives, commodity derivatives, interest rate derivatives and structured liabilities, a significant change in long-dated rates and volatilities and correlation inputs (i.e., the degree of correlation between an equity security and an index, between two different commodities, between two different interest rates, or between interest rates and foreign exchange rates) would result in a significant impact to the fair value; however, the magnitude and direction of the impact depend on whether the Corporation is long or short the exposure. For structured liabilities, a significant increase in yield or decrease in price would result in a significantly lower fair value. A significant decrease in duration may result in a significantly higher fair value.



Bank of America 122


Nonrecurring Fair Value

The Corporation holds certain assets that are measured at fair value, but only in certain situations (e.g., impairment) and these measurements are referred to herein as nonrecurring. The amounts below represent assets still held as of the reporting date for which a nonrecurring fair value adjustment was recorded during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 .

Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

September 30, 2017

Three Months Ended September 30, 2017

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017

(Dollars in millions)

Level 2

Level 3

Gains (Losses)

Assets



Loans held-for-sale

$

70


$

16


$

-


$

(4

)

Loans and leases (1)

-


813


(152

)

(307

)

Foreclosed properties (2, 3)

-


79


(21

)

(35

)

Other assets

353


-


(1

)

(121

)

September 30, 2016

Three Months Ended September 30, 2016

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016

Assets



Loans held-for-sale

$

191


$

48


$

(1

)

$

(44

)

Loans and leases (1)

-


1,333


(143

)

(399

)

Foreclosed properties (2, 3)

-


113


(23

)

(41

)

Other assets

173


-


(18

)

(44

)

(1)

Includes $71 million and $132 million of losses on loans that were written down to a collateral value of zero during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 , compared to losses of $48 million and $112 million for the same periods in 2016 .

(2)

Amounts are included in other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet and represent the carrying value of foreclosed properties that were written down subsequent to their initial classification as foreclosed properties. Losses on foreclosed properties include losses taken during the first 90 days after transfer of a loan to foreclosed properties.

(3)

Excludes $879 million and $1.3 billion of properties acquired upon foreclosure of certain government-guaranteed loans (principally FHA-insured loans) at September 30, 2017 and 2016 .

The table below presents information about significant unobservable inputs related to the Corporation's nonrecurring Level 3 financial assets and liabilities at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 . Loans and leases backed by residential real estate assets represent residential mortgages where the loan has been written down to the fair value of the underlying collateral.

Quantitative Information about Nonrecurring Level 3 Fair Value Measurements

September 30, 2017

(Dollars in millions)

Inputs

Financial Instrument

Fair Value

Valuation

Technique

Significant Unobservable

Inputs

Ranges of

Inputs

Weighted Average

Loans and leases backed by residential real estate assets

$

813


Market comparables

OREO discount

8% to 54%

21

%

Costs to sell

7% to 45%

9

%

December 31, 2016

Loans and leases backed by residential real estate assets

$

1,416


Market comparables

OREO discount

8% to 56%

21

%

Costs to sell

7% to 45%

9

%

NOTE 15

Fair Value Option

The Corporation elects to account for certain financial instruments under the fair value option. For more information on the primary financial instruments for which the fair value option elections have been made, see Note 21 – Fair Value Option to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Corporation's 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The following tables provide information about the fair value carrying amount and the contractual principal outstanding of assets and liabilities accounted for under the fair value option at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , and information about where changes in the fair value of assets and liabilities accounted for under the fair value option are included in the Consolidated Statement of Income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 .


123 Bank of America




Fair Value Option Elections

September 30, 2017

December 31, 2016

(Dollars in millions)

Fair Value Carrying Amount

Contractual Principal Outstanding

Fair Value Carrying Amount Less Unpaid Principal

Fair Value Carrying Amount

Contractual Principal Outstanding

Fair Value Carrying Amount Less Unpaid Principal

Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell

$

56,780


$

56,720


$

60


$

49,750


$

49,615


$

135


Loans reported as trading account assets (1)

5,734


10,749


(5,015

)

6,215


11,557


(5,342

)

Trading inventory – other

11,096


n/a


n/a


8,206


n/a


n/a


Consumer and commercial loans

6,285


6,332


(47

)

7,085


7,190


(105

)

Loans held-for-sale

3,128


4,751


(1,623

)

4,026


5,595


(1,569

)

Customer receivables and other assets

233


230


3


253


250


3


Long-term deposits

468


433


35


731


672


59


Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase

38,852


38,861


(9

)

35,766


35,929


(163

)

Short-term borrowings

1,904


1,904


-


2,024


2,024


-


Unfunded loan commitments

101


n/a


n/a


173


n/a


n/a


Long-term debt (2)

29,897


30,497


(600

)

30,037


29,862


175


(1)

A significant portion of the loans reported as trading account assets are distressed loans which trade and were purchased at a deep discount to par, and the remainder are loans with a fair value near contractual principal outstanding.

(2)

Includes structured liabilities with a fair value of $29.5 billion and $29.7 billion , and contractual principal outstanding of $30.1 billion and $29.5 billion at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 .

n/a = not applicable

Gains (Losses) Relating to Assets and Liabilities Accounted for Under the Fair Value Option

Three Months Ended September 30, 2017

(Dollars in millions)

Trading

Account

Profits

Mortgage Banking Income

(Loss)

Other

Income

Total

Loans reported as trading account assets

$

75


$

-


$

-


$

75


Trading inventory – other (1)

1,217


-


-


1,217


Loans held-for-sale (2)

-


73


19


92


Unfunded loan commitments

-


-


21


21


Long-term debt (3, 4)

(416

)

-


(38

)

(454

)

Other (5)

3


-


(3

)

-


Total

$

879


$

73


$

(1

)

$

951


Three Months Ended September 30, 2016

Loans reported as trading account assets

$

125


$

-


$

-


$

125


Trading inventory – other (1)

907


-


-


907


Loans held-for-sale (2)

5


132


2


139


Unfunded loan commitments

-


-


133


133


Long-term debt (3, 4)

(138

)

-


(24

)

(162

)

Other (5)

(32

)

-


40


8


Total

$

867


$

132


$

151


$

1,150


Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017

Loans reported as trading account assets

$

272


$

-


$

-


$

272


Trading inventory – other (1)

2,890


-


-


2,890


Loans held-for-sale (2)

-


182


93


275


Unfunded loan commitments

-


-


55


55


Long-term debt (3, 4)

(471

)

-


(109

)

(580

)

Other (5)

(41

)

-


44


3


Total

$

2,650


$

182


$

83


$

2,915


Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016

Loans reported as trading account assets

$

251


$

-


$

-


$

251


Trading inventory – other (1)

551


-


-


551


Loans held-for-sale (2)

10


493


57


560


Unfunded loan commitments

-


-


444


444


Long-term debt (3, 4)

(718

)

-


(77

)

(795

)

Other (5)

(7

)

-


(14

)

(21

)

Total

$

87


$

493


$

410


$

990


(1)

The gains (losses) in trading account profits are primarily offset by gains (losses) on trading liabilities that hedge these assets.

(2)

Includes the value of IRLCs on funded loans, including those sold during the period.

(3)

The majority of the net gains (losses) in trading account profits relate to the embedded derivative in structured liabilities and are offset by gains (losses) on derivatives and securities that hedge these liabilities.

(4)

For the cumulative impact of changes in the Corporation's own credit spreads and the amount recognized in OCI, see Note 12 – Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) . For information on how the Corporation's own credit spread is determined, see Note 20 – Fair Value Measurements to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Corporation's 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

(5)

Includes gains (losses) on federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell, consumer and commercial loans, other assets, short-term borrowings, long-term deposits, and federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase.



Bank of America 124


Gains (Losses) Related to Borrower-specific Credit Risk for Assets Accounted for Under the Fair Value Option

Three Months Ended September 30

Nine Months Ended September 30

(Dollars in millions)

2017

2016

2017

2016

Loans reported as trading account assets

$

5


$

-


$

25


$

5


Consumer and commercial loans

(10

)

14


31


(25

)

Loans held-for-sale

(2

)

(10

)

(3

)

(6

)

NOTE 16

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Financial instruments are classified into three levels based on the established fair value hierarchy. For additional information, see Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Principles to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Corporation's 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The following disclosures include financial instruments that are not carried at fair value or only a portion of the ending balance at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 is carried at fair value on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. For more information on these financial instruments and their valuation methodologies, see Note 20 – Fair Value Measurements and Note 22 – Fair Value of Financial Instruments to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Corporation's 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying values and fair values by fair value hierarchy of certain financial instruments where only a portion of the ending balance was carried at fair value at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 are presented in the following table.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

September 30, 2017

Fair Value

(Dollars in millions)

Carrying Value

Level 2

Level 3

Total

Financial assets

Loans

$

895,155


$

69,711


$

839,931


$

909,642


Loans held-for-sale

13,243


12,261


1,012


13,273


Financial liabilities

Deposits

1,284,417


1,284,397


-


1,284,397


Long-term debt

228,666


234,878


1,890


236,768


December 31, 2016

Financial assets

Loans

$

873,209


$

71,793


$

815,329


$

887,122


Loans held-for-sale

9,066


8,082


984


9,066


Financial liabilities



Deposits

1,260,934


1,261,086


-


1,261,086


Long-term debt

216,823


220,071


1,514


221,585


Commercial Unfunded Lending Commitments

Fair values were generally determined using a discounted cash flow valuation approach which is applied using market-based credit default swaps or internally developed benchmark credit curves. The Corporation accounts for certain loan commitments under the fair value option. The carrying values and fair values of the Corporation's commercial unfunded lending commitments were $863 million and $3.8 billion at September 30, 2017 , and $937 million and $4.9 billion at December 31, 2016 . Commercial unfunded lending commitments are primarily classified as Level 3. The carrying value of these commitments is classified in accrued expenses and other liabilities.

The Corporation does not estimate the fair values of consumer unfunded lending commitments because, in many instances, the Corporation can reduce or cancel these commitments by providing notice to the borrower. For more information on commitments, see Note 10 – Commitments and Contingencies .

NOTE 17

Business Segment Information

The Corporation reports its results of operations through the following four business segments: Consumer Banking , GWIM , Global Banking and Global Markets , with the remaining operations recorded in All Other . For additional information, see Note 24 – Business Segment Information to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Corporation's 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The tables below present net income (loss) and the components thereto (with net interest income on an FTE basis) for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 , and total assets at September 30, 2017 and 2016 for each business segment, as well as All Other, including a reconciliation of the four business segments' total revenue, net of interest expense, on an FTE basis, and net income to the Consolidated Statement of Income, and total assets to the Consolidated Balance Sheet.


125 Bank of America




Results of Business Segments and All Other

At and for the three months ended September 30

Total Corporation  (1)

Consumer Banking

(Dollars in millions)

2017

2016

2017

2016

Net interest income (FTE basis)

$

11,401


$

10,429


$

6,211


$

5,289


Noninterest income

10,678


11,434


2,563


2,679


Total revenue, net of interest expense (FTE basis)

22,079


21,863


8,774


7,968


Provision for credit losses

834


850


967


698


Noninterest expense

13,139


13,481


4,459


4,371


Income before income taxes (FTE basis)

8,106


7,532


3,348


2,899


Income tax expense (FTE basis)

2,519


2,577


1,261


1,086


Net income

$

5,587


$

4,955


$

2,087


$

1,813


Period-end total assets

$

2,283,896


$

2,195,314


$

742,513


$

687,241


Global Wealth &
Investment Management

Global Banking

2017

2016

2017

2016

Net interest income (FTE basis)

$

1,496


$

1,394


$

2,743


$

2,470


Noninterest income

3,124


2,985


2,243


2,276


Total revenue, net of interest expense (FTE basis)

4,620


4,379


4,986


4,746


Provision for credit losses

16


7


48


118


Noninterest expense

3,370


3,255


2,118


2,152


Income before income taxes (FTE basis)

1,234


1,117


2,820


2,476


Income tax expense (FTE basis)

465


419


1,062


925


Net income

$

769


$

698


$

1,758


$

1,551


Period-end total assets

$

276,187


$

289,794


$

423,185


$

397,869


Global Markets

All Other

2017

2016

2017

2016

Net interest income (FTE basis)

$

899


$

1,119


$

52


$

157


Noninterest income

3,001


3,239


(253

)

255


Total revenue, net of interest expense (FTE basis)

3,900


4,358


(201

)

412


Provision for credit losses

(6

)

19


(191

)

8


Noninterest expense

2,710


2,656


482


1,047


Income (loss) before income taxes (FTE basis)

1,196


1,683


(492

)

(643

)

Income tax expense (benefit) (FTE basis)

440


609


(709

)

(462

)

Net income (loss)

$

756


$

1,074


$

217


$

(181

)

Period-end total assets

$

629,270


$

595,165


$

212,741


$

225,245


(1)

There were no material intersegment revenues.


Bank of America 126


Results of Business Segments and All Other

At and for the nine months ended September 30

Total Corporation  (1)

Consumer Banking

(Dollars in millions)

2017

2016

2017

2016

Net interest income (FTE basis)

$

33,879


$

31,470


$

17,953


$

15,825


Noninterest income

33,711


32,907


7,614


7,795


Total revenue, net of interest expense (FTE basis)

67,590


64,377


25,567


23,620


Provision for credit losses

2,395


2,823


2,639


1,955


Noninterest expense

41,713


41,790


13,280


13,324


Income before income taxes (FTE basis)

23,482


19,764


9,648


8,341


Income tax expense (FTE basis)

7,770


6,554


3,638


3,088


Net income

$

15,712


$

13,210


$

6,010


$

5,253


Period-end total assets

$

2,283,896


$

2,195,314


$

742,513


$

687,241


Global Wealth &
Investment Management

Global Banking

2017

2016

2017

2016

Net interest income (FTE basis)

$

4,653


$

4,310


$

8,229


$

7,440


Noninterest income

9,254


8,963


6,751


6,456


Total revenue, net of interest expense (FTE basis)

13,907


13,273


14,980


13,896


Provision for credit losses

50


46


80


870


Noninterest expense

10,091


9,816


6,435


6,450


Income before income taxes (FTE basis)

3,766


3,411


8,465


6,576


Income tax expense (FTE basis)

1,420


1,270


3,192


2,435


Net income

$

2,346


$

2,141


$

5,273


$

4,141


Period-end total assets

$

276,187


$

289,794


$

423,185


$

397,869


Global Markets

All Other

2017

2016

2017

2016

Net interest income (FTE basis)

$

2,812


$

3,391


$

232


$

504


Noninterest income

9,743


9,227


349


466


Total revenue, net of interest expense (FTE basis)

12,555


12,618


581


970


Provision for credit losses

2


23


(376

)

(71

)

Noninterest expense

8,117


7,690


3,790


4,510


Income (loss) before income taxes (FTE basis)

4,436


4,905


(2,833

)

(3,469

)

Income tax expense (benefit) (FTE basis)

1,553


1,746


(2,033

)

(1,985

)

Net income (loss)

$

2,883


$

3,159


$

(800

)

$

(1,484

)

Period-end total assets

$

629,270


$

595,165


$

212,741


$

225,245


Business Segment Reconciliations

Three Months Ended September 30

Nine Months Ended September 30

2017

2016

2017

2016

Segments' total revenue, net of interest expense (FTE basis)

$

22,280


$

21,451


$

67,009


$

63,407


Adjustments (2) :





ALM activities

273


(43

)

332


(12

)

Liquidating businesses and other

(474

)

455


249


982


FTE basis adjustment

(240

)

(228

)

(674

)

(666

)

Consolidated revenue, net of interest expense

$

21,839


$

21,635


$

66,916


$

63,711


Segments' total net income

5,370


5,136


16,512


14,694


Adjustments, net-of-taxes (2) :



ALM activities

57


(136

)

(208

)

(453

)

Liquidating businesses and other

160


(45

)

(592

)

(1,031

)

Consolidated net income

$

5,587


$

4,955


$

15,712


$

13,210


September 30

2017

2016

Segments' total assets

$

2,071,155


$

1,970,069


Adjustments (2) :





ALM activities, including securities portfolio

635,305


616,730


Liquidating businesses and other

92,443


116,989


Elimination of segment asset allocations to match liabilities

(515,007

)

(508,474

)

Consolidated total assets

$

2,283,896


$

2,195,314


(1)

There were no material intersegment revenues.

(2)

Adjustments include consolidated income, expense and asset amounts not specifically allocated to individual business segments.



127 Bank of America




Glossary

Alt-A Mortgage A type of U.S. mortgage that is considered riskier than A-paper, or "prime," and less risky than "subprime," the riskiest category. Alt-A interest rates therefore tend to be between those of prime and subprime consumer real estate loans. Typically, Alt-A mortgages are characterized by borrowers with less than full documentation, lower credit scores and higher LTVs.

Assets in Custody – Consist largely of custodial and non-discretionary trust assets excluding brokerage assets administered for clients. Trust assets encompass a broad range of asset types including real estate, private company ownership interest, personal property and investments.

Assets Under Management (AUM) – The total market value of assets under the investment advisory and/or discretion of GWIM which generate asset management fees based on a percentage of the assets' market values. AUM reflects assets that are generally managed for institutional, high net worth and retail clients, and are distributed through various investment products including mutual funds, other commingled vehicles and separate accounts.

Banking Book – All on- and off-balance sheet financial instruments of the Corporation except for those positions that are held for trading purposes.

Carrying Value (with respect to loans) – The amount at which a loan is recorded on the balance sheet. For loans recorded at amortized cost, carrying value is the unpaid principal balance net of unamortized deferred loan origination fees and costs and unamortized purchase premiums or discounts, less net charge-offs and interest payments applied as a reduction of principal under the cost recovery method for loans that have been on nonaccrual status. For PCI loans, the carrying value equals fair value upon acquisition adjusted for subsequent cash collections and yield accreted to date. For credit card loans, the carrying value also includes interest that has been billed to the customer. For loans classified as held-for-sale, carrying value is the lower of carrying value as described above, or fair value. For loans where we have elected the fair value option, the carrying value is fair value.

Client Brokerage Assets – Client assets which are held in brokerage accounts, including non-discretionary brokerage and fee-based assets that generate brokerage income and asset management fee revenue.

Committed Credit Exposure – Includes any funded portion of a facility plus the unfunded portion of a facility on which the lender is legally bound to advance funds during a specified period under prescribed conditions.

Credit Derivatives – Contractual agreements that provide protection against a credit event on one or more referenced obligations. The nature of a credit event is established by the protection purchaser and the protection seller at the inception of the transaction, and such events generally include bankruptcy or insolvency of the referenced credit entity, failure to meet payment obligations when due, as well as acceleration of indebtedness and payment repudiation or moratorium. The purchaser of the credit derivative pays a periodic fee in return for a payment by the protection seller upon the occurrence, if any, of such a credit event. A CDS is a type of a credit derivative.

Credit Valuation Adjustment (CVA) – A portfolio adjustment required to properly reflect the counterparty credit risk exposure as part of the fair value of derivative instruments.

Debit Valuation Adjustment (DVA) – A portfolio adjustment required to properly reflect the Corporation's own credit risk exposure as part of the fair value of derivative instruments and/or structured liabilities.

Funding Valuation Adjustment (FVA) – A portfolio adjustment required to include funding costs on uncollateralized derivatives and derivatives where the Corporation is not permitted to use the collateral it receives.

Interest Rate Lock Commitment (IRLC) – Commitment with a loan applicant in which the loan terms, including interest rate and price, are guaranteed for a designated period of time subject to credit approval.

Letter of Credit – A document issued on behalf of a customer to a third party promising to pay the third party upon presentation of specified documents. A letter of credit effectively substitutes the issuer's credit for that of the customer.

Loan-to-value (LTV) – A commonly used credit quality metric. LTV is calculated as the outstanding carrying value of the loan divided by the estimated value of the property securing the loan. Estimated property values are generally determined through the use of automated valuation models (AVMs) or the CoreLogic Case-Shiller Index. An AVM is a tool that estimates the value of a property by reference to large volumes of market data including sales of comparable properties and price trends specific to the Metropolitan Statistical Area in which the property being valued is located. CoreLogic Case-Shiller is a widely used index based on data from repeat sales of single family homes. CoreLogic Case-Shiller indexed-based values are reported on a three-month or one-quarter lag.



Bank of America 128


Margin Receivable An extension of credit secured by eligible securities in certain brokerage accounts.

Matched Book – Repurchase and resale agreements or securities borrowed and loaned transactions where the overall asset and liability position is similar in size and/or maturity. Generally, these are entered into to accommodate customers where the Corporation earns the interest rate spread.

Mortgage Servicing Rights (MSR) – The right to service a mortgage loan when the underlying loan is sold or securitized. Servicing includes collections for principal, interest and escrow payments from borrowers and accounting for and remitting principal and interest payments to investors.

Net Interest Yield – Net interest income divided by average total interest-earning assets.

Nonperforming Loans and Leases – Includes loans and leases that have been placed on nonaccrual status, including nonaccruing loans whose contractual terms have been restructured in a manner that grants a concession to a borrower experiencing financial difficulties. Loans accounted for under the fair value option, PCI loans and LHFS are not reported as nonperforming loans and leases. Credit card receivables, residential mortgage loans that are insured by the FHA or through long-term credit protection agreements with FNMA and FHLMC (fully-insured loan portfolio) and certain other consumer loans are not placed on nonaccrual status and are, therefore, not reported as nonperforming loans and leases.

Operating Margin – Income before income taxes divided by total revenue, net of interest expense.

Pay Option Loans – Pay option adjustable-rate mortgages have interest rates that adjust monthly and minimum required payments that adjust annually. During an initial five- or ten-year period, minimum required payments may increase by no more than 7.5 percent. If payments are insufficient to pay all of the monthly interest charges, unpaid interest is added to the loan balance (i.e., negative amortization) until the loan balance increases to a specified limit, at which time a new monthly payment amount adequate to repay the loan over its remaining contractual life is established.

Prompt Corrective Action (PCA) – A framework established by the U.S. banking regulators requiring banks to maintain certain levels of regulatory capital ratios, comprised of five categories of capitalization: "well capitalized," "adequately capitalized," "undercapitalized," "significantly undercapitalized" and "critically undercapitalized." Insured depository institutions that fail to meet certain of these capital levels are subject to increasingly strict limits on their activities, including their ability to make capital distributions, pay management compensation, grow assets and take other actions.

Purchased Credit-impaired (PCI) Loan – A loan purchased as an individual loan, in a portfolio of loans or in a business combination with evidence of deterioration in credit quality since origination for which it is probable, upon acquisition, that the investor will be unable to collect all contractually required payments. These loans are recorded at fair value upon acquisition.

Subprime Loans – Although a standard industry definition for subprime loans (including subprime mortgage loans) does not exist, the Corporation defines subprime loans as specific product offerings for higher risk borrowers, including individuals with one or a combination of high credit risk factors, such as low FICO scores, high debt to income ratios and inferior payment history.

Troubled Debt Restructurings (TDRs) – Loans whose contractual terms have been restructured in a manner that grants a concession to a borrower experiencing financial difficulties. Certain consumer loans for which a binding offer to restructure has been extended are also classified as TDRs. Concessions could include a reduction in the interest rate to a rate that is below market on the loan, payment extensions, forgiveness of principal, forbearance, loans discharged in bankruptcy or other actions intended to maximize collection. Secured consumer loans that have been discharged in Chapter 7 bankruptcy and have not been reaffirmed by the borrower are classified as TDRs at the time of discharge from bankruptcy.

Value-at-Risk (VaR) – VaR is a model that simulates the value of a portfolio under a range of hypothetical scenarios in order to generate a distribution of potential gains and losses. VaR represents the loss the portfolio is expected to experience with a given confidence level based on historical data. A VaR model is an effective tool in estimating ranges of potential gains and losses on our trading portfolios.




129 Bank of America




Acronyms

ABS

Asset-backed securities

AFS

Available-for-sale

ALM

Asset and liability management

AUM

Assets under management

BANA

Bank of America, National Association

BHC

Bank holding company

bps

basis points

CCAR

Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review

CDO

Collateralized debt obligation

CDS

Credit default swap

CLO

Collateralized loan obligation

CLTV

Combined loan-to-value

CVA

Credit valuation adjustment

DVA

Debit valuation adjustment

EPS

Earnings per common share

ERC

Enterprise Risk Committee

FASB

Financial Accounting Standards Board

FCA

Financial Conduct Authority

FDIC

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

FHA

Federal Housing Administration

FHLB

Federal Home Loan Bank

FHLMC

Freddie Mac

FICC

Fixed-income, currencies and commodities

FICO

Fair Isaac Corporation (credit score)

FNMA

Fannie Mae

FTE

Fully taxable-equivalent

FVA

Funding valuation adjustment

GAAP

Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America

GLS

Global Liquidity Sources

GNMA

Government National Mortgage Association

GPI

Global Principal Investments

GSE

Government-sponsored enterprise

G-SIB

Global systemically important bank

GWIM

Global Wealth & Investment Management

HELOC

Home equity line of credit

HQLA

High Quality Liquid Assets

HTM

Held-to-maturity

ICAAP

Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process

IMM

Internal models methodology

IRLC

Interest rate lock commitment

ISDA

International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc.

LCR

Liquidity Coverage Ratio

LHFS

Loans held-for-sale

LIBOR

London InterBank Offered Rate

LTV

Loan-to-value

MBS

Mortgage-backed securities

MD&A

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

MI

Mortgage insurance

MLGWM

Merrill Lynch Global Wealth Management

MLI

Merrill Lynch International

MLPCC

Merrill Lynch Professional Clearing Corp

MLPF&S

Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated

MSA

Metropolitan Statistical Area

MSR

Mortgage servicing right

NSFR

Net Stable Funding Ratio

OAS

Option-adjusted spread

OCI

Other comprehensive income

OREO

Other real estate owned

OTC

Over-the-counter

OTTI

Other-than-temporary impairment

PCA

Prompt Corrective Action

PCI

Purchased credit-impaired

PPI

Payment protection insurance

RMBS

Residential mortgage-backed securities

RSU

Restricted stock unit

SBLC

Standby letter of credit

SEC

Securities and Exchange Commission

SLR

Supplementary leverage ratio

TDR

Troubled debt restructurings

TLAC

Total loss-absorbing capacity

TTF

Time-to-required funding

VA

U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs

VaR

Value-at-Risk

VIE

Variable interest entity



Bank of America 130


Part II. Other Information

Bank of America Corporation and Subsidiaries

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

See Litigation and Regulatory Matters in Note 10 – Commitments and Contingencies to the Consolidated Financial Statements , which is incorporated by reference in this Item 1, for litigation and regulatory disclosure that supplements the disclosure in Note 12 – Commitments and Contingencies to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Corporation's 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

There are no material changes from the risk factors set forth under Part 1, Item 1A. Risk Factors of the Corporation's 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

The table below presents share repurchase activity for the three months ended September 30, 2017 . The primary source of funds for cash distributions by the Corporation to its shareholders is dividends received from its banking subsidiaries. Each of the banking subsidiaries is subject to various regulatory policies and requirements relating to the payment of dividends, including requirements to maintain capital above regulatory minimums. All of the Corporation's preferred stock outstanding has preference over the Corporation's common stock with respect to payment of dividends.

(Dollars in millions, except per share information; shares in thousands)

Common Shares Repurchased (1)

Weighted-Average Per Share Price

Shares

Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced Programs

Remaining Buyback

Authority Amounts (2)

July 1 - 31, 2017

30,236


$

24.02


30,235


$

12,183


August 1 - 31, 2017

61,880


24.22


59,353


10,745


September 1 - 30, 2017

34,368


23.78


34,368


9,928


Three months ended September 30, 2017

126,484


24.06




(1)

Includes shares of the Corporation's common stock acquired by the Corporation in connection with satisfaction of tax withholding obligations on vested restricted stock or restricted stock units and certain forfeitures and terminations of employment-related awards under equity incentive plans.

(2)

On June 28, 2017, following the Federal Reserve's non-objection to our 2017 CCAR capital plan, the Board authorized the repurchase of $12.9 billion in common stock from July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018, including approximately $900 million to offset the effect of equity-based compensation plans during the same period. During the three months ended September 30, 2017 , pursuant to the Board's authorization, the Corporation repurchased approximately $ 3.0 billion of common stock, which included common stock to offset equity-based compensation awards. For additional information, see Capital Management -- CCAR and Capital Planning on page 28 and Note 11 – Shareholders' Equity to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

On August 24, 2017, the holders of the Corporation's Series T preferred stock exercised warrants to acquire 700 million shares of the Corporation's common stock. To purchase the Corporation's common stock upon exercise of the warrants, the holders submitted as consideration $5 billion of Series T preferred stock. On August 29, 2017, the Corporation issued 700 million shares of common stock to the holders. The terms of the warrants were previously disclosed in the Corporation's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 25, 2011.  The sale of the Corporation's common stock pursuant to exercise of the warrants has not been registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Such sale is exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) and Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The Corporation did not receive any proceeds from the sale of the common stock upon exercise of the warrants; the cash proceeds the Corporation received in connection with the sale of the Series T preferred stock in August 2011 were used for general corporate purposes.



131 Bank of America




Item 6. Exhibits

Incorporated by Reference

Exhibit No.

Description

Notes

Form

Exhibit

Filing Date

File No.

3(a)

Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation dated March 26, 2004

10-Q

3(a)

5/2/16

1-6523

3(b)

Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Corporation dated March 17, 2015

8-K

3.1

3/20/15

1-6523

11

Earnings Per Share Computation – included in Note 13 – Earnings Per Common Share to the Consolidated Financial Statements

1

12

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred Dividends

1

31(a)

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

1

31(b)

Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

1

32(a)

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

1

32(b)

Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

1

101.INS

XBRL Instance Document

1

101.SCH

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

1

101.CAL

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

1

101.LAB

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

1

101.PRE

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

1

101.DEF

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definitions Linkbase Document

1

(1) Filed herewith.


Signature


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Bank of America Corporation

Registrant

Date:

October 30, 2017

/s/ Rudolf A. Bless

Rudolf A. Bless 

Chief Accounting Officer



Bank of America 132